Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 35, pp 35099–35108 | Cite as

Influence of plant structure and flow path interactions on the plant purification system: dynamic evolution of the SO2 pollution

  • Ni Li
  • Zhe Wang
  • Zhongchao Zhang
Research Article
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

Sulfur dioxide is a major air pollutant in the environment. Fortunately, the plant purification system can effectively reduce SO2 pollution. However, the effect mechanism of plant purification system for the dynamic evolution of SO2 remains incompletely clear. In this work, inspired by the “Boston ivy,” we successfully designed and constructed a semi-continuous plant system. Subsequently, based on the “vine-like plant” and the “island-like plant,” the semi-continuous plant system and the isolated plant system are selected as the models of plant purification system, respectively. The dynamic evolution of SO2 in the plant systems is investigated using the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method. It is demonstrated that the dynamic evolution of SO2 is impacted by the plant structure and the flow path ((cg/lg) + (cl/ll)). In the semi-continuous plant system, the strong flow paths with gradually weakened fluctuation are restricted by this special plant structure, the length of flow paths are extended, and more SO2 can be dissolved. In the isolated plant system, the mild flow paths with linear relationship can easily pass through the plants, such that only a little SO2 is dissolved. Overall, the present study opens a new path into the dynamic evolution of SO2 pollution in the plant systems, which helps providing guidance for the designing of plant purification system.

Keywords

Plant purification system Sulfur dioxide CFD Flow path Flow deflection angle 

Nomenclature

cl, cg, c1, c2

species concentration (–)

Slg

surface concentration (–)

\( {c}_{\mathrm{l}}^{\ast },{c}_{\mathrm{g}}^{\ast } \)

interface concentration (–)

t

time (s)

Dl, Dg

diffusion coefficient (m2 s−1)

\( {\nu}_{R_{\mathrm{g}}} \)

flow velocity (m s−1)

fl, fg

volume fraction (–)

ρl, ρg

density (kg m−3)

Mlg

mass transfer rate (kg s−1 m−3)

ll, lg

flow path length (m)

Notes

Funding information

The study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 70973099 and 41271155).

References

  1. Arb CV, Mueller C, Ammann K, Brunold C (2010) Lichen physiology and air pollution II. Statistical analysis of the correlation between SO2, NO2, NO and O3, and chlorophyll content, net photosynthesis, sulphate uptake and protein synthesis of Parmelia sulcata Taylor. New Phytol 115:431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker CK, Unsworth MH, Greenwood P (1982) Leaf injury on wheat plants exposed in the field in winter to SO2. Nature 299:149–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blakemore FB, Davies C, Isaac JG (1999) Effects of changes in the UK energy demand and environmental legislation on atmospheric pollution by sulphur dioxide. Appl Energ 62:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brychkova G, Xia Z, Yang G, Yesbergenova Z, Zhang Z, Davydov O, Fluhr R, Sagi M (2007) Sulfite oxidase protects plants against sulfur dioxide toxicity. Plant J 50:696–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coughenour MB (1981) Relationship of SO2 dry deposition to a grassland sulfur cycle. Ecol Model 13:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dotzler M, Schütt P (2010) Long lasting effects of O3 and SO2 on the sensitivity to drought in two clones of Picea abies (L.) Karst. For Pathol 20:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durancarril MV, Rodriguez BC (2010) Antioxidant systems in the leaf apoplast compartment of Pinus pinaster Ait. and Pinus radiata D. Don. plants exposed to SO2. Ann Appl Biol 133:455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dytnerskii YI, Kagramanov GG, Storozhuk IP, Kovalenko NF (1989) SO2 Separation from gaseous mixtures by membranes. J Membr Sci 41:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenger J (2009) Air pollution in the last 50 years—from local to global. Atmos Environ 43:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fowler D, Unsworth MH (2010) Turbulent transfer of sulphur dioxide to a wheat crop. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 105:767–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu H, Li Z, Liu Z, Wang Z (2018) Research on big data digging of hot topics about recycled water use on micro-blog based on particle swarm optimization. Sustainability 7:1–15Google Scholar
  12. Ghiorse WC, Alexander M (1976) Effect of microorganisms on the sorption and fate of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide in soil. J Environ Qual 5:227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harnisch J, Borchers R, Fabian P (1995) COS, CS2 and SO2 in aluminium smelter exhaust. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henley RW, King PL, Wykes JL, Renggli CJ, Brink FJ, Clark DA, Troitzsch U (2015) Porphyry copper deposit formation by sub-volcanic sulphur dioxide flux and chemisorption. Nat Geosci 8:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu KD, Bai GS, Li WJ, Yan H, Hu LY, Li YH, Zhang H (2015) Sulfur dioxide promotes germination and plays an antioxidant role in cadmium-stressed wheat seeds. Plant Growth Regul 75:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang S, Lian M, Lu C, Gu Q, Ruan S, Xie X (2018) Ensemble prediction algorithm of anomaly monitoring based on big data analysis platform of open-pit mine slope. Complexity 2018:1–13Google Scholar
  17. Lamani VT, Yadav AK, Narayanappa KG (2017) Influence of low-temperature combustion and dimethyl ether-diesel blends on performance, combustion, and emission characteristics of common rail diesel engine: a CFD study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li P, Wang X, Allinson G, Li X, Stagnitti F, Murray F, Xiong X (2011) Effects of sulfur dioxide pollution on the translocation and accumulation of heavy metals in soybean grain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:1090–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu X, Godbole A, Lu C, Michal G, Venton P (2015) Optimisation of dispersion parameters of Gaussian plume model for CO 2 dispersion. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:18288–18299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Majernik O, Mansfield TA (1970) Direct effect of SO2 pollution on the degree of opening of stomata. Nature 227:377–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mcleod AR (1995) An open-air system for exposure of young forest trees to sulphur dioxide and ozone. Plant Cell Environ 18:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miszalski Z, Mydlarz J (1990) SO2 influence on photosynthesis of tomato plants at different CO2 concentrations. Photosynthetica 24:2–8Google Scholar
  23. Schrader N, Fischer T, Karsten RR, Schwarz G (2003) The crystal structure of plant sulfite oxidase provides insights into sulfite oxidation in plants and animals. Structure 11:1251–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shepherd MA, Haynatzki G, Rautiainen R, Achutan C (2015) Estimates of community exposure and health risk to sulfur dioxide from power plant emissions using short-term mobile and stationary ambient air monitoring. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 65:1239–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taieb D, Brahim AB (2013) Electrochemical method for sulphur dioxide removal from flue gases: Application on sulphuric acid plant in Tunisia. C R Chim 16:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tawvander K, Ljde K, Haneklaus S, Schnug E (2010) Uptake and metabolism of sulphur dioxide by Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 135:101–107Google Scholar
  27. Wang Z, Wang F, He Y, Wang X, Ma S, Wang H (2014a) Numerical study on free-cutting phase precipitation behavior in Fe-Bi-Mn ternary alloy multiphase transformation-diffusion system. Acta Metall Sin 50:1393–1402Google Scholar
  28. Wang Z, Wang FZ, Wang X, He YH, Ma S, Wu Z (2014b) Three-dimensional modelling and numerical simulation on segregation during Fe-Pb alloy solidification in a multiphase system. Acta Phys Sin 63:205–211Google Scholar
  29. Wang Z, Wang X, Tong Y, Wang Y (2018) Impact of structure and flow-path on in situ synthesis of AlN: Dynamic microstructural evolution of Al-AlN-Si materials. Sci China Mater 61:948–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu M, Li J, Ludwig A, Kharicha A (2013) Modeling diffusion-governed solidification of ternary alloys – Part 1: Coupling solidification kinetics with thermodynamics. Comput Mater Sci 79:830–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Založnik M, Combeau H (2010) Thermosolutal flow in steel ingots and the formation of mesosegregates. Int J Therm Sci 49:1500–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao Y, Xu P, Wang L (2010) Simultaneous removal of SO2 and NO by highly reactive absorbent containing calcium hypochlorite. Environ Prog Sustain 27:460–468Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Humanities and Social DevelopmentNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  2. 2.MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of ScienceXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations