Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 35, pp 35184–35199 | Cite as

Effects of landscape plant species and concentration of sewage sludge compost on plant growth, nutrient uptake, and heavy metal removal

  • Shuangshuang Chu
  • Douglass F. Jacobs
  • Dandan Liao
  • Liyin L. Liang
  • Daoming Wu
  • Peijiang Chen
  • Can Lai
  • Fengdi Zhong
  • Shucai Zeng
Research Article

Abstract

Landscape plants have great potentials in heavy metals (HMs) removal as sewage sludge compost (SSC) is increasingly used in urban forestry. We hypothesize that woody plants might perform better in HMs phytoremediation because they have greater biomass and deeper roots than herbaceous plants. We tested the differences in growth responses and HMs phytoremediation among several herbaceous and woody species growing under different SSC concentrations through pot experiments. The mixing percentage of SSC with soil at 0%, 15%, 30%, 60, and 100% were used as growth substrate for three woody (Ficus altissima Bl., Neolamarckia cadamba (Roxb.) Bosser, and Bischofia javanica Bl.) and two herbaceous (Alocasia macrorrhiza (L.) G. Don and Dianella ensifolia (L.) DC) plants. Results showed that the biomass, relative growth rate, and nutrient uptake for all plants increased significantly at each SSC concentration compared to the control; woody plants had higher biomass and nutrient use efficiency than herbaceous plants. All plants growing in SSC-amended soils accumulated appreciable amounts of HMs and reduced the contents of HMs present in the substrates. The woody plants were generally more effective than herbaceous plants in potentials of HMs phytoextraction, but A. macrorrhiza showed higher bioconcentration and translocation of Cu and Zn and D. ensifolia had higher bioconcentration and translocation of Cd than woody plants. The optimal application concentrations were 30% or less for woody plants and 15% for herbaceous plants for plant growth and ecological risk control, respectively. Intercropping suitable woody and herbaceous landscape plants in urban forestry might have promising potentials to minimize the ecological risks in the phytoremediation of SSC.

Keywords

Soil quality Sewage sludge amendment Landscape plant Heavy metal Phytoextraction 

Abbreviations

SSC

Sewage sludge compost

HMs

Heavy metals

N

Nitrogen

P

Phosphate

K

Potassium

RGR

Relative growth rate

AAS

Atomic absorption spectrometry

TF

Translocation factor

BCF

Bioconcentration factor

NUE

Nutrient use efficiency

RF

Remediation factor

Igeo

Geoaccumulation index

Ei

Potential ecological risk factors

RI

Risk indices

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province, China (grant nos. 2015B020207002) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31270675, 41807112) and the PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (grant no. 2018A030310213).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adler A, Karacic A, Weih M (2008) Biomass allocation and nutrient use in fast-growing woody and herbaceous perennials used for phytoremediation. Plant Soil 305:189–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9551-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y, Zang C, Gu M, Gu C, Shao H (2017) Sewage sludge as an initial fertility driver for rapid improvement of mudflat salt-soils. Sci Total Environ 578:47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao S (2000) Soil and agro-chemistry analysis, 3rd edn. China Agricultural Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  4. Belhaj D, Elloumi N, Jerbi B, Zouari M, Abdallah FB, Ayadi H, Kallel M (2016) Effects of sewage sludge fertilizer on heavy metal accumulation and consequent responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:20168–20177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7193-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boen A, Haraldsen TK (2011) Fertilizer effects of increasing loads of composts and biosolids in urban greening. Urban For Urban Gree 10:231–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cay S (2016) Enhancement of cadmium uptake by Amaranthus caudatus, an ornamental plant, using tea saponin. Environ Monit Assess 188(320):320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5334-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng H, Li K, Li M, Yang K, Liu F, Cheng X (2014) Geochemical background and baseline value of chemical elements in urban soil in China. Earth Sci Front 21(3):265–306 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Chu S, Wu D, Liang L, Zhong F, Hu Y, Hu X, Lai C, Zeng S (2017) Municipal sewage sludge compost promotes Mangifera persiciforma tree growth with no risk of heavy metal contamination of soil. Sci Rep 7:13408.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13895-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conesa MÀ, Muir CD, Roldán EJ, Molins AJ, Perdomo A, Galmés J (2017) Growth capacity in wild tomatoes and relatives correlates with original climate in arid and semi-arid species. Environ Exp Bot 141:181–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corrêa-Martins MN, de Souza VV, Souza TDS (2016) Genotoxic and mutagenic effects of sewage sludge on higher plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 124:489–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.11.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dassanayake KB, Jayasinghe GY, Surapaneni A, Hetherington C (2015) A review on alum sludge reuse with special reference to agricultural applications and future challenges. Waste Manag 38:321–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De-Lucia B, Cristiano G, Vecchietti L, Bruno L (2013) Effect of different concentrations of composted organic amendment on urban soil properties, growth and nutrient status of three Mediterranean native hedge species. Urban For Urban Gree 12:537–545.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hakanson L (1980) An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach. Water Res 14:975–1001.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardej M, Ozimek T (2002) The effect of sewage sludge flooding on growth and morphometric parameters of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel. Ecol Eng 18:343–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(01)00095-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hei L, Lee CC, Wang H, Lin XY, Chen XH, Wu QT (2016) Using a high biomass plant Pennisetum hydridum to phyto-treat fresh municipal sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 217:252–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang X, Xue D, Xue L (2015) Changes in soil microbial functional diversity and biochemical characteristics of tree peony with amendment of sewage sludge compost. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:11617–11625.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4407-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang W, Li C, Wang Y, Yi X, He X (2017) Anti-inflammatory lignanamides and monoindoles from Alocasia macrorrhiza. Fitoterapia 117:126–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2017.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang CA, W QT, Sterckeman T, Schwartz C, Sirguey C, Ouvrard S, Perriguey J, Morel JL (2010) Co-planting can phytoextract similar amounts of cadmium and zinc to mono-cropping from contaminated soils. Ecol Eng 36:391–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9371-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kovacs H, Szemmelveisz K (2017) Disposal options for polluted plants grown on heavy metal contaminated brownfield lands—a review. Chemosphere 166:8–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kubátová P, Hejcman M, Száková J, Vondráčková S, Tlustoš P (2016) Effects of sewage sludge application on biomass production and concentrations of Cd, Pb and Zn in shoots of Salix and Populus clones: improvement of phytoremediation efficiency in contaminated soils. Biol Energ Res 9:809–819.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9727-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar V, Chopra AK (2014) Accumulation and translocation of metals in soil and different parts of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) amended with sewage sludge. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 92:103–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-013-1142-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latare AM, Kumar O, Singh SK, Gupta A (2014) Direct and residual effect of sewage sludge on yield, heavy metals content and soil fertility under rice–wheat system. Ecol Eng 69:17–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leguizamo MAO, Fernandez Gomez WD, Sarmiento MCG (2017) Native herbaceous plant species with potential use in phytoremediation of heavy metals, spotlight on wetlands—a review. Chemosphere 168:1230–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu HT (2016) Achilles heel of environmental risk from recycling of sludge to soil as amendment: a summary in recent ten years (2007-2016). Waste Manag 56:575–583.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luo ZB, He J, Polle A, Rennenberg H (2016) Heavy metal accumulation and signal transduction in herbaceous and woody plants: paving the way for enhancing phytoremediation efficiency. Biotechnol Adv 34:1131–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma W, Liu F, Cheng X, Jing Y, Nie C, Zhang P (2014) Environmental evaluation of the application of compost sewage sludge to landscaping as soil amendments: a field experiment on the grassland soils in Beijing. Desalin Water Treat 54:1118–1126.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.916629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Memon AR, Schroder P (2009) Implications of metal accumulation mechanisms to phytoremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:162–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0079-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China (1995). Environmental quality standards for soils of China (GB15618-1995). Available at http://kjs.mep.gov.cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/trhj/trhjzlbz/199603/t19960301_82028.shtml (in Chinese)
  29. Müller G (1969) Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. Geo J 2(3):108–118Google Scholar
  30. Pandey A, Negi PS (2016) Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of Neolamarckia cadamba: a review. J Ethnopharmacol 18:118–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parra A, Zornoza R, Conesa E, Faz A, Gómez-López MD (2017) Nutritional status and its interaction with soil properties and trace elements in six Mediterranean shrub species grown in reclaimed pyritic tailings. Ecol Eng 109:25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patek-Mohd NN, Abdu A, Jusop S, Abdul-Hamid H, Karim MR, Nazrin M, Akbar MH, Jamaluddin AS (2018) Potentiality of Melastoma malabathricum as phytoremediators of soil contaminated with sewage sludge. Sci Agr 75:27–35.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2016-0002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pavao-Zuckerman MA (2008) The nature of urban soils and their role in ecological restoration in cities. Restor Ecol 16:642–649.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00486.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pei N, Chen B, Liu S (2015) Pb and Cd contents in soil, water, and trees at an afforestation site, South China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95:632–637.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1625-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peng YQ, Compton SG, Yang DR (2010) The reproductive success of Ficus altissima and its pollinator in a strongly seasonal environment: Xishuangbanna, Southwestern China. Plant Ecol 209:227–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9690-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Placek A, Grobelak A, Kacprzak M (2016) Improving the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soil by use of sewage sludge. Int J Phytoremediat 18:605–618.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1086308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pollard AJ, Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2014) Facultative hyperaccumulation of heavy metals and metalloids. Plant Sci 217–218:8–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qiu JR, Guo XF, Cai QY, Liu W, Zhang MW, Wei ZB, Wu QT (2014) Phytotreatment of sewage sludge contaminated by heavy metals and PAHs by co-planting Sedum alfredii and Alocasia marorrhiza. Int J Phytoremediat 16:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2012.716095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richard TL (1992) Municipal solid waste composting: physical and biological processing. Biomass Bioenergy 3:163–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(92)90024-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shi X, Zhang X, Chen G, Chen Y, Wang L, Shan X (2011) Seedling growth and metal accumulation of selected woody species in copper and lead/zinc mine tailings. J Environ Sci-China 23(2):266–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60402-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shomar B, Kalavrouziotis IK, Koukoulakis PH, Yahya A (2013) Soil pollution indices under the effect of sludge. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1426–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1436-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shukla OP, Juwarkar AA, Singh SK, Khan S, Rai UN (2011) Growth responses and metal accumulation capabilities of woody plants during the phytoremediation of tannery sludge. Waste Manag 31:115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh J, Kalamdhad AS (2013) Assessment of bioavailability and leachability of heavy metals during rotary drum composting of green waste (Water hyacinth). Ecol Eng 52:59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith SR (2009) A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge. Environ Int 35(1):142–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suchkova N, Darakas E, Ganoulis J (2010) Phytoremediation as a prospective method for rehabilitation of areas contaminated by long-term sewage sludge storage: a Ukrainian–Greek case study. Ecol Eng 36:373–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tai Y, Li Z, McBride MB (2016) Natural attenuation of toxic metal phytoavailability in 35-year-old sewage sludge-amended soil. Environ Monit Assess 188:241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5254-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teng Y, Wu J, Lu S, Wang Y, Jiao X, Song L (2014) Soil and soil environmental quality monitoring in China: a review. Environ Int 69:177–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tervahauta T, Rani S, Hernandez Leal L, Buisman CJ, Zeeman G (2014) Black water sludge reuse in agriculture: are heavy metals a problem? J Hazard Mater 274:229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Valipour A, Ahn YH (2016) Constructed wetlands as sustainable ecotechnologies in decentralization practices: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:180–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5713-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van der Ent A, Baker AJ, Reeves RD, Pollard AJ, Schat H (2013) Hyperaccumulators of metal and metalloid trace elements: facts and fiction. Plant Soil 362(1–2):319–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang N, Wang A, Kong L, He M (2018) Calculation and application of Sb toxicity coefficient for potential ecological risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 610-611:167–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wołejko E, Butarewicz A, Wydro U, Łoboda T (2014) Advantages and potential risks of municipal sewage sludge application to urban soil. Desalin Water Treat 52:3732–3742.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.884714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu D, Chu S, Lai C, Mo Q, Jacobs DF, Chen X, Zeng S (2017) Application concentration and plant species affect the ecological safety of sewage sludge as a landscape soil amendment. Urban For Urban Gree 27:138–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yue Y, Cui L, Lin Q, Li G, Zhao X (2017) Efficiency of sewage sludge biochar in improving urban soil properties and promoting grass growth. Chemosphere 173:551–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zárubová P, Hejcman M, Vondrackova S, Mrnka L, Szakova J, Tlustos P (2015) Distribution of P, K, Ca, Mg, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn in wood and bark age classes of willows and poplars used for phytoextraction on soils contaminated by risk elements. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:18801–18813.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5043-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zeng S, Jacobs DF, Sloan JL, Xue L, Li Y, Chu S (2013) Split fertilizer application affects growth, biomass allocation, and fertilizer uptake efficiency of hybrid Eucalyptus. New For 44:703–771.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9371-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuangshuang Chu
    • 1
  • Douglass F. Jacobs
    • 2
  • Dandan Liao
    • 1
  • Liyin L. Liang
    • 3
  • Daoming Wu
    • 1
  • Peijiang Chen
    • 1
  • Can Lai
    • 1
  • Fengdi Zhong
    • 1
  • Shucai Zeng
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Forestry & Landscape ArchitectureSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.School of Science and Environmental Research InstituteUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations