Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 36, pp 36615–36623 | Cite as

Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic performance of sulfonamides adsorption onto graphene

  • Shuting Zhuang
  • Xin Zhu
  • Jianlong Wang
Research Article

Abstract

With the extensive production and consumption of sulfonamide antibiotics, their existence in aquatic environments has received increasing attention due to their acute and chronic toxic effects. In this study, graphene was characterized and applied for sulfamethazine (SMT) removal from aqueous solution. The effect of the contact time (0–1440 min), initial concentration (2–100 mg L−1), and temperature (298–318 K), as well as pH (2–9) and ionic strength (0–0.2 M NaNO3), have been examined. The maximum adsorption capacity was calculated to be 104.9 mg g−1 using the Langmuir model. The endothermic adsorption process (△H = 10.940 kJ mol−1) was pH- and temperature-dependent, and the adsorption data fitted well with the Langmuir isothermal and the pseudo second-order kinetic models. Additionally, ionic strength (0.01 to 0.2 M NaNO3) had no obvious influence on SMT adsorption by graphene. Ultimately, graphene proved to be an effective adsorbent for sulfonamide antibiotics removal from aqueous solutions.

Keywords

Graphene Antibiotics Sulfamethazine Adsorption Kinetics 

Notes

Funding

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51338005) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in College (IRT-13026).

References

  1. Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB (2010) Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem Rev 110:132–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aminov R (2017) History of antimicrobial drug discovery: major classes and health impact. Biochem Pharmacol 133:4–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azhar MR, Abid HR, Periasamy V, Sun HQ, Tade MO (2017) Adsorptive removal of antibiotic sulfonamide by UiO-66 and ZIF-67 for wastewater treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci 500:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai ZY, Yang Q, Wang JL (2017) Degradation of sulfamethazine antibiotics in Fenton-like system using Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as catalyst. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36:1743–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braschi I, Blasioli S, Gigli L, Gessa CE, Alberti A, Martucci A (2010) Removal of sulfonamide antibiotics from water: evidence of adsorption into an organophilic zeolite Y by its structural modifications. J Hazard Mater 178:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bu QW, Wang B, Huang J, Deng SB, Yu G (2013) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the aquatic environment in China: a review. J Hazard Mater 262:189–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen CQ, Zheng L, Zhou JL, Zhao H (2017) Persistence and risk of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes in major mariculture sites in Southeast China. Sci Total Environ 580:1175–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi T, Zuo JN, Liu FL (2017) Performance and mechanism for cadmium and lead adsorption from water and soil by corn straw biochar. Front Environ Sci Eng 11:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi KJ, Kim SG, Kim SH (2008) Removal of tetracycline and sulfonamide classes of antibiotic compound by powdered activated carbon. Environ Technol 29:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu LB, Wang JL, Liu YK (2015) Degradation of sulfamethazine in sewage sludge mixture by gamma irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 108:102–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das R, Vecitis CD, Schulze A, Cao B, Ismail AF, Lu X, Chen J, Ramakrishna S (2017) Recent advances in nanomaterials for water protection and monitoring. Chem Soc Rev 46(22):6946–7020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding D, Lei Z, Yang Y, Feng C, Zhang Z (2013) Nickel oxide grafted andic soil for efficient cesium removal from aqueous solution: adsorption behavior and mechanisms. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:10151–10158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ducey TF, Collins JC, Ro KS, Woodbury BL, Griffin DD (2017) Hydrothermal carbonization of livestock mortality for the reduction of pathogens and microbially-derived DNA. Front Environ Sci Eng 11(3): DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0930-x
  14. Gao J, Huang J, Chen WW, Wang B, Wang YJ, Deng SB, Yu G (2016) Fate and removal of typical pharmaceutical and personal care products in a wastewater treatment plant from Beijing: a mass balance study. Front Environ Sci Eng 10:491–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Homem V, Santos L (2011) Degradation and removal methods of antibiotics from aqueous matrices—a review. J Environ Manag 92:2304–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurwadkar ST, Adams CD, Meyer MT, Kolpin DW (2007) Effects of sorbate speciation on sorption of selected sulfonamides in three loamy soils. J Agric Food Chem 55:1370–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lertpaitoonpan W, Ong SK, Moorman TB (2009) Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine. Chemosphere 76:558–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Y, Fan Q, Wang JL (2018) Zn-Fe-CNTs catalytic in situ generation of H2O2 for Fenton-like degradation of sulfamethoxazole. J Hazard Mater 342:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu YK, Hu J, Wang JL (2014) Fe2+ enhancing sulfamethazine degradation in aqueous solution by gamma irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 96:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu QQ, Li M, Zhang FW, Yu HC, Zhang Q, Liu X, (2017a) The removal of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole by a high infiltration rate artificial composite soil treatment system. Front Environ Sci Eng 11(2).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0920-z
  22. Liu Y, Liu XH, Dong WP, Zhang LL, Kong Q, Wang WL (2017b) Efficient adsorption of sulfamethazine onto modified activated carbon: a plausible adsorption mechanism. Sci Rep 7:12437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu YK, Wang JL (2013) Degradation of sulfamethazine by gamma irradiation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. J Hazard Mater 250:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nam SW, Choi DJ, Kim SK, Her N, Zoh KD (2014) Adsorption characteristics of selected hydrophilic and hydrophobic micropollutants in water using activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 270:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pang YC, Huang JJ, Xi JY, Hu HY, Zhu Y (2016) Effect of ultraviolet irradiation and chlorination on ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli and its ampicillin resistance gene. Front Environ Sci Eng 10:522–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park S, Ruoff RS (2009) Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol 4(4):217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perreault F, Fonseca de Faria A, Elimelech M (2015) Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 44(16):5861–5896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Radovic LR, Moreno-Castilla C, Rivera-Utrilla J (2001) Carbon materials as adsorbents in aqueous solutions. Chem Phys Carbon 27:227–405Google Scholar
  29. Ren X, Zeng G, Tang L, Wang J, Wan J, Liu Y, Yu J, Yi H, Ye S, Deng R (2018) Sorption, transport and biodegradation—an insight into bioavailability of persistent organic pollutants in soil. Sci Total Environ 610-611:1154–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rostamian R, Behnejad H (2018) Insights into doxycycline adsorption onto graphene nanosheet: a combined quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and kinetic study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 2528–2537Google Scholar
  31. Song XY, Liu R, Chen LJ, Kawagishi T (2017) Comparative experiment on treating digested piggery wastewater with a biofilm MBR and conventional MBR: simultaneous removal of nitrogen and antibiotics. Front Environ Sci Eng 11(2).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0919-5
  32. Tang JT, Wang JL (2018) Metal organic framework with coordinatively unsaturated sites as efficient Fenton-like catalyst for enhanced degradation of sulfamethazine. Environ Sci Technol 52:5367–5377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wan Z, Hu J, Wang JL (2016) Removal of sulfamethazine antibiotics using Ce-Fe-graphene nanocomposite as catalyst by Fenton-like process. J Environ Manag 182:284–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wan Z, Wang JL (2017a) Degradation of sulfamethazine using Fe3O4-Mn3O4/reduced graphene oxide hybrid as Fenton-like catalyst. J Hazard Mater 324:653–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wan Z, Wang JL (2017b) Fenton-like degradation of sulfamethazine using Fe3O4/Mn3O4 nanocomposite catalyst: kinetics and catalytic mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang JL, Bai ZY (2017) Fe-based catalysts for heterogeneous catalytic ozonation of emerging contaminants in water and wastewater. Chem Eng J 312:79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang JL, Chu LB (2016) Irradiation treatment of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) in water and wastewater: an overview. Radiat Phys Chem 125:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang F, Lu X, Peng W, Deng Y, Zhang T, Hu Y, Li XY (2017) Sorption behavior of bisphenol a and triclosan by graphene: comparison with activated carbon. ACS Omega 2(9):5378–5384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang JL, Wang SZ (2016) Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater: a review. J Environ Manag 182:620–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang JL, Wang SZ (2018a) Activation of persulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and application for the degradation of emerging contaminants. Chem Eng J 334:1502–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang JL, Wang SZ (2018b) Microbial degradation of sulfamethoxazole in the environment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:3573–3582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang JL, Zhuan R, Chu LB (2019) The occurrence, distribution and degradation of antibiotics by ionizing radiation: an overview. Sci Total Environ 646:1385–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang JL, Zhuang ST (2017) Removal of various pollutants from water and wastewater by modified chitosan adsorbents. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:2331–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang JL, Zhuang ST, Liu Y (2018) Metal hexacyanoferrates-based adsorbents for cesium removal. Coord Chem Rev 374:430–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xing M, Xu LJ, Wang JL (2016) Mechanism of Co(II) adsorption by zero valent iron/graphene nanocomposite. J Hazard Mater 301:286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu LJ, Wang JL (2017) The application of graphene-based materials for the removal of heavy metals and radionuclides from water and wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:1042–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang WB, Zheng FF, Xue XX, Lu YP (2011) Investigation into adsorption mechanisms of sulfonamides onto porous adsorbents. J Colloid Interface Sci 362:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang C, Lai C, Zeng GM, Huang DL, Yang CP, Wang Y, Zhou YY, Cheng M (2016) Efficacy of carbonaceous nanocomposites for sorbing ionizable antibiotic sulfamethazine from aqueous solution. Water Res 95:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao WT, Guo Y, Lu SG, Yan PP, Sui Q (2016) Recent advances in pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the surface water and sediments in China. Front Environ Sci Eng 10(6).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0868-4
  50. Zhu X, Wang JL (2017) Comparison of sulfamethazine adsorption by multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTS) and magnetic MWCNTS from aqueous solution. Fresenius Environ Bull 26:579–589Google Scholar
  51. Zhuang ST, Cheng R, Kang M, Wang JL (2018) Kinetic and equilibrium of U(VI) adsorption onto magnetic amidoxime-functionalized chitosan beads. J Chean Prod 188:655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhuang ST, Yin YN, Wang JL (2017) Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solution using chitosan grafted with maleic acid by gamma radiation. Nucl Eng Technol 50:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, INETTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.China Three Gorges Projects Development Co., LtdChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Beijing Key Laboratory of Radioactive Waste Treatment, INETTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations