Effects of coal blending in electrostatic precipitation efficiency—Inner Mongolia, China
Based on this study, the Al2O3 content of Jungar coal ash is over 45%, and the resistivity of high-Al2O3 ash in Jungar reaches up to 1012 Ω·cm. These results seriously influenced the electric characteristics of fly ash, and the collection efficiency of electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) evidently decreased. To facilitate the effective collection of fine particle in the flue gas generated before and after coal blending via ESP, the fly ash obtained from a power plant electrostatic precipitation was analyzed in terms of resistivity, size distribution, and cohesive force through a portable dust electrical resistivity test instrument, Bahco centrifuge, and a cohesive force test apparatus invented by the researchers. The mixed ratio of else coal is higher than 50%, the resistivity of the fly ash in the flue gas was lowered to approximately two orders of magnitude, and the size distribution showed an evident decrease in the PM2.5 and PM10 content in fly ash. In addition, the adhesive force and efficiency increase from 95.9 to 99.5% in the electrostatic precipitation. Therefore, the combustion of blending coal is an effective approach to improve the efficiency of ESP used to collect high-Al2O3 fly ash.
KeywordsCoal blending Size distribution Resistivity Cohesive force ESP
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21376072) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2017MS140).
- Betal W (1976) Dust extraction technology: principles, methods, measurement technique. Technicopy Limited, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- National Bureau of Statistics (2011) China Energy Statistical Yearbook, Beijing, (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- National Bureau of Statistics (2014), China Energy Statistical Yearbook, Beijing, (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Long Y, Gao J (1998) The effect of mineral matter of coal on LTS gasifying process. Clean Coal Technol 3:34–37Google Scholar
- Standardization administration of the People’s Republic of China (2002) National Standards of Peoples Republic of China: Methods of performance tests for electrostatic precipitators, GB/T 13931–2002Google Scholar
- Standardization administration of the People’s Republic of China (2007) National Standards of Peoples Republic of China: Test method for analysis of coal ash, GB/T 1574–2007Google Scholar
- Standardization administration of the People’s Republic of China (2008) National Standards of Peoples Republic of China: Method of dust character test-Part 9: Determination of cohesion-Normal pull rift method, GB/T16913.9–2008Google Scholar
- Qi LQ, Yuan YT (2011) Characteristics and the behavior in electrostatic precipitators of high-alumina coal fly ash from the Jungar power plant, Inner Mongolia, China. J Hazard Mater 192:222–225Google Scholar
- Qi LQ, Zhang YJ (2013) Effects of water vapor on flue gas conditioning in the electric fields with corona discharge. J Hazard Mater 256:10–15Google Scholar
- US EPA Method (2000) US EPA Method 5: Determination of particulate matter emissions from stationary sourcesGoogle Scholar
- Yang YP, Yang ZP, Xu G (2013) Situation and prospect of energy consumption for China’s thermal power generation. Proc CSEE 33:1–11 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Yuan YT, Qi LQ (2006) A new type field test instrument for specific resistivity of fly ash. In: Proc. The 10th international conference on electrostatic precipitation, Cairns, Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar