Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 31, pp 31219–31229 | Cite as

Adsorption behavior of chloroform, carbon disulfide, and acetone on coconut shell-derived carbon: experimental investigation, simulation, and model study

  • Xiaoyan Zhao
  • Xiang Li
  • Tianle Zhu
  • Xiaolong Tang
Research Article
  • 129 Downloads

Abstract

The adsorption performances of chloroform (TCM), carbon disulfide (CDS), and acetone (CP) were investigated and compared over self-prepared coconut shell-derived carbon (CDC) to study the adsorption behavior and mechanism of heteroatom (Cl, S, O)-containing volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The result indicates that the adsorption capacity of three typical VOCs obeys the sequence: TCM (361 mg/g) > CDS (194 mg/g) > CP (37 mg/g). However, desorption experiments show that adsorption intensity follows the order: CDS (165 °C) > TCM (147 °C) > CP (130 °C). The influence of surface oxygen-containing functional groups over CDC on adsorption performance was also studied by temperature programmed desorption (TPD) and in situ DRIFT spectra. It is implied that carbonyl in lactone and benzoquinonyl of CDC could affect VOC adsorption intensity by conjugation effect. Furthermore, adsorption isotherms of three VOCs were obtained through Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation and then fitted by classical isothermal models. Furthermore, the total adsorption potentials are calculated by potential theory, and the result follows the order: TCM (− 2.18 kJ/mol) > CDS (− 2.1 kJ/mol) > CP (− 1.5 kJ/mol). It is believed that the effect of magnetic susceptibility (χ) is more crucial than polarizability () and the distance r between the interacting molecules for the potential difference.

Keywords

VOCs Coconut shell activated carbon Carbonyl group GCMC simulation Isotherm models Adsorption potential calculation 

Notes

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8182033), the National Key Research and Development Program (2017TFC0211800), and the American Energy Foundation (6326012).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alvarez PM, García-Araya JF, Beltrán FJ, Masa FJ, Medina F (2005) Ozonation of activated carbons: effect on the adsorption of selected phenolic compounds from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 283:503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell JG, Zhao X, Uygur Y, Thomas KM (2011) Adsorption of chloroaromatic models for dioxins on porous carbons: the influence of adsorbate structure and surface functional groups on surface interactions and adsorption kinetics. J Phys Chem C 115:2776–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benkhedda J, Jaubert JN, Barth D, Perrin L, Bailly M (2000) Adsorption isotherms of m -xylene on activated carbon: measurements and correlation with different models. J Chem Thermodyn 32:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatia S, Abdullah AZ, Wong CT (2009) Adsorption of butyl acetate in air over silver-loaded Y and ZSM-5 zeolites: experimental and modelling studies. J Hazard Mater 163:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biase ED, Sarkisov L (2013) Systematic development of predictive molecular models of high surface area activated carbons for adsorption applications. Carbon 64:262–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biase ED, Sarkisov L (2015) Molecular simulation of multi-component adsorption processes related to carbon capture in a high surface area, disordered activated carbon. Carbon 94:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Wang L, Ding L, Gao X, Ma Y, Guo Y (2011) Application studies of activated carbon derived from rice husks produced by chemical-thermal process—a review. Advances Colloid Interface Sci 163:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiang YC, Chiang PC, Huang CP (2001) Effects of pore structure and temperature on VOC adsorption on activated carbon. Carbon 39:523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demirbas A (2009) Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review. J Hazard Mater 167:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dias JM, Alvimferraz MC, Almeida MF, Riverautrilla J, Sánchezpolo M (2007) Waste materials for activated carbon preparation and its use in aqueous-phase treatment: a review. J Environ Manag 85:833–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dombrowski RJ, Lastoskie CM, Hyduke DR (2001) The Horvath–Kawazoe method revisited. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects 187:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epiepang FE, Li J, Liu Y, Yang RT (2016) Low-pressure performance evaluation of CO2, H2O and CH4 on Li-LSX as a superior adsorbent for air prepurification. Chem Eng Sci 147:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR (2010) The role of surface chemistry in catalysis with carbons. Catal Today 150:2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR, Freitas MMA, Órfão JJM (1999) Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons. Carbon 37:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster KL, Fuerman RG, Economy J, Larson SM, Rood MJ (1992) Adsorption characteristics of trace volatile organic compounds in gas streams onto activated carbon fibers. Chem Mater 4:1068–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcı́A T, Murillo R, Cazorla-Amorós D, Mastral AM, Linares-Solano A (2004) Role of the activated carbon surface chemistry in the adsorption of phenanthrene. Carbon 42:1683–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giraudet S, Pré P, Tezel H, Cloirec PL (2006) Estimation of adsorption energies using the physical characteristics of activated carbons and the molecular properties of volatile organic compounds. Carbon 44:2413–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haydar S, Ferro-Garcı́A MA, Rivera-Utrilla J, Joly JP (2003) Adsorption of p-nitrophenol on an activated carbon with different oxidations. Carbon 41:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemus J, Martin-Martinez M, Palomar J, Gomez-Sainero L, Gilarranz MA, Rodriguez JJ (2012) Removal of chlorinated organic volatile compounds by gas phase adsorption with activated carbon. Chem Eng J 211-212:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li N, Ma X, Zha Q, Kim K, Chen Y, Song C (2011) Maximizing the number of oxygen-containing functional groups on activated carbon by using ammonium persulfate and improving the temperature-programmed desorption characterization of carbon surface chemistry. Carbon 49:5002–5013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lillo-Ródenas MA, Cazorla-Amorós D, Linares-Solano A (2005) Behaviour of activated carbons with different pore size distributions and surface oxygen groups for benzene and toluene adsorption at low concentrations. Carbon 43:1758–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG, Eds (2018) NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, National Institute of Standards and Technology Data. https://doi: https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303
  23. Mcdougall GJ (1991) Physical nature and manufacture of activated carbon. J South African Institute Mining Metallurgy 91:109–120Google Scholar
  24. Morenocastilla C, Carrascomarin F, Mueden A (1997) The creation of acid carbon surfaces by treatment with (NH4)2S2O8. Carbon 35:1619–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ponec V, Knor Z, Cerny S (1974) Adsorption on solids. In: Smith D, Adams NG (eds) English translation. Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Riipinen I, Ylijuuti T, Pierce JR, Petäjä T, Worsnop DR, Kulmala M, Donahue NM (2012) The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth. Nat Geosci 5:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruthven DM (1984) Principles Adsorption Adsorption Processes 56:168–179Google Scholar
  28. Sernaguerrero R, Sayari A (2007) Applications of pore-expanded mesoporous silica. 7. Adsorption of volatile organic compounds. Environ Sci Technol 41:4761–4766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shafeeyan MS, Wan MAWD, Houshmand A, Shamiri A (2010) A review on surface modification of activated carbon for carbon dioxide adsorption. J Analytical Appl Pyrolysis 89:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sircar S (1988) Separation of methane and carbon dioxide gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption. Sep Sci Technol 23:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stoeckli HF (1990) Microporous carbons and their characterization: the present state of the art. Carbon 28:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stuckert NR, Yang RT (2011) CO2 capture from the atmosphere and simultaneous concentration using zeolites and amine-grafted SBA-15. Environ Sci Technol 45:10257–10264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vega E, Lemus J, Anfruns A, Gonzalezolmos R, Palomar J, Martin MJ (2013) Adsorption of volatile sulphur compounds onto modified activated carbons: effect of oxygen functional groups. J Hazard Mater 258:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang CM, Kueisen Chang A, Chung TW, Wu H (2004) Adsorption equilibria of aromatic compounds on activated carbon, silica gel, and 13X zeolite. J Chem Eng Data 50:527–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang H, Zhu T, Fan X, Na H (2014a) Adsorption and desorption of small molecule volatile organic compounds over carbide-derived carbon. Carbon 67:712–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang S, Liang Z, Chao L, Li A (2014b) Enhanced adsorption and desorption of VOCs vapor on novel micro-mesoporous polymeric adsorbents. J Colloid Interface Sci 428:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warhurst AM, Fowler GD, Mcconnachie GL, Pollard SJT (1997) Pore structure and adsorption characteristics of steam pyrolysis carbons from Moringa oleifera. Carbon 35:1039–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang KB, Peng JH, Srinivasakannan C, Zhang L, Xia HY, Duan XH (2010) Preparation of high surface area activated carbon from coconut shells using microwave heating. Bioresour Technol 101:6163–6169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang RT (2003) Adsorbents: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yoon YH, Nelson JH (1984) Application of gas adsorption kinetics. I: a theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45:517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Space and EnvironmentBeihang UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Energy and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations