Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 30, pp 30633–30646 | Cite as

Toxicity potential of particles caused by particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPAHs) at two roadside locations and relationship with traffic

  • Anubha Goel
  • Shubham Rathi
  • Manish Agrawal
Research Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

This study assessed exposure by the roadside to highly toxic particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPAHs) that are known to adsorb preferentially on fine particles, aerodynamic diameter (dp ≤ 1 μm). The real-time air quality measurements were conducted in March, April, and May 2015 in Kanpur at two busy roadside locations: one outside IIT Kanpur main gate, IG, and another by a residential area, M3. The locations show varying land use type and traffic density. Higher averaged daily concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 were observed at IG (PM10 700–800 μg/m3) owing to nature and high density of traffic, and occurrence of biomass burning nearby. Statistically significant relation (R2 > 90%, p < 0.05) between PM1 and PM2.5 highlights the influence of mobile sources on particle load at IG. IG, the busier location, had higher daily averaged concentration of aggregate PPAHs (104 ng/m3) than M3 which is located near a residential area (38 ng/m3). In contrast, the higher average daily value of PC/DC ratio (mass per unit surface area of PPAHs on nanoparticles) at M3 (4.87 ng/mm2) than at IG (4.08 ng/mm2) suggests that PAHs of greater mass occur on particles at M3. Finer particles are known to adsorb pollutants of a larger mass that are likely to be more toxic in case of PAHs suggest that ambient air at M3 has more toxicity potential. However, this inference is not based on chemical analyses, and chemical characteristics must also be taken into account for the detailed assessment of health risk. The multiple path dosimetry model (MPPD-v3.04) reveals that the 99.02% of PM10 inhaled, 77.01% of PM2.5 and 34.54% of PM1 are deposited in the outermost (head) region of the human respiratory tract.

Keywords

Air quality Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Particulate mass Vehicle pollution Human health Multiple path dosimetry model (MPPD) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Ruchin Tejawat, Mr. Rushyendranath, Mr. Mrinmoy Chakraborty, and Mr. Saifi Izhar (M.Tech. students) for their help during sampling and model data analysis.

References

  1. Agrawal M (2017) Determination of source signatures for application of psa model to assess contribution of probable sources to on-road pollutant. Doctorate Thesis, IITK, Civil (10103067)Google Scholar
  2. Akhtar US, Rastogi N, McWhinney RD, Urch B, Chow CW, Evans GJ, Scott JA (2014) The combined effects of physicochemical properties of size-fractionated ambient particulate matter on in vitro toxicity in human A549 lung epithelial cells. Toxicol Rep 1:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aneja VP, Agrawal A, Roelle PA, Phillips SB, Tong Q, Watkins N, Yablonsky R (2001) Measurements and analysis of criteria pollutants in New Delhi, India. Environ Int 27:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badyda A, Gayer A, Czechowski P, Majewski G, Dąbrowiecki P (2016) Pulmonary function and incidence of selected respiratory diseases depending on the exposure to ambient PM10. Int J Mol Sci 17(11):1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baek SO, Field RA, Goldstone ME, Kirk PW, Lester JN, Perry R (1991) A review of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: sources, fate and behavior. Water Air Soil Pollut 60(3–4):279–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behera SN, Sharma M (2010) Reconstructing primary and secondary components of PM2.5 composition for an urban atmosphere. Aerosol Sci Technol 44(11):983–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belosi F, Santachiara G, Prodi F (2013) Performance evaluation of four commercial optical particle counters. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences 3(01):41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binková B, Šrám RJ (2004) The genotoxic effect of carcinogenic PAHs, their artificial and environmental mixtures (EOM) on human diploid lung fibroblasts. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 547(1–2):109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bispo A, Jourdain M, Jauzein M (1999) Toxicity and genotoxicity of industrial soils polluted by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Org Geochem 30(8):947–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boström CE, Gerde P, Hanberg A, Jernström B, Johansson C, Kyrklund T, Rannug A, Törnqvist M, Victorin K, Westerholm R (2002) Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environ Health Perspect 110(Suppl 3):451–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castellini S, Moroni B, Cappelletti D (2014) PMetro: measurement of urban aerosols on a mobile platform. Measurement 49:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakraborty A, Gupta T (2010) Chemical characterization and source apportionment of submicron (PM1) aerosol in Kanpur region, India. Aerosol Air Qual Res 10(5):433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coppalle A, Delmas V, Bobbia M (2001) Variability of NOx and NO2 concentrations observed at pedestrian level in the city center of a medium sized urban area. Atmos Environ 35:5361–5369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donaldson K, Li XY, MacNee W (1998) Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 29(5):553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelstaedter S, Tegen I, Washington R (2006) North African dust emissions and transport. Earth-Science Reviews 79(1–2), 73–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferm M, Sjöberg K (2015) Concentrations and emission factors for PM2.5 and PM10 from road traffic in Sweden. Atmos Environ 119:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flessel P, Wang YY, Chang K-I, Wesolowski JJ, Guirguis GN, Kim I-S, Levaggi D, Siu W (1991) Seasonal variations and trends in concentrations of filter-collected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and mutagenic activity in the San Francisco Bay Area. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 41(3):276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauderman WJ, Avol E, Gilliland F, Vora H, Thomas D, Berhane K et al (2004) The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. N Engl J Med 351(11):1057–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaur A, Tripathi SN, Kanawade VP, Tare V, Shukla SP (2014) Four-year measurements of trace gases (SO2, NOx, CO, and O3) at an urban location, Kanpur, in Northern India. J Atmos Chem 71(4):283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greber T, Giessel T, Pettenkofer C, Siegmann HC, Ertl G (1995) Substrate mediated autoionization of benzene on graphite. Surf Sci 343(3):L1187–L1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hallquist M, Wenger JC, Baltensperger U, Rudich Y, Simpson D, Claeys M et al (2009) The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues. Atmos Chem Phys 9(14):5155–5236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heim M, Mullins BJ, Umhauer H, Kasper G (2008) Performance evaluation of three optical particle counters with an efficient “multimodal” calibration method. J Aerosol Sci 39(12):1019–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kammann U, Biselli S, Hühnerfuss H, Reineke N, Theobald N, Vobach M, Wosniok W (2004) Genotoxic and teratogenic potential of marine sediment extracts investigated with comet assay and zebrafish test. Environ Pollut 132(2):279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katsouyanni K, Touloumi G, Samoli E, Gryparis A, Le Tertre A, Monopolis Y et al (2001) Confounding and effect modification in the short-term effects of ambient particles on total mortality: results from 29 European cities within the APHEA2 project. Epidemiology 12(5):521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khreis H, Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, de Hoogh K, Nieuwenhuijsen M (2018) OP IX-5 traffic-related air pollution and the local burden of childhood asthma in Bradford, UK. Occup Environ Med 75(Suppl 1):A18–A18Google Scholar
  26. Kirchstetter TW, Harley RA, Kreisberg NM, Stolzenburg MR, Hering SV (1999) On-road measurement of fine particle and nitrogen oxide emissions from light-and heavy-duty motor vehicles. Atmos Environ 33(18):2955–2968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar A, Srivastava D, Agrawal M, Goel A (2014) Snapshot of PM loads evaluated at major road and railway intersections in an urban locality. International Journal of Environmental Protection 4(1):23Google Scholar
  28. Li CS, Lin CH (2002) PM1/PM2.5/PM10 characteristics in the urban atmosphere of Taipei. Aerosol Sci Technol 36(4):469–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang CJ, Liu YS, Liang JJ (2017) PCDD/Fs and PAHs compositions and source reconciliations in the basin area of central Taiwan. Sustainable Environment Research 27(2):77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2016.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Líbalová H, Krčková S, Uhlířová K, Milcová A, Schmuczerová J, Ciganek M, Kléma J, Machala M, Šrám RJ, Topinka J (2014) Genotoxicity but not the AhR-mediated activity of PAHs is inhibited by other components of complex mixtures of ambient air pollutants. Toxicol Lett 225(3):350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lim S, Lee M, Lee G, Kim S, Yoon S, Kang K (2012) Ionic and carbonaceous compositions of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 at Gosan ABC Superstation and their ratios as source signature. Atmos Chem Phys 12(4):2007–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu Y, Liu L, Lin JM, Tang N, Hayakawa K (2006) Distribution and characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in airborne particulates of East Asia. China Particuology 4(6):283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maji KJ, Dikshit AK, Deshpande A (2017) Disability-adjusted life years and economic cost assessment of the health effects related to PM2.5 and PM10 pollution in Mumbai and Delhi, in India from 1991 to 2015. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(5):4709–4730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mancilla Y, Herckes P, Fraser MP, Mendoza A (2015) Secondary organic aerosol contributions to PM2.5 in Monterrey, Mexico: temporal and seasonal variation. Atmos Res 153:348–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSRES.2014.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mastral AM, Callén MS, García T (1999) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and organic matter associated to particulate matter emitted from atmospheric fluidized bed coal combustion. Environ Sci Technol 33(18):3177–3184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McClellan RO (1987) Health effects of exposure to diesel exhaust particles. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 27(1):279–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ministry of Environment, F. and C. C (2014) National Air Quality Index (AQI) launched by the Environment Minister AQI is a huge initiative under ‘Swachh Bharat.’ Press Information BureauGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagy AS, Szabó J, Csanádi Z, Erdős J (2016) Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air PM2.5 in an urban site of Győr, Hungary. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering 10(10):949–952Google Scholar
  39. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (2011) http://cpcb.nic.in/air-quality-standard/. Last Access: 2 Apr 2018
  40. Nebert DW, Dalton TP, Okey AB, Gonzalez FJ (2004) Role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated induction of the CYP1 enzymes in environmental toxicity and cancer. J Biol Chem 279(23):23847–23850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nemmar A, Hoet PM, Vanquickenborne B, Dinsdale D, Thomeer M, Hoylaerts MF et al (2002) Passage of inhaled particles into the blood circulation in humans. Circulation 105(4):411–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nikolaou K, Masclet P, Mouvier G (1984) Sources and chemical reactivity of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere—a critical review. Sci Total Environ 32(2):103–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oberdörster G, Ferin J, Gelein R, Soderholm SC, Finkelstein J (1992) Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury: studies with ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 97:193–199Google Scholar
  44. Oberdörster G, Celein RM, Ferin J, Weiss B (1995) Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafine particles? Inhal Toxicol 7(1):111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oberdörster G (2001) Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 74(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Okuda T (2013) Measurement of the specific surface area and particle size distribution of atmospheric aerosol reference materials. Atmos Environ 75:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ott WR, Siegmann HC (2006) Using multiple continuous fine particle monitors to characterize tobacco, incense, candle, cooking, wood burning, and vehicular sources in indoor, outdoor, and in-transit settings. Atmos Environ 40(5):821–843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2005.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ott DK, Cyrs W, Peters TM (2008) Passive measurement of coarse particulate matter, PM10–2.5. J Aerosol Sci 39(2):156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pankow JF (1987) Review and comparative analysis of the theories on partitioning between the gas and aerosol particulate phases in the atmosphere. Atmos Environ (1967) 21(11):2275–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pitz M, Cyrys J, Karg E, Wiedensohler A, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J (2003) Variability of apparent particle density of an urban aerosol. Environ Sci Technol 37(19):4336–4342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pope CA, Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Dockery DW, Evans JS, Speizer FE, Heath CW (1995) Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of US adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151(3):669–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rajput P, Singh DK, Singh AK, Gupta T (2018) Chemical composition and source-apportionment of sub-micron particles during wintertime over Northern India: new insights on influence of fog-processing. Environ Pollut 233:81–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sagai M, Furuyama A, Ichinose T (1996) Biological effects of diesel exhaust particles (DEP). III. Pathogenesis of asthma like symptoms in mice. Free Radic Biol Med 21(2):199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sakai R, Siegmann HC, Sato H, Voorhees AS (2002) Particulate matter and particle-attached polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the indoor and outdoor air of Tokyo measured with personal monitors. Environ Res 89(1):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saldarriaga-Noreña H, López-Márquez R, Murillo-Tovar M, Hernández-Mena L, Ospina-Noreña E, Sánchez-Salinas E, Waliszewski S, Montiel-Palma S (2015) Analysis of PAHs associated with particulate matter PM2.5 in two places at the city of Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. Atmosphere 6(9):1259–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith H (1994) Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication 66Google Scholar
  57. Srimuruganandam B, Nagendra SMS (2010) Analysis and interpretation of particulate matter–PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 emissions from the heterogeneous traffic near an urban roadway. Atmos Pollut Res 1(3):184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tiwari S, Dahiya A, Kumar N (2015) Investigation into relationships among NO, NO2, NOx, O3, and CO at an urban background site in Delhi, India. Atmos Res 157:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vahedian M, Khanjani N, Mirzaee M, Koolivand A (2017) Associations of short-term exposure to air pollution with respiratory hospital admissions in Arak, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng 15(1):17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Velasco E, Siegmann P, Siegmann HC (2004) Exploratory study of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different environments of Mexico City. Atmos Environ 38(29):4957–4968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vestreng V (2002) Emission data reported to UNECE/EMEP: quality assurance and trend analysis & presentation of WebDab: MSC-W status report 2002Google Scholar
  62. Villalobos AM, Amonov MO, Shafer MM, Jai Devi J, Gupta T, Tripathi SN, et al (2015) Source apportionment of carbonaceous fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in two contrasting cities across the Indo–Gangetic Plain. Atmos Pollut Res 6(3):398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang YQ, Zhang XY, Gong SL, Zhou CH, Hu XQ, Liu HL, Niu T, Yang YQ (2008) Surface observation of sand and dust storm in East Asia and its application in CUACE/Dust. Atmos Chem Phys 8(3):545–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang YQ, Zhang XY, Sun JY, Zhang XC, Che HZ, Li Y (2015) Spatial and temporal variations of the concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in China. Atmos Chem Phys 15(23):13585–13598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. World health organization Media centre (2016) WHO | Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
  66. Zhang XY, Gong SL, Zhao TL, Arimoto R, Wang YQ, Zhou ZJ (2003) Sources of Asian dust and role of climate change versus desertification in Asian dust emission. Geophys Res Lett 30(24).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018206
  67. Zwozdziak A, Gini MI, Samek L, Rogula-Kozlowska W, Sowka I, Eleftheriadis K (2017) Implications of the aerosol size distribution modal structure of trace and major elements on human exposure, inhaled dose and relevance to the PM2.5 and PM10 metrics in a European pollution hotspot urban area. J Aerosol Sci 103:38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIIT KanpurKanpurIndia
  2. 2.APTL at Center for Environmental Science and Engineering (CESE)IIT KanpurKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations