Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 36, pp 35928–35935 | Cite as

Remediation potential of caffeine, oxybenzone, and triclosan by the salt marsh plants Spartina maritima and Halimione portulacoides

  • Nazaré Couto
  • Ana Rita Ferreira
  • Paula Guedes
  • Eduardo Mateus
  • Alexandra B. Ribeiro
Sustainable Waste Management
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) have attracted increasing concern during the last decade because of their widespread uses and continuous release to the aquatic environment. This work aimed to study the distribution of caffeine (CAF), oxybenzone (MBPh), and triclosan (TCS) when they arrive in salt marsh areas and to assess their remediation potential by two different species of salt marsh plants: Spartina maritima and Halimione portulacoides. Experiments were carried out in the laboratory either in hydroponics (sediment elutriate) or in sediment soaked in elutriate, for 10 days. Controls without plants were also carried out. CAF, MBPh, and TCS were added to the media. In unvegetated sediment soaked in elutriate, CAF was mainly in the liquid phase (83%), whereas MBPh and TCS were in the solid phase (90% and 56%, respectively); the highest remediation was achieved for TCS (40%) and mainly attributed to bioremediation. The presence of plants in sediment soaked in elutriate-enhanced PPCPs remediation, decreasing CAF and TCS levels between approximately 20-30% and MBPh by 40%.. Plant uptake, adsorption to plant roots/sediments, and bio/rhizoremediation are strong hypothesis to explain the decrease of contaminants either in water or sediment fractions, according to PPCPs characteristics.

Keywords

Pharmaceutical and personal care compounds Phytoremediation Sediment Water Salt marsh area 

Notes

Acknowledgments

N. Couto and P. Guedes acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia for their Post-Doc fellowships, SFRH/BPD/81122/2011 and SFRH/BPD/114660/2016, respectively.

Funding information

This study received financial support provided by 4KET4Reuse (SOE1/P1/E0253) and CEMOWAS (SOE2/P5/F0505), co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) and by FCT/MEC through grants UID/AMB/04085/2013, Research unit CENSE “Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3042_MOESM1_ESM.docx (257 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 257 kb)

References

  1. Almeida CMR, Mucha AP, Delgado MFC, Isabel Caçador M, Bordalo AA, Vasconcelos MTSD (2008) Can PAHs influence Cu accumulation by salt marsh plants? Mar Environ Res 66:311–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer E, Petrie B, Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Wolfaardt GM (2017) The fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), endocrine disrupting contaminants (EDCs), metabolites and illicit drugs in a WWTW and environmental waters. Chem 174:437–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benotti MJ, Brownawell BJ (2007) Distributions of Pharmaceuticals in an Urban Estuary during both dry- and wet-weather conditions. Environ Sci Technol 41:5795–5802.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0629965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burken JG, Schnoor JL (1998) Predictive relationships for uptake of organic contaminants by hybrid poplar trees. Environ Sci Technol 32:3379–3385.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es9706817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caçador I, Duarte B (2012) Tagus estuary salt marsh structure and dynamics: a historical perspective. In: Jordan SJ (ed) Estuaries: classification, ecology and human impacts. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, p 41–56Google Scholar
  6. Caçador I, Vale C, Catarino F (2000) Seasonal variation of Zn, Pb, Cu and Cd concentrations in the root–sediment system of Spartina maritima and Halimione portulacoides from Tagus estuary salt marshes. Mar Environ Res 49:279–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1136(99)00077-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho PN, Basto MCP, Silva MFGM, Machado A, Bordalo AA, Vasconcelos MTSD (2010) Ability of salt marsh plants for TBT remediation in sediments. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 17:1279–1286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0307-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho PN, Rodrigues PNR, Evangelista R, Basto MCP, Vasconcelos MTSD (2011) Can salt marsh plants influence levels and distribution of DDTs in estuarine areas? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 93:415–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho PN, Basto MCP, Almeida CMR (2012) Potential of Phragmites australis for the removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals from aquatic media. Bioresour Technol 116:497–501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho PN, Araújo JL, Mucha AP, Basto MCP, Almeida CMR (2013) Potential of constructed wetlands microcosms for the removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals from livestock wastewater. Bioresour Technol 134:412–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen F, Huber C, Schröder P (2017) Fate of the sunscreen compound oxybenzone in Cyperus alternifolius based hydroponic culture: uptake, biotransformation and phytotoxicity. Chemosphere 182:638–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ChongBang Z, Jiang W, WenLi L et al (2010) Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 36:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Couto MNPFS, Basto MCP, Vasconcelos MTSD (2011) Suitability of different salt marsh plants for petroleum hydrocarbons remediation. Chemosphere 84:1052–1057.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Couto MNPFS, Basto MCP, Vasconcelos MTSD (2012) Suitability of Scirpus maritimus for petroleum hydrocarbons remediation in a refinery environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 19:86–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0538-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dordio AV, Duarte C, Barreiros M, Carvalho AJP, Pinto AP, da Costa CT (2009) Toxicity and removal efficiency of pharmaceutical metabolite clofibric acid by Typha spp. – potential use for phytoremediation? Bioresour Technol 100:1156–1161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duarte B, Almeida PR, Caçador I (2009) Spartina maritima (cordgrass) rhizosediment extracellular enzymatic activity and its role in organic matter decomposition processes and metal speciation. Mar Ecol 30:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2009.00326.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duarte B, Caetano M, Almeida PR, Vale C, Caçador I (2010) Accumulation and biological cycling of heavy metal in four salt marsh species, from Tagus estuary (Portugal). Environ Pollut 158:1661–1668.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ebele AJ, Abou-Elwafa Abdallah M, Harrad S (2017) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerg Contam 3:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2016.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fent K, Weston AA, Caminada D (2006) Ecotoxicology of human pharmaceuticals. Aquat Toxicol 76:122–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gogoi A, Mazumder P, Tyagi VK, et al (2018) Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in water environment: A review. Groundw Sustain Dev 6:169–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.009
  21. Gonçalves C, Teixeira C, Basto MCP, Almeida CMR (2016) PAHs levels in Portuguese estuaries and lagoons: salt marsh plants as potential agents for the containment of PAHs contamination in sediments. Reg Stud Mar Sci 7:211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2016.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heberer T (2002) Occurrence, fate, and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment: a review of recent research data. Toxicol Lett 131:5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00041-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hijosa-Valsero M, Matamoros V, Martín-Villacorta J, Bécares E, Bayona JM (2010a) Assessment of full-scale natural systems for the removal of PPCPs from wastewater in small communities. Water Res 44:1429–1439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hijosa-Valsero M, Matamoros V, Sidrach-Cardona R, Martín-Villacorta J, Bécares E, Bayona JM (2010b) Comprehensive assessment of the design configuration of constructed wetlands for the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products from urban wastewaters. Water Res 44:3669–3678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoyett Z, Owens MA, Clark CJ II, Abazinge M (2016) A comparative evaluation of environmental risk assessment strategies for pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Ocean Coast Manag 127:74–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klosterhaus SL, Grace R, Hamilton MC, Yee D (2013) Method validation and reconnaissance of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and alkylphenols in surface waters, sediments, and mussels in an urban estuary. Environ Int 54:92–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lam MW, Young CJ, Brain RA, Johnson DJ, Hanson MA, Wilson CJ, Richards SM, Solomon KR, Mabury SA (2004) Aquatic persistence of eight pharmaceuticals in a microcosm study. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1431–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lichtenthaler H, Wellburn A (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Meeting, Liverpool, 11Google Scholar
  29. Madureira TV, Barreiro JC, Rocha MJ, Rocha E, Cass QB, Tiritan ME (2010) Spatiotemporal distribution of pharmaceuticals in the Douro River estuary (Portugal). Sci Total Environ 408:5513–5520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matamoros V, Nguyen LX, Arias CA, Salvadó V, Brix H (2012) Evaluation of aquatic plants for removing polar microcontaminants: a microcosm experiment. Chemosphere 88:1257–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mesa J, Rodríguez-Llorente ID, Pajuelo E, Piedras JMB, Caviedes MA, Redondo-Gómez S, Mateos-Naranjo E (2015) Moving closer towards restoration of contaminated estuaries: bioaugmentation with autochthonous rhizobacteria improves metal rhizoaccumulation in native Spartina maritima. J Hazard Mater 300:263–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mucha AP, Almeida CMR, Bordalo AA, Vasconcelos MTSD (2005) Exudation of organic acids by a marsh plant and implications on trace metal availability in the rhizosphere of estuarine sediments. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pi N, Ng JZ, Kelly BC (2017) Bioaccumulation of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting chemicals in aquatic macrophytes: results of hydroponic experiments with Echinodorus horemanii and Eichhornia crassipes. Sci Total Environ 601:812–820.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramos S, Homem V, Alves A, Santos L (2015) Advances in analytical methods and occurrence of organic UV-filters in the environment — a review. Sci Total Environ 526:278–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ratola N, Cincinelli A, Alves A, Katsoyiannis A (2012) Occurrence of organic microcontaminants in the wastewater treatment process. A mini review. J Hazard Mater 239–240:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.040
  36. Ribeiro H, Mucha AP, Almeida CMR, Bordalo AA (2014) Potential of phytoremediation for the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated salt marsh sediments. J Environ Manag 137:10–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevens KJ, Kim S-Y, Adhikari S, Vadapalli V, Venables BJ (2009) Effects of triclosan on seed germination and seedling development of three wetland plants: Sesbania herbacea, Eclipta prostrata, and Bidens frondosa. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:2598–2609.  https://doi.org/10.1897/08-566.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun Q, Li Y, Li M, Ashfaq M, Lv M, Wang H, Hu A, Yu CP (2016) PPCPs in Jiulong River estuary (China): spatiotemporal distributions, fate, and their use as chemical markers of wastewater. Chemosphere 150:596–604.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Zambello E (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in urban wastewater: removal, mass load and environmental risk after a secondary treatment—a review. Sci Total Environ 429:123–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang Y, Fu J, Peng H, Hou L, Liu M, Zhou JL (2011) Occurrence and phase distribution of selected pharmaceuticals in the Yangtze Estuary and its coastal zone. J Hazard Mater 190:588–596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang DQ, Hua T, Gersberg RM, Zhu J, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2013) Fate of caffeine in mesocosms wetland planted with Scirpus validus. Chemosphere 90:1568–1572.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhao C, Xie H, Xu J, Xu X, Zhang J, Hu Z, Liu C, Liang S, Wang Q, Wang J (2015) Bacterial community variation and microbial mechanism of triclosan (TCS) removal by constructed wetlands with different types of plants. Sci Total Environ 505:633–639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CENSE, Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, Faculdade de Ciências e TecnologiaUniversidade Nova de LisboaCaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations