Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 30, pp 30401–30409 | Cite as

Pore structure and environmental serves of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis conditions

  • Shenggao Lu
  • Yutong Zong
Research Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The pore structure of biochar determines many biochar-induced environmental serves. In order to predict quantitatively, the environmental serves of biochar, it is very important to characterize the porosity and pore size distribution of biochar and to understand how biochar pore structure relates to the environmental serves. In this study, pore characteristics of biochars derived from different feedstocks were determined using nitrogen adsorption and the mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) methods. A great variation of pore characteristics in biochar was found, depending on feedstock material. The specific surface area (SSA) of biochars varied greatly, ranging from 1.06 to 70.22 m2/g. Total pore volume and porosity of biochars determined by the MIP method ranged from 1.28 to 3.68 cm3/g and from 57.8 to 79.7%, respectively. The pore size distribution of biochars had bimodal peaks in the range of 5–15 and 1.5–5 μm for the herbaceous plant and broad-leaf forest biochars, while coniferous forest biochar had two peaks at the pore sizes of 6–25 and 1.5–3 μm, respectively. Biochars had substantial storage pores (0.5–50 μm), accounting for about 85% of total pore volume, and small transmission and residual pores. The herbaceous plant biochars had larger volume of transmission pores (> 50 μm) than broad-leaf and coniferous forest biochar. Effects of pyrolysis conditions (temperature and residence time) on pore characteristics largely depended on feedstocks types. The difference in feedstocks would greatly affect pore characteristics of biochar, while the effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar pore characteristics varied with biomass type. The detailed characterization of pore structure in biochars could effectively predict the potential impacts of biochars as soil amendment and pollutant sorbent.

Keywords

Biochar Porosity Pore size distribution (PSD) Biomass Mercury intrusion porosimeter 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China (2016YFD0200302).

References

  1. Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G (2013) Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202-203:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM D4284 (1994) Standard test method for determining pore volume distribution of catalysts by mercury intrusion porosimetry, vol 05.03. ASTM Committee D-32 on Catalysts, ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  3. Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenerg 5:202–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao X, Dugan B, Driver EL, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA (2014) New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenergy 66:176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrell LD, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, Wimmer B, Soja G (2016) Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties. Geoderma 282:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 107:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 61:196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregg SJ, Sing SW (1982) Adsorption, surface area, and porosity. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hardie M, Clothier B, Bound S, Oliver G, Close D (2014) Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant Soil 376:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyvaluoma J, Kulju S, Hannula M, Wikberg H, Kalli A, Rasa K (2018) Quantitative characterization of pore structure of several biochars with 3D imaging. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8823-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Illingworth J, Williams PT, Rand B (2013) Characterization of biochar porosity from pyrolysis of biomass flax fibre. J Energy Inst 86:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaafar NM, Clode PL, Abbott LK (2014) Microscopy observations of habitable space in biochar for colonization by fungal hyphae from soil. J Integr Agric 13:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jimenez-Cordero D, Heras F, Alonso-Morales N, Gilarranz MA, Rodriguez JJ (2013) Porous structure and morphology of granular chars from flash and conventional pyrolysis of grape seeds. Biomass Bioenergy 54:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones K, Ramakrishnan G, Uchimiya M, Orlov A (2015) New applications of X-ray tomography in pyrolysis of biomass: biochar imaging. Energy Fuel 29:1628–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT (2012) Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy 41:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krzesinska M, Pilawa B, Pusz S, Ng J (2006) Physical characteristics of carbon materials derived from pyrolysed vascular plants. Biomass Bioenergy 30:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laine J, Yunes S (1992) Effect of the preparation method on the pore size distribution of activated carbon from coconut shell. Carbon 30:601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lal R, Shukla MK (2004) Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lou L, Luo L, Cheng G, Wei Y, Mei R, Xun B, Xu X, Hu B, Chen Y (2012) The sorption of pentachlorophenol by aged sediment supplemented with black carbon produced from rice straw and fly ash. Bioresour Technol 112:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mimmo T, Panzacchi P, Baratieri M, Davies CA, Tonon G (2014) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on miscanthus (Miscanthus xgiganteus) biochar physical, chemical and functional properties. Biomass Bioenergy 62:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quilliam RS, Glanville HC, Wade SC, Jones DL (2013) Life in the “charosphere” - does biochar in agricultural soil provide a significant habitat for microorganisms? Soil Biol Biochem 65:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quin PR, Cowie AL, Flavel RJ, Keen BP, Macdonald LM, Morris SG, Singh BP, Young IM, Van Zwieten L (2014) Oil mallee biochar improves soil structural properties–a study with x-ray micro-CT. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schnee LS, Knauth S, Hapca S, Otten W, Eickhorst T (2016) Analysis of physical pore space characteristics of two pyrolytic biochars and potential as microhabitat. Plant Soil 408:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shinogi Y, Kanri Y (2003) Pyrolysis of plant, animal and human waste: physical and chemical characterization of the pyrolytic products. Bioresour Technol 90:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Soil Res 48:516–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenergy 84:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun FF, Lu SG (2014) Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and pore-space properties of clayey soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J Food Agric Environ 9:1137–1143Google Scholar
  31. Wang Y, Hu Y, Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G (2013) Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues at different temperatures and residence times. Energy Fuel 27:5890–5899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang SS, Gao B, Zimmerman AR, Li YC, Ma LN, Harris WG, Migliaccio KW (2015) Physicochemical and sorptive properties of biochars derived from woody and herbaceous biomass. Chemosphere 134:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Washburn EW (1921) Note on a method of determing the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. PNAS 7:115–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spokas K (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag 36:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu XM, Chen BL, Zhu LZ, Xing BS (2017) Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: a review. Environ Pollut 227:98–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resource and Environment, College of Environmental and Resource SciencesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations