Toxicity evaluation and environmental risk assessment of 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy acetic acid (MCPA) on non-target aquatic macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata
- 159 Downloads
Aquatic plants in agricultural landscapes play a vital role in maintaining the ecological integrity within the aquatic systems while facing an array of disturbances. Among them, information on herbicide exposure on non-target aquatic plants is scarce. The present study was designed to fill this information gap by detecting the impacts of 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) on Hydrilla verticillata using morpho-anatomical and physiological biomarkers and assessing the environmental risk of MCPA to the non-target environment. H. verticillata was exposed to different MCPA concentrations (10, 100, 500, 1000 μg/L) and control (0 μg/L) for 7 days. At the end of the experiment, plant growth, pigments, H2O2 content, peroxidase activity (POD) and plant anatomy were compared. The environmental risk was assessed using predicted environmental concentration/predicted no effect concentration (PEC:PNEC) ratio, hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI). Control plants exhibited the highest growth, and a growth decline was noted in parallel to MCPA exposure, where a similar trend was detected for the plant pigment contents. MCPA induced chlorosis and oxidative stress in H. verticillata. Risk analysis detected high values for PEC:PNEC ratios (3–9), HQ (1.92–5.79) and HI (28.15). MCPA-exposed H. verticillata could recover once those plants received natural conditions. Overall, present findings showed the negative impacts of MCPA on non-target aquatic plant H. verticillata. These findings will be useful to clarify the interaction between agrochemicals and non-target aquatic plants. Such information would benefit to decide the criteria in aquatic ecosystem management.
KeywordsChlorosis Environmental risk assessment MCPA Oxidative stress H. verticillata
The authors wish to acknowledge the Head of the Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences and Technology, University of Ruhuna for providing facilities for microscopic analysis.
- Atapaththu KSS, Asaeda T (2015b) Responses of aquatic macrophytes to flucuations in abiotic stress vectors. In: Crystal E, Rodney (eds) Aquatic plants composition, nutrient concentration and environmental impact. Nova, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Calow PP (2009) Handbook of environmental risk assessment and management. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
- Hickey G (2010) Ecotoxicological risk assessment: developments in PNEC estimation. Durham UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Mahmood I, Imadi SR, Shazadi K, Gul A, Hakeem KR (2016) Effects of pesticides on environment, plant, soil and microbes. Springer, pp 253–269Google Scholar
- Maltby L, Arnold D, Arts G, Davies J, Heimbach F, Pickl C, Poulsen V (2009) Aquatic macrophyte risk assessment for pesticides. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
- Manuilova A, Svensson H (2003) Methods and tools for assessment of environmental risk. Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry, DANTES projectGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Gil JL, Prosser R, Hanta G, Poirier D, Lissemore L, Hanson M, Solomon KR (2017) Aquatic hazard assessment of MON 0818, a commercial mixture of alkylamine ethoxylates commonly used in glyphosate-containing herbicide formulations. Part 2: roles of sediment, temperature, and capacity for recovery following a pulsed exposure. Environ Toxicol Chem 36(2):512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salman JM, Abdul-Adel E, AlKaim AF (2016) Effect of pesticide glyphosate on some biochemical features in cyanophyta algae oscillatorialimnetica. Int J Pharm Technol Res 9(8):355–365Google Scholar
- Strandberg B, Boutin C, Mathiassen SK, Damgaard C, Dupont YL, Carpenter DJ, Kudsk P (2017) Effects of herbicides on non-target terrestrial plants, pesticide dose: effects on the environment and target and non-target organisms. ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, pp 149–166Google Scholar