Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 28, pp 28431–28444 | Cite as

The sap flow-based assessment of atmospheric trace gas uptake by three forest types in subtropical China on different timescales

  • Xia Chen
  • Ping Zhao
  • Yanting Hu
  • Xiuhua Zhao
  • Lei Ouyang
  • Liwei Zhu
  • Guangyan Ni
Research Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Assessing the uptake of trace gases by forests contributes to understanding the mechanisms of gas exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere and to evaluating the potential risk of these pollutant gases to forests. In this study, the multi-timescale characteristics of the stomatal uptake of NO, NO2, SO2 and O3 by Schima superba, Eucalyptus citriodora and Acacia auriculiformis were investigated by continuous sap flow measurements for a 3-year period. The peak canopy stomatal conductance (GC) for these three species appeared between 9:00 and 12:00, which was jointly regulated by the vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Additionally, annual and seasonal variations in the stomatal uptake of trace gases for these three tree species suggested that there was a combination effect between canopy stomatal conductance and ambient concentration on the uptake of trace gases. Furthermore, the result demonstrated that the trace gas absorption capacities among these three forest types followed the order of S. superba > E. citriodora > A. auriculiformis. The findings of this study have theoretical significance and application value in assessing air purification and the risk of harm to forests in Southern China.

Keywords

Canopy stomatal conductance Trace gas uptake Sap flow measurements Environment Economic tree species Pollutant removal 

Notes

Funding information

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41630752 and 41275169).

References

  1. Aubinet M et al (2000) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv Ecol Res 30:113–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckett KP, Freer-Smith P, Gail T (2000) Effective tree species for local air quality management. J Arboric 26:12–18Google Scholar
  3. Braun S, Thomas VFD, Quiring R, Flückiger W (2010) Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus. Environ Pollut 158(6):2043–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman CT (1992) Control of combustion-generated nitrogen oxide emissions: technology driven by regulation. Symp Combust 24(1):859–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell GS, Norman JM (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1626-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaparro-Suarez IG, Meixner FX, Kesselmeier J (2011) Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) uptake by vegetation controlled by atmospheric concentrations and plant stomatal aperture. Atmos Environ 45(32):5742–5750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dizengremel P, Le Thiec D, Bagard M, Jolivet Y (2008) Ozone risk assessment for plants: central role of metabolism-dependent changes in reducing power. Environ Pollut 156:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dufour G, Eremenko M, Orphal J, Flaud JM (2010) IASI observations of seasonal and day-to-day variations of tropospheric ozone over three highly populated areas of China, Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong. Atmos Chem Phys 10:3787–3801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duyzer J, Weststrate H, Walton S (1995) Exchange of ozone and nitrogen oxides between the atmosphere and coniferous forest. Water Air Soil Pollut 85:2065–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewers BE, Oren R, Phillips N, Strömgren M, Linder S (2001) Mean canopy stomatal conductance responses to water and nutrient availabilities in Picea abies and Pinus taeda. Tree Physiol 21(12–13):841–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferretti M, Marchetto A, Arisci S, Bussotti F, Calderisi M, Carnicelli S, Cecchini G, Fabbio G, Bertini G, Matteucci G, de Cinti B, Salvati L, Pompei E (2014) On the tracks of nitrogen deposition effects on temperate forests at their southern European range—an observational study from Italy. Glob Chang Biol 20(11):3423–3438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao C-J, Tang G-Y, Li K, Xie Q-H (2013) Root biomass and its distribution of Azadirachta indica and Acacia auriculiformis plantations in the dry-hot valley. Acta Ecol Sin 33(6):1964–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao J-H, Zhu B, Wang Y-Z, Kang H-Q (2015) Distribution and long-term variation of tropospheric NO2 over China during 2005 to 2013. China Environ Sci 35(8):2307–2318Google Scholar
  14. Granier A (1987) Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3(4):309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han W, Fang J, Guo D, Zhang Y (2005) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytol 168(2):377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hargreaves KJ, Fowler D, Storeton-West RL, Duyzer JH (1992) The exchange of nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone between pasture and the atmosphere. Environ Pollut 75:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu Y-T, Zhao P, Niu J-F, Sun Z-W, Zhu L-W (2015) Characteristics of canopy stomatal conductance in plantations of three revegetation tree species and its sensitivity to environmental factors. Chin J Appl Ecol 26(9):2623–2631Google Scholar
  18. Jim CY, Chen WY (2008) Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). J Environ Manag 88:665–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kangasjarvi J, Jaspers P, Kollist H (2005) Signalling and cell death in ozone-exposed plants. Plant Cell Environ 28:1021–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karlsson PE, Braun S, Broadmeadow M, Elvira S, Emberson L, Gimeno BS, le Thiec D, Novak K, Oksanen E, Schaub M, Uddling J, Wilkinson M (2007) Risk assessments for forest trees: the performance of the ozone flux versus the AOT concepts. Environ Pollut 146:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kohno Y, Matsumura H, Ishii T, Izuta T (2005) Establishing critical levels of air pollutants for protecting East Asian vegetation—a challenge. Plant Responses to Air Pollution and Global Change. Springer, Tokyo, pp 243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Köstner BMM, Schulze ED, Kelliher FM, Hollinger DY, Byers JN, Hunt JE, McSeveny TM, Meserth R, Weir PL (1992) Transpiration and canopy conductance in a pristine broad-leaved forest of Nothofagus: an analysis of xylem sap flow and eddy correlation measurements. Oecologia 91(3):350–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Köstner B, Matyssek R, Heilmeier H, Clausnitzer F, Nunn AJ, Wieser G (2008) Sap flow measurements as a basis for assessing trace-gas exchange of trees. Flora 203(1):14–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landolt W, Keller T (1985) Uptake and effects of air pollutants on woody plants. Experientia 41:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Z-A, Peng S-L (2001) Nutrient structure of several man made forests in tropics and subtropics of China. Chin J Ecol 20(4):1–4Google Scholar
  26. Lu P, Urban L, Zhao P (2004) Granier’s thermal dissipation probe (TDP) method for measuring sap flow in trees: theory and practice. Acta Bot Sin 46:631–646Google Scholar
  27. Matyssek R, Sandermann H, Wieser G, Booker F, Cieslik S, Musselman R, Ernst D (2008) The challenge of making ozone risk assessment for forest trees more mechanistic. Environ Pollut 156:567–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McAdam, Brodribb (2015) The evolution of mechanisms driving the stomatal response to vapor pressure deficit. Plant Physiol 167:833–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McPherson EG, Simpson JR (2003) Potential energy savings in buildings by an urban tree planting programme in California. Urban For Urban Green 2:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Medlyn et al (2011) Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob Chang Biol 17:2134–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mei T-T, Zhao P, Wang Q (2010) Effects of tree diameter at breast height and soil moisture on transpiration of Schima superba based on sap flow pattern and normalization. Chin J Appl Ecol 21(10):2457–2464Google Scholar
  32. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Andrade JL (2001) Regulation of water flux through tropical forest canopy trees: do universal rules apply? Tree Physiol 21:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mott KA, Parkhurst DF (1991) Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant Cell Environ 14:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Musselman RC, Lefohn AS, Massman WJ, Heath RL (2006) A critical review and analysis of the use of exposure- and flux-based ozone indices for predicting vegetation effects. Atmos Environ 40:1869–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nowak DJ, Civerolo KL, Rao ST, Sistla G, Luley CJ, Crane DE (2000) A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmos Environ 34:1601–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nunn AJ, Wieser G, Metzger U, Löw M, Wipfler P, Häberle KH, Matyssek R (2007) Exemplifying whole-plant ozone uptake in adult forest trees of contrasting species and site conditions. Environ Pollut 146:629–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Onandia G, Olsson AK, Barth S, King JS, Uddling J (2011) Exposure to moderate concentrations of tropospheric ozone impairs tree stomatal response to carbon dioxide. Environ Pollut 159(10):2350–2354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paoletti E, Manning WJ (2007) Toward a biologically significant and usable standard for ozone that will also protect plants. Environ Pollut 150(1):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phillips N, Oren R (1998) A comparison of daily representations of canopy conductance based on two conditional time-averaging methods and the dependence of daily conductance on environmental factors. Ann Des Sci For 55:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips N, Nagchaudhuri A, Oren R, Katul G (1997) Time constant for water transport in loblolly pine trees estimated from time series of evaporative demand and stem sapflow. Trees 11:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pleim JE, Finkelstein PL, Clarke JF, Ellestad TG (1999) A technique for estimating dry deposition velocities based on similarity with latent heat flux. Atmos Environ 33(14):2257–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004) Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(30):11001–11006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers HH, Jeffries HE, Witherspoon AM (1979) Measuring air pollutions uptake by plants: nitrogen dioxide. J Environ Qual 18:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schäfer KVR (2011) Canopy stomatal conductance following drought, disturbance, and death in an upland oak/pine forest of the New Jersey Pine Barrens, USA. Front Plant Sci 2(2):15Google Scholar
  45. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2012) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. John Wiley & Sons, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  46. Simpson D, Ashmore, MR, Emberson L, Tuovinen JP (2007) A comparison of two different approaches for mapping potential ozone damage to vegetation. A model study. Environ Pollut 146(3):715–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shen J et al (2017) Study on ozone pollution characteristics and source apportionment in Guangdong Province. Acta Sci Circumst 14:49–46Google Scholar
  48. Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Koch DM, Schmidt GA, Unger N, Bauer SE (2009) Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science 326(5953):716–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slovik S, Siegmund A, FÜHrer HW, Heber U (1996) Stomatal uptake of SO2, NOx and O3 by spruce crowns (Picea abies) and canopy damage in Central Europe. New Phytol 132(4):661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  51. Sun Z-W et al (2014) Seasonal variations of sap flow and transpiration water consumption of introduced tree species Acacia auriculaeformis and Eucalyptus citriodora. Chin J Ecol 33(10):2588–2595Google Scholar
  52. Tang JW, Bolstad PV, Brent EE, Ankur RD, Kenneth JD, Eileen VC (2006) Sap flux-upscaled canopy transpiration, stomatal conductance, and water use efficiency in an old growth forest in the Great Lakes region of the United States. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 111(G2).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tao F, Feng Z (2000) Critical loads of SO2 dry deposition and their exceedance in South China. Water Air Soil Pollut 124(3–4):429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Uddling J, Teclaw RM, Pregitzer KS, Ellsworth DS (2009) Leaf and canopy conductance in aspen and aspen-birch forests under free-air enrichment of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiol 29:1367–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. UNECE (2004) Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads & levels and air pollution effects, risks, and trends. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-RoßlauGoogle Scholar
  56. Vahedpour M, Zolfaghari F (2011) Mechanistic study on the atmospheric formation of acid rain base on the sulfur dioxide. Struct Chem 22(6):1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wan JM, Lin M, Chan CY, Zhang ZS, Engling G, Wang XM, Chan IN, Li SY (2011) Change of air quality and its impact on atmospheric visibility in central-western Pearl River Delta. Environ Monit Assess 172:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang H, Zhou W, Wang X, Gao F, Zheng H, Tong L, Ouyang Z (2012) Ozone uptake by adult urban trees based on sap flow measurement. Environ Pollut 162:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wellburn FAM, Wellburn AR (1994) Atmospheric ozone affects carbohydrate allocation and winter hardiness of Pinus halepensis Mill. J Exp Bot 45:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wieser G, Luis VC, Cuevas E (2006) Quantification of ozone uptake at the stand level in a Pinus canariensis forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands, an approach based on sap flow measurements. Environ Pollut 140:383–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson K, Goldstein A, Falge E, Aubinet M, Baldocchi D, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Ceulemans R, Dolman H, Field C, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Law BE, Kowalski A, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Monson R, Oechel W, Tenhunen J, Valentini R, Verma S (2002) Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric For Meteorol 113(1):223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wullschleger SD, Wilson KB, Hanson PJ (2000) Environmental control of whole-plant transpiration, canopy conductance and estimates of the decoupling coefficient for large red maple trees. Agric For Meteorol 104:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang X, Zhang P, Zhang Y, Li X, Qiu H (2007) The trend, seasonal cycle, and sources of tropospheric NO2 over China during 1997–2006 based on satellite measurement. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 50:1877–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhao P, Rao X-Q, Ma L, Cai X-A, Zeng X-P (2005) Application of Granier’s sap flow system in water use of Acacia mangium forest. J Trop & Subtrop Bot 13:457–468Google Scholar
  65. Zhao P, Rao X-Q, Ma L, Cai X-A, Zeng X-P (2006) The variations of sap flux density and whole2tree transpiration across individuals of Acacia mangium. Acta Ecol Sin 26(12):4050–4058Google Scholar
  66. Zhao P-Q et al (2014) The relationship between vessel characteristics and sap flow of eight subtropical tree species. J Trop & Subtrop Bot 22(6):537–548Google Scholar
  67. Zheng J-Y, Zhong L-J, Wang T, Louie PKK, Li Z-C (2010) Ground-level ozone in the Pearl River Delta region: analysis of data from a recently established regional air quality monitoring network. Atmos Environ 44(6):814–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zimmermann F, Plessow K, Queck R, Bernhofer C, Matschullat J (2006) Atmospheric N-and S-fluxes to a spruce forest—comparison of inferential modelling and the throughfall method. Atmos Environ 40(25):4782–4796CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xia Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ping Zhao
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yanting Hu
    • 1
  • Xiuhua Zhao
    • 1
  • Lei Ouyang
    • 1
  • Liwei Zhu
    • 1
  • Guangyan Ni
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations