Advertisement

Development of hybrid processes for the removal of volatile organic compounds, plasticizer, and pharmaceutically active compound using sewage sludge, waste scrap tires, and wood chips as sorbents and microbial immobilization matrices

  • Renata Alves de Toledo
  • U. Hin Chao
  • Tingting Shen
  • Qihong Lu
  • Xueqing Li
  • Hojae Shim
Low cost organic and inorganic sorbents to fight soil and water pollution

Abstract

This study evaluated the reutilization of waste materials (scrap tires, sewage sludge, and wood chips) to remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs) benzene/toluene/ethylbenzene/xylenes/trichloroethylene/cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (BTEX/TCE/cis-DCE), plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and pharmaceutically active compound carbamazepine from artificially contaminated water. Different hybrid removal processes were developed: (1) 300 mg/L BTEX + 20 mg/L TCE + 10 mg/L cis-DCE + tires + Pseudomonas sp.; (2) 250 mg/L toluene + sewage sludge biochar + Pseudomonas sp.; (3) 100 mg/L DEHP + tires + Acinetobacter sp.; and (4) 20 mg/L carbamazepine + wood chips + Phanerochaete chrysosporium. For the hybrid process (1), the removal of xylenes, TCE, and cis-DCE was enhanced, resulted from the contribution of both physical adsorption and biological immobilization removal. The hybrid process (2) was also superior for the removal of DEHP and required a shorter time (2 days) for the bioremoval. For the process (3), the biochar promoted the microbial immobilization on its surface and substantially enhanced/speed up the bioremoval of toluene. The fungal immobilization on wood chips in the hybrid process (4) also improved the carbamazepine removal considerably (removal efficiencies of 61.3 ± 0.6%) compared to the suspended system without wood chips (removal efficiencies of 34.4 ± 1.8%). These hybrid processes would not only be promising for the bioremediation of environmentally concerned contaminants but also reutilize waste materials as sorbents without any further treatment.

Keywords

Biochar Biosorption Carbamazepine DEHP Microbial immobilization VOCs Waste scrap tires Wood chips 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the Macau Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT/115/2016/A3; FDCT044/2017/AFJ) and the University of Macau Multi-Year Research Grant (MYRG2017-00181-FST).

References

  1. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Oh SE, Mohan D, Moon DH, Lee YH, Ok YS (2013) Modeling adsorption kinetics of trichloroethylene onto biochars derived from soybean Stover and peanut shell wastes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8364–8373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahsaine HA, Zbair M, El Haouti R (2017) Mesoporous treated sewage sludge as outstanding low-cost adsorbent for cadmium removal. Desalin Water Treat 85:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida ILS, Antoniosi Filho NR, Alves MIR, Carvalho BG, Coelho NMM (2012) Removal of BTEX from aqueous solution using Moringa oleifera seed cake. Environ Technol 33:1299–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arshadi M, Shakeri H, Savacion JWL (2016) A green adsorbent for the removal of BTEX from aqueous media. RSC Adv 6:14290–14305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avila MAS, Breiter R (2008) Competitive sorption of cis-DCE and TCE on silica gel as a model porous mineral solid. Chemosphere 72:1807–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azubuike CC, Chikere CB, Okpokwasili GC (2016) Bioremediation techniques - classification based on site application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:180.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balcha A, Yadav OP, Dey T (2016) Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye by zinc oxide nanoparticles obtained from precipitation and sol-gel methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:25485–25493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belgacem A, Rebiai R, Hadoun H, Khemaissia S, Belmedani M (2014) The removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions onto activated carbon developed from grinded used tire. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:684–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatnagar A, Sillapãã B (2010) Utilization of agro-industrial and municipal waste materials as potential adsorbents for water treatment – a review. Chem Eng J 157:277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buttiglieri G, Knepper TP (2008) Removal of emerging contaminants in wastewater treatments: conventional activated sludge treatment. In: Barceló D, Petrovic M (eds) Emerging contaminants from industrial and municipal waste. Removal technologies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  11. Carmalin SA, Lima EC (2018) Removal of emerging contaminants from the environment by adsorption. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 150:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carvalho MN, da Mota M, Benachour M, Sales DCS, Abreu CAM (2012) Evaluation of BTEX and phenol removal from aqueous solution by multi-solute adsorption onto smectite organoclay. J Hazard Mater 239-240:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen J, Wang C, Oan Y, Farzana SS, Tam NFY (2018) Biochar accelerates microbial reductive debromination of 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47) in anaerobic mangrove sediments. J Hazard Mater 341:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chowdhury S, Chakraborty S, Saha P (2011) Biosorption of basic green 4 from aqueous solution by Ananas comosus (pineapple) leaf powder. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 84:520–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chung HK, Kim WH, Park J, Cho J, Jeong TY, Park PK (2015) Application of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms to predict adsorbate removal efficiency or required amount of adsorbent. J Ind Eng Chem 28:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deokar SK, Mandavgane SA, Kulkarni BD (2016) Agro-industrial waste: a low-cost adsorbent for effective removal of 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid herbicide in batch and packed bed modes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:16164–16175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dey T (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles and cellulosic nanofibers to remove arsenic and other heavy metals from water. In: Dey T (ed) Nanotechnology for water purification. Universal Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  18. Forrest M (2014) Recycling and re-use of waste rubber. Smithers Rapra, ShawburyGoogle Scholar
  19. Gabarrón S, Gernjak W, Valero F, Barceló A, Petrovic M, Rodríguez-Roda I (2016) Evaluation of emerging contaminants in a drinking water treatment plant using electrodialysis reversal technology. J Hazard Mater 309:192–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gai X, Wang H, Liu J, Liu S, Ren T, Liu H (2014) Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on biochar adsorption of ammonium and nitrate. PLoS One 9:e113888.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garg VK, Kumar R, Gupta R (2004) Removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solution by adsorption using agro-industry waste: a case study of Prosopis cineraria. Dyes Pigments 62:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garoma T, Skidmore L (2011) Modeling the influence of ethanol on the adsorption and desorption of selected BTEX compounds on bentonite and kaolin. J Environ Sci 23:1865–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gohl O, Friedrich A, Hoppert M, Averhoff B (2006) The thin pili of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 mediate adhesion to biotic and abiotic surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1394–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gu Y, Hou Y, Huang D, Hao Z, Wang X, Wei Z, Jousset A, Tan S, Xu D, Shen Q, Xu Y, Friman VP (2017) Application of biochar reduces Ralstonia solanacearum infection via effects on pathogen chemotaxis, swarming motility, and root exudate adsorption. Plant Soil 415:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta VK, Nayak A, Agarwal S, Tyagi I (2014) Potential of activated carbon from waste rubber tire for the adsorption of phenolics: effect of pre-treatment conditions. J Colloid Interface Sci 417:420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haroune L, Saibi S, Cabana H, Bellenger JP (2017) Intracellular enzymes contribution to the biocatalytic removal of pharmaceuticals by Trametes hirsuta. Environ Sci Technol 51:897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang JW (2014) Removing environmental organic pollutants with bioremediation and phytoremediation. Biotechnol Lett 36:1129–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karmacharya MS, Gupta VK, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Jha VK (2016) Removal of as(III) and as(V) using rubber tire derived activated carbon modified with alumina composite. J Mol Liq 216:836–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klüpfel L, Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Sander M (2014) Redox properties of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 48:5601–5611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Konggidinata MI, Chao B, Lian Q, Subramanian R, Zappi M, Gang DD (2017) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of BTEX onto ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC). J Hazard Mater 336:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krause RWM, Thwala LN, Dey T (2012) Silver-impregnated cyclodextrin nanocomposite for safe drinking water. In: Dey T (ed) Nanotechnology for water purification. Universal Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 51–70Google Scholar
  32. Li X, Xu J, de Toledo RA, Shim H (2015) Enhanced removal of naproxen and carbamazepine from wastewater using a novel countercurrent seepage bioreactor immobilized with Phanerochaete chrysosporium under non-sterile conditions. Bioresour Technol 197:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li J, de Toledo RA, Shim H (2017) Multivariate optimization for the simultaneous bioremoval of BTEX and chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas plecoglossicida. J Hazard Mater 321:238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu Y, Yan L, Wang Y, Zhou S, Fu J, Zhang J (2011) Biodegradation of phenolic compounds from cooking wastewater by immobilized white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J Hazard Mater 165:1091–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu Q, de Toledo RA, Xie F, Li J, Shim H (2015) Combined removal of a BTEX, TCE, and cis-DCE mixture using Pseudomonas sp. immobilized on scrap tyres. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:14043–14049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu Q, de Toledo RA, Xie F, Li J, Shim H (2017) Reutilization of waste scrap tyres as the immobilization matrix for the enhanced bioremoval of a monoaromatic hydrocarbons, methyl tert-butyl ether, and chlorinated ethenes mixture from water. Sci Total Environ 583:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magi E, Di Carro M, Mirasole C, Benedetti B (2018) Combining passive sampling and tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of pharmaceuticals and other emerging pollutants in drinking water. Microchem J 136:56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marco-Urrea E, Pérez-Trujillo M, Vicent T, Caminal G (2009) Ability of white-rot fungi to remove selected pharmaceuticals and identification of degradation products of ibuprofen by Trametes versicolor. Chemosphere 74:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moran M, Zogorski JS, Squillace PJ (2007) Chlorinated solvents in groundwater of the United States. Environ Sci Technol 41:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moranty SK, Boehm AB (2014) Escherichia coli removal in biochar-augmented biofilter: effect of infiltration rate, initial bacterial concentration, biochar particle size, and presence of compost. Environ Sci Technol 48:11535–11542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pijanowska A, Kaczorek E, Chrzanowski T, Olszanowski A (2007) Cell hydrophobicity of Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus spp. bacteria and hydrocarbon biodegradation in the presence of Quillaya saponin. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramola S, Mishra T, Rana G, Srivastava RK (2014) Characterization and pollutant removal efficiency of biochar derived from bagasse, bamboo, and Tyre. Environ Monit Assess 186:9023–9039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubilar O, Tortella G, Cea M, Acevedo F, Bustamante M, Gianfreda L, Diez MC (2011) Bioremediation of a Chilean Andisol contaminated with pentachlorophenol (PCP) by solid substrate cultures of white-rot fungi. Biodegradation 22:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salim CJ, Liu H, Kennedy JF (2010) Comparative study of the adsorption on chitosan beads of phthalate esters and their degradation products. Carbohydr Polym 81:640–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salimi M, Esrafili A, Gholami M, Jafari AJ, Kalantary RR, Farzadkia M, Kermani M, Sobhi HR (2017) Contaminants of emerging concern: a review of new approach in AOP technologies. Environ Monitor Assess 189:414.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6097-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. San Miguel G, Lambert SD, Graham NJD (2006) A practical review of the performance of organic and inorganic adsorbents for the treatment of contaminated waters. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:1685–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schäfer AI, Nghlem LD, Waite TD (2003) Removal of the natural hormone estrone from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Environ Sci Technol 37:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shakeri H, Arshadi M, Salvacion JWL (2016) Removal of BTEX by using a surfactant – bio-originated composite. J Colloid Inter Sci 466:186–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simantiraki F, Kollias CG, Maratos D, Hahladakis J, Gidarakos E (2013) Qualitative determination and application of sewage sludge and municipal waste compost for BTEX removal from groundwater. J Environ Chem Eng 1:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun S, Jia L, Li B, Yuan A, Kong L, Qi H, Ma W, Zhang A, Wu Y (2018) The occurrence and fate of PAHs over multiple years in wastewater treatment plant of Harbin, Northeast China. Sci Total Environ 624:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tribedi P, Sil AK (2013) Cell surface hydrophobicity: a key component in the degradation of polyethylene succinate by Pseudomonas sp. AKS2. J Appl Microbiol 116:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. UNESCO (2012) The 4th edition of the UN world water development report. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr4-2012/. Accessed 17 Jan 2018
  53. UNESCO (2017) The United Nations world water development report. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  54. Vasiliadou IA, Sánchez-Vázquez R, Molina R, Martinez F, Melero JA, Bautista LF, Iglesias J, Morales G (2016) Biological removal of pharmaceutical compounds using white-rot fungi concomitant FAME production of the residual biomass. J Environ Manag 180:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vidal CB, Raulino GSC, Barros AL, Lima ACA, Ribeiro JP, Pires MJR, Nascimento RF (2012) BTEX removal from aqueous solutions by HDTMA-modified Y zeolite. J Environ Manag 112:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vukelic D, Boskovic N, Agarski B, Radonic J, Budak I, Pap S, Sekulic MT (2018) Eco-design of a low-cost adsorbent produced from waste cherry kernels. J Clean Prod 174:1620–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang S, Peng Y (2010) Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 156:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wei Z, Seo Y (2010) Trichloroethylene (TCE) adsorption using sustainable organic mulch. J Hazard Mater 181:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wen ZD, Gao DW, Li Z, Ren NQ (2013) Effects of humic acid on phthalate adsorption to vermiculite. Chem Eng J 223:298–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilkinson JL, Hooda PS, Swinden J, Barker J, Barton S (2018) Spatial (bio)accumulation of pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, plasticisers, perfluorinated compounds and metabolites in river sediment, aquatic plants and benthic organisms. Environ Pollut 234:864–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams PRD (2014) Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in public water systems, private wells, and ambient groundwater wells in New Jersey compared to regulatory and human-health benchmarks. Environ Forensic 15:97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wong S, Ngadi N, Inuwa IM, Hassan O (2018) Recent advances in applications of activated carbon from biowaste for wastewater treatment: a short review. J Clean Prod 175:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xu J, Lu Q, de Toledo RA, Shim H (2017) Degradation of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) by an indigenous isolate Acinetobacter sp. SN13. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 117:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ye J, Rensing C, Su J, Zhu YG (2017) From chemical mixtures to antibiotic resistance. J Environ Sci 62:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yu L, Yuan Y, Tang J, Wang Y, Zhou S (2015a) Biochar as an electron shuttle for reductive dechlorination of pentachlorophenol by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Sci Rep 5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16221
  66. Yu S, Lee PK, Hwang S (2015b) Groundwater contamination with volatile organic compounds in urban and industrial area: analysis of co-occurrence and land use effects. Environ Earth Sci 74:3661–3677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yuan Y, Bola N, Prévoteau A, Vithanage M, Biswas JK, Ok YS, Wang H (2017) Applications of biochar in redox-mediated reactions. Bioresour Technol 246:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zahmatkesh M, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2018) A novel approach for application of white rot fungi in wastewater treatment under non-sterile conditions: immobilization of fungi on sorghum. Environ Technol 39:2030–2040Google Scholar
  69. Zhang H, Tang J, Wang L, Liu J, Gurav RG, Sun K (2017) A novel bioremediation strategy for petroleum hydrocarbon pollutants using salt tolerant Corynebacterium variabile HRJ4 and biochar. J Environ Sci 47:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renata Alves de Toledo
    • 1
  • U. Hin Chao
    • 1
  • Tingting Shen
    • 1
  • Qihong Lu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xueqing Li
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hojae Shim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of MacauMacauChina
  2. 2.Environmental Microbiome Research Center and the School of Environmental Science and EngineeringSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Water Environmental Research InstituteShenzhen Academy of Environmental ScienceShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations