Development of hybrid processes for the removal of volatile organic compounds, plasticizer, and pharmaceutically active compound using sewage sludge, waste scrap tires, and wood chips as sorbents and microbial immobilization matrices
This study evaluated the reutilization of waste materials (scrap tires, sewage sludge, and wood chips) to remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs) benzene/toluene/ethylbenzene/xylenes/trichloroethylene/cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (BTEX/TCE/cis-DCE), plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and pharmaceutically active compound carbamazepine from artificially contaminated water. Different hybrid removal processes were developed: (1) 300 mg/L BTEX + 20 mg/L TCE + 10 mg/L cis-DCE + tires + Pseudomonas sp.; (2) 250 mg/L toluene + sewage sludge biochar + Pseudomonas sp.; (3) 100 mg/L DEHP + tires + Acinetobacter sp.; and (4) 20 mg/L carbamazepine + wood chips + Phanerochaete chrysosporium. For the hybrid process (1), the removal of xylenes, TCE, and cis-DCE was enhanced, resulted from the contribution of both physical adsorption and biological immobilization removal. The hybrid process (2) was also superior for the removal of DEHP and required a shorter time (2 days) for the bioremoval. For the process (3), the biochar promoted the microbial immobilization on its surface and substantially enhanced/speed up the bioremoval of toluene. The fungal immobilization on wood chips in the hybrid process (4) also improved the carbamazepine removal considerably (removal efficiencies of 61.3 ± 0.6%) compared to the suspended system without wood chips (removal efficiencies of 34.4 ± 1.8%). These hybrid processes would not only be promising for the bioremediation of environmentally concerned contaminants but also reutilize waste materials as sorbents without any further treatment.
KeywordsBiochar Biosorption Carbamazepine DEHP Microbial immobilization VOCs Waste scrap tires Wood chips
This work was supported by the grants from the Macau Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT/115/2016/A3; FDCT044/2017/AFJ) and the University of Macau Multi-Year Research Grant (MYRG2017-00181-FST).
- Buttiglieri G, Knepper TP (2008) Removal of emerging contaminants in wastewater treatments: conventional activated sludge treatment. In: Barceló D, Petrovic M (eds) Emerging contaminants from industrial and municipal waste. Removal technologies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–36Google Scholar
- Dey T (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles and cellulosic nanofibers to remove arsenic and other heavy metals from water. In: Dey T (ed) Nanotechnology for water purification. Universal Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 1–28Google Scholar
- Forrest M (2014) Recycling and re-use of waste rubber. Smithers Rapra, ShawburyGoogle Scholar
- Krause RWM, Thwala LN, Dey T (2012) Silver-impregnated cyclodextrin nanocomposite for safe drinking water. In: Dey T (ed) Nanotechnology for water purification. Universal Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 51–70Google Scholar
- UNESCO (2012) The 4th edition of the UN world water development report. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr4-2012/. Accessed 17 Jan 2018
- UNESCO (2017) The United Nations world water development report. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
- Yu L, Yuan Y, Tang J, Wang Y, Zhou S (2015a) Biochar as an electron shuttle for reductive dechlorination of pentachlorophenol by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Sci Rep 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16221
- Zahmatkesh M, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2018) A novel approach for application of white rot fungi in wastewater treatment under non-sterile conditions: immobilization of fungi on sorghum. Environ Technol 39:2030–2040Google Scholar