The way forward confronting eco-environmental challenges during land-use practices: a bibliometric analysis
- 56 Downloads
With rapid urbanisation and industrialisation, land-use practice, while satisfying the ever-increasing desires of our material civilisation in the short term, may undermine natural ecosystems on a local, regional and global scale in the long run. Innovative and sustainable land-use practices should be developed in response, so that eco-environmental problems can assessed and dealt with during the whole process of land-use planning, construction, operation, maintenance and management. Using a bibliometric analysis, this study has traced global trends in land-use research from 1992 to 2016, as indexed in the Science Citation Index EXPANDED (SCI-EXPANDED) and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). A novel method called ‘word cluster analysis’ has revealed that hotspot analysis is one of the emerging techniques, tools and strategies used to respond to, improve, and protect deteriorating ecosystems during land use. Based on involving various elements, the emerging analytical techniques and tools, including geographical information systems (GIS) and remote sensing, have attracted attention for their ability to assess and solve increasingly serious eco-environmental problems, such as climate change, deforestation, soil erosion, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and eutrophication. Ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, protected areas, and sustainable development are also potential resilience strategies used to confront eco-environmental destruction. The maximum benefits that can be derived from natural ecosystems should be pursued to achieve environmentally sustainable land-use development, strengthening the socio-economy and eco-environment, as well as enhancing the well-being of people and nature.
KeywordsBibliometric analysis Eco-environmental challenges Land use Science Citation Index EXPANDED (SCI-EXPANDED) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
This work was supported by Inner Mongolia Grassland Talent Plan; Innovation team of quantity quality-ecological monitoring-sustainable utilisation of land resources in Inner Mongolia. The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Yuh-Shan Ho for the technical support and guidance of our manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Bell M, Pavitt K (1997) Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 83–137Google Scholar
- Chang S, Blanco JA, Lo Y (2016) Introductory chapter: land use change ecosystem services and tropical forests. IntechOpen Limited, London, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5772/65840
- Dudley N (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland, pp 1–43Google Scholar
- Escadafal R, Barbero Sierra C, Exbrayat W, Marques MJ, Akhtar Schuster M, El Haddadi A, Ruiz M (2015) First appraisal of the current structure of research on land and soil degradation as evidenced by bibliometric analysis of publications on desertification. Land Degrad Dev 26(5):413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garfield E (1990) Key-words-plus takes you beyond title words. 2. Expanded journal coverage for current-contents-on-diskette includes social and behavioral-sciences. Current Contents 33:5–9Google Scholar
- Lambin EF, Geist HJ (2008) Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, pp 1–8Google Scholar
- Ligmann-Zielinska A (2018) ‘Can you fix it?’ using variance-based sensitivity analysis to reduce the input space of an agent-based model of land use change. In: Thill J-C, Dragicevic S (eds) GeoComputational Analysis and Modeling of Regional Systems, Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Cham, pp 77–99Google Scholar
- Persson O, Danell R, Schneider JW (2009) How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating scholarly communication studies: a Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday, pp 9–24Google Scholar
- Purdom R, Nokes K (2014) Brazil repeals forest code and deforestation accelerates. Environmental protection, available online at http://eponline.com/articles/2014/01/08/Brazil-repeals-forest-code-and-deforestationaccelerates. Aspx Last accessed 23 Nov 2014
- Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensitivity analysis, 1. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, pp 1–312Google Scholar
- Stevens N (1933) How plant pathology can contribute to a land utilization program. Phytopathology 23:404–406Google Scholar
- Teixeira RF, de Souza DM, Curran MP, Antón A, Michelsen O, I Canals LM (2016) Towards consensus on land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative preliminary recommendations based on expert contributions. J Clean Prod 112: 4283–4287Google Scholar
- USDA Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) and Texas A&M AgriLife Research (2018) SWAT-Soil & Water Assessment Tool (https://swat.tamu.edu), Grassland, Soil & Water Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Texas, USA
- Wilson CM, Matthews WH (1970) Man’s impact on the global environment. Report of the Study of Critical Environmental Problems (SCEP). MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Yan W, Yin C, Zhang S (1999) Nutrient budgets and biogeochemistry in an experimental agricultural watershed in southeastern China. Biogeochemistry 45(1):1–19Google Scholar