Advertisement

Performance and recovery of a completely separated partial nitritation and anammox process treating phenol-containing wastewater

  • Wei Wang
  • Chao Pang
  • Julian Muñoz Sierra
  • Zhenhu Hu
  • Xuesong Ren
Appropriate Technologies to Combat Water Pollution
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Anammox process is considered as a promising technology for removing total nitrogen from low-strength ammonium and phenol-containing wastewater. However, it is still a challenge for the anammox process to treat high-strength ammonium and phenol-containing wastewater. A completely separated partial nitritation and anammox (CSPN/A) process was developed to remove total nitrogen from high-strength phenol-containing wastewater. About 92% of COD, 100% of phenol, and 82.4% of total nitrogen were successfully removed at a NH4+-N concentration of 200 mg L−1 with a phenol/NH4+-N mass ratio of 0.5 in the CSPN/A process. Furthermore, a shock loading of 300 mg phenol L−1 with a phenol/NH4+-N mass ratio of 1.5 led to a complete failure of partial nitritation, but the performance was rapidly recovered by the increase of NH4+-N concentration. Although the activities of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria and anammox bacteria were severely inhibited at a phenol/NH4+-N mass ratio of 1.5, the enrichment of efficient phenol degraders in the CSPN stage could strengthen the performance robustness of partial nitritation and anammox process. Therefore, this study presented a new insight on the feasibility of the anammox process for treating high-strength ammonium and phenol-containing wastewater.

Keywords

Partial nitritation Anammox process Phenol Ammonium-oxidizing bacteria Performance robustness Phenol degraders 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, University of Science and Technology of China (KF201702), National Science Foundation of China (51208164), and Project of Science and Technology in Anhui Province of China (1501041130).

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2701_MOESM1_ESM.doc (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 23 kb)

References

  1. Ali M, Chai LY, Min XB, Tang CJ, Afrin S, Liao Q, Wang HY, Peng C, Song YX, Zheng P (2016) Performance and characteristics of a nitritation air-lift reactor under long-term HRT shortening. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 111:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21rd edn. USA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Beristain-Cardoso R, Texier AC, Alpuche-Solís Á, Gómez J, Razo-Flores E (2009) Phenol and sulfide oxidation in a denitrifying biofilm reactor and its microbial community analysis. Process Biochem 44:23–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2008.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettazzi E, Caffaz S, Vannini C, Lubello C (2010) Nitrite inhibition and intermediates effects on Anammox bacteria: a batch-scale experimental study. Process Biochem 45:573–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braga JK, Motteran F, Silva EL, Varesche MBA (2015) Evaluation of bacterial community from anaerobic fluidized bed reactor for the removal of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate from laundry wastewater by 454-pyrosequence. Ecol Eng 82:231–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CJ, Sun FQ, Zhang HQ, Wang JF, Shen YL, Liang XQ (2016) Evaluation of COD effect on anammox process and microbial communities in the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Bioresour Technol 216:571–578.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dapena-Mora A, Campos JL, Mosquera-Corral A, Jetten MSM, Méndez R (2004) Stability of the ANAMMOX process in a gas-lift reactor and a SBR. J Biotechnol 110:159–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egli K, Fanger U, Alvarez PJJ, Siegrist H, van de MEERJR, Zehnder AJB (2001) Enrichment and characterization of an anammox bacterium from a rotating biological contactor treating ammonium-rich leachate. Arch Microbiol 175:198–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002030100255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El-Fadel M, Sleem F, Hashisho J, Saikaly PE, Alameddine I, Ghanimeh S (2018) Impact of SRT on the performance of MBRs for the treatment of high strength landfill leachate. Waste Manag 73:165–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gai HJ, Jiang YB, Qian Y, Kraslawski A (2008) Conceptual design and retrofitting of the coal-gasification wastewater treatment process. Chem Eng J 138:84–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao MM, Diao MH, Yuan SS, Wang YK, Xu H, Wang XH (2017) Effects of phenol on physicochemical properties and treatment performances of partial nitrifying granules in sequencing batch reactors. Biotechnol Rep 13:13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2016.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrity G, Brenner DJ, Kreig N, Staley J (2005) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology vol. 2 part C. The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Giustinianovich EA, Campos JL, Roeckel MD (2016) The presence of organic matter during autotrophic nitrogen removal: problem or opportunity? Sep Purif Technol 166:102–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo Q, Shi ZJ, Yang CC, Huang M, Xu JL, Xu YQ, Ni WM, Jin RC (2017) Individual and combined inhibition of phenol and thiocyanate on microbial activity of partial nitritation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:14207–14217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9024-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang XW, Urata K, Wei QY, Yamashita Y, Hama T, Kawagoshi Y (2016) Fast start-up of partial nitritation as pre-treatment for anammox in membrane bioreactor. Biochem Eng J 105:371–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Isaka K, Sumino T, Tsuneda S (2007) High nitrogen removal performance at moderately low temperature utilizing anaerobic ammonium oxidation reactions. J Biosci Bioeng 103:486–490.  https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.103.486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaroszynski LW, Cicek N, Sparling R, Oleszkiewicz JA (2011) Importance of the operating pH in maintaining the stability of anoxic ammonium oxidation (anammox) activity in moving bed biofilm reactors. Bioresour Technol 102:7051–7056.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jetten MSM, van de Pas-Schoonena KT, Schalk J, van Dongen UGJM, van de Graafa AA, Logemann S, Muyzer G, van Loosdrecht MC, Kuenen JG (1998) The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium. FEMS Microbiol Rev 22:421–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(98)00023-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jia SY, Han HJ, Zhuang HF, Hou BL (2016) The pollutants removal and bacterial community dynamics relationship within a full-scale British gas/Lurgi coal gasification wastewater treatment using a novel system. Bioresour Technol 200:103–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jin RC, Yang GF, Yu JJ, Zheng P (2012) The inhibition of the Anammox process: a review. Chem Eng J 197:67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin RC, Zhang QQ, Yang GF, Xing BS, Ji YX, Chen H (2013) Evaluating the recovery performance of the ANAMMOX process following inhibition by phenol and sulfide. Bioresour Technol 142:162–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim YM, Cho HU, Lee DS, Park D, Park JM (2011) Influence of operational parameters on nitrogen removal efficiency and microbial communities in a full-scale activated sludge process. Water Res 45:5785–5795.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lackner S, Gilbert EM, Vlaeminck SE, Joss A, Horn H, van Loosdrecht MCM (2014) Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences—an application survey. Water Res 55:292–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lauchnor EG, Semprini L (2013) Inhibition of phenol on the rates of ammonia oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea grown under batch, continuous fed, and biofilm conditions. Water Res 47:4692–4700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li HQ, Han HJ, Du MA, Wang W (2011a) Inhibition and recovery of nitrification in treating real coal gasification wastewater with moving bed biofilm reactor. J Environ Sci (China) 23:568–574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60449-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li XM, Xiao Y, Liao DX, Zheng W, Yi T, Yang Q, Zeng GM (2011b) Granulation of simultaneous partial nitrification and Anammox biomass in one single SBR system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 163:1053–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9108-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li JZ, Meng J, Li JL, Wang C, Deng KW, Sun K, Buelna G (2016) The effect and biological mechanism of COD/TN ratio on nitrogen removal in a novel upflow microaerobic sludge reactor treating manure-free piggery wastewater. Bioresour Technol 209:360–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li X, Huang Y, Yuan Y, Bi Z, Liu X (2017) Startup and operating characteristics of an external air-lift reflux partial nitritation-ANAMMOX integrative reactor. Bioresour Technol 238:657–665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang ZW, Han ZY, Yang SY Liang XQ, Du P, Liu GF, Yang Y (2011) A control strategy of partial nitritation in a fixed bed biofilm reactor. Bioresour Technol 102:710–715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang YH, Li D, Zhang XJ, Zeng HP, Yang Z, Zhang J (2014) Microbial characteristics and nitrogen removal of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) process treating low C/N ratio sewage. Bioresour Technol 169:103–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lim JW, Ng SL, Khor SM, Seng CE (2012) Inhibitory effect of 2,4-dichlorophenol on nitrogen removal in a sequencing batch reactor. Korean J Chem Eng 29:886–890.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0267-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu YQ, Tay JH, Ivanov V, Moy BYP, Yu L, Tay STL (2005) Influence of phenol on nitrification by microbial granules. Process Biochem 40:3285–3289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu HY, Zhu LY, Tian XH, Yin YS (2017a) Seasonal variation of bacterial community in biological aerated filter for ammonia removal in drinking water treatment. Water Res 123:668–677.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu QF, Singh VP, Fu ZM, Wang J, Hu L (2017b) An anoxic–aerobic system for simultaneous biodegradation of phenol and ammonia in a sequencing batch reactor. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:11789–11799.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8840-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lotti T, van der Star WRL, Kleerebezem R, Lubello C, van Loosdrecht MCM (2012) The effect of nitrite inhibition on the anammox process. Water Res 46:2559–2569.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma B, Wang SY, Cao SB, Miao YY, Jia FX, Du R, Peng YZ (2016) Biological nitrogen removal from sewage via anammox: recent advances. Bioresour Technol 200:981–990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miao YY, Peng YZ, Zhang L, Li BK, Li XY, Wu L, Wang SM (2018) Partial nitrification-anammox (PNA) treating sewage with intermittent aeration mode: effect of influent C/N ratios. Chem Eng J 334:664–672.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pereira AD, Leal CD, Dias MF, Etchebehere C, Chernicharo CAL, de Araújo JC (2014) Effect of phenol on the nitrogen removal performance and microbial community structure and composition of an anammox reactor. Bioresour Technol 166:103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qin YJ, Cao Y, Ren JY, Wang TY, Han B (2017) Effect of glucose on nitrogen removal and microbial community in anammox-denitrification system. Bioresour Technol 244:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Remmas N, Melidis P, Katsioupi E, Ntougias S (2016) Effects of high organic load on amoA and nirS gene diversity of an intermittently aerated and fed membrane bioreactor treating landfill leachate. Bioresour Technol 220:557–565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shinoda Y, Sakai Y, Uenishi H, Uchihashi Y, Hiraishi A, Yukawa H, Yurimoto H, Kato N (2004) Aerobic and anaerobic toluene degradation by a newly isolated denitrifying bacterium, Thauera sp. strain DNT-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1385–1392.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.3.1385-1392.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tang CJ, Zheng P, Mahmood Q, Chen JW (2009) Start-up and inhibition analysis of the Anammox process seeded with anaerobic granular sludge. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1093–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-009-0593-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toh S, Ashbolt N (2002) Adaptation of anaerobic ammonium-oxidising consortium to synthetic coke-ovens wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:344–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-1007-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang B, Peng YZ, Guo YY, Yuan Y, Zhao MY, Wang SY (2016) Impact of partial nitritation degree and C/N ratio on simultaneous sludge fermentation, denitrification and Anammox process. Bioresour Technol 219:411–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang W, Wu BT, Pan SL, Yang K, Hu ZH, Yuan SJ (2017) Performance robustness of the UASB reactors treating saline phenolic wastewater and analysis of microbial community structure. J Hazard Mater 331:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang QL, Song K, Hao XD, Wei J, Pijuan M, van Loosdrecht MCM, Zhao HJ (2018) Evaluating death and activity decay of Anammox bacteria during anaerobic and aerobic starvation. Chemosphere 201:25–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu J, He CD, van Loosdrecht MCM, Pérez J (2016) Selection of ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) over nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) based on conversion rates. Chem Eng J 304:953–961.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wyffels S, van Hulle SWH, Boeckx P, Volcke EIP, van Cleemput O, Vanrolleghem PA, Verstraete W (2004) Modeling and simulation of oxygen-limited partial nitritation in a membrane-assisted bioreactor (MBR). Biotechnol Bioeng 86:531–542.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu CY, Han HJ, Jia SY, Zhao Q (2016) Influence of phenol on ammonia removal in an intermittent aeration bioreactor treating biologically pretreated coal gasification wastewater. J Environ Sci (China) 43:99–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang GF, Jin RC (2012) The joint inhibitory effects of phenol, copper (II), oxytetracycline (OTC) and sulfide on Anammox activity. Bioresour Technol 126:187–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang GF, Guo XL, Chen SX, Liu JH, Guo LX, Jin RC (2013) The evolution of Anammox performance and granular sludge characteristics under the stress of phenol. Bioresour Technol 137:332–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang ZJ, Li YY, Chen SH, Wang SM, Bao XD (2012) Simultaneous nitrogen and carbon removal from swine digester liquor by the canon process and denitrification. Bioresour Technol 114:84–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang XW, Qu YY, Ma Q, Zhang ZJ, Li DX, Wang JW, Shen WL, Shen E, Zhou JT (2015) Illumina MiSeq sequencing reveals diverse microbial communities of activated sludge systems stimulated by different aromatics for indigo biosynthesis from indole. PLoS One 10:e0125732.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125732 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang L, Narita Y, Gao L, Ali M, Oshiki M, Ishii S, Okabe S (2017) Microbial competition among anammox bacteria in nitrite-limited bioreactors. Water Res 125:249–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhuang HF, Han HJ, Shan SD (2016) Treatment of real coal gasification wastewater using a novel integrated system of anoxic hybrid two stage aerobic processes: performance and the role of pure oxygen microbubble. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:11916–11926.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6393-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chao Pang
    • 1
  • Julian Muñoz Sierra
    • 3
    • 4
  • Zhenhu Hu
    • 1
  • Xuesong Ren
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Municipal Engineering, School of Civil and Hydraulic EngineeringHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina
  3. 3.Section Sanitary Engineering, Department of Water ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  4. 4.KWR Watercycle Research InstituteNieuwegeinThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations