Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 22, pp 21671–21681 | Cite as

Cadmium phytoextraction potential of king grass (Pennisetum sinese Roxb.) and responses of rhizosphere bacterial communities to a cadmium pollution gradient

  • Li Hu
  • Ru Wang
  • Xianglin Liu
  • Bo Xu
  • Tuanhui Xie
  • Yunyun Li
  • Mingkuang Wang
  • Guo Wang
  • Yanhui ChenEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Screening for tolerant and high biomass producing plants is important for phytoextraction efforts in remediating agricultural soils contaminated by heavy metals. We carried out a greenhouse experiment involving a soil cadmium (Cd) concentration gradient (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg kg−1) to assess growth and phytoextraction capacity of king grass (Pennisetum sinese Roxb.) in soils contaminated by Cd and to explore changes in diversity and structure of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities in response to long-term Cd pollution. A significant positive relationship was observed between Cd concentrations in P. sinese stems, leaves, and roots and soil Cd concentration. The highest Cd concentrations in shoots and roots were 28.87 and 34.01 mg kg−1, respectively, at 8 mg kg−1of soil Cd supply. Total extraction amounts of Cd in P. sinese were 0.22–1.86 mg plant−1 corresponding to treatment with 0.5–8 mg kg−1 Cd. Most of the Cd was stored in shoots, and the largest accumulation was 1.56 mg plant−1 with 54.02 g dry shoot weight. After phytoextraction, changes in rhizobacterial community composition were found with different levels of Cd application, whereas there were no clear trends in diversity and richness. Results of this study show the feasibility of P. sinese in accumulating Cd and provide support for its application in remediation of soil moderately contaminated by Cd.

Keywords

Cadmium Pennisetum sinese Roxb. Phytoextraction Soil bacterial community 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Li and his colleague for help with MiSeq sequencing.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301576) and the Research Fund for science and technology project of Fujian (2017R1004-3). Part of this work was supported by Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science.

References

  1. Baudoin E, Benizri E, Guckert A (2003) Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1183–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg J, Brandt KK, Al-Soud WA, Holm PE, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Nybroea O (2012) Selection for Cu-tolerant bacterial communities with altered composition, but unaltered richness, via long-term Cu exposure. Appl Environ Microb 78:7438–7446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R (2011) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4516–4522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM, Betley J, Fraser L, Bauer M, Gormley N, Gilbert JA, Smith G, Knight R (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Hu L, Liu X, Deng Y, Liu M, Xu B, Wang M, Wang G (2017) Influences of king grass (Pennisetum sinese Roxb.)-enhanced approaches for phytoextraction and microbial communities in multi-metal contaminated soil. Geoderma 307:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui H, Fan Y, Yang J, Xu L, Zhou J, Zhu Z (2016) In situ phytoextraction of copper and cadmium and its biological impacts in acidic soil. Chemosphere 161:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng L, Zeng G, Fan C, Lu L, Chen X, Chen M, Wu H, He X, He Y (2015) Response of rhizosphere microbial community structure and diversity to heavy metal co-pollution in arable soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:8259–8269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desai C, Parikh RY, Vaishnav T, Shouche YS, Madamwar D (2009) Tracking the influence of long-term chromium pollution on soil bacterial community structures by comparative analyses of 16S rRNA gene phylotypes. Res Microbiol 160:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epelde L, Becerril JM, Allica JH, Barrutia O, Garbisu C (2008) Functional diversity as indicatorof the recovery of soil health derived from Thlaspi caerulescens growth and metal phytoextraction. Appl Soil Ecol 39:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epelde L, Mijangos I, Becerril JM, Garbisu C (2009) Soil microbial community as bioindicator of the recovery of soil functioning derived from metal phytoextraction with sorghum. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1788–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1353–1364Google Scholar
  12. Garbisu C, Alkorta I (2001) Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour Technol 77:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo XY, Zuo YB, Wang BR, Li JM, Ma YB (2010) Toxicity and accumulation of copper and nickel in maize plants cropped on calcareous and acidic field soils. Plant Soil 333:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson ML (1985) Soil chemical analysis: advanced course, 2nd edn. University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  15. Jusselme MD, Miambi E, Mora P, Diouf M, Rouland-Lefèvre C (2013) Increased lead availability and enzyme activities in root-adhering soil of Lantana camara during phytoextraction in the presence of earthworms. Sci Total Environ 445-446:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khan S, Hesham AEL, Qiao M, Rehman S, He J (2010) Effects of Cd and Pb on soil microbial community structure and activities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:288–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kocoń A, Jurga B (2017) The evaluation of growth and phytoextraction potential of Miscanthus × giganteus and Sidahermaphrodita on soil contaminated simultaneously with Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4990–5000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li J, Sun Y, Yin Y, Ji R, Wu J, Wang X, Guo H (2010) Ethyl lactate-EDTA composite system enhances the remediation of the cadmium-contaminated soil by autochthonous willow (Salix × aureo-pendula CL ‘J1011’) in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. J Hazard Mater 181:673–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li X, Rui J, Mao Y, Yannarell A, Mackie R (2014) Dynamics of the bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of a maize cultivar. Soil Biol Biochem 68:392–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li J, Hu H, Ma Y, Wang J, Liu Y, He J (2015) Long-term nickel exposure altered the bacterial community composition but not diversity in two contrasting agricultural soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:10496–10505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu X, Peng K, Wang A, Lian C, Shen Z (2010) Cadmium accumulation and distribution in populations of Phytolacca americana L. and the role of transpiration. Chemosphere 78:1136–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lombi E, Zhao FJ, Duniham SJ, McGarth SP (2000) Cadmium accumulation in populations of Thlaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi goesingense. New Phytol 145:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu M, Zhang Z, Wang J, Zhang M, Xu Y, Wu X (2014a) Interaction of heavy metals and pyrene on their fates in soil and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Environ Sci Technol 48:1158–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu Q, Tang L, Wang S, Huang B, Chen Y, Chen X (2014b) An investigation on the characteristics of cellulose nanocrystals from Pennisetum sinese. Biomass Bioenergy 70:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma C, Ming H, Lin C, Naidu R, Bolan N (2016) Phytoextraction of heavy metal from tailing waste using Napier grass. Catena 136:74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGrath SP, Lombi E, Gray CW, Caille N, Dunham SJ, Zhao FJ (2006) Field evaluation of Cd and Zn phytoextraction potential by the hyperaccumulators Thlaspi caerulescens and Arabidopsis halleri. Environ Pollut 141:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MEP, MLR (2014) The communique of national investigation of soil contamination. Ministry of environmental protection of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.mep.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/qt/201404/t20140417_270670.htm
  28. ÓDonnell AG, Seasman M, Macrae A, Waite I, Davies JT (2001) Plants and fertilisers as drivers of change in microbial community structure and function in soils. Plant Soil 232:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosselli W, Keller C, Boschi K (2003) Phytoextraction capacity of trees growing on a metal contaminated soil. Plant Soil 256:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shi G, Cai Q (2009) Cadmium tolerance and accumulation in eight potential energy crops. Biotechnol Adv 27:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh BK, Quince C, Macdonald CA, Khachane A, Thomas N, Al-Soud WA, Sorensen SJ, He Z, White D, Sinclair A, Crooks B, Zhou J, Campbell CD (2014) Loss of microbial diversity in soils is coincident with reductions in some specialized functions. Environ Microbiol 16:2408–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Solís-Domínguez FA, Gonźalez-Chávez MC, Carrillo-Gonźalez R, Rodŕıguez-Vázquez R (2007) Accumulation and localization of cadmium in Echinochloa polystachya grown within a hydroponic system. J Hazard Mater 141:630–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sun Y, Zhou Q, Wang L, Liu W (2009) Cadmium tolerance and accumulation characteristics of Bidens pilosa L. as a potential Cd-hyperaccumulator. J Hazard Mater 161:808–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sun SY, Dafforn KA, Brown MV, Johnston EL (2012) Bacterial communities are sensitive indicators of contaminant stress. Mar Pollut Bull 64:1029–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vogel-Mikus K, Drobne D, Regvar M (2005) Zn, Cd and Pb accumulation and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of pennycress Thlaspi praecox Wulf. (Brassicaceae) from the vicinity of a lead mine and smelter in Slovenia. Environ Pollut 133:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu F, Yang W, Zhang J, Zhou L (2010) Cadmium accumulation and growth responses of a poplar (Populus deltoids × Populus nigra) in cadmium contaminated purple soil and alluvial soil. J Hazard Mater 177:268–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiao W, Wang H, Li T, Zhu Z, Zhang J, He Z, Yang X (2013) Bioremediation of Cd and carbendazim co-contaminated soil by Cd-hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii associated with carbendazim-degrading bacterial strains. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:380–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ (2006) Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci Total Environ 368:456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang S, Chen M, Li T, Xu X, Deng L (2010a) A newly found cadmium accumulator—Malva sinensis Cavan. J Hazard Mater 173:705–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang X, Xia H, Li Z, Zhuang P, Gao B (2010b) Potential of four forage grasses in remediation of Cd and Zn contaminated soils. Bioresour Technol 101:2063–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang X, Zhang X, Gao B, Li Z, Xia H, Li H, Li J (2014) Effect of cadmium on growth, photosynthesis, mineral nutrition and metal accumulation of an energy crop, king grass (Pennisetum americanum × P. purpureum). Biomass Bioenergy 67:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang W, Chen L, Zhang R, Lin K (2016) High throughput sequencing analysis of the joint effects of BDE209-Pb on soil bacterial community structure. J Hazard Mater 301:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao FJ, Lombi E, McGrath SP (2003) Assessing the potential for zinc and cadmium phytoremediation with the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Soil 249:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao FJ, Jiang RF, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2006) Cadmium uptake, translocation and tolerance in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. New Phytol 172:646–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhu Z, Yang X, Wang K, Huang H, Zhang X, Fang H, Li T, Alva AK, He Z (2012) Bioremediation of Cd-DDT co-contaminated soil using the Cd-hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii and DDT-degrading microbes. J Hazard Mater 235-236:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li Hu
    • 1
  • Ru Wang
    • 1
  • Xianglin Liu
    • 1
  • Bo Xu
    • 1
  • Tuanhui Xie
    • 1
  • Yunyun Li
    • 1
  • Mingkuang Wang
    • 1
  • Guo Wang
    • 1
  • Yanhui Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Health and RegulationFujian Agriculture and Forestry UniversityFuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations