Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 12, pp 11558–11564 | Cite as

Controlling risks of P water pollution by sorption on soils, pyritic material, granitic material, and different by-products: effects of pH and incubation time

  • Aurora Romar-Gasalla
  • Juan Carlos Nóvoa-Muñoz
  • Manuel Arias-Estévez
  • María J. Fernández-Sanjurjo
  • Esperanza Álvarez-Rodríguez
  • Avelino Núñez-DelgadoEmail author
Low cost organic and inorganic sorbents to fight soil and water pollution

Abstract

Batch experiments were used to test P sorbent potential of soil samples, pyritic and granitic materials, mussel shell, mussel shell ash, sawdust, and slate waste fines for different pH and incubation times. Maximum P sorption varied in a wide range of pH: < 4 for pyritic material, 4–6 for forest soil, > 5 for slate fines, > 6 for shell ash, and pH 6–8 for mussel shell. P sorption was rapid (< 24 h) for forest soil, shell ash, pyritic material, and fine shell. On the opposite side, it was clearly slower for vineyard soil, granitic material, slate fines, pine sawdust, and coarse shell, with increased P sorption even 1 month later. For any incubation time, P sorption was > 90% in shell ash, whereas forest soil, pyritic material, and fine shell showed sorption rates approaching 100% within 24 h of incubation. These results could be useful to manage and/or recycle the sorbents tested when focusing on P immobilization or removal, in circumstances where pH changes and where contact time may vary from hours to days, thus aiding to diminish P pollution and subsequent eutrophication risks, promoting conservation and sustainability.

Keywords

By-products Forest and vineyard soils Phosphorus Recycling Sorption Water pollution 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Government of Spain), through grant numbers CGL2012-36805-C02-01 and CGL2012-36805-C02-02. It also received funds from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (FEDER in Spain), being a complement to the previous grants, without additional grant number.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2267_MOESM1_ESM.docx (28 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 27 kb)

References

  1. Agbenin JO (1995) Phosphorus sorption by three cultivated savanna alfisols as influenced by pH. Fertilizer Res 44(2):107–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen BL, Mallarino AP (2006) Relationships between extractable soil phosphorus and phosphorus saturation after long-term fertilizer or manure application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:454–463.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson DM, Lindquist NL (1985) Time-course measurements of phosphorus depletion and cyst formation in the dinoflagellate Gonyaulax tamarensis Lebour. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 86(1):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(85)90039-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anjos JT, Rowell DL (1987) The effect of lime on phosphorus adsorption and barley growth in three acid soils. Plant Soil 103(1):75–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arias JS, Fernández PG (2001) Changes in phosphorus adsorption in a palexerult amended with limestone and/or gypsum. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32(5–6):751–758.  https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100103906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arias M, Da Silva-Carballal J, García-Río L, Mejuto J, Núñez A (2006) Retention of phosphorus by iron and aluminum-oxides-coated quartz particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 295(1):65–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arshadi M, Foroughifard S, Etemad Gholtash J, Abbaspourrad A (2015) Preparation of iron nanoparticles-loaded Spondias purpurea seed waste as an excellent adsorbent for removal of phosphate from synthetic and natural waters. J Colloid Interface Sci 452:69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkowitz J, Anderson MA, Amrhein C (2006) Influence of aging on phosphorus sorption to alum floc in lake water. Water Res 40(5):911–916.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soils. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300007189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckingham SE, Neff J, Maybach BT, Reynolds RL (2010) Chemical and textural controls on phosphorus mobility in drylands of southeastern Utah. Biogeochemistry 100:105–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9408-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campos M, Antonangelo JA, Reynaldo L, Alleoni F (2016) Phosphorus sorption index in humid tropical soils. Soil Tillage Res 156:110–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carreira JA, Viiñegla B, Lajtha K (2006) Secondary CaCO3 and precipitation of P–Ca compounds control the retention of soil P in arid ecosystems. J Arid Environ 64:460–473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chowdhury RB, Moore GA, Weatherley AJ, Arora M (2017) Key sustainability challenges for the global phosphorus resource their implications for global food security and options for mitigation. J Clean Prod 140(2:945–963.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das J, Patra BS, Baliarsingh N, Parida KM (2006) Adsorption of phosphate by layered double hydroxides in aqueous solutions. Appl Clay Sci 32(3–4):252–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2006.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devau N, Le Cadre E, Hinsinger P, Gerard F (2010) A mechanistic model for understanding root-induced chemical changes controlling phosphorus availability. Ann Bot 105:1183–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández-Pazos MT, Garrido-Rodríguez B, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Núñez-Delgado A, Álvarez E (2013) Cr(VI) adsorption and desorption on soils and bio-sorbents. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1366-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garnier J, Cugier P, Billen G, Guillaud JF, Ménesguen A (2005) Modelling the eutrophication of the Seine Bight (France) under historical present and future riverine nutrient loading. J Hydrol 304(1–4):381–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grace MA, Clifford E, Healy MG (2016) The potential for the use of waste products from a variety of sectors in water treatment processes. J Clean Prod 137:788–802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guppy CN, Menzies NW, Moody PW, Blamey FPC (2005) Competitive sorption reactions between phosphorus and organic matter in soil: a review. Aust J Soil Res 43:189–202.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR04049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haynes RJ (1982) Effects of liming on phosphate availability. Plant Soil 68:289–308.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197935 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237(2):173–195.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013351617532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hongshao Z, Stanforth R (2001) Competitive adsorption of phosphate and arsenate on goethite. Environ Sci Technol 35:4753–4757.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es010890y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonasson RG, Martin RR, Giuliacci ME, Tazaki K (1988) Surface reactions of goethite with phosphate. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 84:2311–2315.  https://doi.org/10.1039/F19888402311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kyllingsbæk A, Hansen JF (2007) Development in nutrient balances in Danish agriculture 1980–2004. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 79:267–280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-007-9114-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu S, Tan X, Liu Y, Gu Y, Zeng G, Hu X, Wang H, Zhou L, Jiang L, Zhao B (2016) Production of biochars from Ca impregnated ramie biomass (Boehmeria nivea (L) Gaud) and their phosphate removal potential. RSC Adv 6:5871–5880.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA22142K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lürling M, Mackay E, Reitzel K, Spears BM (2016) Editorial—a critical perspective on geo-engineering for eutrophication management in lakes. Water Res 97:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/jwatres201603035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maguire RO, Foy RH, Baily JS, Sims JT (2001) Estimation of the phosphorus sorption capacity of acidic soils in Ireland. Eur J Soil Sci 52:479–487.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00394.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGechan MB, Lewis DR (2002) SW—soil and water: sorption of phosphorus by soil part 1: principles equations and models. Biosyst Eng 82:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mejías JH, Alfaro M, Harsh J (2013) Approaching environmental phosphorus limits on a volcanic soil of southern Chile. Geoderma 207:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.04.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mengel K (1985) Dynamics and availability of major nutrients in soils. Adv Soil Sci 2:96–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5088-3_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naidu R, Syers JK, Tillman RW, Kirkman JH (1990) Effect of liming and added phosphate on charge characteristics of acid soils. J Soil Sci 41:157–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00053.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Núñez-Delgado A, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Fernández-Calviño D (2015) Perspectives on the use of by-products to treat soil and water pollution. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 210:199–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Otero M, Cutillas-Barreiro L, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Núñez-Delgado A (2015) Cr(VI) sorption/desorption on untreated and mussel-shell-treated soil materials: fractionation and effects of pH and chromium concentration. Solid Earth 6:373–382.  https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-373-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paulter MC, Sims JT (2000) Relationships between soil test phosphorus soluble phosphorus and phosphorus saturation in Delaware soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:765–773.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642765x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pereira JR, De-Faria CMB (1998) Phosphorus sorption in some soils of the semi-arid region of the Brazilian northeast. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 33:1179–1184Google Scholar
  36. Pierzynski GM, Mcdowell RW, Sims JT (2005) Chemistry cycling and potential movement of inorganic phosphorus in soils. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus agriculture and the environment. ASA, Madison, pp 53–86.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr46.c3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quintáns-Fondo A, Ferreira-Coelho G, Paradelo-Núñez R, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez-Delgado A (2016) Promoting sustainability in the mussel industry: mussel shell recycling to fight fluoride pollution. J Clean Prod 131:485–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rahnemaie R, Hiemstra T, Van Riemsdijk WH (2007) Geometry, charge distribution and surface speciation of phosphate on goethite. Langmuir 23(7):3680–3689.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la062965n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rivas-Pérez IM, Paradelo-Núñez R, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez-Delgado A (2015) As(V) and P competitive sorption on soils, by-products and waste materials. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(12):15706–15715.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121215016
  40. Romar-Gasalla A, Rivas-Pérez IM, Paradelo-Núñez R, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez-Delgado A (2016) Phosphorus retention on forest and vineyard soil samples mussel shell pine-sawdust and on pyritic granitic and waste materials. Geoderma 280:8–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanyal SK, De-Datta SK (1991) Chemistry of phosphorus transformation in soil. Adv Soil Sci 16:1–20Google Scholar
  42. Sato S, Comerford NB (2005) Influence of soil pH on inorganic phosphorus sorption and desorption in a humid brazilian Ultisol. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 29(5):685–694.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3144-8_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seco-Reigosa N, Bermúdez-Couso A, Garrido-Rodríguez B, Arias-Estévez M, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez- Delgado A (2013) As(V) retention on soils and forest by-products and other waste materials. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:6574–6583.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1730-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seco-Reigosa N, Cutillas-Barreiro L, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Núñez-Delgado A (2014) Mixtures including wastes from the mussel shell processing industry: retention of arsenic chromium and mercury. J Clean Prod 84:680–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seco-Reigosa N, Cutillas-Barreiro L, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Arias-Estévez M, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Núñez-Delgado A (2015) Adsorption desorption and fractionation of As(V) on untreated and mussel shell-treated granitic material. Solid Earth 6:337–346.  https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-337-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shen H, Wang Z, Zhou A, Chen J, Hu M, Donga X, Xiab Q (2015) Adsorption of phosphate onto amine functionalized nano-sized magnetic polymer adsorbents: mechanism and magnetic effect. RSC Adv 5(28):22080–22090.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA14630A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shinohara R, Imai A, Kohzu A, Tomioka N, Furusato E, Satou T, Sano T, Komatsu K, Miura S, Shimotori K (2016) Dynamics of particulate phosphorus in a shallow eutrophic lake. Sci Total Environ 563–564:413–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strauss R, Brümmer GW, Barrow NJ (1997) Effects of crystallinity of goethite: II rates of sorption and desorption of phosphate. Eur J Soil Sci 48(1):101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00189.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tian Y, Wang Q, Zhang W, Gao L (2016) Reducing environmental risk of excessively fertilized soils and improving cucumber growth by Caragana microphylla-straw compost application in long-term continuous cropping systems. Sci Total Environ 544:251–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Torrent J, Schwertmann U, Barron V (1992) Fast and slow phosphate sorption by goethite-rich natural minerals. Clay Clay Miner 40:14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1992.0400103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Torrent J, Barbens E, Gil-Sotres F (2007) Agriculture as a source of phosphorus for eutrophication in southerm Europe. Soil Use Manage 23:25–35.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00122.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vega FL, Van Riemsdijk WH (2011) Competitive and synergistic effects in pH dependent phosphate adsorption in soils: LCD modeling. Liping Weng Environ Sci Technol 45:8420–8428.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es201844d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang Y, Shen Z, Niua J, Liu R (2009) Adsorption of phosphorus on sediments from the three-gorges reservoir (China) and the relation with sediment compositions. J Hazard Mater 162:92–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang R, Guo S, Li N, Li R, Zhang Y, Jiang J, Wang Z, Liu Q, Wu D, Sun Q, Du L, Zhao M (2015) Phosphorus accumulation and sorption in calcareous soil under long-term fertilization. PLoS One 10(8):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yin H, Han M, Tang W (2016) Phosphorus sorption and supply from eutrophic lake sediment amended with thermally-treated calcium-rich attapulgite and a safety evaluation. Chem Eng J 285:671–678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yolcubal I, Akyol NH (2008) Adsorption and transport of arsenate in carbonate-rich soils: coupled effects of nonlinear and rate-limited sorption. Chemosphere 73:1300–1307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zach-Maor A, Semiat R, Shemer H (2011a) Synthesis, performance, and modeling of immobilized nano-sized magnetite layer for phosphate removal. J Colloid Interface Sci 357(2):440–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zach-Maor A, Semiat R, Shemer H (2011b) Adsorption–desorption mechanism of phosphate by immobilized nano-sized magnetite layer: interface and bulk interactions. J Colloid Interface Sci 363(2):608–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang H, Selim HM (2008) Reaction and transport of arsenic in soils: equilibrium and kinetic modeling. Adv Agron 98:45–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00202-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aurora Romar-Gasalla
    • 1
  • Juan Carlos Nóvoa-Muñoz
    • 2
  • Manuel Arias-Estévez
    • 2
  • María J. Fernández-Sanjurjo
    • 1
  • Esperanza Álvarez-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Avelino Núñez-Delgado
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Engineering Polytechnic SchoolUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaLugoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, Faculty of SciencesUniversidade de VigoOurenseSpain

Personalised recommendations