Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Assessing the use of sand, peat soil, and pine bark for the attenuation of polar pesticides from agricultural run-off: a bench-scale column experiment

Abstract

Biofilters have been shown to be efficient for removing pollutants from different water effluents, but little information is available about their capacity to remove highly polar pesticides from agricultural run-off waters. In this study, we assess the capacity of three different biofilter-supporting materials (sand, peat soil, and pine bark) to remove five phenoxyacid herbicides (mecoprop, dicamba, MCPA, dichlorprop and 2,4-D) and five non-ionic pesticides (atrazine, simazine, fenitrotion, diazinon, and alachlor) from real agricultural run-off waters. The experimental design included three columns 120 cm in length and 15 cm in diameter, each filled with 100 cm of one of the selected supporting materials. After 30 days of acclimation, the columns were fed with agricultural run-off water spiked at 10 μg L−1 with each of the studied pesticides for 20 days at a hydraulic loading rate (HLR) of 0.32 m day−1. The results show that the sand filter was the best supporting material for removing phenoxyacid herbicides (77% on average), whereas peat soil and pine bark were best for removing non-ionic pesticides (72% on average). The attenuation of mecoprop and dichlorprop correlated negatively with the enantiomeric fraction. Therefore, this study shows that the use of waste-to-product materials in biofilter systems is a good solution for removing pollutants from agricultural run-off waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Bælum J, Prestat E, David MM, Strobel BW, Jacobsen CS (2012) Modeling of phenoxy acid herbicide mineralization and growth of microbial degraders in 15 soils monitored by quantitative real-time PCR of the functional tfdA gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5305–5312

  2. Bertelkamp C, Schoutteten K, Vanhaecke L, Vanden Bussche J, Callewaert C, Boon N, Singhal N, van der Hoek JP, Verliefde ARD (2015) A laboratory-scale column study comparing organic micropollutant removal and microbial diversity for two soil types. Sci Total Environ 536:632–638

  3. Bertelkamp C, van der Hoek JP, Schoutteten K, Hulpiau L, Vanhaecke L, Vanden Bussche J, Cabo AJ, Callewaert C, Boon N, Löwenberg J, Singhal N, Verliefde ARD (2016) The effect of feed water dissolved organic carbon concentration and composition on organic micropollutant removal and microbial diversity in soil columns simulating river bank filtration. Chemosphere 144:932–939

  4. Boyd PM, Baker JL, Mickelson SK, Ahmed SI (2003) Pesticide transport with surface runoff and subsurface drainage through a vegetative filter strip. Agric Biosyst Eng Publ 46:9

  5. Buser H-R, Müller MD, Theobald N (1998) Occurrence of the pharmaceutical drug clofibric acid and the herbicide mecoprop in various Swiss Lakes and in the North Sea. Environ Sci Technol 32:188–192

  6. Cao X, Liu J, Meng X (2010): Evaluation of a slow sand filter in advanced wastewater treatment, 2010 international conference on mechanic automation and control engineering, MACE2010, pp 4942–4944

  7. Capri E, Trevisan M, Gennari M, Nègre M, Walker A (1994) Alachlor degradation and sorption in soil: comparison of two different experimental techniques. Toxicol Environ Chem 43:41–49

  8. Davis AM, Thorburn PJ, Lewis SE, Bainbridge ZT, Attard SJ, Milla R, Brodie JE (2013) Environmental impacts of irrigated sugarcane production: herbicide run-off dynamics from farms and associated drainage systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:123–135

  9. Escolà Casas M, Nielsen TK, Kot W, Hansen LH, Johansen A, Bester K (2017) Degradation of mecoprop in polluted landfill leachate and waste water in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Res 121:213–220

  10. Eurostat (2013) Agri-environmental indicator—pesticide pollution of water

  11. Felding G, Sørensen JB, Mogensen BB, Hansen AC (1995) Phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicides in run-off. Sci Total Environ 175:207–218

  12. Feng W, Hatt BE, McCarthy DT, Fletcher TD, Deletic A (2012) Biofilters for stormwater harvesting: understanding the treatment performance of key metals that pose a risk for water use. Environ Sci Technol 46:5100–5108

  13. Franco J, Matamoros V (2016) Mitigation of polar pesticides across a vegetative filter strip. A mesocosm study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:25402–25411

  14. Frková Z, Johansen A, de Jonge LW, Olsen P, Gosewinkel U, Bester K (2016) Degradation and enantiomeric fractionation of mecoprop in soil previously exposed to phenoxy acid herbicides—new insights for bioremediation. Sci Total Environ 569–570:1457–1465

  15. Gikas GD (2014) Water quality of drainage canals and assessment of nutrient loads using QUAL2Kw. Environ Process 1:369–385

  16. Harner T, Wiberg K, Norstrom R (2000) Enantiomer fractions are preferred to enantiomer ratios for describing chiral signatures in environmental analysis. Environ Sci Technol 34:218–220

  17. Harrison I, Williams GM, Carlick CA (2003) Enantioselective biodegradation of mecoprop in aerobic and anaerobic microcosms. Chemosphere 53:539–549

  18. Hedegaard MJ, Arvin E, Corfitzen CB, Albrechtsen H-J (2014) Mecoprop (MCPP) removal in full-scale rapid sand filters at a groundwater-based waterworks. Sci Total Environ 499:257–264

  19. Kulikova NA, Perminova IV (2002) Binding of atrazine to humic substances from soil, peat, and coal related to their structure. Environ Sci Technol 36:3720–3724

  20. Nakhla G, Farooq S (2003) Simultaneous nitrification–denitrification in slow sand filters. J Hazard Mater 96:291–303

  21. Oravec M, Šimek Z, Holoubek I (2010) The effect of humic acid and ash on enantiomeric fraction change of chiral pollutants. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 359:60–65

  22. Paszko T, Muszyński P, Materska M, Bojanowska M, Kostecka M, Jackowska I (2016) Adsorption and degradation of phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicides in soils: a review. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:271–286

  23. Paül V, McKenzie FH (2013) Peri-urban farmland conservation and development of alternative food networks: insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Land Use Policy 30:94–105

  24. Razzaque AHM, Hanafi MM (2005) Leaching of nitrogen in peat soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 35:1793–1799

  25. Rodriguez-Cruz S, Andrades MS, Sanchez-Camazano M, Sanchez-Martin MJ (2007) Relationship between the adsorption capacity of pesticides by wood residues and the properties of woods and pesticides. Environ Sci Technol 41:3613–3619

  26. Rodríguez-Cruz MS, Marín-Benito JM, Ordax JM, Azejjel H, Sánchez-Martín MJ (2012) Influence of pine or oak wood on the degradation of alachlor and metalaxyl in soil. J Environ Manag 95(Supplement):S228–S232

  27. Romero E, Matallo MB, Peña A, Sánchez-Rasero F, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Dios G (2001) Dissipation of racemic mecoprop and dichlorprop and their pure R-enantiomers in three calcareous soils with and without peat addition. Environ Pollut 111:209–215

  28. Ruane EM, Murphy PNC, French P, Healy MG (2014) Comparison of a stratified and a single-layer laboratory sand filter to treat dairy soiled water from a farm-scale woodchip filter. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1915

  29. Rügge K, Juhler RK, Broholm MM, Bjerg PL (2002) Degradation of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of the herbicides MCPP and dichlorprop in a continuous field-injection experiment. Water Res 36:4160–4164

  30. Sanchez-Martin MJ, Piccolo A, Sanchez-Camazano M, Arienzo M (1997) Diazinon leaching through a sandy soil amended with different humic materials. Toxicol Environ Chem 62:21–33

  31. Sánchez-Rasero F, Matallo MB, Dios G, Romero E, Peña A (1998) Simultaneous determination and enantiomeric resolution of mecoprop and dichlorprop in soil samples by high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 799:355–360

  32. Schäfer RB, Caquet T, Siimes K, Mueller R, Lagadic L, Liess M (2007) Effects of pesticides on community structure and ecosystem functions in agricultural streams of three biogeographical regions in Europe. Sci Total Environ 382:272–285

  33. Schaffer M, Kröger KF, Nödler K, Ayora C, Carrera J, Hernández M, Licha T (2015) Influence of a compost layer on the attenuation of 28 selected organic micropollutants under realistic soil aquifer treatment conditions: insights from a large scale column experiment. Water Res 74:110–121

  34. Schubert J (2002) Hydraulic aspects of riverbank filtration—field studies. J Hydrol 266:145–161

  35. Vymazal J, Březinová T (2015) The use of constructed wetlands for removal of pesticides from agricultural runoff and drainage: a review. Environ Int 75:11–20

  36. Wauchope RD (1978): The pesticide content of surface water draining from agricultural fields—a Review1. J Environ Qual 7

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. V. M. would like to acknowledge a Ramon y Cajal contract from the MEC (RYC-2013-12522).

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MEC) through project CTM2012-33547.

Author information

Correspondence to Víctor Matamoros.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 400 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matamoros, V., Franco, J. Assessing the use of sand, peat soil, and pine bark for the attenuation of polar pesticides from agricultural run-off: a bench-scale column experiment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 20640–20647 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2213-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biofilter
  • Non-ionic pesticides
  • Phenoxyacid herbicides
  • Water pollution
  • Enantiomeric fraction