Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for US population aged ≥ 6 years for 2013–2014 were used to analyze data for four heterocyclic aromatic amines (HCAA), namely 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AαC), 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhlP), harman, and norharman. Data were analyzed separately for children aged 6–11 years (N = 416), adolescents aged 12–19 years (N = 475), adults aged 20–64 years (N = 1913), and seniors aged ≥ 65 years (N = 458). Adult males had lower concentrations of AαC and harman than adult females (1.44 vs. 2.22 pg/mL for AαC, p < 0.01 and 136.8 vs. 163.2 pg/mL for harman, p = 0.04). Racial/ethnic differences were observed in the adjusted concentrations of HCAAs. For adults, adjusted concentrations of HCAAs were lower for non-Hispanic Asians and Hispanics as compared to non-Hispanic blacks and whites. For example for AαC, the adjusted concentrations for non-Hispanic Asians, Hispanics, non-Hispanic blacks and whites were 1.16, 2.00, 2.37, and 2.16 pg/mL respectively. Adjusted concentrations of AαC were found to be lower among nonsmokers as compared to smokers for adolescents (0.34 vs. 1.32 pg/mL, p < 0.01), adults (0.40 vs. 7.91 pg/mL, p < 0.01), and seniors (0.30 vs. 4.29 pg/mL, p < 0.01). For both harman and norharman, adult nonsmokers had lower adjusted concentrations than smokers (125.7 vs. 177.6 pg/mL, p < 0.01 for harman, 296.1 vs. 421.6 pg/mL, p < 001, for norharman). Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke was found to be associated with higher concentrations of AαC among adolescents (p = 0.01) and adults (p = 0.01) and for harman (p = 0.01) and norharman (p = 0.01) among seniors. In conclusion, concentrations of selected HCAAs can be several fold higher among smokers as compared to nonsmokers and gender as well as race/ethnicity also affect the observed concentrations of HCAA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The author received no funds to conduct this research and all data used in this research are available free of cost at www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he had no conflict of interest.
Carrizo D, Brennan SF, Chevallier OP, Woodside J, Cooper KM, Cantwell MM, Cuskelly G, Elliott CT (2017) Distribution of serum levels of persistent organic pollutants, heterocyclic aromatic amine theoretical intake and nutritional cofactors in a semi-rural island population. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:22393–22401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9851-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu Y, Zhao G, Wang S, Yu J, Xie F, Wang H, Xie J (2014) Simultaneous determination of fifteen heterocyclic aromatic amines in the urine of smokers and nonsmokers using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1333:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konorev D, Koopmeiners JS, Tang Y, Thompson EAF, Jensen JA, Hatsukami DK, Turesky RJ (2015) Measurement of the heterocyclic amines 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phnyimidao[4,5-b]pyridine in urine: effects of cigarette smoking. Chem Res Toxicol 28:2390–2399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubin JH, Colt JS, Camann D, Davis S, Cerhan JR, Severson RK, Bernstein L, Hartge P (2004) Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environ Health Perspect 112(17):1691–1696Google Scholar