Flue gas desulfurization residues (FGDR) are the main solid wastes produced in coal-fired power plants that can be reused as alternative materials for civil and agricultural applications. However, the pollutants contained in the FGDR might contaminate the local environment, hindering their material reuse. In this study, the physical-chemical characteristics, leaching, and phytotoxicity (Triticum aestivum) of the material were investigated. The FGDR samples were obtained from three pulverized coal-fired power plants in China. Multivariate statistical analyses were used to consider the contributions of the leaching components to the germination index of wheat seeds in the FGDR leachates. The FGDR contained a high percentage of amorphous mass. The ranges of selected metals and micronutrients in the FGDR are As (31.5–63.0 mg/kg), B (574–3090 mg/kg), Ba (2799–3073 mg/kg), Cr (up to 4.73 mg/kg), Cu (0.29–1.38 mg/kg), Mn (136–370 mg/kg), Ni (9.93–22.9 mg/kg), Pb (1.29–7.29 mg/kg), Sr (886–1706 mg/kg), and Zn (335–458 mg/kg). The leaching toxicity of the FGDR leachates was lower than the regulatory limit of the identification standards for hazardous waste, indicating that the FGDR are non-hazardous materials. Metals, especially Ba, Cu, Fe, and Pb, as well as As and B, in the leachate had inhibitory effects on seed germination than the other constituents. The results in this study showed that the leachate phytotoxicity resulting from FGDR could be evaluated before the utilization of FGDR, giving crucial information for the adaptation of these alternative materials.
Flue gas desulfurization residues Phytotoxicity Triticum aestivumMultivariate analysis
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research received financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21577102), the major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2017ZX07202005), the National Social Science Fund of China (No.12&ZD236), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Ernst WHO (1998) Effects of heavy metals in plants at the cellular and organismic level ecotoxicology. In: Gerrit S, Bernd M (eds) III. Bioaccumulation and biological effects of chemicals. Wiley and Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, New York, pp 587–620Google Scholar
European standard EN 1097-7 (2000) Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates. Determination of the particle density of filler. Pycnometer method, European committee for standardizationGoogle Scholar
Hou J, Liu GN, Xue W, Fu WJ, Liang BC, Liu XH (2014) Seed germination, root elongation, root-tip mitosis, and micronucleus induction of five crop plants exposed to chromium in fluvo-aquatic soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:671–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China (MEP) (2007) Identification standards for hazardous wastes—identification for extraction toxicity. GB 5085.3-2007. Beijing, China (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Phoungthong K, He PJ, Shao LM, Zhang H (2016a) Phytotoxicity and groundwater impacts of leaching from thermal treatment residues in roadways. J Environ Sci In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.11.009