Retention and release of hexavalent and trivalent chromium by chitosan, olive stone activated carbon, and their blend
- 68 Downloads
Shrimp shells and waste of olive stones were used as feedstock for the preparation of chitosan and activated carbon. The adsorption of CrVI and CrIII species in aqueous solution by the materials prepared and their blend were studied by using the well-known kinetic and isotherm models, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscope. It was demonstrated that the rates of adsorption were controlled by diffusion inside particles and throughout the liquid film, and adsorption occurred spontaneously (− 26 < ∆G° < − 15 kJ/mol) in the range of 298–333 K, except for that involving CrIII species and activated carbon. The maximum amounts of Cr species retained by the composite (146 mg of CrVI/g and 33 mg of CrIII/g at 298 K) were three times greater than those of the basic constituents. Adsorption was markedly affected by temperature and pH, and CrVI species were substantially desorbed in acid mediums, particularly in acetic acid solution. The recovery of CrIII species varied according to the adsorbent and the solution used. The immobilization of CrVI species (HCrO4− and CrO42−) and CrIII species (Cr(OH)2+ and Cr3(OH)45+) by chitosan was accomplished by means of amine moieties and hydroxyls of D-glucosamine units of the biopolymer. The adsorption of CrVI species on activated carbon involved π electrons of aromatic rings as well as oxygenated sites (C–OH, C=O, C–O–C). In such a condition, CrVI was partially reduced into CrIII. For the composite, the amino functional groups of chitosan and hydroxyls of both constituents were implicated in the linkage of the biopolymer and activated carbon, and the C–O–H and C–O–C functional groups of chitosan were involved in the retention of CrVI species. For CrIII species, adsorption occurred preferentially on hydroxyls of the components, and consequently, the chains of the biopolymer recovered some flexibility.
KeywordsChitosan Activated carbon Composite Chromium cations Adsorption Regeneration
This work was financially supported by the CNRST under grant no. PPR/26/2015.
- Basset J, Denny RC, Jeffery GH, Mendham J (1986) Vogel’s textbook of quantitative inorganic analysis. ELBS. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Bohli T, Fiol N, Villaescusa I, Ouederni A (2013) Adsorption on activated carbon from olive stones: kinetics and equilibrium of phenol removal from aqueous solution. J Chem Eng Process Technol 4(6). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000165
- Bohli T, Ouederni A, Fiol N, Villaescusa I (2012) Uptake of Cd2+ and Ni2+ metal ions from aqueous solutions by activated carbons derived from waste olive stones. Int J Chem Eng Appl 3(4):232–236Google Scholar
- Brugnerotto J, Lizardi J, Goycoolea FM, Arguelles-Monal W, Desbrieres J, Rinaudo M (2001) An infrared investigation in relation with chitin and chitosan characterization. Polymer Polymer 42:3569–3580Google Scholar
- Crini, G., Bardot, P. M., Guibal, E. (2009). Chitine et chitosane: du biopolymère à l'application. Presses Universitaires de Franche-Conté (France), pp. 19–54Google Scholar
- Freundlich H (1907) Über die adsorption in Lösungen. Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie 57:385–470Google Scholar
- Moura, J. M., Gründmann, D. D. R., Cadaval Jr., T. R. S., Dotto, G. L., Pinto, L. A. A. (2016). Comparison of chitosan with different physical forms to remove reactive black 5 from aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng, 4, 2259–2267Google Scholar
- Rwayhah, Y.M.N., Hassan, M.L. Shehata, M.R. (2017). Nanoporous activated carbon from olive stones wastes. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 76, 725–732Google Scholar
- Temkin MJ, Pyzhev V (1940) Recent modifications to Langmuir isotherms. Acta Physiochim USSR 12:217Google Scholar