Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 4324–4336 | Cite as

Degradation of carbendazim in water via photo-Fenton in Raceway Pond Reactor: assessment of acute toxicity and transformation products

  • Elizângela Pinheiro da Costa
  • Sue Ellen C. Bottrel
  • Maria Clara V. M. Starling
  • Mônica M. D. Leão
  • Camila Costa AmorimEmail author
Advanced Oxidation Technologies: State-of-the-Art in Ibero-American Countries

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the degradation of fungicide carbendazim (CBZ) via photo-Fenton reactions in artificially and solar irradiated photoreactors at laboratory scale and in a semi-pilot scale Raceway Pond Reactor (RPR), respectively. Acute toxicity was monitored by assessing the sensibility of bioluminescent bacteria (Aliivibrio fischeri) to samples taken during reactions. In addition, by-products formed during solar photo-Fenton were identified by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (UFLC-MS). For tests performed in lab-scale, two artificial irradiation sources were compared (UVλ > 254nm and UV-Visλ > 320nm). A complete design of experiments was performed in the semi-pilot scale RPR in order to optimize reaction conditions (Fe2+ and H2O2 concentrations, and water depth). Efficient degradation of carbendazim (> 96%) and toxicity removal were achieved via artificially irradiated photo-Fenton under both irradiation sources. Control experiments (UV photolysis and UV-Vis peroxidation) were also efficient but led to increased acute toxicity. In addition, H2O2/UVλ > 254nm required longer reaction time (60 minutes) when compared to the photo-Fenton process (less than 1 min). While Fenton’s reagent achieved high CBZ and acute toxicity removal, its efficiency demands higher concentration of reagents in comparison to irradiated processes. Solar photo-Fenton removed carbendazim within 15 min of reaction (96%, 0.75 kJ L−1), and monocarbomethoxyguanidine, benzimidazole isocyanate, and 2-aminobenzimidazole were identified as transformation products. Results suggest that both solar photo-Fenton and artificially irradiated systems are promising routes for carbendazim degradation.

Keywords

Pesticide removal Micropollutant removal AOP UV light Sunlight RPR Pilot reactor 

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2130_MOESM1_ESM.docx (176 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 175 kb)

References

  1. Arzate S, García Sánchez JL, Soriano-Molina P, Casas López JL, Campos-Mañas MC, Agüera A, Sánchez Pérez JA (2017) Effect of residence time on micropollutant removal in WWTP secondary effluents by continuous solar photo-Fenton process in raceway pond reactors. Chem Eng J 316:1114–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behnajady MA, Modirshahla N, Ghanbary F (2007) A kinetic model for the decolorization of C.I. Acid yellow 23 by Fenton process. J Hazard Mater 148:98–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bojanowska-Czajka A, Nichipor H, Drzewicz P, Szostek B, Gałęzowska A, Męczyńska S, Kruszewski M, Zimek Z, Nałęcz-Jawecki G, Trojanowicz M (2011) Radiolytic decomposition of pesticide carbendazim in waters and wastes for environmental protection. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289:303–314.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1104-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottrel SEC, Amorim CC, Leão MMD, Costa EP, Lacerda IA (2014) Degradation of ethylenethiourea pesticide metabolite from water by photocatalytic processes. J Environ Sci Health B 49:263–270.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2014.868280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boudina A, Emmelin C, Baaliouamer A, Grenier-Loustalot MF, Chovelon JM (2003) Photochemical behaviour of carbendazim in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 50:649–655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00620-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkhardt M, Kupper T, Hean S, et al (2007) Release of biocides from urban areas into aquatic systems. 6th Int Conf NOVATECH 1483–1489Google Scholar
  7. Carra I, Santos-Juanes L, Acién Fernández FG, Malato S, Sánchez Pérez JA (2014) New approach to solar photo-Fenton operation. Raceway ponds as tertiary treatment technology. J Hazard Mater 279:322–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carra I, Sirtori C, Ponce-Robles L, Sánchez Pérez JA, Malato S, Agüera A (2015) Degradation and monitoring of acetamiprid, thiabendazole and their transformation products in an agro-food industry effluent during solar photo-Fenton treatment in a raceway pond reactor. Chemosphere 130:73–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chavaco LC, Arcos CA, Prato-Garcia D (2017) Decolorization of reactive dyes in solar pond reactors: perspectives and challenges for the textile industry. J Environ Manag 198:203–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chisti Y (2016) Algae biotechnology. In: Bux F, Chisti Y (eds) Algae biotechnology, green energy and technology. Springer, Cham, pp 21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dujaković N, Grujić S, Radišić M, Vasiljević T, Laušević M (2010) Determination of pesticides in surface and ground waters by liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 678:63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IBAMA (2016) Relatórios de comercialização de agrotóxicos. http://www.ibama.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=594&Itemid=515. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
  13. IUPAC (2016) Carbendazim. http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/iupac/Reports/116.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
  14. Jornet D, Angeles Castillo M, Consuelo Sabater M et al (2013) Photodegradation of carbendazim sensitized by aromatic ketones. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 256:36–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaur T, Toor AP, Wanchoo RK (2014) Parametric study on degradation of fungicide carbendazim in dilute aqueous solutions using nano TiO2. Desalin Water Treat 3994:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.879081 Google Scholar
  16. Kaur T, Sraw A, Toor AP, Wanchoo RK (2016) Utilization of solar energy for the degradation of carbendazim and propiconazole by Fe doped TiO2. Sol Energy 125:65–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaur T, Sraw A, Wanchoo RK, Toor AP (2018) Solar assisted degradation of carbendazim in water using clay beads immobilized with TiO 2 & Fe doped TiO 2. Sol Energy 162:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kupper T, Plagellat C, Brändli RC, de Alencastro LF, Grandjean D, Tarradellas J (2006) Fate and removal of polycyclic musks, UV filters and biocides during wastewater treatment. Water Res 40:2603–2612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Litter MI, Candal RJ, Meichtry JM (eds) (2013) Advanced oxidation technologies—sustainable solutions for environmental treatments. CRC Press, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  20. Loewy M, Kirs V, Carvajal G et al (1999) Groundwater contamination by azinphos methyl in the Northern Patagonic Region (Argentina). Sci Total Environ 225:211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00365-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loos R, Tavazzi S, Paracchini B, Canuti E, Weissteiner C (2013) Analysis of polar organic contaminants in surface water of the northern Adriatic Sea by solid-phase extraction followed by ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography-QTRAP® MS using a hybrid triple-quadrupole linear ion trap instrument. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:5875–5885.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6944-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lunak S, Sedlak P (1992) Photoinitiated reactions of hydrogen peroxide in the liquid phase. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 68:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malato S, Fernandez-Ibanez P, Maldonado MI et al (2009) Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: recent overview and trends. Catal Today 147:1–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manenti DR, Soares PA, Silva TFCV, Módenes AN, Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Bergamasco R, Boaventura RAR, Vilar VJP (2015) Performance evaluation of different solar advanced oxidation processes applied to the treatment of a real textile dyeing wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:833–845.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2767-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marcelino RBP, Queiroz MTA, Amorim CC, Leão MMD, Brites-Nóbrega FF (2014) Solar energy for wastewater treatment: review of international technologies and their applicability in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:762–773.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3033-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mazellier P, Leroy E, Legube B (2002) Photochemical behavior of the fungicide carbendazim in dilute aqueous-solution. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 153:221–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00296-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazellier P, Leroy É, De Laat J, Legube B (2003) Degradation of carbendazim by UV/H2O2 investigated by kinetic modelling. Environ Chem Lett 1:68–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-002-0010-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Montagner CC, Vidal C, Acayaba RD, Jardim WF, Jardim ICSF, Umbuzeiro GA (2014) Trace analysis of pesticides and an assessment of their occurrence in surface and drinking waters from the state of São Paulo (Brazil). Anal Methods 6:6668–6677.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AY00782D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montalti M, Credi A, Prodi L, Gandolfi MT (2006) Chemical actinometry. In: Montalti M, Credi A, Prodi L, Gandolfi MT (eds) Handbook of photochemistry, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 601–616Google Scholar
  30. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2016) PubChem BioAssay Database; AID=1224879. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioassay/1224879. Accessed 22 Jan 2018
  31. Nogueira RFP, Oliveira MC, Paterlini W (2005) Simple and fast spectrophotometric determination of H2O2 in photo-Fenton reactions using metavanadate. Talanta 66:86–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Panadés R, Ibarz A, Esplugas S (2000) Photodecomposition of CARBENDAZIM in aqueous solutions. Water Res 34:2951–2954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rabiet M, Margoum C, Gouy V, Carluer N, Coquery M (2010) Assessing pesticide concentrations and fluxes in the stream of a small vineyard catchment—effect of sampling frequency. Environ Pollut 158:737–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rajeswari R, Kanmani S (2009) TiO 2-based heterogeneous photocatalytic water treatment combined with ozonation. Iran J Environ Heal Sci Eng 6:61–66Google Scholar
  35. Rajeswari R, Kanmani S (2010) Comparative study on photocatalytic oxidation and photolytic ozonation for the degradation of pesticide wastewaters. Desalin Water Treat 19:301–306.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ribeiro ACA, Dores EFG d C, Amorim RSS, Lourencetti C (2013) Resíduos de pesticidas em águas superficiais de área de nascente do rio São Lourenço - MT: validação de método por extração em fase sólida e cromatografia líquida. Quim Nova 36:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rivas G, Carra I, García Sánchez JL, Casas López JL, Malato S, Sánchez Pérez JA (2015) Modelling of the operation of raceway pond reactors for micropollutant removal by solar photo-Fenton as a function of photon absorption. Appl Catal B Environ 178:210–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saien J, Khezrianjoo S (2008) Degradation of the fungicide carbendazim in aqueous solutions with UV/TiO2 process: optimization, kinetics and toxicity studies. J Hazard Mater 157:269–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spasiano D, Marotta R, Malato S, Fernandez-Ibañez P, di Somma I (2015) Solar photocatalysis: materials, reactors, some commercial, and pre-industrialized applications. A comprehensive approach. Appl Catal B Environ 170–171:90–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.12.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Starling MCVM, dos Santos PHR, de Souza FAR, Oliveira SC, Leão MMD, Amorim CC (2017) Application of solar photo-Fenton toward toxicity removal and textile wastewater reuse. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12515–12528.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7395-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vilar VJP, Pinho LX, Pintor AMA, Boaventura RAR (2011) Treatment of textile wastewaters by solar-driven advanced oxidation processes. Sol Energy 85:1927–1934.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.04.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xiao Z, Wang M, Lu JR (2011) Degradation of fungicide carbendazim in aqueous solution by sonolytic ozonation. 2011 Int. Conf. Remote Sensing, Environ. Transp. Eng. RSETE 2011 - Proc. 8166–8169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizângela Pinheiro da Costa
    • 1
  • Sue Ellen C. Bottrel
    • 2
  • Maria Clara V. M. Starling
    • 1
  • Mônica M. D. Leão
    • 1
  • Camila Costa Amorim
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departament of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Research Group on Environmental Applications of Advanced Oxidation ProcessesUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Departament of Sanitary and Environmental EngineeringUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaJuiz de ForaBrazil

Personalised recommendations