Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 19, pp 18632–18641 | Cite as

Influence of temperature fluctuations on one-stage deammonification systems in northern cold region

  • Xiaolong Wang
  • Guiman Qi
  • YuegenYan
  • Dawen GaoEmail author
Research Article
  • 188 Downloads

Abstract

Cold and fluctuant temperatures are still a bottleneck for the application of one-stage deammonification in mainstream anammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation). In this study, to simulate the practical but critical operational condition under rapidly fluctuant temperatures between April and May in cold northern area, two deammonification reactors with anammox granular sludge and nitritation flocculent sludge were tested under the cold shock with temperature fluctuations (11–18 °C). Under the controlled temperature (32 °C), good performances were obtained in both reactors. However, after the cold shock (ca. 13 °C), both reactors deteriorated similarly. The ammonia removal efficiencies decreased by half, while total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiencies decreased by two thirds. Nitrite accumulated in both reactors, while nitrate production was not disturbed although its contributions from nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) increased. In the stage with increasing wastewater temperatures (17.5 ± 2.2 °C), several operational conditions were tested to recover the performances, including limited dissolved oxygen, long hydraulic retention time (HRT), high nitrogen loading with elevated pH, and low NH4+–N (60 mg/L), which did not significantly improve the performances, while the phenomena of heterotrophic nitrate reduction dramatically improved the nitrogen removal performances under limited aeration. During the cold temperature shock, insufficient anammox activity, and nitrate overproduction were the main problems.

Keywords

One-stage deammonification Nitrogen removal Temperature fluctuations NOB suppression 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (No. ZD201412) and Harbin Science and Technology Program (2016RAXXJ010).

References

  1. Anthonisen A, Loehr R, Prakasam T, Srinath E (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48:835–852Google Scholar
  2. Apha A (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao Y, van Loosdrecht MCM, Daigger GT (2017) Mainstream partial nitritation–anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: status, bottlenecks, and further studies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:1365–1383.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-8058-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cui F (2012) Cold CANON: anammox at low temperatures. Master, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert EM, Agrawal S, Schwartz T, Horn H, Lackner S (2015) Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures. Water Res 81:92–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gonzalez-Martinez A, Rodriguez-Sanchez A, Garcia-Ruiz MJ, Muñoz-Palazon B, Cortes-Lorenzo C, Osorio F, Vahala R (2016) Performance and bacterial community dynamics of a CANON bioreactor acclimated from high to low operational temperatures. Chem Eng J 287:557–567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hao X, Heijnen JJ, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2002) Model-based evaluation of temperature and inflow variations on a partial nitrification–ANAMMOX biofilm process. Water Res 36:4839–4849.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00219-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hardison AK, Algar CK, Giblin AE, Rich JJ (2015) Influence of organic carbon and nitrate loading on partitioning between dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and N2 production. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 164:146–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellinga C, Schellen A, Mulder J, Van Loosdrecht M, Heijnen J (1998) The SHARON process: an innovative method for nitrogen removal from ammonium-rich waste water. Water Sci Technol 37:135–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00281-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ke Y, Azari M, Han P, Görtz I, Gu J-D, Denecke M (2015) Microbial community of nitrogen-converting bacteria in anammox granular sludge. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 103:105–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laureni M, Falås P, Robin O, Wick A, Weissbrodt DG, Nielsen JL, Ternes TA, Morgenroth E, Joss A (2016) Mainstream partial nitritation and anammox: long-term process stability and effluent quality at low temperatures. Water Res 101:628–639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li X, Sung S (2015) Development of the combined nitritation–anammox process in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor with anammox granules. Chem Eng J 281:837–843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, Sun S, Badgley BD, Sung S, Zhang H, He Z (2016) Nitrogen removal by granular nitritation-anammox in an upflow membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Water Res 94:23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lotti T, Kleerebezem R, Hu Z, Kartal B, Jetten M, van Loosdrecht M (2014) Simultaneous partial nitritation and anammox at low temperature with granular sludge. Water Res 66:111–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lotti T, Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht M (2015) Effect of temperature change on anammox activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:98–103.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Shaughnessy M (2016) Mainstream deammonification. Water Intell Online 15:9781780407852.  https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780407852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Poot V, Hoekstra M, Geleijnse MAA, van Loosdrecht MCM, Pérez J (2016) Effects of the residual ammonium concentration on NOB repression during partial nitritation with granular sludge. Water Res 106:518–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosenwinkel KH, Cornelius A (2005) Deammonification in the moving-bed process for the treatment of wastewater with high ammonia content. Chem Eng Technol 28:49–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200407070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vadivelu VM, Keller J, Yuan Z (2007a) Effect of free ammonia on the respiration and growth processes of an enriched Nitrobacter culture. Water Res 41:826–834.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vadivelu VM, Keller J, Yuan Z (2007b) Free ammonia and free nitrous acid inhibition on the anabolic and catabolic processes of Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter. Water Sci Technol 56:89–97.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Kempen R, Mulder J, Uijterlinde C, Loosdrecht M (2001) Overview: full scale experience of the SHARON® process for treatment of rejection water of digested sludge dewatering. Water Sci Technol 44:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vlaeminck SE, Terada A, Smets BF, Linden DV, Boon N, Verstraete W, Carballa M (2009) Nitrogen removal from digested black water by one-stage partial nitritation and anammox. Environ Sci Technol 43:5035–5041.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es803284y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vlaeminck S, De Clippeleir H, Verstraete W (2012) Microbial resource management of one-stage partial nitritation/anammox. Microb Biotechnol 5:433–448.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00341.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang X, Gao D (2016) In-situ restoration of one-stage partial nitritation-anammox process deteriorated by nitrate build-up via elevated substrate levels. Sci Rep 6:37500.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang CC, Lee PH, Kumar M, Huang YT, Sung SW, Lin JG (2010) Simultaneous partial nitrification, anaerobic ammonium oxidation and denitrification (SNAD) in a full-scale landfill-leachate treatment plant. J Hazard Mater 175:622–628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wett B (2007) Development and implementation of a robust deammonification process. Water Sci Technol 56:81–88.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wett B, Omari A, Podmirseg SM, Han M, Akintayo O, Gómez Brandón M, Murthy S, Bott C, Hell M, Takács I, Nyhuis G, O’Shaughnessy M (2013) Going for mainstream deammonification from bench-to full-scale for maximized resource efficiency. Water Sci Technol 68:283–289.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zekker I, Rikmann E, Mandel A, Kroon K, Seiman A, Mihkelson J, Tenno T, Tenno T (2016) Step-wise temperature decreasing cultivates a biofilm with high nitrogen removal rates at 9°C in short-term anammox biofilm tests. Environ Technol 37:1933–1946.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1135995 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and EnvironmentHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.Puritek (Nanjing) Co LtdNanjngChina

Personalised recommendations