Ecotoxicological effects of microplastics on biota: a review
- 6.7k Downloads
The ubiquitous presence of microplastics in the environment has drawn the attention of ecotoxicologists on its safety and toxicity. Sources of microplastics in the environment include disintegration of larger plastic items (secondary microplastics), personal care products like liquid soap, exfoliating scrubbers, and cleaning supplies etc. Indiscriminate usage of plastics and its poor waste disposal management pose serious concern on ecosystem quality at global level. The present review focused on the ecological impact of microplastics on biota at different trophic levels, its uptake, accumulation, and excretion etc., and its plausible mechanistic toxicity with risk assessment approaches. Existing scientific evidence shows that microplastics exposure triggers a wide variety of toxic insult from feeding disruption to reproductive performance, physical ingestion, disturbances in energy metabolism, changes in liver physiology, synergistic and/ or antagonistic action of other hydrophobic organic contaminants etc. from lower to higher trophics. Thus, microplastic accumulation and its associated adverse effects make it mandatory to go in for risk assessment and legislative action. Subsequent research priorities, agenda, and key issues to be addressed are also acknowledged in the present review.
KeywordsMicroplastics Ecological impacts Risk assessment Regulatory ecotoxicology
The authors acknowledge Prof. Alok Dhawan, Director, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (IITR), Lucknow for his encouragement and support. This manuscript has CSIR-IITR communication number 3403.
No funding is involved.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Formal consent is not required for this study.
- Batel A, Linti F, Scherer M, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2016) Transfer of benzo[a]pyrene from microplastics to artemia nauplii and further to zebrafish via a trophic food web experiment: cyp1a induction and visual tracking of persistent organic pollutants. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:1656–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beer S, Garm A, Huwer B, Dierking J, Nielsen, TG (2018) No increase in marine microplastic concentration over the last three decades–A case study from the Baltic Sea. Sci. Total. Environ. 621: 1272–1279.Google Scholar
- Besseling E, Wegne A, Foekema EM, VandenHeuvel-Greve MU, Koelmans AA (2013) Effects of microplastics on fitness and PCB bioaccumulation by the lugworm Arenicola marina (L.). Environ Sci Technol 42:5026–5031Google Scholar
- Besseling E, Wang B, Lürling M, Koelmans AA (2014) Nanoplastic affects growth of S. obliquus and reproduction of D. magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(20):12336–43Google Scholar
- Blair RM, Waldron S, Phoenix V, Gauchotte-Lindsay C (2017) Micro- and nanoplastic pollution of freshwater and wastewater treatment systems. Springer Science Reviews 5:19–30.Google Scholar
- Duis K, Coors A (2016) Microplastics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: sources (with a specific focus on personal care products), fate and effects. Envt Sci Eur 28(2):1–25Google Scholar
- Essel R, Engel R, Carus M (2015) Sources of microplastics relevant to marine protection in Germany. Texte 64/2015. Dessau-Roßlau: German Federal Environment AgencyGoogle Scholar
- European Commission (2013) Guidance on monitoring of marine litter in European seas. A guidance document within the common implementation strategy for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, MSFD Technical Subgroup on Marine Litter, IspraGoogle Scholar
- Faure F, Corbaz M, Baecher H, de Alencastro L (2012) Pollution due to plastics and microplastics in Lake Geneva and in the Mediterranean Sea. Arch Des Sci 65:157–164Google Scholar
- Fonte E, Ferreira P, Guilhermino L (2016) Temperature rise and microplastics interact with the toxicity of theantibiotic cefalexin to juveniles of the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps): post-exposure predatory behaviour, acetylcholinesterase activity and lipid peroxidation. Aquat Toxicol 180:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fossi MC, Coppola D, Baini M, Giannetti M, Guerranti C (2014) Larger filter feeding marine organisms as indicators of microplastics in the pelagic environment: the case studies of the Mediterranean basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) and fin whale (Balaeno pteraphysalus). Mar Envtl Res 100:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gajendiran A, Krishnamoorthy S, Abraham J (2016) Microbial degradation of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) by aspergillus clavatus strain JASK1 isolated from landfill soil. 3. Biotech 6(1):1–6Google Scholar
- GESAMP (2015) Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: a global assessment. Reports and Studies 90. London: IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental ProtectionGoogle Scholar
- House of Commons (HC) (2016) Environmental audit committee: environmental impact of microplastics. Fourth Report of Session 2016-2017:1–42Google Scholar
- Ioakeimidis C, Fotopoulou KN, Karapanagioti HK, Geraga M, Zeri C, Papathanassiou E, Galgani F, Papatheodorou G (2016) The degradation potential of PET bottles in the marine environment: An ATR-FTIR based approach. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23501
- Kärrman A, Vigren D, Karlsson C, van Bavel B. (2016) Pilot study on the occurrence and disposition of microplastics in lake Vättern. Report to VätternvårdsförbundetGoogle Scholar
- Khan FR, Syberg K, Shashoua Y, Bury NR (2015) Influence of polyethylene microplastic beads on the uptake and localization of silver in zebrafish (Danio rerio) Environ. Pollut. 206: 73–79Google Scholar
- Laist DW (1997) Impacts of marine debris: entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records. In: Coe JM, Rogers DB (eds) Marine debris: sources, impacts and solutions. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lambert S, Sinclair C, Boxall A (2014) Occurrence, degradation and effect of polymer-based materials in the environment. Rev Envt Contam Toxicol 227:1–42Google Scholar
- Lyakurwa DJ (2017) Uptake and effects of microplastic particles in selected marine microalgae species; Oxyrrhis marina and Rhodomonas baltica. Master of Science Thesis, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NUST). Pp. 1–65Google Scholar
- Moore CJ, Lattin GL, Zellers AF (2011) Quantity and type of plastic debris flowing from two urban rivers to coastal waters and beaches of Southern California. J Integr Coast Zone Manag 11:65–73Google Scholar
- Mugilarasan M, Venkatachalapathy R, Sharmila N (2015) Occurrence of microplastic resin pellets in sediments around Agatti Island, India. Intl J Rec Sci Res 6:7198–7201Google Scholar
- Nigam R (1982) Plastic pellets on the Caranzalem beach sands, Goa. India Mahasagar Bull Natl Inst Oceanogr 15:125–127Google Scholar
- Noren F, Naustvoll LJ (2010) Survey of microplastic anthropogenic particles in Skagerrak. Klima-og forurensningsdirektoratet TA 2779-2011:1–20Google Scholar
- Paul-Pont I, Lacroix C, Gonzalez Fernandez C, Hegaret H, Lambert C, Goïc NL, Frere L, Cassone A-L, Sussarellu R, Fabioux C, Guyomarch J, Albentosa M, Huvet A, Soudant P (2016) Exposure of marine mussels Mytilus spp. to polystyrene microplastics: toxicity and influence on fluoranthene bioaccumulation. Environ Pollut 216:724–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rist SE, Assidqi K, Zamani NP, Appel D, Perschke M, Huhn M, Lenz M (2016) Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel Perna viridis. Mar Pollut Bull 111:213–220Google Scholar
- Romano N, Ashikin M, The JC, Syukri F, Karami A (2017) Effects of pristine polyvinyl chloride fragments on whole body histology and protease activity in silver barb Barbodes gonionotus fry. Environ Pollut S0269–7491(17):33728–33724Google Scholar
- Sussarellu R, Suquet M, Thomas Y, Lambert C, Fabioux C, Pernet MEJ, Goïc NL, Quillien V, Mingant C, Epelboin Y, Corporeau C, Guyomarch J, Robbens J, Paul-Pont I, Soudant P, Huvet A (2016) Oyster reproduction is affected by exposure to polystyrene microplastics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:2430–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson RC, Moore CJ, VomSaal FS, Swan SH (2009b) Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos. Trans R Soc Lond 13: Biol Sci 364: 2153–2166Google Scholar
- UNEP (2011) Emerging issues in our global environment. UNEP Year Book, 2011Google Scholar
- Wagner M, Scherer C, Alvarez-Munoz D, Brennholt N, Bourrain X, Buchinger S, Fries E, Grosbois C, Klasmeier J, Marti T, Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Urbatzka R, Vethaak AD, Winther-Lielsen M, Reifferscheid G (2014) Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know. Environ Sci Eur 26:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wentworth, J., Stafford, C., 2016. Marine Microplastic Pollution, POSTNOTE (528), Houses of Parliament. UK. URL http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/POST-PN-0528?utm_source=website&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=PN528