Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 20, pp 19675–19686 | Cite as

Infection risk in gyms during physical exercise

  • Alexandro Andrade
  • Fábio Hech Dominski
  • Marcelo Luiz Pereira
  • Carla Maria de Liz
  • Giorgio Buonanno
Research Article

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the risk of infection (influenza and tuberculosis) for individuals participating in physical exercise. This was achieved by assessment of carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, and examination of the physical characteristics of a number of gyms to determine whether there was a relationship to CO2 levels. This study was performed in three different gyms ventilated with either split system or central system air conditioners. The risk of airborne infection (percent of susceptible persons infected) was estimated for each gym using the Wells-Riley model. The risk of infection increased during periods of peak occupancy where the ventilation required by occupants was greater. In each gym, the highest risk of infection occurred during the evening where occupancy and CO2 levels were high. The infection risk for influenza was high in all situations due to the high quantum generation rate for this agent. This study suggests that inefficient ventilation in gyms is a significant problem, with high CO2 concentrations resulting in impaired air quality and high health risks to users, including increased risk of infections such as influenza and tuberculosis.

Keywords

Air pollution Indoor Fitness centers Motor activity Infection Health 

Notes

Contributors

AA conceived the study, designed the investigation, reviewed the database, analyzed the data, wrote the first draft of the paper, and approved the final submission. FHD collected the data, reviewed the database, analyzed the data, wrote the first draft of the paper, and approved the final submission. MLP conceived the study, designed the investigation, and analyzed the data. CML collected the data, reviewed the database, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the paper. GB reviewed the first draft of the paper and approved the final submission.

Funding information

This study was supported by the Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (CAPES), Public notice (no. 03/2015), through masters scholarship and financially supported by FAPESC (Research and Innovation Support Foundation of the State of Santa Catarina) through research (Project No. 2287/PAP 04/2014).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_1822_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

References

  1. ACGIH (1991) Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices, 6th edn. American conference of governmental industrial hygienists, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso WJ, Viboud C, Simonsen L, Hirano EW, Daufenbach LZ, Miller MA (2007) Seasonality of influenza in Brazil: a traveling wave from the Amazon to the subtropics. Am J Epidemiol 165(12):1434–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves CA, Calvo AI, Castro A et al (2013) Indoor air quality in two university sports facilities. Aerosol Air Qual Res 13:1723–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASHRAE (2005) Fundamentals handbook. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  5. ASHRAE (2012) Standard 52.2–2012. Method of testing general ventilation air-cleaning devices for removal efficiency by particle size. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  6. ASHRAE. Standard 62.1 (2004) Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. American society of heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM D6245-07 (2007) Standard guide for using indoor carbon dioxide concentrations to evaluate indoor air quality and ventilation. ASTM international, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. Barreira CCS, Carvalho APO (2007) A realidade portuguesa do conforto em instalações de fitness. O que mudar? Motricidade 3(2):69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beggs CB, Noakes CJ, Sleigh PA, Fletcher LA, Siddiqi K (2003) The transmission of tuberculosis in confined spaces: an analytical review of alternative epidemiological models. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 7:1015–1026Google Scholar
  10. Braniš M, Šafránek J (2011) Characterization of coarse particulate matter in school gyms. Environ Res 111(4):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braniš M, Šafránek J, Hytychová A (2009) Exposure of children to airborne particulate matter of different size fractions during indoor physical education at school. Build Environ 44:1246–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. BRASIL – Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) (2003) Resolução n° 9 de 16 de janeiro de 2003. Dispõe sobre padrões referenciais de qualidade do ar interior em ambientes climatizados artificialmente de uso público e coletivo. Disponível em: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/portal/anvisa/anvisa/home
  13. Buonanno G, Fuoco FC, Marini S et al (2012) Particle resuspension in school gyms during physical activities. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12:803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlisle AJ, Sharp NCC (2001) Exercise and outdoor ambient air pollution. Br J Sports Med 35(4):214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castro A et al (2015) Indoor aerosol size distributions in a gymnasium. Sci Total Environ 524:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chatzidiakou L, Mumovic D, Summerfield A (2015) Is CO2 a good proxy for indoor air quality in classrooms? Part 2: health outcomes and perceived indoor air quality in relation to classroom exposure and building characteristics. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 36(2):162–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clements-Croome DJ, Awbi HB, Bakó-Biró Z, Kochhar N, Williams M (2008) Ventilation rates in schools. Build Environ 43(3):362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EPA (1999) Exposure factors handbook. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/C-99/001Google Scholar
  19. Graudenz GS, Kalil J, Saldiva PH, Gambale W, Latorre MRDO, Morato-Castro FF (2002) Upper respiratory symptoms associated with aging of the ventilation system in artificially ventilated offices in Sao Paulo, Brazil. CHEST J 122(2):729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hug SM, Hansmann R, Monn C, et al (2008) Restorative effects of physical activity in forests and indoor settings. Int J Fit 4(2):25–37Google Scholar
  21. Illinois Department of Public Health Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality (2011) Disponível em http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/factsheets/indoorairqualityguide_fs.htm
  22. Issarow CM, Mulder N, Wood R (2015) Modelling the risk of airborne infectious disease using exhaled air. J Theor Biol 372:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones BM, Kirby R, Kolokotroni M, Payne T (2008) Air quality measured in a classroom served by roof mounted natural ventilation windcatchers. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference for the Engineering Doctorate in Environmental Technology. UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Jung CC, Wu PC, Tseng CH, Su HJ (2015) Indoor air quality varies with ventilation types and working areas in hospitals. Build Environ 85:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liao CM, Chen SC, Chang CF (2008a) Modeling respiratory infection control measure effects. Epidemiol Infect 136(3):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liao CM, Chen SC, Chang CF (2008b) Modelling respiratory infection control measure effects. Epidemiol Infect 136:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Massey D, Kulshrestha A, Masih J, Taneja A (2012) Seasonal trends of PM 10, PM 5.0, PM 2.5 & PM 1.0 in indoor and outdoor environments of residential homes located in North-Central India. Build Environ 47:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nardell EA, Keegan J, Cheney SA, Etkind SC (1991) Airborne infection. Theoretical limits of protection achievable by building ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:302–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noakes CJ, Sleigh PA (2008) Applying the Wells–Riley equation to the risk of airborne infection in hospital environments: the importance of stochastic and proximity effects, In: Proceedings of Indoor Air 2008, International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Paper ID: 42, Copenhagen, 17–22 August 2008Google Scholar
  30. Noakes CJ, Sleigh PA (2009) Mathematical models for assessing the role of airflow on the risk of airborne infection in hospital wards. J R Soc InterfaceGoogle Scholar
  31. Pegas PN, Alves CA, Evtyugina MG et al (2001) Indoor air quality in elementary schools of Lisbon in spring. Environ Geochem Health 33(5):455–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pereira ML, Vilain R, Tribess A (2009) Modeling and measurement of air contaminant distribution in a operating room ventilated with split system. 9th International Conference on Industrial Ventilation. ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar
  33. Pires da Silva R et al (2009) Salivary immunoglobulin A(s-IgA) and exercise: relevance of its control in athletes and methodological implications. Rev Bras Med Esporte 15(6):459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramalho O, Wyart G, Mandin C, Blondeau P, Cabanes PA, Leclerc N, Mullot JU, Boulanger G, Redaelli M (2015) Association of carbon dioxide with indoor air pollutants and exceedance of health guideline values. Build Environ 93:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramos CA, Wolterbeek HT, Almeida SM (2014) Exposure to indoor air pollutants during physical activity in fitness centers. Build Environ 82:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramos CA, Reis JF, Almeida T et al (2015) Estimating the inhaled dose of pollutants during indoor physical activity. Sci Total Environ 527:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riley EC, Murphy G, Riley RL (1978) Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school. Am J Epidemiol 107(5):421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rudnick SN, Milton DK (2003) Risk of indoor airborne infection transmission estimated from carbon dioxide concentration. Indoor Air 13(3):237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schirmer WN, Szymanski MSE, Gauer MA (2009) Qualidade do ar interno em ambientes climatizados—Verificação dos parâmetros físicos e concentração de dióxido de carbono em agência bancária. Tecno-Lógica 13(1):41–45Google Scholar
  40. Seppänen O, Fisk WJ (2002) Association of ventilation system type with SBS symptoms in office workers. Indoor Air 12(2):98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Storla DG, Yimer S, Bjune GA (2008) A systematic review of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. BMC Public Health 8(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sze To GN, Chao CYH (2010) Review and comparison between the Wells–Riley and dose-response approaches to risk assessment of infectious respiratory diseases. Indoor Air 20(1):2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tan D, Mulyono S (2010) Determining the indoor air quality. San Jose State University Fitness Center. The Faculty of the Department of General Engineering San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  44. Vercruyssen M, Kamon E, Hancock PA (2007) Effects of carbon dioxide inhalation on psychomotor and mental performance during exercise and recovery. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 13(1):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wells WF (1955) Airborne contagion and air hygiene: an ecological study of droplet infections. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Wells EM, Berges M, Metcalf M, Kinsella A, Foreman K, Dearborn DG, Greenberg S (2015) Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations. Build Environ 93:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolkoff P (2013) Indoor air pollutants in office environments: assessment of comfort, health, and performance. Int J Hyg Environ Health 216(4):371–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodcock RC (2000) CO2 measurements for IAQ analysis. Occup Health Saf 69(5):56–58 60, 62Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Center of Health and Sport ScienceSanta Catarina State UniversityFlorianopolisBrazil
  2. 2.Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Santa CatarinaSão JoséBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations