Abstract
During the last decade, a lot of research has been focused on identifying the methane yields achievable when using microalgae biomass (fresh and pretreated) as a substrate in anaerobic digestion. Encountered differences are frequently attributed to the different microalgae strains (cell walls and macromolecular profiles) or the different metabolic activities of anaerobic sludge used as inoculum. Nevertheless, under the hypothesis that the state of microalgae upon biomass storage may also play a significant role, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of biomass processing and storage on methane yields and hydrolysis kinetics in batch mode assays. Slight changes in the macromolecular profile distribution of the different tested biomass were observed. Regardless of the time that the biomass was stored, results revealed that frozen biomass doubled the hydrolysis constant and enhanced methane yield by 1.56-fold compared to fresh microalgae biomass (82.4 mL CH4 g COD in−1). Similar enhancement was obtained with the freeze-dried biomass, and slightly lower values were obtained (1.34-fold) for the biomass kept at 4 °C longer than a week. Likewise, the semi-continuously operated reactor fed with microalgae biomass stored for 28 days at 4 °C did not show any effect in terms of methane production, although nitrogen mineralization was higher than expected. Remarkably, the initial stage of the biomass should be carefully considered for comparison purposes with the available literature on batch mode assays. This study highlights the importance of considering how the biomass is stored before the anaerobic digestion process to avoid misleading conclusions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou Nohra J, Barrington S, Frigon JC, Guiot SR (2003) In storage psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine slurry. Resour Conserv Recycl 38:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00092-7
Acién FG, Molina E, Fernández-Sevilla JM, Barbosa M, Gouveia L et al (2017) Chapter 20—economics of microalgae production. Microalgae-based biofuels and bioproducts: from feedstock cultivation to end-products. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, Elsevier, pp 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101023-5.00020-0
Alzate ME, Muñoz R, Rogalla F, Fdz-Polanco F, Pérez-Elvira SI (2012) Biochemical methane potential of microalgae: influence of substrate to inoculum ratio, biomass concentration and pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 123:488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.113
Babarro JMF, Reiriz MJF, Labarta U (2001) Influence of preservation techniques and freezing storage time on biochemical composition and spectrum of fatty acids of Isochrysis galbana clone T-ISO. Aquac Res 32:565–572. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2001.00579.x
Ben-Amotz A, Ben-Amotz B, Gilboa A (1980) Cryopreservation of marine unicellular algae. I. A survey of algae with regard to size, culture age, photosynthetic activity and chlorophyll-to-cell ratio. Mar Ecol Prog Series 2:157–161. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps002157
Cordero-Esquivel B, Voltolina-Lobina D, Correa-Sandoval F (1993) The biochemical composition of two diatoms after different preservation techniques. Comp Biochem Phys B 105:369–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(93)90243-X
Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001
DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC
Girault R, Bridoux G, Nauleau F, Poullain C, Bu J et al (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and greasy sludge from flotation process: batch versus CSTR experiments to investigate optimal design. Bioresour Technol 105:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.024
González-Fernández C, García-Encina PA (2009) Impact of substrate to inoculum ratio in anaerobic digestion of swine slurry. Biomass Bioenergy 33(8):1065–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.008
González-Fernández C, Sialve B, Bernet N, Steyer J-P (2012) Impact of microalgae characteristics on their conversion to biofuel. Part II: focus on biomethane production. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 6:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.337
González-Fernández C, Sialve B, Bernet N, Steyer J-P (2013) Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of thermally pretreated Scenedesmus sp. biomass. Bioresour Technol 129:219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.123
González-López CV, Mdel Cerón-García C, Acién-Fernández FG, Segovia-Bustos C, Chisti Y, Fernández-Sevilla JM (2010) Protein measurements of microalgal and cyanobacterial biomass. Bioresour Technol 101:7587–7591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.077
Gruber-Brunhumer MR, Jerney J, Zohar E, Nussbaumer M, Hieger C (2015) Acutodesmus obliquus as a benchmark strain for evaluating methane production from microalgae: influence of different storage and pretreatment methods on biogas yield. Algal Res 12:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.08.022
Jaenicke R (1990) Protein structure and function at low temperatures. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 326:535–551. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0030
Kreuger E, Nges IA, Björnsson L (2011) Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-44
Lardon L, Hélias A, Sialve B, Steyer JP, Bernard O (2009) Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 43:6475–6481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.048
Lin LP (1985) Microstructure of spray-dried and freeze-dried microalgal powders. Food Struc 4:2 digitalcommons.usu.edu/foodmicrostructure/vol4/iss2/17
Mahdy A, Mendez L, Ballesteros M, González-Fernández C (2015) Protease pretreated Chlorella vulgaris biomass bioconversion to methane via semi-continuous anaerobic digestion. Fuel 158:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.052
Mahdy A, Ballesteros M, González-Fernández C (2016) Enzymatic pretreatment of Chlorella vulgaris for biogas production: influence of urban wastewater as a sole nutrient source on macromolecular profile and biocatalyst efficiency. Bioresour Technol 199:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.080
Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetan NS (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 14:217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020
Mendez L, Mahdy A, Demuez M, Ballesteros M, González-Fernández C (2014) Effect of high pressure thermal pretreatment on Chlorella vulgaris biomass: organic matter solubilisation and biochemical methane potential. Fuel 117:674–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.032
Méndez L, Mahdy A, Ballesteros M, González-Fernández C (2015) Biomethane production using fresh and thermally pretreated Chlorella vulgaris biomass: a comparison of batch and semi-continuous feeding mode. Ecol Eng 84:273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.056
Molina Grima E, Sánchez Pérez JA, García Camacho F, Acién Fernández FG, López-Alonso D, Segura del Castillo CI (1994) Preservation of the marine microalga, Isochrysis galbana: influence on the fatty acid profile. Aquacult 123:377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90072-8
Molinuevo-Salces B, Mahdy A, Ballesteros M, González-Fernández C (2016) From piggery wastewater nutrients to biogas: microalgae biomass revalorization through anaerobic digestion. Renew Energy 96B:1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.090
Mussgnug JH, Klassen V, Schlüter A, Kruse O (2010) Microalgae as substrates for fermentative biogas production in a combined biorefinery concept. J Biotechnol 150:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.07.030
Ometto F, Quiroga G, Pšenička P, Whitton R, Jefferson B, Villa R (2014) Impacts of microalgae pre-treatments for improved anaerobic digestion: thermal treatment, thermal hydrolysis, ultrasound and enzymatic hydrolysis. Water Res 15:350–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.040
Passos F, Uggetti E, Carrère H, Ferrer I (2014a) Pretreatment of microalgae to improve biogas production: a review. Bioresour Technol 172:403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.114
Passos F, Astals S, Ferrer I (2014b) Anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass after ultrasound pretreatment. Waste Manag 34:2098–2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.004
Posadas E, Morales MM, Gomez C, Acién FG, Muñoz R (2015) Influence of pH and CO2 source on the performance of microalgae-based secondary domestic wastewater treatment in outdoors pilot raceways. Chem Eng J 265:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.059
Queiroz Zepka L, Jacob-Lopes E, Goldbeck R, Queiroz MI (2008) Production and biochemical profile of the microalgae Aphanothece microscopica Nägeli submitted to different drying conditions. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 47:1305–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.04.013
Ramos-Suárez JL, Martínez A, Carreras N (2014) Optimization of the digestion process of Scenedesmus sp. and Opuntia maxima for biogas production. Energy Convers Manag 88:1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.064
Ras M, Lardon L, Sialve B, Bernet N, Steyer JP (2011) Experimental study on a coupled process of production and anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresour Technol 102:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.146
Schwede S, Rehman ZU, Gerber M, Theiss C, Span R (2013) Effects of thermal pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of Nannochloropsis salina biomass. Bioresour Technol 143:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.043
Shields RJ, Lupatsch I (2012) Algae for aquaculture and animal feeds. J Anim Sci 21:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110298321.fm
Sialve B, Bernet N, Bernard O (2009) Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. Biotechnol Adv 27:409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.03.001
Søndergaard MM, Fotidis IA, Kovalovszki A, Angelidaki I (2015) Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural byproducts with manure for enhanced biogas production. Energy Fuel 29:8088–8094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for the financial support provided through the grants ENE2013-45416-R and RYC-2014-16823. We would also like to acknowledge the Community of Madrid for the support offered in the framework of the project INSPIRA-1 (S2013/ABI-2783) and in addition to the WWTP of Valladolid (Spain) for kindly supplying the anaerobic sludge samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barreiro-Vescovo, S., de Godos, I., Tomás-Pejó, E. et al. Effect of microalgae storage conditions on methane yields. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 14263–14270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1643-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1643-9