Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Impact of dynamical and microphysical schemes on black carbon prediction in a regional climate model over India

Abstract

Aerosol concentrations and their properties strongly depend on dynamics of atmosphere. Effects of physical and dynamical parameterizations on meteorology and black carbon (BC) mass in Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-CHEM) are investigated over India. Simulations are performed in ten experiments considering two boundary layer, three cumulus parameterization, and five microphysics schemes during winter and monsoon of 2008. Morrison double-moment physical parameterization, Yonsei University boundary layer parameterization with Kain-Fritsch and Grell-Freitas cumulus parameterization schemes are found suitable to simulate meteorology and BC mass over India. BC mass is found to be underestimated in almost all experiments during winter; while, BC mass is overestimated in monsoon over Ahmedabad, Delhi, and Kanpur, which suggests inefficient wet scavenging of BC in monsoon, while lower emission rate may cause differences in winter. The results will be useful in understanding parameterizations and their impact on aerosols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Arakawa A (2004) The cumulus parameterization problem: past, present, and future. J Clim 17(13):2093–2525

  2. Chen Y, Zhao C, Zhang Q, Deng ZZ, Huang MY, Ma XC (2009) Aircraft study of mountain chimney effect of Beijing. China J Geophys Res 114(D8), https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010610

  3. Emmons LK, Walters S, Hess PG, Lamarque JF, Pfister GG, Fillmore D, Granier C, Guenther A, Kinnison D, Laepple T, Orlando J, Tie X, Tyndall G, Wiedinmyer C, Baughcum SL, Kloster S (2010) Description and evaluation of the model for ozone and related chemical tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4). Geosci Model Dev 3(1):43–67

  4. Fast JD, Gustafson WI, Easter RC, Zaveri RA, Barnard JC, Chapman EG, Grell GA, Peckham SE (2006) Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of houston using a fully coupled meteorology-chemistry-aerosol model. J Geophys Res 111(D21), https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006721

  5. Feng Y, Kotamarthi V, Coulter R, Zhao C, Cadeddu M (2016) Radiative and thermodynamic responses to aerosol extinction profiles during the pre-monsoon month over South Asia. Atmos Chem Phys 16:247–264. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-247-2016

  6. Freitas SR, Longo KM, Chatfield R, Latham D, Silva Dias MAF, Andreae MO, Prins E, Santos J C, Gielow R, Carvalho Jr JA (2007) Including the sub-grid scale plume rise of vegetation fires in low resolution atmospheric transport models. Atmos Chem Phys 7:3385–3398

  7. Grell GA, Dévényi D (2002) A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophys Res Letts 29(14, 1693) https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311

  8. Grell GA, Peckham SE, Schmitz R, McKeen SA, Frost G, Skamarock WC, Eder B (2005) Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the wrf model. Atmos Env 39(37):6957–6975

  9. Grell GA, Freitas SR (2014) A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling. Atmos Chem Phys 14:5233–5250

  10. Guenther A, Karl T, Harley P, Wiedinmyer C, Palmer PI, Geron C (2006) Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (model of emissions of gases and aerosols from nature). Atmos Chem Phys 6:3181–3210

  11. Holt T, Raman S (1988) A review and comparative evaluation of multilevel boundary layer parameterizations for first-order and turbulent kinetic energy closure schemes. Rev Geophys 26:761–780

  12. Hong SY, Noh Y (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134:2318–2341

  13. Iacono MJ, Delamere JS, Mlawer EJ, Shephard MW, Clough SA, Collins WD (2008) Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J Geophys Res 113:D13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944

  14. Janjiċ ZI (1994) The step-mountain eta coordinate model: further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon Weather Rev 122(5):927–945

  15. Jiménez PA, Dudhia J, González-Rouco JF, Navarro J, Montávez JP, García-Bustamante E (2012) A revised scheme for the WRF surface layer formulation. Mon Weather Rev 140:898–918

  16. Kain KF (2004) The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol 43:170–181

  17. Kumar R, Naja M, Pfister GG, Barth MC, Brasseur GP (2012) Simulations over South Asia using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem): set-up and meteorological evaluation. Geosci Model Dev 5:321–343

  18. Lim KSS, Hong SY (2010) Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models. Mon Weather Rev 138:1587–1612

  19. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys 20:851–875

  20. Morrison H, Thompson G, Tatarskii V (2009) Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon Weather Rev 137:991–1007

  21. Ojha N, Pozzer A, Rauthe-Schöch A, Baker AK, Yoon J, Brenninkmeijer CAM, Lelieveld J (2016) Ozone and carbon monoxide over India during the summer monsoon: regional emissions and transport. Atmos Chem Phys 16:3013–3032

  22. Pai DS, Latha S, Rajeevan M, Sreejith O P, Satbhai NS, Mukhopadhyay B (2014) Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25 × 0.25) long period (1901 - 2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region. Mausam 65:1–18

  23. Petroff A, Mailliat A, Amielh M, Anselmet F (2008) Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part II: A new modelling approach and applications. Atmos Environ 42:3654–3683

  24. Pfister GG et al (2011) Characterizing summertime chemical boundary conditions for airmasses entering the US West Coast. Atmos Chem Phys 11:1769–1790. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1769-2011

  25. Pruppacher HR, Klett JD, Wang PK (eds) (1997) Microphysics of clouds and precipitation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  26. Pryor SC, Binkowski FS (2004) An analysis of the time scales associated with aerosol processes during dry deposition. Aerosol Sci Tech 38:1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290885827

  27. Ram K, Sarin MM, Tripathi S (2010) Inter-comparison of thermal and optical methods for determination of atmospheric black carbon and attenuation coefficient from an urban location in northern India. Atmos Res 97:335–342

  28. Ramachandran S, Kedia S (2010) Black carbon aerosols over an urban region: radiative forcing and climate impact. J Geophys Res 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013560

  29. Safai P, Kewat S, Praveen P, Rao P, Momin G, Ali K, Devara P (2007) Seasonal variation of black carbon aerosols over a tropical urban city of Pune, India. Atmos Env 41:2699–2709

  30. Singh S, Gupta NC, Soni K, Tanwar RS, Nath S, Arya BC, Gere BS (2011) Variation in aerosol black carbon concentration and its emission estimates at the mega-city Delhi. Int J Remote Sens 32:6749–6764

  31. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research wrf version 2. Technical report, DTIC Document

  32. Srivastava R (2017) Trends in aerosol optical properties over South Asia. Int J Climatol 37:371–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4710

  33. Srivastava R, Sherin SH (2017) Spatio-temporal variations of black carbon and optical properties in a regional climate model. Int J Climatol 37:1432–1443. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4787

  34. Stull RB (1984) Transilient turbulence theory Part I: The concept of eddy-mixing across finite distances. J Atmos Sci 41:3351–3367

  35. Stull RB (ed) (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  36. Tewari M, Chen F, Wang W, Dudhia J, LeMone M, Mitchell K, Ek M, Gayno G, Wegiel J, Cuenca R (2004) Implementation and verification of the unified noah land surface model in the WRF model

  37. Textor C et al (2007) The effect of harmonized emissions on aerosol properties in global models - an AeroCom experiment. Atmos Chem Phys 7:4489–4501. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4489-2007

  38. Thompson G, Field PR, Rasmussen RM, Hall WD (2008) Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon Weather Rev 136:5059–5115

  39. Thompson G, Eidhammer T (2014) A study of aerosol impacts on clouds and precipitation development in a large winter cyclone. J Atmos Sci 71:3636–3658

  40. Troen I, Mahrt L (1986) A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer: sensitivity to surface evaporation. Bound-Layer Meteorol 37:129–148

  41. Twomey S (1974) Pollution and the planetary albedo. Atmos Environ 8:1251–1256

  42. Wesely ML (1989) Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmos Env 23(6):1293–1304

  43. Wiedinmyer C, Akagi SK, Yokelson RJ, Emmons LK, Al-Saadi JA, Orlando JJ, Soja AJ (2011) The fire inventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geosci Model Dev 4:625–641

Download references

Acknowledgements

Meteorological data for initial and boundary conditions are downloaded from http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2/. The initial and boundary conditions for chemical field, biogenic emissions, biomass burnings, anthropogenic emissions and programs used to process the data sets are obtained from https://www2.acom.ucar.edu/wrf-chem. The Radiosonde data are obtained from University of Wyoming. Authors are grateful to Rajesh Kumar and his team (UCAR, USA) for their support in WRF-Chem installation and simulations. Authors are thankful to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding

The funding for the study is provided by Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India (SR/S4/AS-107/2012).

Author information

Correspondence to Rohit Srivastava.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Gerhard Lammel

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOCX 695 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastava, R., Bran, S.H. Impact of dynamical and microphysical schemes on black carbon prediction in a regional climate model over India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 14844–14855 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1607-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dynamical parameterization
  • Meteorology
  • Aerosols
  • Black carbon
  • Regional climate model