Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 13, pp 12491–12506 | Cite as

The environmental Kuznets curve in the presence of corruption in developing countries

  • Tajul Ariffin Masron
  • Yogeeswari SubramaniamEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Environmental degradation is at an alarming level in developing economies. The present paper examines the direct and indirect impacts of corruption on environmental deterioration using the panel data of 64 developing countries. Adopting the generalized method of moments (GMM) technique, the paper finds evidence that corruption exhibits a positive impact on pollution. Subsequently, there is also evidence indicating that the level of pollution tends to be higher in countries with a higher level of corruption, eliminating the effectiveness of income effect on environmental preservation. These results also suggest that environmental degradation is monotonically increasing with higher corruption and invalidate the presence of the EKC. Hence, a policy focuses that an anti-corruption particularly in the environmental and natural resources sector needs to be emphasized and enforced in order to reduce or possibly to totally eliminate the rent for corruption.

Keywords

Corruption Carbon emission Ecological footprint Developing countries 

References

  1. Acar S, Tekce M (2014) Economic development and industrial pollution in the Mediterranean region: a panel data analysis. Topics Middle East, Afr Econ 16(1):65–95Google Scholar
  2. Ajide KB, Adeniyi O (2010) FDI and the environment in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria. Environ Res J 4(4):291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcantara-Ayala I (2002) Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology 47(2):107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54(February):1622–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed AH (2015) Investigating the environmental kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48(January):315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10):4772–4778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52(May):16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68(1):29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atici C (2009) Carbon emissions in Central and Eastern Europe: environmental kuznets curve and implications for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 17(3):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bal-Gunduz Y (2017) Debt sustainability in low-income countries: policies, institutions, or shocks? IMF Working Paper No. WP/17/114 Washington: International Monetary FundGoogle Scholar
  12. Baltagi BH, Bratberg E, Holmås TH (2005) A panel data study of physicians’ labor supply: the case of Norway. Health Econ 14(10):1035–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Begum RA, Sohag K, Abdullah SMS, Jaafar M (2015) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41(October):594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S, Ozturk I (2015) The role of renewable energy consumption and trade: environmental kuznets curve analysis for sub-Saharan Africa countries. Afr Dev Rev 27(3):288–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bento JPC, Moutinho V (2016) CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55(March):142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54(February):838–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blackburn K (2012) Corruption and development: explaining the evidence. Manch Sch 80(4):401–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87(1):115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clausen R, York R (2008) Global biodiversity decline of marine and freshwater fish: a cross-national analysis of economic, demographic, and ecological influences. Soc Sci Res 37(4):1310–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cole MA (2007) Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 62(3):637–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coondoo D, Dinda S (2008) Carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecol Econ 65(2):375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crespo Cuaresma J, Hlouskova J, Obersteiner M (2008) Natural disasters as creative destruction? Evidence from developing countries. Econ Inq 46(2):214–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Damania R, Fredriksson PG, List JA (2003) Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):490–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dillon J, Ekmekji K, Feighery A, Garrett R, Gray M, Johnson T, Jones S, Legge T, Leous JP, Raeisghasem A, Reilly K (2006) Corruption & the environment. In a project for Transparency International, Environmental Science and Policy Workshop, Columbia University, School of International & Public AffairsGoogle Scholar
  25. Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60(August):1074–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dutta S, Geiger T, Lanvin B (2015) The global information technology report 2015. World Econ Forum 1(1):80–85Google Scholar
  27. Fredriksson PG, Millimet DL (2001) Bureaucratic corruption and environmental policy: theory and evidence from the United States. Department of Economics, Southern Methodist UniversityGoogle Scholar
  28. Fredriksson PG, Svensson J (2003) Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. J Public Econ 87(7):1383–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fredriksson PG, Vollebergh HR, Dijkgraaf E (2004) Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 47(2):207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Global Footprint Network (2017) Data and methodology. Retrieved May 2017 from: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/data
  31. Griffith-Jones S, Ocampo JA, Spratt S (2012) Financing renewable energy in developing countries: mechanisms and responsibilities. European Report on DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  32. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hettige H, Mani M, Wheeler D (2000) Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. J Dev Econ 62(2):445–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Howes M, Wortley L, Potts R, Dedekorkut-Howes A, Serrao-Neumann S, Davidson J, Nunn P (2017) Environmental sustainability: a case of policy implementation failure? Sustainability 9(2):165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ibrahim MH, Law SH (2014) Social capital and CO2 emission—output relations: a panel analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29(January):528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ito K (2016) CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: evidence from panel data for developed countries. Econ Bull 36(1):553–559Google Scholar
  37. Jackson RJ, Jackson D (2008) Politics in Canada: culture, institutions, behaviour and public policy. Pearson Prentice Hall, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  38. Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60(January):824–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jin Y, Andersson H, Zhang S (2016) Air pollution control policies in China: a retrospective and prospects. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(12):1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Zoido-Lobaton P (1999) Governance matters’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2196. Washington, DC: World BankGoogle Scholar
  41. Krishnan S, Teo TS, Lim VK (2013) Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: a cross-country analysis. Inf Manag 50(8):638–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lamla MJ (2009) Long-run determinants of pollution: a robustness analysis. Ecol Econ 69(1):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Investigation of the environmental kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68(May):490–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee CC, Lee JD (2009) Income and CO2 emissions: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy 37(2):413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leitao A (2010) Corruption and the environmental kuznets curve: empirical evidence for sulfur. Ecol Econ 69(11):2191–2201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lippe M (1999) Corruption and environment at the local level. Transparency International Working Paper. Berlin, Transparency InternationalGoogle Scholar
  47. Lohmann L (2010) Neoliberalism and the calculable world: the rise of carbon trading. The rise and fall of neoliberalism. Zed Books, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Lopez R, Mitra S (2000) Corruption, pollution, and the kuznets environment curve. J Environ Econ Manag 40(2):137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. López R, Toman MA (2006) Economic development and environmental sustainability: new policy options. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marques AC, Fuinhas JA, Manso JP (2010) Motivations driving renewable energy in European countries: a panel data approach. Energy policy 38(11):6877–6885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110(3):681–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mo PH (2001) Corruption and economic growth. J Comp Econ 29(1):66–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Olken BA, Pande R (2012) Corruption in developing countries. Annu Rev Econ 4(1):479–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oxley JE (1999) Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. J Econ Behav Organ 38(3):283–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ozcan B (2013) The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 62(November):1138–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working Paper WP238 Technology and Employment Programme. International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  57. Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36(1):685–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pellegrini L, Gerlagh R (2006) Corruption, democracy, and environmental policy: an empirical contribution to the debate. J Environ Dev 15(3):332–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reyes O, Gilbertson T (2010) Carbon trading: how it works and why it fails. Soundings 45(45):89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rodrik D (1992) Political economy and development policy. Eur Econ Rev 36:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51(September):184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Samimi AJ, Ahmadpour M, Ghaderi S (2012) Governance and environmental degradation in MENA region. Proc Soc Behav Sci 62(October):503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmalensee R, Stoker TM, Judson RA (1998) World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950–2050. Rev Econ Stat 80(1):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shafiei S, Salim RA (2014) Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 66(March):547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 46(S1):757–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88(1):376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sheng J, Han X, Zhou H, Miao Z (2016) Effects of corruption on performance: evidence from the UN-REDD Programme. Land Use Policy 59(December):344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shiva V (1991) Ecology and the politics of survival: conflicts over natural resources in India. United Nations University Press, New Delhi and LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 108(3):599–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith K (2013) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Sparling DW, Richter KO, Callhoun A, Micacchion M (2002) United States environmental protection agency. Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  73. Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sundström A (2013) Corruption in the commons: why bribery hampers enforcement of environmental regulations in South African fisheries. Int J Commons 7(2):454–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy policy 37(1):246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. UNCTAD (2017) UNCTAD Stat. Retrieved May 2017 from: http://unctadstat.unctad.org
  77. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2002) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. Preliminary version prepared as an interagency effort coordinated by the ISDR Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  78. Vincent JR (1997) Testing for environmental kuznets curves within a developing country. Environ Dev Econ 2(04):417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vukina T, Beghin JC, Solakoglu EG (1999) Transition to markets and the environment: effects of the change in the composition of manufacturing output. Environ Dev Econ 4(4):582–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walter M, Luebke MA (2013) The impact of corruption on climate change: threatening emissions trading mechanisms? Environ Dev 7(July):128–138Google Scholar
  81. Walter I, Ugelow JL (1979) Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio 8(2/3):102–109Google Scholar
  82. Welsch H (2004) Corruption, growth, and the environment: a cross-country analysis. Environ Dev Econ 9(05):663–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Winbourne S (2002) Corruption and the environment. Management systems international and USAID, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  84. World Bank (2017a) World development indicators. Retrieved May 2017 from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator
  85. World Bank (2017b) Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved May 2017 from: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worldwide-governance-indicators
  86. World Health Organization (2002) The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang YJ, Jin YL, Chevallier J, Shen B (2016) The effect of corruption on carbon dioxide emissions in APEC countries: a panel quantile regression analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 112(107):220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zugravu N, Ben Kheder S (2008) The pollution haven hypothesis: a geographic economy model in a comparative study. Working Paper Series 232, Fondazione Eni Enrico MatteiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations