Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 13, pp 12579–12587 | Cite as

The ‘333’ integrated strategy for effective pollution control and its application to the heavily polluted Jialu River in north China

  • Yu Huang
  • Jie Sun
  • Aimin Li
  • Xianchuan XieEmail author
Research Article
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, an integrated approach named the ‘333’ strategy was applied to pollution control in the Jialu River, in northern China, which is heavily burdened with anthropogenic pollution. Due to a deficiency of the natural ecological inflow, the Jialu River receives predominantly industrial and municipal effluent. The ‘333’ strategy is composed of three steps of pollution control including industrial point-source pollution control, advanced treatment of municipal wastewater, and ecological restoration; three increased stringency emission standards; and three stages of reclamation. Phase 1 of the ‘333’ strategy focuses on industrial point-source pollution control; phase 2 aims to harness municipal wastewater and minimize sewage effluents using novel techniques for advanced water purification; phase 3 of the ‘333’ strategy focuses on the further purification of effluents flowing into Jialu River with the employment of an engineering-based ecological restoration project. The application of the ‘333’ strategy resulted in the development of novel techniques for water purification including modified magnetic resins (NDMP resin), a two-stage internal circulation anaerobic reactor (IC reactor) and an ecological restoration system. The results indicate that water quality in the river was significantly improved, with increased concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO), as well as reduction of COD by 42.8% and NH3-N by 61.4%. In addition, it was observed that the total population of phytoplankton in treated river water notably increased from only one prior to restoration to 8 following restoration. This system also provides a tool for pollution control of other similar industrial and anthropogenic source polluted rivers.

Keywords

Urban river ‘333’ strategy Emission standard NDMP resin Ecological restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge generous support provided by Jiangsu Nature Science Fund (BK20151378), NSFC (41203062 and 51438008), China’s National Key Project of Science and Technology (2015ZX07204-007 and 2017ZX07602-004), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (090514380001). The authors declare no competing financial interests in the publication of this article.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_1467_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1408 kb)

References

  1. Adishkumar S, Kanmani S (2010) Treatment of phenolic wastewaters in single baffle reactor by solar/TiO2/H2O2 process. Desalin Water Treat 24(1-3):67–73.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque A, Makinia J, Pagilla K (2012) Impact of aeration conditions on the removal of low concentrations of nitrogen in a tertiary partially aerated biological filter. Ecol Eng 44:44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chelliapan S, Sallis PJ (2011) Application of anaerobic biotechnology for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment. IIOAB J 2:13–21Google Scholar
  4. Comoglu BA, Iscen CF, Ilhan S (2016) The anaerobic treatment of pharmaceutical industry wastewater in an anaerobic batch and upflow packed-bed reactor. Desalin Water Treat 57(14):6278–6289.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1005691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper ER, Siewicki TC, Phillips K (2008) Preliminary risk assessment database and risk ranking of pharmaceuticals in the environment. Sci Total Environ 398(1-3):26–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Enright A-M, McHugh S, Collins G, O’Flaherty V (2005) Low-temperature anaerobic biological treatment of solvent-containing pharmaceutical wastewater. Water Res 39(19):4587–4596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghanbari F, Moradi M (2015) A comparative study of electrocoagulation, electrochemical fenton, electro-fenton and peroxi-coagulation for decolorization of real textile wastewater: electrical energy consumption and biodegradability improvement. J Environ Chem Eng 3(1):499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghorbani M, Eisazadeh H (2013) Removal of cod, color, anions and heavy metals from cotton textile wastewater by using polyaniline and polypyrrole nanocomposites coated on rice husk ash. Compos Part B 45(1):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrelkas F, Azizi A, Yaacoubi A, Benhammou A, Pons MN (2009) Treatment of textile dye effluents using coagulation–flocculation coupled with membrane processes or adsorption on powdered activated carbon. Desalination 235(1-3):330–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim S, Jensen JN, Aga DS, Weber AS (2007) Tetracycline as a selector for resistant bacteria in activated sludge. Chemosphere 66(9):1643–1651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koseoglu-Imer DY (2013) The determination of performances of polysulfone (ps) ultrafiltration membranes fabricated at different evaporation temperatures for the pretreatment of textile wastewater. Desalination 316:110–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li CC, Cabassud C, Guigui C (2015) Evaluation of membrane bioreactor on removal of pharmaceutical micropollutants: a review. Desalin Water Treat 55(4):845–858.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.926839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lourenco ND, Franca RDG, Moreira MA, Gil FN, Viegas CA, Pinheiro HM (2015) Comparing aerobic granular sludge and flocculent sequencing batch reactor technologies for textile wastewater treatment. Biochem Eng J 104:57–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.04.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu X, Liu L, Yang B, Chen J (2009) Reuse of printing and dyeing wastewater in processess assessed by pilot-scale test using combined biological process and sub-filter technology. J Clean Prod 17(2):111–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mbuligwe SE, Kaseva ME (2005) Pollution and self-cleansing of an urban river in a developing country: a case study in dar es salaam, tanzania. Environ Manag 36(2):328–342.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0068-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng KK, Shi X, Tang MKY, Ng HY (2014) A novel application of anaerobic bio-entrapped membrane reactor for the treatment of chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 132:634–643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ning D, Huang Y, Pan R, Wang F, Wang H (2014) Effect of eco-remediation using planted floating bed system on nutrients and heavy metals in urban river water and sediment: a field study in china. Sci Total Environ 485:596–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oktem YA, Ince O, Sallis P, Donnelly T, Ince BK (2008) Anaerobic treatment of a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresour Technol 99(5):1089–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Punzi M, Nilsson F, Anbalagan A, Svensson B-M, Jönsson K, Mattiasson B, Jonstrup M (2015) Combined anaerobic–ozonation process for treatment of textile wastewater: removal of acute toxicity and mutagenicity. J Hazard Mater 292:52–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qin H-P, Su Q, Khu S-T (2013) Assessment of environmental improvement measures using a novel integrated model: a case study of the shenzhen river catchment, china. J Environ Manag 114:486–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Radjenovic J, Petrovic M, Barceló D (2007) Analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and removal using a membrane bioreactor. Anal Bioanal Chem 387(4):1365–1377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0883-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radjenovic J, Sedlak DL (2015) Challenges and opportunities for electrochemical processes as next-generation technologies for the treatment of contaminated water. Environ Sci Technol 49(19):11292–11302.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shahtalebi A, Sarrafzadeh M, Rahmati MM (2011) Application of nanofiltration membrane in the separation of amoxicillin from pharmaceutical wastewater. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 8:109Google Scholar
  24. Shuang C, Li P, Li A, Zhou Q, Zhang M, Thou Y (2012) Quaternized magnetic microspheres for the efficient removal of reactive dyes. Water Res 46(14):4417–4426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sponza DT, Çelebi H (2012) Removal of oxytetracycline (otc) in a synthetic pharmaceutical wastewater by sequential anaerobic multichamber bed reactor (amcbr)/completely stirred tank reactor (cstr) system: biodegradation and inhibition kinetics. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87(7):961–975.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.3706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sreekanth D, Sivaramakrishna D, Himabindu V, Anjaneyulu Y (2009) Thermophilic treatment of bulk drug pharmaceutical industrial wastewaters by using hybrid up flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresour Technol 100(9):2534–2539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun Y, Chen Z, Wu G, Wu Q, Zhang F, Niu Z, Hu HY (2016a) Characteristics of water quality of municipal wastewater treatment plants in china: implications for resources utilization and management. J Clean Prod 131:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun J, Ji X, Zhang R, Huang Y, Liang Y, Du J et al (2016b) Endocrine disrupting compounds reduction and water quality improvement in reclaimed municipal wastewater: a field-scale study along jialu river in north china. Chemosphere 157:232–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Szpyrkowicz L, Juzzolino C, Kaul SN (2001) A comparative study on oxidation of disperse dyes by electrochemical process, ozone, hypochlorite and fenton reagent. Water Res 35(9):2129–2136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00487-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang C-J, Zheng P, Chen T-T, Zhang J-Q, Mahmood Q, Ding S, Chen XG, Chen JW, Wu DT (2011) Enhanced nitrogen removal from pharmaceutical wastewater using sba-anammox process. Water Res 45(1):201–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor JA, Frey LT (2013) The need for industry and occupation standards in hospital discharge data. J Occup Environ Med 55(5):495–499.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318293af12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tekin H, Bilkay O, Ataberk SS, Balta TH, Ceribasi IH, Sanin FD et al (2006) Use of fenton oxidation to improve the biodegradability of a pharmaceutical wastewater. J Hazard Mater 136(2):258–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vergili I, Gencdal S (2015) Applicability of combined fenton oxidation and nanofiltration to pharmaceutical wastewater. Desalin Water Treat 56(13):3501–3509.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.976772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vlyssides A, Loizidou M, Karlis P, Zorpas A, Papaioannou D (1999) Electrochemical oxidation of a textile dye wastewater using a pt/ti electrode. J Hazard Mater 70(1-2):41–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00130-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang WL, Gao JQ, Guo X, Li WC, Tian XY, Zhang RQ (2012) Long-term effects and performance of two-stage baffled surface flow constructed wetland treating polluted river. Ecol Eng 49:93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang Q, Yang W, Ngo H, Guo W, Jin P, Dzakpasu M et al (2016) Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in china. Environ Int 92:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang Y-Z, Song X-F, Kondoh A, Xia J, Tang C-Y (2011) Behavior, mass inventories and modeling evaluation of xenobiotic endocrine-disrupting chemicals along an urban receiving wastewater river in henan province, china. Water Res 45(1):292–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zheng SK, Chen JJ, Jiang XM, Li XF (2011) A comprehensive assessment on commercially available standard anion resins for tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater. Chem Eng J 169(1-3):194–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Center for Hydrosciences Research, School of the Environment, School of Life ScienceNanjing UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations