Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 9759–9770 | Cite as

Enhanced removal performance of Cr(VI) by the core-shell zeolites/layered double hydroxides (LDHs) synthesized from different metal compounds in constructed rapid infiltration systems

  • Xiangling ZhangEmail author
  • Yu Lei
  • Ye Yuan
  • Jingtian Gao
  • Yinghe Jiang
  • Zhouying Xu
  • Shuangjie Zhao
Research Article


Nine kinds of LDHs were synthesized by the co-precipitation method under alkaline conditions with different combinations of trivalent metal compounds (FeCl3, AlCl3, CoCl3) and divalent metal compounds (CaCl2, MgCl2, ZnCl2), which were then coated in situ on the surface of zeolites to synthesize core-shell zeolites/LDHs composites. The zeolites before and after modification were characterized by SEM and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Using the different core-shell zeolites/LDHs and original zeolite substrates, the constructed rapid infiltration systems (CRIS) simulated test columns were set to treat the municipal sewage containing hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI). Isothermal adsorption tests were subsequently performed. The average removal efficiencies of the small-sized zeolites were much higher than those of the large-sized zeolites. For the small-sized zeolites, the Cr(VI) removal performances of the Mg-LDHs- and Al-LDHs-modified zeolite substrates were efficiently enhanced in particular, which could reach over 90%. And the removal rate of core-shell zeolites/ZnAl-LDHs reached 94.5%. Meanwhile, the maximum adsorption capacity of ZnAl-LDHs-modified zeolites could reach 51.0 mg/kg, indicating that the adsorption properties could be enhanced by ZnAl-LDHs coating. During the purification experiments, most of the LDHs-modified zeolites maintained their predominant chemical adsorption ability for the removal of Cr(VI). Therefore, the small-sized core-shell zeolites/ZnAl-LDHs composites could be used as potential substrates for the efficient removal of Cr(VI) in CRIS.


Cr(VI) removal Zeolite substrate Coating modification ZnAl-LDHs Different metal compounds Constructed rapid infiltration system 



The authors also thank the Material Research and Testing Center, Wuhan University of Technology for their technical support in the characterization of the original and modified zeolite substrates.

Funding information

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NOs. 31670541, 31270573, 31400435) and the Excellent Academic Dissertation Cultivation Funds of Postgraduate in Wuhan University of Technology (No. 2017-YS-043).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Alguacil FJ, Alonso M, Lopez F, Lopez-Delgado A (2008) Uphill permeation of Cr(VI) using Hostarex A327 as ionophore by membrane-solvent extraction processing. Chemosphere 72(4):684–689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali IO, Hassan AM, Shaaban SM, Soliman KS (2011) Synthesis and characterization of ZSM-5 zeolite from rice husk ash and their adsorption of Pb2+ onto unmodified and surfactant-modified zeolite. Sep Purif Technol 83:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An WH, Xiao H, Yu M, Chen XY, Xu YX, Zhou WM (2013) Adsorptive removal of trace oxytetracycline from water by acid-modified zeolites: influencing factors. Water Sci Technol 68(11):2473–2478. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arancribia-Miranda N, Yumi JES, Escudey M (2015) Effective of cations in the background electrolyte on the adsorption kinetics of copper and cadmium and isoelectric point of imogolite. J Hazard Mater 299:675–684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asiabi H, Yamini Y, Shamsayei M (2017) Highly selective and efficient removal of arsenic(V), chromium(VI) and selenium(V) oxyanions by layered double hydroxide intercalated with zwitterionic glycine. J Hazard Mater 339:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkin PW (1998) Physical chemistry, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Carson BL, Ellis HV, McCann JL (1987) Toxicology and biological monitoring of metals in humans. Q Rev Biol 62:259Google Scholar
  8. Charisse MD, Cagonoc, Magdaleno R, Vasquez J (2017) Enhanced chromium adsorption capacity via plasma modification of natural zeolites. Jpn J Appl Phys 56:1–6Google Scholar
  9. Chen JM (2012) Comparative experiment study on the total phosphorus removal efficiency of different infiltration media combinations in the CRI system. Adv Mater Res 415-417:1735–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen TH, Feng YL, Xu HF, Peng SC, Huang CH, Tang SP (2004) Treatment of wastewater containing Cr(VI) by LDHs synthesizing in situ. Environ Sci 25(2):89–93Google Scholar
  11. Dubinin MM, Radushkevich LV (1947) Proceeding of the academy science. Phy Chem Sect 55:331–333Google Scholar
  12. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Environmental Research Information (1990) Environmental pollution control alternatives: drinking water treatment for small communities. Tratamento Da AguaGoogle Scholar
  13. Erdem E, Karapinar N, Donat R (2004) The removal of heavy metal cations by natural zeolites. J Colloid Interface Sci 280:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang J, Gu ZM, Gang DC, Liu CX, Ilton ES, Deng BL (2007) Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution by activated carbon coated with quaternized poly (4-vinylpyridine). Environ Sci Technol 41(13):4748–4753. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ge Y, Wang X, Zheng Y, Dzakpasu M, Zhao Y, Xiong J (2015) Functions of slags and gravels as substrates in large-scale demonstration constructed wetland system for polluted water treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(17):12982–12991. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goyer RA, Mehlman MA (1977) Advances in modern toxicology: toxicology of trace elements. Hemisphere Publishing CorporationGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo L, Zhang XL, Chen QZ, Ruan CY, Leng YJ (2015) Enhanced removal performance by the core-shell/MgFe-layered double hydroxides (LDHs) for municipal wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:6749–6757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta VK, Shrivastava AK, Jain N (2001) Biosorption of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions by green algae spirogyra species. Water Res 35(17):4079–4085. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Habiba U, Afifil AM, Salleh A, Ang BC (2017) Chitosan/(polyvinyl alcohol)/zeolite electrospun composite nanofibrous membrane for adsorption of Cr6+, Fe3+ and Ni2+. J Hazard Mater 322(Pt A):182–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. He YT, Traina SJ (2005) Cr(VI) reduction and immobilization by magnetite under alkaline pH conditions: the role of passivation. Environ Sci Technol 39(12):4499–4504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernández-Montoya V, Pérez-Cruz MA, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Moreno-virgen MR (2013) Competitive adsorption of dyes and heavy metals on zeolite structures. J Environ Manag 116:213–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu J, Chen G, Lo IMC (2005) Removal and recovery of Cr(VI) from wastewater by maghemite nanoparticles. Water Res 39(18):4528–4536. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang DY, Shi Q, Zhang YC (2003) Contents of heavy metals in coral in Porites in Sanya Bay and their environmental significance. Mar Environ Sci 22:35–38Google Scholar
  24. Hutton M, Symon C (1986) The quantities of cadmium, lead, mercury and arsenic entering the U.K. environment from human activities. Sci Total Environ 57:129–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ismael IS (2010) Synthesis and characterization of zeolite X obtained from kaolin for adsorption of Zn(II). Acta Geochim 29:130–136Google Scholar
  26. Jaiswal A, Mani R, Banerjee S, Gautam RK, Chattopadhyaya MC (2015) Synthesis of novel nano-layered double hydroxide by urea hydrolysis method and their application in removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution: kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies. J Mol Liq 202:52–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Juan JT, Maria AG, Marta IL (2001) Experimental evidence in favor of an initial one-electron-transfer process in the heterogeneous photo-catalytic reduction of chromium(VI) over TiO2. Langmuir 17:3515–3517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khitous M, Salem Z, Halliche D (2016) Effect of interlayer anions on chromium removal using Mg-Al layered double hydroxides: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Chinese J Chem Eng 24:433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leone V, Canzano S, Iovino P, Salvestrini S, Capasso S (2013) A novel organo -zeolite adduct for environmental applications: sorption of phenol. Chemosphere 91:415–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lian YL, Xu MY, Zhong YM, Yang YQ, Chen FR, Guo J (2015) Ammonia oxidizers in a pilot-scale multilayer rapid infiltration system for domestic wastewater treatment. PLoS One 10:1–18Google Scholar
  31. Liu HB, Peng SC, Shu L, Chen TH, Bao T, Frost RL (2013) Magnetic zeolite NaA: synthesis, characterization based on metakaolin and its application for the removal of Cu2+, Pb2+. Chemosphere 91(11):1539–1546. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu Y, Jiang B, Fang L, Ling FL, Gao JM, Wu F (2016) High performance NiFe layered double hydroxide for methyl orange dye and Cr(VI) adsorption. Chemosphere 152:415–422. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira H (2012) Chromium as an environmental pollutant: insights on induced plant toxicity. J Bot 2012:375–843Google Scholar
  34. Owlad M, Aroua MK, Daud WAW, Baroutian S (2009) Removal of hexavalent chromium -contaminated water and wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 200(1-4):59–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ozturk S, Kaya T, Aslim B, Tan S (2012) Removal and reduction of chromium by Pseudomonas spp and their correlation to rhamnolipid production. J Hazard Mater 231–232:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patterson RR, Fendorf S (1997) Reduction of hexavalent chromium by amorphous iron sulfide. Environ Sci Technol 31(7):2039–2044. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petrić J, Trgo M, Vukojevic Medvidovic N (2004) Removal of zinc, copper and lead by natural zeolite-a comparison of adsorption isotherms. Water Res 38(7):1893–1899. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sahinkaya E, Kilic A, Altun M, Komnitsas K, Lens PNL (2012) Hexavalent chromium reduction in a sulfur reducing packed-bed bioreactor. J Hazard Mater 219-220:253–259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwarzenbach RP, Escher BI, Fenner K, Hofstetter TB, Johnson CA (2006) The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 313(5790):1072–1077. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. SEPA (2002) Water and wastewater monitoring and analysis method, 4th edn. China Environmental Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  41. Sinha V, Manikandan NA, Pakshirajan K, Chaturvedi R (2017) Continuous removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater by phytoextraction using Tradescantia pallida plant based vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland system. Int Biodeter Biodegr 119:96–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SPSS (2003) Analytical software, statistical package for the social science (SPSS) headquarter. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  43. Tian WL, Kong XG, Jiang MH, Lei XD, Duan X (2016) Hierarchical layered double hydroxide epitaxially grown on vermiculite for Cr(VI) removal. Mater Lett 175:110–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang KY, Chung TS (2006) Fabrication of polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for removal of chromate. J Membr Sci 281(1-2):307–315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang DB, Zhang ZY, Li XM, Zheng W, Yang Q, Ding Y (2010) A full-scale treatment of freeway toll-gate domestic sewage using ecology filter integrated constructed rapid infiltration. Ecol Eng 36(6):827–831. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang WW, Zhou JB, Achari G, Yu JG, Cai WQ (2014) Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solutions by hydrothermal synthetic layered double hydroxides: adsorption performance, coexisting anions and regeneration studies. Colloid Surf A 457:33–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu Q, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Yao L, Xie G (2008) Processing of chromium(VI)-contaminated wastewater with Chengde’s organically modified zeolite. J Lanzhou Univ Technol 34(3):69–72Google Scholar
  48. Zhang XL, Zhang S, He F, Wu ZB (2007) Different performance of eight filter media in vertical flow constructed wetland: removal of organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus. Fresenius Environ Bull 16:1468–1473Google Scholar
  49. Zhang XL, Liu XT, Xu L, Luo Q, Chen JJ, Hu L, Jin JH (2013) Purification effect of vertical flow constructed wetlands using modified substrates coated with MgFe-LDHs. China Environ Sci 33:1407–1412Google Scholar
  50. Zhang XL, Guo L, Wang YF, Ruan CY (2015) Removal of oxygen demand and nitrogen using different particle-sizes of anthracite coated with nine kinds of LDHs for wastewater treatment. Sci Rep-UK 5(1):15146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang XL, Guo L, Huang HL, Jiang YH, Li M, Leng YJ (2016) Removal of phosphorus by the core-shell bio-ceramic/Zn-layered double hydroxides (LDHs) composites for municipal wastewater treatment in constructed rapid infiltration system. Water Res 96:280–291. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiangling Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yu Lei
    • 1
  • Ye Yuan
    • 1
  • Jingtian Gao
    • 1
  • Yinghe Jiang
    • 1
  • Zhouying Xu
    • 1
  • Shuangjie Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations