Advertisement

Static decontamination of oil-based drill cuttings with pressurized hot water using response surface methodology

  • Zhong Chen
  • Dongyuan Li
  • Kun Tong
  • Zeliang Chen
  • Hongzhen Chen
  • Qiao Chen
  • Yuanjian XuEmail author
Research Article
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Separating organic pollutants from oil-based drill cuttings (OBDC) is the current trend for its safe disposal. In this study, pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) was adapted to decontaminate OBDC for the first time. Two typical OBDC samples, i.e., diesel-based drill cuttings (OBDC-A) and white oil-based drill cuttings (OBDC-B), were statically extracted in a homemade batch autoclave. Response surface methodology (RSM) with a central composite design (CCD) was applied to investigate the effects and interactive effects of three independent operating parameters (temperature, extraction time, and water volume) and to ultimately optimize the PHWE process. The results suggested that temperature is the dominant parameter, followed by water volume and extraction time. Interactive effects among the three parameters are present in the PHWE of OBDC-A but absent in the PHWE of OBDC-B. The suitable conditions for the effective PHWE of OBDC-A were found to be a temperature of 284–300 °C, water volume of 15–35 ml, and extraction time of 20–60 min. The corresponding conditions were 237–300 °C, 15–35 ml, and 20–60 min for the PHWE of OBDC-B. These different phenomena are caused by the different characteristics of the two OBDC samples. All of the polynomial models obtained from the RSM experiments are very valid and can adequately describe the relationship among the three independent operating parameters and responses. The experimental results also confirmed that PHWE is a more efficient separation technique for decontaminating OBDC than single organic solvent extraction or low-temperature thermal desorption because PHWE integrates the advantages of both these processes.

Keywords

Petroleum contamination Hazardous solid waste Oily sludge Waste drill fluids Shale gas 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control (PPC2016001), the CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology, the West Young Scholar Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing Basic and Frontier Research Projects (CSTC2015JCYJBX0120), the Chongqing City Social Undertakings and Livelihood Protection Science and Technology Innovation Special Project (CSTC2017SHMSA120001), and the Chongqing Land Bureau Science and Technology Planning Project (CQGT-KJ-2017026, CQGT-KJ-2014037).

References

  1. Ahmad F, Anwar S, Firdous S, Da-Chuan Y, Iqbal S (2018) Biodegradation of bispyribac sodium by a novel bacterial consortium BDAM: optimization of degradation conditions using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 349:272–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AQSIQ of China (2008) GB 4914-2008, effluent limitations for pollutants from offshore petroleum exploration and production. China Standard Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  3. ASME (2011) Drilling fluids processing handbook. Elsevier, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball AS, Stewart RJ, Schliephake K (2012) A review of the current options for the treatment and safe disposal of drill cuttings. Waste Manage Res 30:457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardo G, Marroccoli M, Nobili M, Telesca A, Valenti GL (2007) The use of oil well-derived drilling waste and electric arc furnace slag as alternative raw materials in clinker production. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang MS, Shen JY, Yang S-H, Wu GJ (2011) Subcritical water extraction for the remediation of phthalate ester-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 192:1203–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Z, Chen Z, Yin F, Wang G, Chen H, He C, Xu Y (2017) Supercritical water oxidation of oil-based drill cuttings. J Hazard Mater 332:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Z, Zhou J, Chen Z, Chen H, Chen Q, He C, Liu X, Xu Y (2018) A laboratory evaluation of superheated steam extraction process for decontamination of oil-based drill cuttings. J Environ Chem Eng 6:6691–6699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darajeh N, Idris A, FardMasoumi HR, Nourani A, Truong P, Sairi NA (2016) Modeling BOD and COD removal from palm oil mill secondary effluent in floating wetland by Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) using response surface methodology. J Environ Manag 181:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Almeida PC, de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo O, de Medeiros JL (2017) Managing offshore drill cuttings waste for improved sustainability. J Clean Prod 165:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhir RK, Csetenyi LJ, Dyer TD, Smith GW (2010) Cleaned oil-drill cuttings for use as filler in bituminous mixtures. Constr Build Mater 24:322–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hashimoto S, Watanabe K, Nose K, Morita M (2004) Remediation of soil contaminated with dioxins by subcritical water extraction. Chemosphere 54:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He C, Du H, Tan C, Chen Z, Chen Z, Yin F, Xu Y, Liu X (2018) Semi-continuous pressurized hot water extraction of black tea. J Food Eng 227:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu G, Li J, Zeng G (2013) Recent development in the treatment of oily sludge from petroleum industry: a review. J Hazard Mater 261:470–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Islam M, Jo Y, Jung S, Park J (2013) Evaluation of subcritical water extraction process for remediation of pesticide-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1–10Google Scholar
  16. Islam MN, Jo YT, Park JH (2014) Remediation of soil contaminated with lubricating oil by extraction using subcritical water. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1511–1516Google Scholar
  17. Islam M, Park H, Park J (2015a) Extraction of diesel from contaminated soil using subcritical water. Environ Earth Sci 74:3059–3066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Islam M, Shin M, Jo Y, Park J (2015b) TNT and RDX degradation and extraction from contaminated soil using subcritical water. Chemosphere 119:1148–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Javed U, Farooq R, Shehzad F, Khan Z (2018) Optimization of HNO3 leaching of copper from old AMD Athlon processors using response surface methodology. J Environ Manage 211:22–27Google Scholar
  20. Khanjari Y, Eikani MH, Rowshanzamir S (2015) Experimental and theoretical investigation of the removal organic pollutants from contaminated soils using superheated water. J Supercrit Fluids 103:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khanjari Y, Eikani MH, Rowshanzamir S (2016) Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil using superheated water extraction. J Supercrit Fluids 111:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khanpour R, Sheikhi-Kouhsar MR, Esmaeilzadeh F, Mowla D (2014) Removal of contaminants from polluted drilling mud using supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. J Supercrit Fluids 88:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kogbara RB, Ayotamuno JM, Onuomah I, Ehio V, Damka TD (2016) Stabilisation/solidification and bioaugmentation treatment of petroleum drill cuttings. Appl Geochem 71:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma J, Yang Y, Dai X, Chen Y, Deng H, Zhou H, Guo S, Yan G (2016) Effects of adding bulking agent, inorganic nutrient and microbial inocula on biopile treatment for oil-field drilling waste. Chemosphere 150:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MEP of China (2016) National hazardous waste inventory of China. http://www.mep.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bl/201606/t20160621_354852.htm. Accessed 17 May 2018
  26. Mohammed B, Cheeseman CR (2011) Use of oil drill cuttings as an alternative raw material in sandcrete blocks. Waste Biomass Valoriiz 2:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. NIST (n.d.) Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. http://webbook.nist.Gov/chemistry/fluid/. Accessed 23 April 2018
  28. Okparanma R, Araka P, Ayotamuno J, Mouazen A (2018) Towards enhancing sustainable reuse of pre-treated drill cuttings for construction purposes by near-infrared analysis: a review. J Civil Eng Constr Technol 9(3):19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossi AS, Faria MG, Pereira MS, Ataíde CH (2016) Kinetics of microwave heating and drying of drilling fluids and drill cuttings. Dry Technol 35:1130–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shang H, Snape CE, Kingman SW, Robinson JP (2006) Microwave treatment of oil-contaminated North Sea drill cuttings in a high power multimode cavity. Sep Purif Technol 49:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith RM (2002) Extractions with superheated water. J Chromatogr A 975:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teo CC, Tan SN, Yong JWH, Hew CS, Ong ES (2010) Pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). J Chromatogr A 1217:2484–2494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tomšik A, Pavlić B, Vladić J, Cindrić M, Jovanov P, Sakač M, Mandić A, Vidović S (2017) Subcritical water extraction of wild garlic (Allium ursinum L.) and process optimization by response surface methodology. J Supercrit Fluids 128:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uematsu M, Frank EU (1980) Static dielectric constant of water and steam. J Phys Chem Ref Data 9:1291–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang C, Jin J, Lin X, Xiong D, Mei X (2017a) A study on the oil-based drilling cutting pyrolysis residue resource utilization by the exploration and development of shale gas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 24:17816–17828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang C, Lin X, Zhang C, Mei X (2017b) Environmental security control of resource utilization of shale gas’ drilling cuttings containing heavy metals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:21973–21983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang S, Zheng C, Zhao J, Li X, Lu H (2017c) Extracting and recovering diesel from oil-based drill cuttings using switchable hydrophilic solvents. Chem Eng Res Des 128:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xynos N, Papaefstathiou G, Gikas E, Argyropoulou A, Aligiannis N, Skaltsounis A-L (2014) Design optimization study of the extraction of olive leaves performed with pressurized liquid extraction using response surface methodology. Sep Purif Technol 122:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan P, Lu M, Guan Y, Zhang W, Zhang Z (2011) Remediation of oil-based drill cuttings through a biosurfactant-based washing followed by a biodegradation treatment. Bioresource Techn 102:10252–10259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yao G, Chen Z, Chen Q, Li D, Xie Z, Zhou Y, Xiong X, Xu Y (2018) Behaviors of organic and heavy metallic pollutants during supercritical water oxidation of oil-based drill cuttings. Water Air Soil Pollut 229:102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao L, Zhu T, Hou H, Qin X, Li F, Terada A, Hosomi M (2015) Removal of PCBs and HCB from contaminated solids using a novel successive self-propagated sintering process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:17527–17539CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution ControlBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesChongqingChina
  3. 3.School of Petroleum EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina
  4. 4.Environmentally-Benign Chemical Process Research Center, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology (CIGIT)Chinese Academy of SciencesChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations