Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 29, pp 22948–22953 | Cite as

Protective role of humic acids against picloram-induced genomic instability and DNA methylation in Phaseolus vulgaris

  • Mahmut Sinan Taspinar
  • Murat Aydin
  • Burcu Sigmaz
  • Nalan Yildirim
  • Guleray AgarEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) is a liquid auxinic herbicide used to control broad-leaved weeds. Picloram is representing a possible hazard to ecosystems and human health. Therefore, in this study, DNA methylation changes and DNA damage levels in Phaseolus vulgaris exposed to picloram, as well as whether humic acid (HA) has preventive effects on these changes were investigated. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) techniques were used for identification of DNA damage and coupled restriction enzyme digestion-random amplification (CRED-RA) techniques were used to detect the changed pattern of DNA methylation. According to the obtained results, picloram (5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/l) caused DNA damage profile changes (RAPDs) increasing, DNA hypomethylation and genomic template stability (GTS) decreasing. On the other hand, different concentrations of applied HA (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10%) reduced hazardous effects of picloram. The results of the experiment have explicitly indicated that HAs could be an alternative for reducing genetic damage in plants. In addition to the alleviate effects of humic acid on genetic damage, its epigenetic effect is hypomethylation.

Keywords

DNA methylation Genomic instability Humic acids Picloram 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Research Funds appropriated to Ataturk University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aina R, Sgorbati S, Santagostino A, Labra M, Ghiani A, Citterio S (2004) Specific hypomethylation of DNA is induced by heavy metals in white clover and industrial hemp. Physiol Plant 121:472–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balague C, Sturtz N, Duffard R, Evangelista de Duffard AM (2001) Effect of 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide on Escherichia coli growth, chemical composition, and cellular envelope. Environ Toxicol 16:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botelho RG, dos Santos JB, Fernandes KM et al (2012) Effects of atrazine and picloram on grass carp: acute toxicity and histological assessment. Toxicol Environ Chem 94:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinnusamy V, Gong Z, Zhu JK (2008) Abscisic acid-mediated epigenetic processes in plant development and stress responses. J İntegr Plant Biol 50(10):1187–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Concheri G, Nardi S, Piccolo A, Dell’agnola G, Rascio N (1994) Effects of humic fractions on morphological changes related to invertase and peroxidase activities in wheat seedlings roots. In: Senesi N, Miano T (eds) Humic substances in the global environment and implications for human health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 257–262Google Scholar
  6. De Marco A, De Simone C, D’Ambrosio C, Owczarek M (1999) Buthionine sulfoximine prevents the reduction of the genotoxic activity of maleic hydrazide by soil humic substances in Vicia faba seedlings. Mutat Res 438:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duchnowıcz P, Koter M (2003) Damage to the erythrocyte membrane caused by chlorophenoxyacetic herbicides. Cell Mol Biol Lett 8:25–30Google Scholar
  8. Ferrara G, Loffredo E, Senesi N, Marcos R (2006) Humic acids reduce the genotoxicity of mitomycin C in the human lymphoblastoid cell line TK6. Mutat Res 603:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrara G, Loffredo E, Simeone R, Senesi N (2000) Evaluation of antimutagenic and desmutagenic effects of humic and fulvic acids on root tips of Vicia faba. Environ Toxicol 15:513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammock D, Huang CC, Mort G, Swinehart JH (2003) The effect of humic acid on the uptake of mercury(II), cadmium(II), and zinc(II) by chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) eggs. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khaled H, Fawy HA (2011) Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil Water Res 6:21–29Google Scholar
  12. Koukal B, Gueguen C, Pardos M, Dominik J (2003) Influence of humic substances on the toxic effects of cadmium and zinc to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Chemosphere 53:953–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kulikova NA, Stepanova EV, Koroleva OV (2005) Mitigating activity of humic substances: direct influence on biota. Perminova IV et al. Eds. Use of humic substances to remediate polluted environments: from theory to practice, NATO Science Series IV. Earth Environ Sci 52:285–310Google Scholar
  14. Lajmanovich RC, Junges CM, Attademo AM, Peltzer PM, Cabagna-Zenklusen MC, Basso A (2013) Individual and mixture toxicity of commercial formulations containing glyphosate, Metsulfuron-methyl, Bispyribac-sodium, and picloram on Rhinella arenarum tadpoles. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marova I, Kucerik J, Duronova K, Mikulcova A, Vlckova Z (2011) Antimutagenic and/or genotoxic effects of processed humic acids as tested upon S. Cerevisiae D7. Environ Chem Lett 9:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin F (1975) Humic acids from lignite.1. Anallytical characteristics and thermaldegradation. Fuel 54:236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Menzel R, Sturzenbaum S, Bärenwaldt A, Kulas J, Steinberg CEW (2005) Humic material induces behavioral and global transcriptional responses in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Technol 39:8324–8332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Menzel S, Bouchnak R, Menzel R, Steınberg CE (2011) Dissolved humic substances initiate DNA methylation in cladocerans. AquaticToxicology 105:3–4Google Scholar
  19. Mohammed KB, Ma TH (1999) Tradescantia-micronucleus and -stamen hair mutation assays on genotoxicity of the gaseous and liquid forms of pesticides. Mutat Res 426:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oakes DJ, Webster WS, Brown-Woodman PDC et al (2002) Testicular changes induced by chronic exposure to the herbicide formulation, Tordon 75D((R)) (2,4-D dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and picloram) in rats. Reprod Toxicol 16:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ortega YK, Pearson DE (2010) Effects of Picloram application on community dominants vary with initial levels of spotted knapweed (Centaurea Stoebe) invasion. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salvi ND, George L, Eapen S (2001) Plant regeneration from leaf base callus of turmeric and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of regenerated plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 66:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sawamura S, Jackson WT (1968) Cytological studies in vivo of picloram, pyriclor, trifluralin, 2,3,6-TBA, 2,3,5,6-TBA and nitralin. Cytologia 33:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sener O, Can E, Arslan M, Celis N (2008) Effects of genotype and Picloram concentrations on callus induction and plant regeneration from immature inflorescence of spring barley cultivars (Hordeum VulgareL.) Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 22:915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soniya EV, Banerjee NS, Das MR (2001) Genetic analysis of somaclonal variation among callus-derived plants of tomato. Curr Sci 80:1213–1215Google Scholar
  26. Tan M (2010) Analysis of DNA methylation of maize in response to osmotic and salt stress based on methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang L, Zeng GM, Shen GL, Lı YP, Zhang Y, Huang DL (2008) Rapid detection of Picloram in agricultural field samples using a disposable immunomembrane- based electrochemical sensor. Environ Sci Technol 42:1207–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trevisan S, Pizzeghello D, Ruperti B, Francioso O, Sassi A, Palme K, Quaggıotti S, Nardi S (2010) Humic substances induce lateral root formation and expression of the early auxin-responsive IAA19 gene and DR5 synthetic element in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol 12:604–614Google Scholar
  29. Vaughan D, Malcolm R, Ord BG (1985) Influence of humic substances on biochemical processes in plants. Soil Organic Matter and Biological Activity, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 78–108Google Scholar
  30. Voets J, Bervoets L, Blust R (2004) Cadmium bioavailability and accumulation in the presence of humic acid to the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Environ Sci Technol 38:1003–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yildirim N, Agar G, Taspinar MS, Turan M, Aydin M, Arslan E (2014) Protective role of humic acids against dicamba-induced genotoxicity and DNA methylation in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil and Plant Science 64:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahmut Sinan Taspinar
    • 1
  • Murat Aydin
    • 2
  • Burcu Sigmaz
    • 3
  • Nalan Yildirim
    • 4
  • Guleray Agar
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of AgricultureAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Field Crops, Faculty of AgricultureAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceErzincan UniversityErzincanTurkey

Personalised recommendations