Protective role of humic acids against picloram-induced genomic instability and DNA methylation in Phaseolus vulgaris
- 1.4k Downloads
Picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) is a liquid auxinic herbicide used to control broad-leaved weeds. Picloram is representing a possible hazard to ecosystems and human health. Therefore, in this study, DNA methylation changes and DNA damage levels in Phaseolus vulgaris exposed to picloram, as well as whether humic acid (HA) has preventive effects on these changes were investigated. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) techniques were used for identification of DNA damage and coupled restriction enzyme digestion-random amplification (CRED-RA) techniques were used to detect the changed pattern of DNA methylation. According to the obtained results, picloram (5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/l) caused DNA damage profile changes (RAPDs) increasing, DNA hypomethylation and genomic template stability (GTS) decreasing. On the other hand, different concentrations of applied HA (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10%) reduced hazardous effects of picloram. The results of the experiment have explicitly indicated that HAs could be an alternative for reducing genetic damage in plants. In addition to the alleviate effects of humic acid on genetic damage, its epigenetic effect is hypomethylation.
KeywordsDNA methylation Genomic instability Humic acids Picloram
This study was supported by grants from the Research Funds appropriated to Ataturk University.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Concheri G, Nardi S, Piccolo A, Dell’agnola G, Rascio N (1994) Effects of humic fractions on morphological changes related to invertase and peroxidase activities in wheat seedlings roots. In: Senesi N, Miano T (eds) Humic substances in the global environment and implications for human health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 257–262Google Scholar
- Duchnowıcz P, Koter M (2003) Damage to the erythrocyte membrane caused by chlorophenoxyacetic herbicides. Cell Mol Biol Lett 8:25–30Google Scholar
- Khaled H, Fawy HA (2011) Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil Water Res 6:21–29Google Scholar
- Kulikova NA, Stepanova EV, Koroleva OV (2005) Mitigating activity of humic substances: direct influence on biota. Perminova IV et al. Eds. Use of humic substances to remediate polluted environments: from theory to practice, NATO Science Series IV. Earth Environ Sci 52:285–310Google Scholar
- Lajmanovich RC, Junges CM, Attademo AM, Peltzer PM, Cabagna-Zenklusen MC, Basso A (2013) Individual and mixture toxicity of commercial formulations containing glyphosate, Metsulfuron-methyl, Bispyribac-sodium, and picloram on Rhinella arenarum tadpoles. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menzel S, Bouchnak R, Menzel R, Steınberg CE (2011) Dissolved humic substances initiate DNA methylation in cladocerans. AquaticToxicology 105:3–4Google Scholar
- Soniya EV, Banerjee NS, Das MR (2001) Genetic analysis of somaclonal variation among callus-derived plants of tomato. Curr Sci 80:1213–1215Google Scholar
- Trevisan S, Pizzeghello D, Ruperti B, Francioso O, Sassi A, Palme K, Quaggıotti S, Nardi S (2010) Humic substances induce lateral root formation and expression of the early auxin-responsive IAA19 gene and DR5 synthetic element in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol 12:604–614Google Scholar
- Vaughan D, Malcolm R, Ord BG (1985) Influence of humic substances on biochemical processes in plants. Soil Organic Matter and Biological Activity, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 78–108Google Scholar