Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 28, pp 22414–22426 | Cite as

Oxidation of winery wastewater by sulphate radicals: catalytic and solar photocatalytic activations

  • Jorge Rodríguez-Chueca
  • Carlos Amor
  • Joana Mota
  • Marco S. Lucas
  • José A. Peres
Research Article

Abstract

The treatment of winery effluents through sulphate radical-based advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOPs) driven by solar radiation is reported in this study. Photolytic and catalytic activations of peroxymonosulphate (PMS) and persulphate (KPS and SPS) at different pH values (4.5 and 7) were studied in the degradation of organic matter. Portugal is one of the largest wine producers in Europe. The wine making activities generate huge volume of effluents characterized by a variable volume and organic load, being their seasonal nature one of the most important drawbacks. Recently, SR-AOPs are gradually attracting attention as in situ chemical oxidation technologies, instead of hydroxyl radical AOPs (HR-AOPs). The studied concentrations are suitable to obtain notable values of organic matter degradation, with TOC removal around 50%. In general terms, no notable differences were observed between treatments at pH values 4.5 and 7. Photolytic activation of SPS with solar radiation treatments obtained the highest efficiency (28 and 40% of TOC removal with 1 and 50 mM, respectively, at pH 4.5) in comparison to KPS and PMS. The addition of a transition metal as catalyst, such as Fe(II) or Co(II), increased considerably the TOC removal efficiency higher than 50%, but not in all cases. For instance, the combination KPS or PMS with Co(II) at pH 4.5 did not allow to obtain better results than photolytic activation of these persulphate salts. In summary, the use of SR-AOPs could be a serious alternative as tertiary treatment for winery wastewaters.

Keywords

Winery wastewater Peroxymonosulphate Persulphate Solar radiation; cobalt Iron 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) for the financial supports provided to CQVR through PEst-C/QUI/UI0616/2014 and to CITAB for the project UID/AGR/04033/2013. Also, the authors acknowledge the Project INTERACT—Integrative Research in Environment, Agro-Chains and Technology—NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000017. Jorge Rodríguez-Chueca acknowledges the funding provided by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) through the Juan de la Cierva-formación grant (No. FJCI-2014-20195).

Supplementary material

11356_2017_9896_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Figure S1 (DOCX 21 kb)
11356_2017_9896_MOESM2_ESM.docx (38 kb)
Figure S2 (DOCX 38 kb)

References

  1. Ahmadi M, Ghanbari F (2016) Optimizing COD removal from greywater by photoelectro-persulfate process using Box-Behnken design: assessment of effluent quality and electrical energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(19):19350–19361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anipsitakis GP, Dionysiou DD (2004) Radical Generation by the Interaction of Transition Metals with Common Oxidants. Environ Sci Technol 38:3705–3712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antoniou MG, de la Cruz AA, Dionysiou DD (2010) Degradation of microcystin-LR using sulfate radicals generated through photolysis, thermolysis and e− transfer mechanisms Appl. Catal B: Environ 96:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennedsen LR, Muff J, Søgaard EG (2012) Influence of chloride and carbonates on the reactivity of activated persulfate. Chemosphere 86:1092–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen J, Qian Y, Liu H, Huang T (2016) Oxidative degradation of diclofenac by thermally activated persulfate: implication for ISCO. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(4):3824–3833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng J, Shao Y, Gao N, Tan C, Zhou S, Hu X (2013) CoFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles as a highly active heterogeneous catalyst of oxone for the degradation of diclofenac in water. J Hazard Mater 262:836–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diez AM, Sanroman MA, Pazos M (2017) Sequential two-column electro-Fenton-photolytic reactor for the treatment of winery wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(2):1137–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE, Franson MAH (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. APA-AWWA-WEF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Farré MJ, Domènech X, Peral J (2006) Assessment of photo-Fenton and biological treatment coupling for Diuron and Linuron removal from water. Water Res 40:2533–2540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feierman DE, Winston GW, Cederbaum AI (1985) Ethanol oxidation by hydroxyl radicals: role of iron chelates, superoxide, and hydrogen peroxide. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 9(2):95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fumi MD, Parodi G, Parodi E, Silva A, Marchetti R (1995) Optimisation of long-term activated-sludge treatment of winery wastewater. Bioresour Technol 52:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghauch A, Tuqan AM, Kibbi N (2012) Ibuprofen removal by heated persulfate in aqueous solution: a kinetics study. Chem Eng J 197:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huie RE, Clifton CL (1993) Kinetics of the self-reaction of hydroxymethylperoxyl radicals. Chem Phys Lett 205:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huie RE, Clifton CL, Neta P (1991) Electron transfer reaction rates and equilibria of the carbonate and sulfate radical anions. Int J Radiat Appl Instrum C Radiat Phys Chem 38(5):477–481Google Scholar
  15. Iglesias O, Meijide J, Bocos E, Sanromán MA, Pazos M (2015) New approaches on heterogeneous electro-Fenton treatment of winery wastewater. Electrochim Acta 169:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ioannou LA, Li Puma G, Fatta-Kassinos D (2015) Treatment of winery wastewater by physicochemical, biological and advanced processes: a review. J Hazard Mater 286:343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ISO 7027 (1999) Water quality—determination of turbidity. International Organization for Standarization, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  18. ISO 7888 (1985) Water quality—determination of electrical conductivity. International Organization for Standarization, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji Y, Ferronato C, Salvador A, Yang X, Chovelon JM (2014) Degradation of ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole by ferrous-activated persulfate: implications for remediation of groundwater contaminated by antibiotics Sci. Total Environ 472:800–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan JA, He X, Khan HM, Shah NS, Dionysiou DD (2013) Oxidative degradation of atrazine in aqueous solution by UV/H2O2/Fe2+, UV/S2O8 2/Fe2+ and UV/HSO5 /Fe2+ processes: a comparative study Chem. Eng J 218:376–383Google Scholar
  21. Klaning UK, Sehested K, Appelman EH (1991) Laser flash photolysis and pulse radiolysis of aqueous solutions of the fluoroxysulfate ion, SO4F–. Inorg Chem 30:3582–3584Google Scholar
  22. Kolthoff IM, Miller IK (1951) The chemistry of persulfate. I. The kinetics and mechanism of the decomposition of the persulfate ion in aqueous medium. J Am Chem Soc 73:3055–3059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolthoff IM, Medalia AI, Raaen HP (1951) The reaction between ferrous iron and peroxides. IV. Reaction with potassium persulfate1a. J Am Chem Soc 73(4):1733–1739Google Scholar
  24. Kwon M, Kim S, Yoon Y, Jung Y, Hwang T, Lee J, Kang J (2015) Comparative evaluation of ibuprofen removal by UV/H2O2 and UV/S2O8 2− processes for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 269:379–390 Chemosphere CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liao C, Kang S, Wu F (2001) Hydroxyl radical scavenging role of chloride and bicarbonate ions in the H2O2/UV process. Chemosphere 44(5):1193–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Y, Guo H, Zhang Y, Tang W, Cheng X, Liu H (2016) Activation of peroxymonosulphate by BiVO4 under visible light for degradation of Rhodamine B. Chem Phys Lett 653:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas MS, Peres JA, Puma GL (2010) Treatment of winery wastewater by ozone-based advanced oxidation processes (O3, O3/UV and O3/UV/H2O2) in a pilot-scale bubble column reactor and process economics. Sep Purif Technol 72(3):235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo C, Ma J, Jiang J, Liu Y, Song Y, Yang Y, Guan Y, Wu D (2015) Simulation and comparative study on the oxidation kinetics of atrazine by UV/H2O2, UV/HSO5 - and UV/S2O8 2-. Water Res 80:99–108Google Scholar
  29. Monteagudo JM, Durán A, González R, Expósito AJ (2015) In situ chemical oxidation of carbamazepine solutions using persulphate simultaneously activated by heat energy, UV light, Fe2+ ions, and H2O2. Appl Catal B 176–177:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moreira FC, Boaventura RAR, Brillas E, Vilar VJP (2015) Remediation of a winery wastewater combining aerobic biological oxidation and electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. Water Res 75:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mosteo R, Ormad MP, Mozas E, Sarasa J, Ovelleiro JL (2006) Factorial experimental design of winery wastewaters treatment by heterogeneous photo-Fenton process. Water Res 40(8):1561–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neta P, Huie RE, Ross AB (1988) Rate constants for reactions of inorganic radicals in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem Ref Data 17:1027–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rastogi A, Al-Abed SR, Dionysiou DD (2009) Sulfate radical-based ferrous-peroxymonosulfate oxidative system for PCBs degradation in aqueous and sediment systems. Appl Catal B 85(3–4):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodríguez-Chueca J, Amor C, Silva T, Dionysiou DD, Li Puma G, Lucas MS, Peres JA (2017) Treatment of winery wastewater by sulphate radicals: HSO5 /transition metal/UV-A LEDs Chem. Eng J 310(2):473–483Google Scholar
  35. Ross AB, Neta P (1979) Rate constants for reactions of inorganic radicals in aqueous solution. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Santos C, Lucas MS, Dias AA, Bezerra RMF, Peres JA, Sampaio A (2014) Winery wastewater treatment by combination of Cryptococcus laurentii and Fenton’s reagent. Chemosphere 117:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott JP, Ollis DF (1997) Integration of chemical and biological oxidation processes for water treatment II: recent illustrations and experiences. J Adv Oxid Technol 2:374–381Google Scholar
  38. Shukla RP, Wang S, Ang HM, Tadé MO (2010) Photocatalytic oxidation of phenolic compounds using zinc oxide and sulphate radicals under artificial solar light. Sep Purif Technol 70(3):338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 16:144–158Google Scholar
  40. Tan C, Gao N, Deng Y, An N, Deng J (2012) Heat-activated persulfate oxidation of diuron in water. Chem Eng J 203:294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. USEPA. (1993). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 410.4. The determination of chemical oxygen demand by semi-automated colorimetry. August 1993. Cincinnati, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang YR, Chu W (2012) Photo-assisted degradation of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid by Fe(II)-catalyzed activation of oxone process: the role of UV irradiation, reaction mechanism and mineralization. Appl Catal B Environ 123-124:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang ZH, Yuan RX, Guo YG, Xu L, Liu JS (2011) Effects of chloride ions onbleaching of azo dyes by Co2+/oxone regent: kinetic analysis. J Hazard Mater 190:1083–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wei G, Liang X, He Z, Liao Y, Xie Z, Liu P, Ji S, He H, Li D, Zhang J (2015) Heterogeneous activation of oxone by substituted magnetites Fe3xMxO4 (Cr, Mn, Co, Ni) for degradation of Acid Orange II at neutral pH. J Mol Catal A Chem 398:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu Y, Lin Z, Zhang H (2016) Mineralization of sucralose by UV-based advanced oxidation processes: UV/PDS versus UV/H2O2. Chem Eng J 285:392–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Environmental Technology (ESCET)Universidad Rey Juan CarlosMostolesSpain
  2. 2.Centro de Química de Vila Real, Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD)Vila RealPortugal

Personalised recommendations