Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 21, pp 20453–20465 | Cite as

Design and evaluation of a compact photocatalytic reactor for water treatment

  • Marko Kete
  • Olena Pliekhova
  • Lev Matoh
  • Urška Lavrenčič ŠtangarEmail author
Water: From Pollution to Purification

Abstract

A compact reactor for photocatalytic oxidation and photocatalytic ozonation water treatment was developed and evaluated by using four model pollutants. Additionally, combinations of pollutants were evaluated. Specially produced Al2O3 porous reticulated monolith foams served as TiO2 carriers, offering a high surface area support. UV lamps were placed in the interior to achieve reduced dimensions of the reactor (12 cm in diameter × 20 cm in height). Despite its small size, the overall photocatalytic cleaning capacity was substantial. It was evaluated by measuring the degradation of LAS + PBIS and RB19 as representatives of surfactants and textile dyes, respectively. These contaminants are commonly found in household grey wastewater with phenol as a trace contaminant. Three different commercial photocatalysts and one mixture of photocatalysts (P25, P90, PC500 and P25 + PC500) were introduced in the sol-gel processing and immobilized on foamed Al2O3 monoliths. RB19 and phenol were easily degradable, while LAS and PBIS were more resistant. The experiments were conducted at neutral-acidic pH because alkaline pH negatively influences both photocatalyic ozonation (PCOZ) and photocatalysis. The synergistic effect of PCOZ was generally much more expressed in mineralization reactions. Total organic carbon TOC half lives were in the range of between 13 and 43 min in the case of individual pollutants in double-deionized water. However, for the mixed pollutants in tap water, the TOC half-life only increased to 53 min with the most efficient catalyst (P90). In comparison to photocatalysis, the PCOZ process is more suitable for treating wastewater with a high loading of organic pollutants due to its higher cleaning capacity. Therefore, PCOZ may prove more effective in industrial applications.

Keywords

Photocatalysis Photocatalytic ozonation TiO2 Al2O3 monolith LAS PBIS Reactive Blue 19 Phenol 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been financially supported by Electrolux S.P.A. and the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding no. P2-0377 and P1-0134, Belgian-Slovenian project “Development of advanced TiO2-based photocatalyst for the degradation of organic pollutants from wastewater”). The doctoral study of M. Kete was partly cofinanced by the European Union through the European Social Fund. Cofinancing was carried out within the framework of the Operational Program for Human Resources Development for 2007–2013, 1. Development priority: Promoting entrepreneurship and adaptability; priority 1.3: Scholarship Scheme. The doctoral study of O. Pliekhova has been funded by INFINITY project in the framework of the EU Erasmus Mundus Action 2.

References

  1. Agustina TE, Ang HM, Vareek VK (2005) A review of synergistic effect of photocatalysis and ozonation on waste water treatment. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 6:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beltran FJ, Aguinaco A, Garcia-Araya JF (2010) Kinetic modelling of TOC removal in the photocatalytic ozonation of diclofenac aqueous solutions. Appl Catal B Environ 100:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beltran FJ, Garca-Araya JF, Alvarez PM (2000) Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate removal from water and waste water. 1. Kinetics of decomposition by ozonation. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:2214–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beltran FJ, Rivas FJ, Gimeno O (2005) Comparison between photocatalytic ozonation and other oxidation processes for the removal of phenols from water. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 80:973–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley B, Daigger G, Rubin R, Tchobanoglous G (2002) Evaluation of onsite waste water treatment technologies using sustainable development criteria. Clean Techn Environ Policy 4:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busca G, Berardinelli S, Resini C, Arrighi L (2008) Technologies for the removal of phenol from fluid streams: a short review of recent developments. J Hazard Mater 160:265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camacho-Munoz D, Martin J, Santos JL et al (2014) Occurrence of surfactants in waste water: hourly and seasonal variations in urban and industrial waste waters from Seville (southern Spain). Sci Total Environ 468–469:977–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cernigoj U, Stangar UL, Jirkovsky J (2010) Effect of dissolved ozone or ferric ions on photodegradation of thiacloprid in presence of different TiO2 catalysts. J Hazard Mater 177:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cernigoj U, Stangar UL, Trebse P (2007) Degradation of neonicotinoid insecticides by different advanced oxidation processes and studying the effect of ozone on TiO2 photocatalysis. Appl Catal B Environ 75:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen TY, Kao CM, Hong A et al (2009) Application of ozone on the decolorization of reactive dyes—Orange-13 and Blue-19. Desalination 249:1238–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Xie Y, Yang J et al (2014) Reaction mechanism and metal ion transformation in photocatalytic ozonation of phenol and oxalic acid with Ag+/TiO2. J Environ Sci 26:662–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherifi H, Hanini S, Bentahar F (2009) Adsorption of phenol from wastewater using vegetal cords as a new adsorbent. Desalination 244:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CWK, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman HM, Marquis CP, Scott JA et al (2005) Bactericidal effects of titanium dioxide-based photocatalysts. Chem Eng J 113:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dominguez JR, Beltran J, Rodriguez O (2005) Vis and UV photocatalytic detoxification methods using TiO2, TiO2/H2O2, TiO2/O3, TiO2/S2O8 2−, O3, H2O2, S2O8 2−, Fe3+/H2O2 and Fe3+/H2O2/C2O4 2− for dyes treatment. Catal Today 101:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Esplugas S, Gimenez J, Contreras S et al (2002) Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation. Water Res 36:1034–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Etchepare R, Hoek JP (2015) Health risk assessment of organic micropollutants in greywater for potable reuse. Water Res 72:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fountoulakis MS, Terzakis S, Kalogerakis N, Manios T (2009) Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates from domestic waste water in pilot constructed wetlands and a gravel filter. Ecol Eng 35:1702–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 9:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gimeno O, Rivas FJ, Beltran FJ, Carbajo M (2007) Photocatalytic ozonation of winery waste waters. J Agric Food Chem 55:9944–9950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guimaraes JR, Maniero MG, de Araujo RN (2012) A comparative study on the degradation of RB-19 dye in an aqueous medium by advanced oxidation processes. J Environ Manag 110:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta VK, Ali I, Saleh TA, Nayak A, Agarwal S (2012) Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—an overview. RSC Adv 2:6380–6388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. He Z, Lin L, Song S et al (2008) Mineralization of C.I. Reactive Blue 19 by ozonation combined with sonolysis: performance optimization and degradation mechanism. Sep Purif Technol 62:376–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hernandez-Leal L, Temmink H, Zeeman G, Buisman CJN (2011) Removal of micropollutants from aerobically treated grey water via ozone and activated carbon. Water Res 45:2887–2896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horn TB, Zerwes FV, Kist LT, Machado EL (2014) Constructed wetland and photocatalytic ozonation for university sewage treatment. Ecol Eng 63:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ji Y, Zhou L, Ferronato C, Salvador A, Yang X, Chovelon JM (2013) Degradation of sunscreen agent 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid by TiO2 photocatalysis: kinetics, photoproducts and comparison to structurally related compounds. Appl Catal B Environ 140–141:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jing Y, Li L, Zhang Q et al (2011) Photocatalytic ozonation of dimethyl phthalate with TiO2 prepared by a hydrothermal method. J Hazard Mater 189:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kete M, Pavlica E, Fresno F et al (2014) Highly active photocatalytic coatings prepared by a low-temperature method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:11238–11249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Hua L, Li S (2010) Photocatalytic degradation of reactive brilliant blue KN-R by TiO2/UV process. Desalination 258:48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu J, Zhang T, Ma J, Chen Z (2009) Evaluation of disinfection byproducts formation during chlorination and chloramination of dissolved natural organic matter fractions isolated from a filtered river water. J Hazard Mater 162:140–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucas MS, Peres JA, Lan BY, Puma GL (2009) Ozonation kinetics of winery waste water in a pilot-scale bubble column reactor. Water Res 43:1523–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahne D, Stangar UL, Trebse P, Bulc TG (2012) TiO2-based photocatalytic treatment of raw and constructed-wetland pretreated textile wastewater. Int J Photoenergy 2012:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2012/725692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malato S, Fernandez-Ibanez P, Maldonado MI et al (2009) Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: recent overview and trends. Catal Today 147:1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marques SM, Tavares CJ, Oliveira LF, Oliveira-Campos AMF (2010) Photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Reactive Blue 19 with nitrogen-doped TiO2 catalysts thin films under UV/visible light. J Mol Struct 983:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nasuhoglu D, Rodayan A, Berk D, Yargeau V (2012) Removal of the antibiotic levofloxacin (LEVO) in water by ozonation and TiO2 photocatalysis. Chem Eng J 189-190:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ochuma IJ, Osibo OO, Fishwick RP et al (2007) Three-phase photocatalysis using suspended titania and titania supported on a reticulated foam monolith for water purification. Catal Today 128:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oller I, Malato S, Sánchez-Pérez JA (2011) Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination—a review. Sci Total Environ 409:4141–4166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oyama T, Otsu T, Hidano Y et al (2011) Enhanced remediation of simulated waste waters contaminated with 2-chlorophenol and other aquatic pollutants by TiO2-photoassisted ozonation in a sunlight-driven pilot-plant scale photoreactor. Sol Energy 85:938–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Panda KK, Mathews AP (2014) Ozone oxidation kinetics of Reactive Blue 19 anthraquinone dye in a tubular in situ ozone generator and reactor: modeling and sensitivity analyses. Chem Eng J 255:553–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pera-Titus M, Garcia-Molina V, Banos MA et al (2004) Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review. Appl Catal B Environ 47:219–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petrenko VI, Avdeev MV, Garamus VM et al (2010) Micelle formation in aqueous solutions of dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid studied by small-angle neutron scattering. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 369:160–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Petrie B, Barden R, Kasprzyk-Hordern B (2015) A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring. Water Res 72:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plesch G, Vargova M, Vogt UF et al (2012) Zr doped anatase supported reticulated ceramic foams for photocatalytic water purification. Mater Res Bull 47:1680–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quist-Jensen CA, Macedonio F, Drioli E (2015) Membrane technology for water production in agriculture: desalination and wastewater reuse. Desalination 364:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raupp GB, Alexiadis A, Hossain MM, Changrani R (2001) First-principles modeling, scaling laws and design of structured photocatalytic oxidation reactors for air purification. Catal Today 69:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richardson JT, Peng Y, Remue D (2000) Properties of ceramic foam catalyst supports: pressure drop. Appl Catal A Gen 204:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richardson SD (2008) Environmental mass spectrometry: Emerging contaminants and current issues. Analytical Chemistry 80:4373–4402Google Scholar
  48. Rivas FJ, Beltran FJ, Encinas A (2012) Removal of emergent contaminants: integration of ozone and photocatalysis. J Environ Manag 100:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodriguez EM, Fernandez G, Alvarez PM, Beltran FJ (2012) TiO2 and Fe(III) photocatalytic ozonation processes of a mixture of emergent contaminants of water. Water Res 46:152–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salaeh S, Kovacic M, Kosir D, Kusic H, Stangar UL, Dionysiou DD, Bozic AL (2017) Reuse of TiO2-based catalyst for solar driven water treatment: thermal and chemical reactivation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 333:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suarez S, Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM (2008) How are pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) removed from urban waste waters. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suligoj A, Cernigoj U, Stangar UL (2010) Preparation procedure of durable titania coatings on metal supports for photocatalytic cleaning applications. Patent number SI 23585 A. The Slovenian Intellectual Property Office, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  53. Twigg MV, Richardson JT (2007) Fundamentals and applications of structured ceramic foam catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:4166–4177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vargova M, Plesch G, Vogt UF et al (2011) TiO2 thick films supported on reticulated macroporous Al2O3 foams and their photoactivity in phenol mineralization. Appl Surf Sci 257:4678–4684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Willis RM, Stewart RA, Giurco DP et al (2011) End use water consumption in households: impact of socio-demographic factors and efficient devices. J Clean Prod 60:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wintgens T, Melin T, Salehi F, Hochstrat R (2008) Emerging contaminants and treatment options in water recycling for indirect potable use. Water Sci Technol 57:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang H, Cheng H (2007) Controlling nitrite level in drinking water by chlorination and chloramination. Sep Purif Technol 56:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yildirim AO, Gul S, Eren O, Kusvuran E (2011) A comparative study of ozonation, homogeneous catalytic ozonation, and photocatalytic ozonation for C.I. Reactive Red 194 azo dye degradation. CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water 39:795–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zsilak Z, Szabo-Bardos E, Fonagy O et al (2014) Degradation of benzenesulfonate by heterogeneous photocatalysis combined with ozonation. Catal Today 230:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marko Kete
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olena Pliekhova
    • 1
  • Lev Matoh
    • 3
  • Urška Lavrenčič Štangar
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.University of Nova GoricaNova GoricaSlovenia
  2. 2.Arhel d.o.o., Design and EngineeringLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical TechnologyUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations