Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 25, pp 24535–24547 | Cite as

A sustainable manufacturing system design: A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model

  • Reda NujoomEmail author
  • Ahmed Mohammed
  • Qian Wang
Environmental Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources

Abstract

In the past decade, there has been a growing concern about the environmental protection in public society as governments almost all over the world have initiated certain rules and regulations to promote energy saving and minimize the production of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in many manufacturing industries. The development of sustainable manufacturing systems is considered as one of the effective solutions to minimize the environmental impact. Lean approach is also considered as a proper method for achieving sustainability as it can reduce manufacturing wastes and increase the system efficiency and productivity. However, the lean approach does not include environmental waste of such as energy consumption and CO2 emissions when designing a lean manufacturing system. This paper addresses these issues by evaluating a sustainable manufacturing system design considering a measurement of energy consumption and CO2 emissions using different sources of energy (oil as direct energy source to generate thermal energy and oil or solar as indirect energy source to generate electricity). To this aim, a multi-objective mathematical model is developed incorporating the economic and ecological constraints aimed for minimization of the total cost, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions for a manufacturing system design. For the real world scenario, the uncertainty in a number of input parameters was handled through the development of a fuzzy multi-objective model. The study also addresses decision-making in the number of machines, the number of air-conditioning units, and the number of bulbs involved in each process of a manufacturing system in conjunction with a quantity of material flow for processed products. A real case study was used for examining the validation and applicability of the developed sustainable manufacturing system model using the fuzzy multi-objective approach.

Keywords

Sustainable manufacturing systems Energy consumption CO2 Lean manufacturing Environmental constraints Multi-objective 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Ministry of Education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the financial support in this study. Also, the authors would like to thank the anonymous referees whose thorough reviews and insightful comments made a valuable contribution to this article.

References

  1. Abdallah T, Diabat A, Simchi-Levi D (2010) A carbon sensitive supply chain network problem with green procurement. Proceedings of the 40th international Conference in Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE), 1–6. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin SH, Zhang G (2013) A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl Math Model 37(6):416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branham M, Gutowski TG, Jones A, Sekulic DP (2008) A thermodynamic framework for analyzing and improving manufacturing processes. In: ISEE. IEEE, San Francisco, CA:1–6Google Scholar
  4. EPA (2008) The Lean and Environment Toolkit. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov/lean/toolkit/index.htm accessed June 26
  5. Ghadiri M, Marjani A, Shirazian S (2017) Development of a mechanistic model for prediction of CO2 capture from gas mixtures by amine solutions in porous membranes. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9048-8
  6. Guillén-Gosálbez G, Grossmann IE (2009) Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. AICHE J 55(1):99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heilala J,Vatanen S, Tonteri H, Montonen J, Lind S, Johansson B, Stahre J (2008) Simulation-based sustainable manufacturing system design. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference:1922–1930Google Scholar
  8. Jamshidi R, Ghomi SF, Karimi B (2012) Multi-objective green supply chain optimization with a new hybrid memetic algorithm using the Taguchi method. Scientia Iranica 19(6):1876–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiménez López M, Arenas M, Bilbao A, Rodriguez MV (2007) Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: an interactive method resolution. Eur J Oper Res 177:1599–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lai YL, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy mathematical programming, 1st edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li C, ZhangZhang X, Suzuki S (2009) Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products: multi-optimization method. Chem Eng Res Des 87:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mohammed A, Wang Q (2017a) The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 184:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohammed A, Wang Q (2017b) Developing a meat supply chain network design using a multi-objective possibilistic programming approach. Br Food J 119:690–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohammed A, Wang Q, Alyahya S, Bennett N (2016) Design and optimization of an RFID-enabled automated warehousing system under uncertainties: a multi-criterion fuzzy programming approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:1661–1670Google Scholar
  15. Nurjanni KP, Carvalho MS, da Costa LAAF (2014) Green supply chain design with multi-objective optimization. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bali, Indonesia, 7–9Google Scholar
  16. Nujoom R, Wang Q, Bennett N (2016b) An integrated method for sustainable manufacturing systems design. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP SciencesGoogle Scholar
  17. Nujoom R, Mohammed A, Wang Q, Bennett N (2016a) The multi-objective optimization model for a sustainable manufacturing system design. In: Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), 2016 I.E. International Conference on 1134–1140Google Scholar
  18. Paju M, Heilala J, Hentula M, Heikkila A, Johansson B, Leong S, Lyons K (2010) Framework and indicators for a sustainable manufacturing mapping methodology. In: the WSC, IEEE, Baltimore, MD:3411–3422Google Scholar
  19. Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 39(9):8182–8192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taghdisian H, Pishvaie MR, Farhadi F (2014) Multi-objective optimization approach for green design of methanol plant based on CO2-efficeincy indicator. J Clean Prod 103:640–650Google Scholar
  21. Wang C, Larsson M, Ryman C, Grip CE, Wikström JO, Johnsson A, Engdahl J (2008) A model on CO2 emission reduction in integrated steelmaking by optimization methods. IJER 32:1092–1106Google Scholar
  22. Wang F, Lai X, Shi N (2011) A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design. Decis Support Syst 51:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang Q, Chatwin CR (2005) Key issues and developments in modelling and simulation-based methodologies for manufacturing systems analysis, design and performance evaluation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(11–12):1254–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang Q, Lassalle S, Mileham AR, Owen GW (2009) Analysis of a linear walking worker line using a combination of computer simulation and mathematical modeling approaches. JMSY 28:64–70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  2. 2.Business SchoolCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations