Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 23, pp 19076–19085 | Cite as

Pollution-induced community tolerance in benthic macroinvertebrates of a mildly lead-contaminated lake

  • Andrew Y. Oguma
  • Paul L. Klerks
Research Article


Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) has been used to demonstrate effects of sediment contamination on microbes and meiofauna. Our study explored the potential to detect PICT in benthic macroinvertebrates of a lake with long-term mild lead (Pb) contamination. We collected macrobenthos from two areas in Caddo Lake, Texas, a control area (CO) with a mean sediment Pb level of 11 μg/g and Goose Prairie (GP) where sediment Pb levels averaged 74 μg/g. Upon return to the laboratory, we exposed macroinvertebrates to a lethal lead concentration and assessed 48-h mortality. Mortality of CO macrobenthos was significantly higher than that of GP macrobenthos, providing evidence that these communities differed in their tolerance to lead. A comparison of macrobenthos community composition between the areas showed that the GP macrobenthos lacked metal-sensitive taxa such as gastropods and amphipods (which were present at CO). Similarly, a higher proportion of the GP benthos belonged to metal-tolerant taxa such as isopods and chironomids. Thus, changes in community composition appeared to be at least partly responsible for differences in community tolerance. Our results showed that a sediment Pb concentration below effect-based sediment quality guidelines had a measurable impact on macrobenthos, thus demonstrating that results from single-species toxicity tests may underestimate impacts on communities. This study also confirms that the PICT approach with macroinvertebrates is a feasible and potentially powerful approach for detecting contaminant impacts.


Benthos Macroinvertebrates Community tolerance Lead Impact 



This work was funded with student grants from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette Graduate Student Organization and the Ecology Center of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. We thank Marvin “Trey” Mace III, Courtney Curtis, Emmanuel Blankson, Johanna Farmer, and Kruuttika Satbhai for the assistance in field sampling and/or laboratory processing of samples. We thank Kate Hayes-Huer for the assistance with the manuscript preparation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_9553_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 35 kb).


  1. Adeyemi JA, Klerks PL (2013) Occurrence of copper acclimation in the least killifish Heterandria formosa, and associated biochemical and physiological mechanisms. Aquat Toxicol 130:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allert AL, DiStefano RJ, Fairchild JF, Schmitt CJ, McKee MJ, Girondo JA, Brumbaugh WG, May TW (2013) Effects of historical lead–zinc mining on riffle-dwelling benthic fish and crayfish in the Big River of southeastern Missouri, USA. Ecotoxicology 22:506–521. doi: 10.1007/s10646-013-1043-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balthis WL, Hyland JL, Fulton MH, Pennington PL, Cooksey C, Key PB, DeLorenzo ME, Wirth EF (2010) Effects of chemically spiked sediments on estuarine benthic communities: a controlled mesocosm study. Environ Monitor Assessm 161:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkson J (1951) Why I prefer logits to probits. Biometrics 7:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanck H (2002) A critical review of procedures and approaches used for assessing pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) in biotic communities. Human Ecol Risk Assessm 8:1003–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanck H, Dahl B (1996) Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) in marine periphyton in a gradient of tri-n-butyltin (TBT) contamination. Aquat Toxicol 35:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boivin M-EY, Breure AM, Posthuma L, Rutgers M (2002) Determination of field effects of contaminants—significance of pollution-induced community tolerance. Human Ecol Risk Assessm 8:1035–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonada N, Prat N, Resh VH, Statzner B (2006) Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annu Rev Entomol 51:495–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bufflap SE, Allen HE (1995) Sediment pore water collection methods for trace metal analysis: a review. Water Res 29:165–177. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)E0105-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements WH (1999) Metal tolerance and predator-prey interactions in benthic macroinvertebrate stream communities. Ecol Appl 9:1073–1084Google Scholar
  11. Clements WH, Newman MC (2002) Community ecotoxicology. John Wiley and Sons, LTD, Chichester, West Sussex, EnglandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clements WH, Rohr JR (2009) Community responses to contaminants: using basic ecological principles to predict ecotoxicological effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1789–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Franson MAH, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernández-Calviño D, Arias-Estévez M, Díaz-Raviña M, Bååth E (2011) Bacterial pollution induced community tolerance (PICT) to Cu and interactions with pH in long-term polluted vineyard soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2324–2331. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant A (2002) Pollution tolerant species and communities: intriguing toys or invaluable monitoring tools? Human Ecol Risk Assessm 8:955–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton AB Jr, Cairns J Jr (1995) Handbook of ecotoxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt JW, Anderson BS, Phillips BM, Tjeerdema RS, Taberski KM, Wilson CJ, Puckett HM, Stephenson M, Fairey R, Oakden J (2001) A large-scale categorization of sites in San Francisco Bay, USA, based on the sediment quality triad, toxicity identification evaluations, and gradient studies. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1252–1265. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620200614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King RS, Richardson CJ (2002) Evaluating subsampling approaches and macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution for wetland bioassessment. J N Am Benthol Soc 21:150–171. doi: 10.2307/1468306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klerks PL (2002) Adaptation, ecological impacts, and risk assessment: insights from research at Foundry Cove, Bayou Trepagnier and Pass Fourchon. Human Ecol Risk Assessm 8:971–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klerks PL, Levinton JS (1989) Rapid evolution of metal resistance in a benthic oligochaete inhabiting a metal-polluted site. Biol Bull 176:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knauer K, Leimgruber A, Hommen U, Knauert S (2010) Co-tolerance of phytoplankton communities to photosynthesis II inhibitors. Aquat Toxicol 96:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malaj E, Grote M, Schäfer RB, Brack W, von der Ohe PC (2012) Physiological sensitivity of freshwater macroinvertebrates to heavy metals. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1754–1764. doi: 10.1002/etc.1868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marqués MJ, Martínez-Conde E, Rovira JV (2003) Effects of zinc and lead mining on the benthic macroinvertebrates of a fluvial ecosystem. Water Air Soil Pollut 148:363–388. doi: 10.1023/A:1025411932330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Millward RN, Grant A (1995) Assessing the impact of copper on nematode communities from a chronically metal-enriched estuary using pollution-induced community tolerance. Mar Pollut Bull 30:701–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Millward RN, Grant A (2000) Pollution-induced tolerance to copper of nematode communities in the severely contaminated Restronguet Creek and adjacent estuaries, Cornwall, United Kingdom. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:454–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Millward RN, Klerks PL (2002) Contaminant-adaptation and community tolerance in ecological risk assessment: introduction. Human Ecol Risk Assessm 8:921–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan AJ, Kille P, Stürzenbaum SR (2007) Microevolution and ecotoxicology of metals in invertebrates. Environ Sci Technol 41:1085–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muyssen BTA, Janssen CR (2004) Multi-generation cadmium acclimation and tolerance in Daphnia magna Straus. Environ Pollut 130:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman MC (1995) Quantitative methods in quantitative ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  31. Niklińska M, Chodak M, Laskowski R (2006) Pollution-induced community tolerance of microorganisms from forest soil organic layers polluted with Zn or Cu. Appl Soil Ecol 32:265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pesce S, Lissalde S, Lavieille D, Margoum C, Mazzella N, Roubeix V, Montuelle B (2010) Evaluation of single and joint toxic effects of diuron and its main metabolites on natural phototrophic biofilms using a pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) approach. Aquat Toxicol 99:492–499. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rice KC (1999) Trace-element concentrations in streambed sediment across the conterminous United States. Environ Sci Technol 33:2499–2504Google Scholar
  34. Rotter S, Sans-Piché F, Streck G, Altenburger R, Schmitt-Jansen M (2011) Active bio-monitoring of contamination in aquatic systems - an in situ translocation experiment applying the PICT concept. Aquat Toxicol 101:228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmitt-Jansen M, Veit U, Dudel G, Altenburger R (2008) Ecological perspective in aquatic ecotoxicology: approaches and challenges. Basic Appl Ecol 9:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schumacher BA (2002) Methods for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in soils and sediments. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith JG, Brandt CC, Christensen SW (2011) Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness. Environ Manag 47:1077–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tlili A, Berard A, Blanck H, Bouchez A, Cássio F, Eriksson KM, Morin S, Montuelle B, Navarro E, Pascoal C, Pesce S, Schmitt-Jansen M, Behra R (2016) Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT): towards an ecologically relevant risk assessment of chemicals in aquatic systems. Freshwat Biol 61:2141–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tlili A, Maréchal M, Bérard A, Volat B, Montuelle B (2011) Enhanced co-tolerance and co-sensitivity from long-term metal exposures of heterotrophic and autotrophic components of fluvial biofilms. Sci Total Environ 409:4335–4343Google Scholar
  40. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Method 3051a: microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson JT (2003) Occurrence of and trends in selected sediment-associated contaminants in Caddo Lake, east Texas, 1940–2002. Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4253. United States Geological Survey, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Louisiana at LafayetteLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations