Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 22, pp 18355–18362 | Cite as

Evapotranspiration versus oxygen intrusion: which is the main force in alleviating bioclogging of vertical-flow constructed wetlands during a resting operation?

  • Guofen Hua
  • Qiuwen ChenEmail author
  • Jun Kong
  • Man Li
Research Article

Abstract

Clogging is the most significant challenge limiting the application of constructed wetlands. Application of a forced resting period is a practical way to relieve clogging, particularly bioclogging. To reveal the alleviation mechanisms behind such a resting operation, evapotranspiration and oxygen flux were studied during a resting period in a laboratory vertical-flow constructed wetland model through physical simulation and numerical model analysis. In addition, the optimum theoretical resting duration was determined based on the time required for oxygen to completely fill the pores, i.e., formation of a sufficiently thick and completely dry layer. The results indicated that (1) evapotranspiration was not the key factor, but was a driving force in the alleviation of bioclogging; (2) the rate of oxygen diffusion into the pores was sufficient to oxidize and disperse the flocculant biofilm, which was essential to alleviate bioclogging. This study provides important insights into understanding how clogging/bioclogging can be alleviated in vertical-flow constructed wetlands.

Graphical abstract

Evapotranspiration versus oxygen intrusion in alleviating bioclogging in vertical flow constructed wetlands

Keywords

Constructed wetland Bioclogging Resting operation Theoretical resting duration 

Abbreviations

VFCW

Vertical-flow constructed wetland

ODE

Ordinary differential equation

EPS

Extracellular polymeric substances

ET

Evapotranspiration

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would particularly like to thank Dr. Chenming Zhang from the University of Queensland for his kind assistance during the preparation of the paper. The authors acknowledge financial support for this study from Natural Science Foundation of China (51509070, 91547206), Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M571779), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015B15214). This study was also supported by the China Scholarship Council for a 1-year study at EPFL, Switzerland. The authors are grateful to Dr. Christine Watts for English corrections.

References

  1. Anda A, Soos G, Teixeira da Silva JA, Kozma-Bognar V (2015) Regional evapotranspiration from a wetland in central Europe, in a 16-year period without human intervention. Agric For Meteorol 205:60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borin M, Milani M, Salvato M, Toscano A (2011) Evaluation of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Evapotranspiration in northern and southern Italy. Ecol Eng 37(5):721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellis BD, Butterfield P, Jones WL (1999) Effects of carbon source, carbon concentration, and chlorination on growth related parameters of heterotrophic biofilm bacteria. Microbial Ecol 4:330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fujimaki H, Inoue M (2003) A flux-controlled steady-state evaporation method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at low matric pressure head values. Soil Sci 168(6):385–395Google Scholar
  5. Guimerà X, Dorado AD, Bonsfills A, Gabriel D, Gamisans X (2015) Effect of biomass density on oxygen diffusivity measured inside biofilms with a MEA sensor. 7th European Meeting on Chemical Industry and Environment, Tarragona, pp 10–12Google Scholar
  6. Headley TR, Davison L, Huett DO, Müller R (2012) Evapotranspiration from subsurface horizontal flow wetlands planted with Phragmites australis in sub-tropical Australia. Water Res 46(2):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hua GF, Zeng YT, Zhao ZW, Cheng KB, Chen G (2014) Applying a resting operation to alleviate bioclogging in vertical flow constructed wetlands: an experimental lab evaluation. J Environ Manag 136:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim JW, Choi H, Pachepsky YA (2010) Biofilm morphology as related to the porous media clogging. Water Res 44:1193–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kimball BA, Jackson RD, Reginato RJ, Nakayama FS, Idso SB (1976) Comparison of field-measured and calculated soil-heat fluxes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40(1):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knowles P, Dotro G, Nivala J, García J (2011) Clogging in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands: occurrence and contributing factors. Ecol Eng 37(2):99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Milani M, Toscano A (2013) Evapotranspiration from pilot-scale constructed wetlands planted with Phragmites australis in a Mediterranean environment. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 48(5):568–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mostafa M, Van Geel PJ (2012) Validation of a relative permeability model for bioclogging in unsaturated soils. Vadose Zone J. doi: 10.2136/vzj2011.0044
  13. Murray F (1967) On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. J Appl Meteorol 6(1):203–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nivala J, Knowles P, Dotro G, García J, Wallace S (2012) Clogging in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands: measurement, modeling and management. Water Res 46(6):1625–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ntwampe SKO, Sheldon MS, Volschenk H (2008) Oxygen mass transfer for an immobilized biofilm of Phanerochaete chrysosporium in a membrane gradostat reactor. Braz J Chem Eng 25(4):649–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Papaevangelou Vassiliki A, Gikas Georgios D, Tsihrintzis Vassilios A (2012) Evaluation of evapotranspiration in small on-site HSF constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci Health A 47(5):766–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pavelic P, Dillon PJ, Mucha M, Nakai T, Barry KE, Bestland E (2011) Laboratory assessment of factors affecting soil clogging of soil aquifer treatment systems. Water Res 45:3153–3163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Petitjean A, Forquet N, Wanko A, Laurent J, Molle P, Mosé R, Sadowski A (2012) Modelling aerobic biodegradation in vertical flow sand filters: impact of operational considerations on oxygen transfer and bacterial activity. Water Res 46(7):2270–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Randerson PF, Moran C, Bialowiec A (2011) Oxygen transfer capacity of willow (Salix viminalis L.) Biomass Bioenergy 35:2306–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robins PC (1974) A method of measuring the aerodynamic resistance to the transport of water vapour from forest canopies. J Appl Ecol 11(1):315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saito H, Simϋnek J, Mohanty B (2006) Numerical analysis of coupled water, vapor, and heat transport in the vadose zone. Vadose Zone J 5(2):784–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sani A, Scholz M, Babatunde A, Wang Y (2013) Impact of water quality parameters on the clogging of vertical-flow constructed wetlands treating urban wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1488–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharma P, Poulsen TG, Kalluri PNV (2009) Gaseous oxygen uptake in porous media at different moisture contents and airflow velocities. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59(6):676–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun G, Zhao Y, Allen S, Cooper D (2006) Generating “tide” in pilot-scale constructed wetlands to enhance agricultural wastewater treatment. Eng Life Sci 6(6):560–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sutherland IW (2001) Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology 147:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang B, Zhao J, Guo Z, Ma J, Xu H, Jia Z (2015) Differential contributions of ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers to nitrification in four paddy soils. The ISME Journal 9:1062–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu SB, Zhang DX, Austin D, Dong R, Pang C (2011) Evaluation of a lab-scale tidal flow constructed wetland performance: oxygen transfer capacity, organic matter and ammonium removal. Ecol Eng 37(11):1789–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang CM, Li L, Lockington D (2014) Numerical study of evaporation-induced salt accumulation and precipitation in bare saline soils: Mechanism and feedback. Water Resour Res 50(10):8084–8106Google Scholar
  29. Zhao YQ, Sun G, Allen SJ (2004) Purification capacity of a highly loaded laboratory scale tidal flow reed bed system with effluent recirculation. Sci Total Environ 330(1–3):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Eco-Environmental ResearchNanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric PowerHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.College of Harbour, Coastal, and Offshore EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations