Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries?

  • 486 Accesses

  • 44 Citations

Abstract

This paper examines whether the hypothetical environmental Kuznet curve (EKC) exists or not and investigates how trade openness affects CO2 emissions, together with real GDP and total primary energy consumption. The study sample comprises ten newly industrialized countries (NICs-10) from 1971 to 2013. The results support the existence of hypothetical EKC and indicate that trade openness negatively and significantly affects emissions, while real GDP and energy do positive effects of emissions. Moreover, the empirical results of short-run causalities indicate feedback hypothetical linkage of real GDP and trade, unidirectional linkages from energy to emissions, and from trade to energy. The error correction terms (ECTs) reveal in the long run, feedback linkages of emissions, real GDP, and trade openness, while energy Granger causes emissions, real GDP, and trade, respectively. The study recommendations are that our policymakers should encourage and expand the trade openness in these countries, not only to restrain CO2 emissions but also to boost their growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Ahmad A, Zhao YH, Shahbaz M et al (2016) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: an aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy. Energy Policy 96:131–143

  2. Ahmed K, Shahbaz M, Kyophilavong P (2016) Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade nexus: evidence from the newly industrializing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:7676–7691

  3. Akin CS (2014) The impact of foreign trade, energy consumption and income on CO2 emissions. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4:465–475

  4. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy 84:382–389

  5. Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35:4772–4778

  6. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 47:173–185

  7. Boddin D (2016) The role of newly industrialized economies in global value chains. IMF Working Papers: WP/16/207

  8. Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41

  9. BP (2016) British petroleum statistical review of world energy. Available from: http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/excel/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-workbook.xlsx

  10. Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Adv Econ 15:161–177

  11. Destek MA, Balli E, Manga M (2016) The relationship between CO2 emission, energy consumption, urbanization and trade openness for selected CEECs. Res World Econ 7:52–58

  12. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431

  13. Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085

  14. Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213

  15. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276

  16. Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:15663–15676

  17. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Natl bur Econ Res Work Pap Ser No 3914, pp 1–5

  18. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377

  19. Guillén MF (2003) Multinationals, ideology, and organized labor. The limits of convergence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 126

  20. Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37:1156–1164

  21. Hsiao C (2007) Panel data analysis––advantages and challenges. Soc Estad Investig Oper 0:1–63

  22. Ibrahim MH, Rizvi SAR (2015) Emissions and trade in Southeast and East Asian countries: a panel co-integration analysis. Int J Clim Change Strategies Manage 7:460–475

  23. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

  24. IRENA (2015) Rethinking energy: renewable energy and climate change. International Renewable Energy Agency. Available from: https://www.irena.org/rethinking/IRENA%20_REthinking_Energy_2nd_report_2015.pdf

  25. Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37:5167–5172

  26. Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831

  27. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254

  28. Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103

  29. Kohler M (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade: a South African perspective. Energy Policy 63:1042–1050

  30. Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev XLV:1–28

  31. Kyophilavong P, Shahbaz M, Anwar S, Masood S (2015) The energy-growth nexus in Thailand: does trade openness boost up energy consumption? Renew Sust Energ Rev 46:265–274

  32. Lean HH, Smyth R (2010) CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Appl Energy 87:1858–1864

  33. Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24

  34. Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:631–652

  35. Mehrara M (2013) A panel estimation of the relationship between trade liberalization, economic growth and CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Hyperion Econ J 4:3–27

  36. Nasreen S, Anwar S (2014) Causal relationship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: a panel data analysis of Asian countries. Energy Policy 69:82–91

  37. Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670

  38. Pedroni P (2001) Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev Econ Stat 83:727–731

  39. Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econ Theory 20:597–625

  40. Phillips P, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika 75:335–346

  41. Saboori B, Bin SJ, Mohd S (2012) An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in Indonesia: the role of energy consumption and foreign trade. Int J Econ Financ 4:243–251

  42. Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121

  43. Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232

  44. Sharif Hossain M (2011) Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy 39:6991–6999

  45. Taraska G (2015) The Paris climate agreement. J Chem Inf Model 53:160

  46. Waugh D (2000) Manufacturing industries (chapter 19), world development (chapter 22). Geography, an integrated approach, 3rd edn. Nelson Thornes Ltd., Cheltenham, p 563 576–579, 633, and 640

  47. World Bank (2016) World development indicator. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Junghan Bae.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Liu, X. & Bae, J. Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 17616–17625 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9392-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Trade openness
  • Newly industrialized countries
  • Carbon dioxide emissions
  • Environmental Kuznet curve
  • Total energy
  • Real GDP