Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 23, pp 18770–18781 | Cite as

Renewable energy and greenhouse gas emissions from the waste sectors of European Union member states: a panel data analysis

  • Hélde Araujo Domingos
  • Alexandre Magno De Melo Faria
  • José Alberto Fuinhas
  • António Cardoso Marques
Research Article
  • 532 Downloads

Abstract

In the last two decades, there has been a rich debate about the environmental degradation that results from exposure to solid urban waste. Growing public concern with environmental issues has led to the implementation of various strategic plans for waste management in several developed countries, especially in the European Union. In this paper, the relationships were assessed between economic growth, renewable energy extraction and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the waste sector. The Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis was analysed for the member states of the European Union, in the presence of electricity generation, landfill and GHG emissions for the period 1995 to 2012. The results revealed that there is no inverted-U-shaped relationship between income and GHG emissions in European Union countries. The renewable fuel extracted from waste contributes to a reduction in GHG, and although the electricity produced also increases emissions somewhat, they would be far greater if the waste-based generation of renewable energy did not take place. The waste sector needs to strengthen its political, economic, institutional and social communication instruments to meet its aims for mitigating the levels of pollutants generated by European economies. To achieve the objectives of the Horizon 2020 programme, currently in force in the countries of the European Union, it will be necessary to increase the share of renewable energy in the energy mix.

Keywords

EKC-W GHG emissions Panel data Renewable energy Waste sector European Union 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the Capes Foundation of the Ministry of Education of Brazil, and of the NECE-UBI, Research Unit in Business Science and Economics, sponsored by the Portuguese Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology, project UID/GES/04630/2013, are gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_9324_MOESM1_ESM.doc (360 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 360 kb)
11356_2017_9324_MOESM2_ESM.xls (58 kb)
ESM 2 (XLS 58 kb)

References

  1. Andersen FM, Larsen H, Skovgaard M, Moll S, Isoard S (2007) A European model for waste and material flows. Resour Conserv Recycl 49:421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonioli B, Massarutto A (2012) The municipal waste management sector in Europe: shifting boundaries between public service and the market. Ann Public Coop Econ 83:505–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey I (1999) Flexibility, harmonization and the single market in EU environmental policy: the packaging waste directive. J Common Mark Stud 37:549–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltagi BH (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data, no, third edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  5. Beede D, Bloom D (1995) Economics of the generation and management of MSW, National Bureau of Economics Research, NBER Working Paper, no. 5116, p. 96Google Scholar
  6. Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Gawande K, Wang P (1997) Testing the inverted-U hypothesis for US hazardous waste. Econ Lett 55:435–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bölük G, Mert M (2014) Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy 74:439–446Google Scholar
  8. Cole MA, Rayner AJ, Bates JM (1997) The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50:121–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cruz NF, Ferreira S, Cabral M, Simões P, Marques RC (2014) Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it? Waste Manag 34(2):298–308 ISSN 0956-053XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekins P (1997) The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: examining the evidence. Environ Plann A 29(5):805–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (1999) EU focus on waste management. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p 18 ISBN 92-828-4825-6Google Scholar
  14. European Commission (2012) Analysis of options beyond 20% GHG emission reductions: member state results. Commission Staff Working Paper, pp 1–49, Available in http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/package/docs/swd_2012_5_en.pdf. Accessed 2014-Out-05
  15. European Environment Agency (2010) O Ambiente na Europa-Situação e Perspectivas 2010: Síntese. Agência Europeia do Ambiente, CopenhagaGoogle Scholar
  16. European Environment Agency (2013) Managing municipal solid waste - a review of achievements in 32 European counties, Publication Office European Union, no. 2, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  17. Eurostat (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions from waste disposal, Eurostat Statistic Explained., no. March 2014, pp 1–8. Available in http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Greenhouse_gas_emissions_from_waste_disposal#. Accessed 2014-Out-03
  18. Ezebilo EE, Animasaun ED (2011) Households’ perceptions of private sector municipal solid waste management services: a binary choice analysis. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8:677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredriksson P, Vollebergh H (2009) Corruption, federalism, and policy formation in the OECD: the case of energy policy. Public Choice 140(1):205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuinhas JA, Marques AC, Quaresma TN (2015) Does oil consumption promote economic growth in oil producers? Evidence from OPEC countries. Int J Energ Sect Manag 9(3):323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gawande K, Bohara AK, Berrens RP, Wang P (2000) Internal migration and the environmental Kuznets curve for US hazardous waste sites. Ecol Econ 33:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Granados JAT, Carpintero O (2009) Dispelling the smoke: CO2 emissions and economic growth from a global perspective, Available in http://sitemaker.umich.edu/tapia_granados/files/co2_emissions_and_gdp_growth_-_dec_2009_-_f2.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2015
  23. Hansen W, Christopher M, Verbuecheln M (2002) EU waste policy and challenges for regional and local authorities ecologic–Centre for International and European. Environmental Research, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Harbaugh W, Levinson A, Wilson DM (2002) Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev Econ Stat 84:541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hervieax MS, Darne O (2013) Environmental Kuznets curve and ecological footprint: a time series analysis, Working Paper University of Nantes, Available: http://www.touteconomie.org/afse/index.php/congres/2013/paper/viewFile/51/19. Accessed 29 Mar 2015
  26. Hoechle D (2007) Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata J 3:281–312Google Scholar
  27. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang WM, Lee GWM, Cheng-Wu C (2008) GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto protocol: a revisit of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energ Policy 36(1):239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. IEA (2012) electricity and heat by source of energy. Balances: electricity and heat of sources for European Union −28, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.iea.org/statistics/statisticssearch/report/?year=2012&country=EU28&product=ElectricityandHeat. Accessed 03 Feb 2015
  30. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories—solid waste disposal. Intergovernmental Panel Clim Chang 5:1–40Google Scholar
  31. Johnstone N, Labonne J (2004) Generation of household solid waste in OECD countries: an empirical analysis using macroeconomic data. Land Econ 80(4):529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lino FAM, Ismail KAR (2011) Energy and environmental potential of solid waste in Brazil. Energ Policy 39(6):3496–3502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maddison D (2006) Environmental Kuznets curves: a spatial econometric approach. J Environ Econ Manag 51(2):218–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magrinho A, Didelet F, Semiao V (2006) Municipal solid waste disposal in Portugal. Waste Manag 26:1477–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mazzanti M, Zoboli R (2008) Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness. Evidence on decoupling from the European Union. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:1221–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohareb AK, Warith MA, Diaz R (2008) Modelling greenhouse gas emissions for municipal solid waste management strategies in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:1241–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Monni S (2012) From landfilling to waste incineration: implications on GHG emissions of different actors. Int J Greenh Gas Control 8:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noor ZZ, Yusuf RO, Abba AH, Abu Hassan MA, Mohd Din MF (2013) An overview for energy recovery from municipal solid wastes (MSW) in Malaysia scenario. Renew Sust Energ Rev 20:378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Okuda I, Thomson VE (2007) Regionalization of municipal solid waste management in Japan: balancing the proximity principle with economic efficiency. Environ Manag 40:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ozcan B (2013) The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energ Policy 62:1138–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pao H-T, Tsai C-M (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energ Policy 38(12):7850–7860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pirotta FJC, Ferreira EC, Bernardo CA (2013) Energy recovery and impact on land use of Maltese municipal solid waste incineration. Energy 49:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raj NT, Iniyan S, Goic R (2011) A review of renewable energy based cogeneration technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(8):3640–3648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Read AD, Phillips P, Robinson G (1997) Landfill as a future waste management option in England: the view of landfill operators. Resour Conserv Recycl 20(3):183–205 ISSN 0921-3449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothman DS (1998) Environmental Kuznets curves—real progress or passing the buck?: a case for consumption-based approaches. Ecol Econ 25:177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sadorsky P (2009) Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energ Policy 37(10):4021–4028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seppälä T, Haukioja T, Kaivo-oja J (2001) The EKC hypothesis does not hold for direct material flows: environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis tests for direct material flows in five industrial countries. Popul Environ 23(2):217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sevigné Itoiz E, Gasol CM, Farreny R, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2013) CO2ZW: carbon footprint tool for municipal solid waste management for policy options in Europe. Inventory of Mediterranean countries. Energ Policy 56:623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shmelev SE, Powell JR (2006) Ecological-economic modelling for strategic regional waste management systems. Ecol Econ 59:115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sjöström M, Östblom G (2010) Decoupling waste generation from economic growth—a CGE analysis of the Swedish case. Ecol Econ 69(7):1545–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stern DI (2003) The environmental Kuznets curve. Available in http://isecoeco.org/pdf/stern.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2015
  52. Stern DI, Common MS, Barbier EB (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 24(7):1151–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Teixeira S, Monteiro E, Silva V, Rouboa A (2014) Prospective application of municipal solid wastes for energy production in Portugal. Energ Policy 71:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walls M, Macauley M, Anderson S (2005) Private markets, contracts, and government provision: what explains the Organization of Local Waste and Recycling Markets? Urban Aff Rev 40(5):590–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yanrong W, Cuili W, Han W (2011) Research on the quantitative relationship between the generation of industrial solid waste and per capita GDP of Henan Province. Energy Procedia 5:593–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuberi MJS, Ali SF (2015) Greenhouse effect reduction by recovering energy from waste landfills in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hélde Araujo Domingos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandre Magno De Melo Faria
    • 3
  • José Alberto Fuinhas
    • 1
  • António Cardoso Marques
    • 1
  1. 1.NECE-UBI R&D unit funded by the FCT - Portuguese Foundation for the Development of Science andTechnology, Minister of Science, Technology and Higher Education, and University of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal
  2. 2.The Capes Foundation, Ministry of Education of BrazilBrasíliaBrazil
  3. 3.Federal University of Mato GrossoCuiabáBrazil

Personalised recommendations