Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 19, pp 16407–16417 | Cite as

Growth-corruption-health triaca and environmental degradation: empirical evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand

Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 471 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the impact of economic growth, corruption, health, and poverty on environmental degradation for three countries from ASEAN, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand using annual data over the period of 1994–2014. The relationship between environmental degradation (pollution) by carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth is examined along with some other variables, namely health expenditure, poverty, agriculture value added growth, industrial value added growth, and corruption. The ordinary least squares (OLS) method is applied as an analytical technique for parameter estimation. The empirical results reveal that almost all variables are statistically significant at the 5% level of significance, whereby test rejects the null hypotheses of non-cointegration, indicating that all variables play an important role in affecting the environment across countries. Empirical results also indicate that economic growth has significant positive impact, while health expenditures show significantly negative impact on the environment. Corruption has significant positive effect on environment in the case of Malaysia; while in the case of Indonesia and Thailand, it has insignificant results. However, for the individual analysis across countries, the regression estimate suggests that economic growth has a significant positive relationship with environment for Indonesia, while it is found insignificantly negative and positive in the case of Malaysia and Thailand, respectively, during the period under the study. Empirical findings of the study suggest that policy-makers require to make technological-friendly environment sequentially to surmount unregulated pollution, steady population transfers from rural areas to urban areas are also important, and poverty alleviation and better health provision can also help to improve the environment.

Keywords

Economic growth Health Poverty Corruption CO2 emission ASEAN 

JEL classification

O40 K32 P36 Q5 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arouri M, Shahbaz M, Onchang R, Islam F, Teulon F (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in Thailand: cointegration and causality analysis. J Energy Dev 39(2):149–170Google Scholar
  3. Azam M (2016) Does environmental degradation shackle economic growth? A panel data investigation on 11 Asian countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65(2016):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azam M, Khan AQ (2016) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 63:556–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azam M, Khan AQ, Abdullah HB, Qureshi ME (2016) The impact of CO2 emissions on economic growth: evidence from selected higher CO2 emissions economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(7):6376–6389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bae JH, Park T, Shortle JS (2015) Impacts of green ODA, economic growth, and corruption on climate change. Presented at 2015 EAAERE Conference, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  7. Bae JH , Li DD, Rishi M (2016) Determinants of CO2 emission for Post-Soviet Union independent countries. Climate Policy. Published online: 13 Jan 2016. DOI:  10.1080/14693062.2015.112475
  8. Bartelmus P (1986) Environment and development. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtsson S, Fridell E, Andersson K (2014) Fuels for short sea shipping: a comparative assessment with focus on environmental impact. Proc Inst Mech Eng M J Eng the Maritime Environment 228(1):44–54Google Scholar
  10. Centre for Health Protection (2016) The health effects of air pollution. Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Retrieved from http://www.chp.gov.hk/en/content/9/460/3557.html
  11. Clare D, Peretiatko R (1990) The nexus between industrialization and environment: a case study of Indian enterprises. Environ Manag Health 13(1):80–97Google Scholar
  12. Cole MA (2007) Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 62(3–4):637–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dampier W (1982) Ten years after stockholm: a decade of environmental debate. Ambio 11(4):215–231Google Scholar
  14. Dietz S, Neumayer E, De Soysa I (2007) Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving. Environ Dev Econ 12:33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dillon J, Ekmekji K, Feighery A, Garrett R, Gray M, Johnson T, Jones S, Legge T, Leous JP, Raeisghasem A, Reilly K (2006) Corruption & the environment. A project for: Transparency International Environmental Science and Policy Workshop. Columbia University, School of International & Public AffairsGoogle Scholar
  16. Dosanjh A (2011) Childhood asthma and anthropogenic CO2 emissions. J Asthma Allergy 4:103–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EPA (2015) Overview of greenhouse gases: emissions and trends. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/co2.html
  18. Farhani S, Mrizak S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 71:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forsyth T, Leach M, Scoones I (1998) Poverty and environment: priorities for research and policy an overview study. United Nations Development Programme and European Commission. Institute of Development Studies, Falmer, Sussex BN1 9RE, UK. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/4772/1/Poverty_and_environment-priorities_for_research_and_study.pdf
  20. Friedl B, Getzner M (2003) Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol Econ 45:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gani A (2012) The relationship between good governance and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from developing economies. J Econ Dev 37(1):77–93Google Scholar
  22. Garbaccio RF, Ho MS, Jorgenson DW (2000) The health benefits of controlling carbon emissions in China. In: Ancillary benefits and costs of greenhouse gas mitigation, OECD, Paris, 343–376Google Scholar
  23. Gowdy JM, Onyeiwu S (2006) Environmental degradation and sustainable health: a review of the contending issues, book chapter: economics interactions with other disciplines, volume 1, pp. 90–98. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)Google Scholar
  24. Granger CWJ (1981) Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. J Econ 16:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grant L (2008) Carbon dioxide emissions are bad for human health, study finds. Retrieved from http://treevolution.co.za/2008/01/carbon-dioxide-emissions-are-bad-for-human-health-study-finds/
  26. Hassaballa H (2015) The effect of corruption on carbon dioxide emissions in the MENA region. Eur J Sustain Dev 4(2):301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hassan SA, Khalid Z, Gul S (2015) The relationship between growth-inequality-poverty triangle and environmental degradation: unveiling the reality. Arab Econ Bus J 10:57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hwang J (2002) A note on the relationship between corruption and government revenue. J Econ Dev 27(2):161–176Google Scholar
  29. Jalal K (1993) Sustainable development, environment and poverty nexus. Asian development bank, Manila, Philippine Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28124/op007.pdf Google Scholar
  30. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with application to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ 52(2):169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lau L-S, Choong C-K, Eng Y-K (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leitao A (2010) Corruption and the environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence for sulphur. Ecol Econ 69(11):2191–2201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez R, Mitra S (2000) Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve. J Environ Econ Manag 40(2):137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mauro P (1998) Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. J Public Econ 69:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mishra S, Siddiqui NA (2014) A review on environmental and health impacts of cement manufacturing emissions. Int J Geol, Agric Environ Sci 2(3):26–31Google Scholar
  36. Murad MW, Mustapha NHN (2010) Does poverty cause environmental degradation? Evidence from waste management practices of the squatter and low-cost flat households in Kuala Lumpur. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev 7(3):275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Najjar YSH (2011) Gaseous pollutants formation and their harmful effects on health and environment. Innov Energy Policies 1(2011):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roberts J, Timmons PEG, Jodie LM (2003) Social roots of global environmental change: a world-systems analysis of carbon dioxide emissions. J World Syst Res 9:277–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saboori B, Sulaiman JB, Mohd S (2012a) An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in Indonesia: the role of energy consumption and foreign trade. Int J Econ Financ 4(2):243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saboori B, Sulaiman JB, Mohd S (2012b) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taguchi H (2012) The environmental Kuznets curve in Asia: the case of sulphur and carbon emissions. Asia Pac Dev J 19(2):77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanzi V, Davoodi HR (2001) Corruption, growth and public finances. In: Jain AJ (ed) The political economy of corruption. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. United Nation (2010) Sustainable development: from Brundtland to Rio 2012. Background paper prepared for consideration by the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability at its first meeting, 19 September 2010, United Nations Headquarters, New York. Prepared by John Drexhage and Deborah Murphy, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)Google Scholar
  44. United Nations (1997) Glossary of environment statistics, studies in methods, series F, no. 67, United Nations, New York, 1997. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=821
  45. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future: the report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Welsch H (2004) Corruption, growth and the environment: a cross-country analysis. Environ Dev Econ 9(5):663–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wihardja MM (2010) Corruption in the public procurement auctions: positive equilibrium analysis, incentive mechanism design, and empirical study. J Econ Dev 35(1):35–57Google Scholar
  48. Wismans J, Grahn M, Denbratt I (2015) Low-carbon transport—health and climate benefits. Background paper for the Intergovernmental Ninth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia 17–20 November, 2015, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  49. World Bank (1997) Taking action to reduce poverty in sub-Saharan Africa? World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  50. World Bank (2006) Governance and anti-corruption. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/index.html
  51. World Development Indicators (2016) the World Bank databaseGoogle Scholar
  52. World Governance Indicators (2016) the World Bank databaseGoogle Scholar
  53. Yousaf MM, Hussain Z, Ahmad N (2008) Economic evaluation of foreign direct investment in Pakistan. Pak Econ Soc Rev 46(1):37–56Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsAbdul Wali Khan University MardanMardanPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Management SciencesCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyWah CanttPakistan

Personalised recommendations