Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 19, pp 16097–16106 | Cite as

Arsenic accumulation and physiological attributes of spinach in the presence of amendments: an implication to reduce health risk

  • Muhammad Shahid
  • Marina Rafiq
  • Nabeel Khan Niazi
  • Camille Dumat
  • Saliha Shamshad
  • Sana Khalid
  • Irshad Bibi
Research Article

Abstract

The current study examined the effect of calcium (Ca) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on arsenic (As) uptake and toxicity to spinach (Spinacia oleracea) as well as assessed the potential human health risks. Spinach seedlings were exposed to three levels of As (25, 125, and 250 μM) alone or together with three levels of EDTA (25, 125, and 250 μM) and Ca (1, 5, and 10 mM). The effect of EDTA and Ca was assessed in terms of As contents in roots and shoots, hydrogen peroxide production, chlorophyll contents, and lipid peroxidation. The accumulation and toxicity of As to spinach plants increased with increasing As levels in nutrient solution. Exposure to As resulted in lipid peroxidation and reduced chlorophyll contents. The highest level of As alone (250 μM) showed highest human health risk (hazard quotient of 7.09 at As-250). Addition of EDTA enhanced As accumulation by spinach, while reduced As toxicity to spinach, as well as human health risk (hazard quotient of 4.01 at As-250). Similarly, Ca significantly reduced As toxicity to spinach and the human health risks (hazard quotient of 3.79 at As-250) by reducing its accumulation in spinach. Higher levels of Ca were more effective in reducing As uptake and toxicity as well as enhancing chlorophyll contents.

Keywords

Arsenic Calcium EDTA Spinach Physiological attributes Health risk 

References

  1. Abbas MH, Abdelhafez AA (2013) Role of EDTA in arsenic mobilization and its uptake by maize grown on an As-polluted soil. Chemosphere 90:588–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abercrombie JM, Halfhill MD, Ranjan P, Rao MR, Saxton AM, Yuan JS, Stewart CN (2008) Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana plants to As (V) stress. BMC Plant Biol 8:87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belogolova G, Sokolova M, Gordeeva О, Vaishlya О (2015) Speciation of arsenic and its accumulation by plants from rhizosphere soils under the influence of Azotobacter and Bacillus bacteria. J Geochem Explor 149:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cattani I, Beone G, Gonnelli C (2015) Influence of Rhizophagus irregularis inoculation and phosphorus application on growth and arsenic accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated on an arsenic-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:6570–6577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen H-L, Lee C-C, Huang W-J, Huang H-T, Wu Y-C, Hsu Y-C, Kao Y-T (2016) Arsenic speciation in rice and risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in Taiwan population. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:4481–4488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chou M-L, Jean J-S, Yang C-M, Hseu Z-Y, Chen Y-H, Wang H-L, Das S, Chou L-S (2016) Inhibition of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ferric sodium salt (EDTA-Fe) and calcium peroxide (CaO 2) on arsenic uptake by vegetables in arsenic-rich agricultural soil. J Geochem Explor 163:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flora SJ (2011) Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and its reversibility. Free Radic Biol Med 51:257–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garelick H, Jones H, Dybowska A, Valsami-Jones E (2009) Arsenic pollution sources. Reviews of Environmental Contamination Volume 197. Springer, pp. 17–60Google Scholar
  9. Gomes M, Soares A, Garcia Q (2014) Phosphorous and sulfur nutrition modulate antioxidant defenses in Myracrodruom urundeuva plants exposed to arsenic. J Hazard Mater 276:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo J, Feng R, Ding Y, Wang R (2014) Applying carbon dioxide, plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium and EDTA can enhance the phytoremediation efficiency of ryegrass in a soil polluted with zinc, arsenic, cadmium and lead. J Environ Manag 141:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Hakeem KR, Öztürk M, Fujita M (2015) Arsenic toxicity in plantsand possible remediation. Soil Remediation and Plants Prospects and Challenges 1:433–501Google Scholar
  12. Hassan A, Abdel-Mohsen A, Elhadidy H (2014) Adsorption of arsenic by activated carbon, calcium alginate and their composite beads. Int J Biol Macromol 68:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK (1999) Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu X, Jiang M, Zhang J, Zhang A, Lin F, Tan M (2007) Calcium–calmodulin is required for abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense and functions both upstream and downstream of H2O2 production in leaves of maize (Zea mays) plants. New Phytol 173:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Islam E, Liu D, Li T, Yang X, Jin X, Mahmood Q, Tian S, Li J (2008) Effect of Pb toxicity on leaf growth, physiology and ultrastructure in the two ecotypes of Elsholtzia argyi. J Hazard Mater 154:914–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khalid S, Shahid M, Dumat C, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Bakhat FS, Abbas G, Murtaza B, Javeed HMR (2017a) Influence of groundwater and wastewater irrigation on lead accumulation in soil and vegetables: implications for health risk assessment and phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediation. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2017.1319330
  17. Khalid S, Shahid M, Niazi NK, Rafiq M, Bakhat HF, Imran M, Abbas T, Bibi I, Dumat C (2017b) Arsenic behaviour in soil-plant system: biogeochemical reactions and chemical speciation influences, enhancing cleanup of environmental pollutants: non biological approaches. N. Anjum et al. (eds.), Springer 2:97–140Google Scholar
  18. Khan S, Reid BJ, Li G, Zhu Y-G (2014) Application of biochar to soil reduces cancer risk via rice consumption: a case study in Miaoqian village, Longyan. China Environ Int 68:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) [34] Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes, Plant Cell Membranes. Academic Press, pp. 350–382Google Scholar
  20. Liu R, Yang C, Li S, Sun P, Shen S, Li Z (2014) Arsenic mobility in the arsenic-contaminated Yangzonghai Lake in China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 107:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma L, Yang Z, Kong Q, Wang L (2017) Extraction and determination of arsenic species in leafy vegetables: method development and application. Food Chem 217:524–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marmiroli M, Pietrini F, Maestri E, Zacchini M, Marmiroli N, Massacci A (2011) Growth, physiological and molecular traits in Salicaceae trees investigated for phytoremediation of heavy metals and organics. Tree Physiol: tpr090Google Scholar
  23. Marmiroli M, Pigoni V, Savo-Sardaro M, Marmiroli N (2014) The effect of silicon on the uptake and translocation of arsenic in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Environ Exp Bot 99:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marschner H (2011) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic pressGoogle Scholar
  25. Mikirova N, Casciari J, Hunninghake R (2011) Efficacy of oral DMSA and intravenous EDTA in chelation of toxic metals and improvement of the number of stem/progenitor cells in circulation. Transl BiomedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mirza N, Mubarak H, Chai L-Y, Yang Z-H, Mahmood Q, Yong W, Tang C-J, Fahad S, Nasim W (2016) Constitutional tolerance and chlorophyll fluorescence of Boehmeria nivea L in response to the antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) co-contamination. Toxicol Environ Chem: 1–8Google Scholar
  27. Mombo S, Dumat C, Shahid M, Schreck E (2016) A socio-scientific analysis of the environmental and health benefits as well as potential risks of cassava production and consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res: 1–15Google Scholar
  28. Niazi NK, Burton ED (2016) Arsenic sorption to nanoparticulate mackinawite (FeS): an examination of phosphate competition. Environ Pollut 218:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niazi NK, Singh B, Shah P (2011) Arsenic speciation and phytoavailability in contaminated soils using a sequential extraction procedure and XANES spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 45:7135–7142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niazi NK, Singh B, Minasny B (2015) Mid-infrared spectroscopy and partial least-squares regression to estimate soil arsenic at a highly variable arsenic-contaminated site. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1965–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noli F, Tsamos P (2016) Concentration of heavy metals and trace elements in soils, waters and vegetables and assessment of health risk in the vicinity of a lignite-fired power plant. Sci Total Environ 563:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pascaud G, Leveque T, Soubrand M, Boussen S, Joussein E, Dumat C (2014) Environmental and health risk assessment of Pb, Zn, as and Sb in soccer field soils and sediments from mine tailings: solid speciation and bioaccessibility. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4254–4264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pei Z-M, Murata Y, Benning G, Thomine S, Klüsener B, Allen GJ, Grill E, Schroeder JI (2000) Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. Nature 406:731–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pourrut B, Shahid M, Dumat C, Winterton P, Pinelli E (2011) Lead uptake, toxicity, and detoxification in plants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 213:113–136Google Scholar
  35. Rafiq M, Shahid M, Abbas G, Shamshad S, Khalid S, Niazi NK, Dumat C (2017) Comparative effect of calcium and EDTA on arsenic uptake and physiological attributes of Pisum sativum. Int J Phytoremediation: 00–00Google Scholar
  36. Rahman F, Naidu R (2009) The influence of arsenic speciation (AsIII & AsV) and concentration on the growth, uptake and translocation of arsenic in vegetable crops (silverbeet and amaranth): greenhouse study. Environ Geochem Health 31:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rahman A, Mostofa MG, Alam MM, Nahar K, Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M (2015) Calcium mitigates arsenic toxicity in rice seedlings by reducing arsenic uptake and modulating the antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems and stress markers. Biomed Res Int 2015Google Scholar
  38. Ramirez-Andreotta MD, Brusseau ML, Beamer P, Maier RM (2013) Home gardening near a mining site in an arsenic-endemic region of Arizona: assessing arsenic exposure dose and risk via ingestion of home garden vegetables, soils, and water. Sci Total Environ 454:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rehman ZU, Khan S, Qin K, Brusseau ML, Shah MT, Din I (2016) Quantification of inorganic arsenic exposure and cancer risk via consumption of vegetables in southern selected districts of Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 550:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saifullah SM, Zia-Ur-Rehman M, Sabir M, Ahmad HR (2015) Chapter 14 - phytoremediation of Pb-contaminated soils using synthetic chelates. In: Mermut KRHSÖR (ed) Soil remediation and plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shahid M, Pinelli E, Pourrut B, Silvestre J, Dumat C (2011) Lead-induced genotoxicity to Vicia faba L. roots in relation with metal cell uptake and initial speciation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shahid M, Austruy A, Echevarria G, Arshad M, Sanaullah M, Aslam M, Nadeem M, Nasim W, Dumat C (2014a) EDTA-enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metals: a review. Soil Sediment Contam Int J 23:389–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shahid M, Dumat C, Pourrut B, Silvestre J, Laplanche C, Pinelli E (2014b) Influence of EDTA and citric acid on lead-induced oxidative stress to Vicia faba roots. J Soils Sed 14:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shahid M, Pourrut B, Dumat C, Nadeem M, Aslam M, Pinelli E (2014c): Heavy-metal-induced reactive oxygen species: phytotoxicity and physicochemical changes in plants, Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, pp. 1–44Google Scholar
  45. Shahid M, Dumat C, Pourrut B, Abbas G, Shahid N, Pinelli E (2015) Role of metal speciation in lead-induced oxidative stress to Vicia faba roots. Russ J Plant Physiol 62:448–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shakoor MB, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Rahman MM, Naidu R, Dong Z, Shahid M, Arshad M (2015) Unraveling health risk and speciation of arsenic from groundwater in rural areas of Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:12371–12390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shakoor MB, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Murtaza G, Kunhikrishnan A, Seshadri B, Shahid M, Ali S, Bolan NS, Ok YS (2016) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated water using agricultural wastes as biosorbents. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:467–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Uddh-Söderberg TE, Gunnarsson SJ, Hogmalm KJ, Lindegård MBG, Augustsson AL (2015) An assessment of health risks associated with arsenic exposure via consumption of homegrown vegetables near contaminated glassworks sites. Sci Total Environ 536:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xiong T, Dumat C, Pierart A, Shahid M, Kang Y, Li N, Bertoni G, Laplanche C (2016) Measurement of metal bioaccessibility in vegetables to improve human exposure assessments: field study of soil–plant–atmosphere transfers in urban areas, South China. Environ Geochem Health: 1–19Google Scholar
  50. Xu C, Tang M, Zhu S, Naranmandura H, Liu W (2016) Assessment of arsenic in colostrum and cord serum and risk exposure to neonates from an island population in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:22467–22476CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Shahid
    • 1
  • Marina Rafiq
    • 1
  • Nabeel Khan Niazi
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Camille Dumat
    • 5
  • Saliha Shamshad
    • 1
  • Sana Khalid
    • 1
  • Irshad Bibi
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesCOMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT)VehariPakistan
  2. 2.Institute of Soil and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Agriculture FaisalabadFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.Southern Cross GeoScienceSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  4. 4.MARUM and Department of GeosciencesUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  5. 5.Centre d’Etude et de Recherche Travail Organisation Pouvoir (CERTOP), UMR5044Université J. Jaurès - Toulouse IIToulouse Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations