Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 16, pp 14491–14498 | Cite as

A preliminary study for conducting a rational assessment of radon exposure levels

  • Hyung-Jin Jeon
  • Dae-Ryoung Kang
  • Sang-Baek Go
  • Tae-Hyun Park
  • Si-Hyun Park
  • Jung-Eun Kwak
  • Cheol-Min Lee
Research Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the factors that go into a highly reliable estimate of radon exposure levels for use in setting up the case-control study. To this end, the present study conducted a multi-faceted investigation of the distribution of radon concentrations in the bedrooms and living rooms of 400 households in the target areas during the winter months from December 2014 to February 2015. We determined that taking the mean value of the radon concentration levels detected in the bedroom and living room as the representative value of residential concentration is appropriate, given the usability of previous research data and the difference in the concentration levels between the two. In terms of detector placement, we found that detectors should not inconvenience residents or be affected by an air current. Further, we found that housing type should distinguish between regular housing (single-detached, row, and multiplex housing) and apartments but that the building type was not a key factor in the assessment of radon exposure levels. Houses should be classified into those constructed with soil (red clay) and those with constructed with general building materials for the assessment of radon exposure levels.

Keywords

222-Rn Radon exposure Radon Exposure measurement Alpha track detector 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This subject is supported by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) as “the Environmental Health Action Program.” (Grant Number 2015001350004).

References

  1. Cohen BL (1988) Response to Lubin’s proposed explanations of out discrepancy. Health Phys 75(1):18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen BL (1990) A test of the linear no-threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis. Environ Res 53(2):193–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen BL (1995) Test of the linear no-threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis for inhaled radon decay products. Health Phys 68(2):157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darby S, Hill D, Deo H, Auvinen A, Barros-Dios JM, Baysson H et al (2006) Residential radon and lung cancer—detailed results of a collaborative analysis of individual data on 7148 persons with lung cancer and 14 208 persons without lung cancer from 13 epidemiologic studies in Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health:1–84Google Scholar
  5. Goldsmith JR (1999) The residential radon-lung cancer association in U.S. counties: a commentary. Health Phys 76(5):553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenland S, Robins J (1994) Invited commentary: ecologic studies – biases, misconceptions and counterexamples. Amer J Epidem 139(8):747–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hornung RW, Deddens J, Roscoe R (1995) Modifiers of exposure-response estimates for lung cancer among miners exposed to radon progeny. Environ Health Persp 103(Suppl 2):49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Howe GR, Stager RH (1996) Risk of lung cancer mortality after exposure to radon decay products in the Beaverlodge cohort based on revised exposure estimates. Rad Res 146(1):37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim YJ, Lee HY, Kim CS, Chang BU, Rho BH, Kim CK, & Tokonami S (2005) Indoor radon, thoron, and thoron daughter concentrations in Korea. In International Congress Series (Vol. 1276, pp. 46–49). ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim Y, Chang BU, Park HM, Kim CK, Tokonami S (2011) National radon survey in Korea. Radiat Prot Dosim 146(1–3):6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM, Alavanja M, Catalan VS, William Field R et al (2006) A combined analysis of North American case-control studies of residential radon and lung cancer. J Toxic Environ Health A 69(7–8):533–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kurnaz A, Küçükömeroğlu B, Çevik U, Çelebi N (2011) Radon level and indoor gamma doses in dwellings of Trabzon, Turkey. Appl Radiat Isot 69(10):1554–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lázár I, Tóth E, Marx G, Cziegler I, Köteles G (2003) Effects of residential radon on cancer incidence. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 258(3):519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee CM, Sim IS, Cho YS, Park GY, Kim YS, Goung SJN, Joo YK (2012) Radon concentrations in various indoor environments and effective doses to inhabitants in Korea. Environment and Pollution 1(1):55Google Scholar
  15. Lubin JH (1998a) On the discrepancy between epidemiologic studies in individuals of lung cancer and residential radon and Cohen’s ecologic regression. Health Phys 75(1):4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lubin JH (1998b) The influence of residential radon exposure on the estimation of exposure-response trends for lung cancer in underground miners exposed to radon. Rad Res 150(2):259–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lubin JH, Wang ZY, Boice JD, Xu ZY, Blot WJ, De Wang L, Kleinerman RA (2004) Risk of lung cancer and residential radon in China: pooled results of two studies. Int J Cancer 109(1):132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neuberger JS, Gesell TF (2002) Residential radon exposure and lung cancer: risk in nonsmokers. Health Phys 83(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Puskin JS (2003) Smoking as a confounder in ecologic correlations of cancer mortality rates with average county radon levels. Health Phys 84(4):526–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh AK, Kumar A, Prasad R (2006) Distribution of radon levels in Udaipur. Asian J Chem 18(5):3408Google Scholar
  21. Taylor PR, Qiao YL, Schatzkin A, Yao SX, Lubin JH, Mao BL, Rao JY, McAdams M, Xuan XZ, Li JY (1989) Relation of arsenic exposure to lung cancer among tin miners in Yunnan Province, China. Brit J Ind Med 46(12):881–886Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, UNSCEAR 2000 report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes, vol. 1: sources. United Nations PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  23. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2009) Effects of ionizing radiation; UNSCEAR 2006 report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes, vol. 2. United Nations PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  24. World Health Organization (WHO) (2009) WHO handbook on indoor radon http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44149/1/9789241547673_eng.pdf
  25. World Health Organization (WHO) (2016) Fact sheet no. 291: radon and cancer. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs291/en/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyung-Jin Jeon
    • 1
  • Dae-Ryoung Kang
    • 2
  • Sang-Baek Go
    • 3
  • Tae-Hyun Park
    • 4
  • Si-Hyun Park
    • 4
  • Jung-Eun Kwak
    • 4
  • Cheol-Min Lee
    • 4
  1. 1.Korea Environmental Information CenterKorea Environment InstituteSejongSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Humanities and Social MedicineAjou UniversitySuwonSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Preventive MedicineYonsei University Wonju College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringSeokyeong UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations