Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Quantitative characterization of pore structure of several biochars with 3D imaging


Pore space characteristics of biochars may vary depending on the used raw material and processing technology. Pore structure has significant effects on the water retention properties of biochar amended soils. In this work, several biochars were characterized with three-dimensional imaging and image analysis. X-ray computed microtomography was used to image biochars at resolution of 1.14 μm and the obtained images were analysed for porosity, pore size distribution, specific surface area and structural anisotropy. In addition, random walk simulations were used to relate structural anisotropy to diffusive transport. Image analysis showed that considerable part of the biochar volume consist of pores in size range relevant to hydrological processes and storage of plant available water. Porosity and pore size distribution were found to depend on the biochar type and the structural anisotopy analysis showed that used raw material considerably affects the pore characteristics at micrometre scale. Therefore, attention should be paid to raw material selection and quality in applications requiring optimized pore structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Baltrėnas P, Baltrėnaitė E, Spudulis E (2015) Biochar from pine and birch morphology and pore structure change by treatment in biofilter. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:69

  2. Bird MI, Ascough PL, Young IM, Wood CV, Scott AC (2008) X-ray microtomographic imaging of charcoal. J Archaeol Sci 35:2698–2706

  3. Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao X, Dugan B, Driver LE, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA (2014) New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenerg 66:176–185

  4. Bubici S, Korb J-P, Kučerik J, Conte P (2016) Evaluation of the surface affinity of water in three biochars using fast field cycling NMR relaxometry. Magn Reson Chem 54:365–370

  5. Conte P, Nestle N (2015) Water dynamics in different biochar fractions. Magn Reson Chem 53:726–734

  6. Eibisch N, Schroll R, Fuß R, Mikutta R, Helfrich M, Flessa H (2015) Pyrochars and hydrochars differently alter the sorption of the herbicide isoproturon in an agricultural soil. Chemosphere 119:155–162

  7. Fagernäs L, Kuoppala E, Arpiainen V (2015) Composition, utilization and economic assessment of torrefaction condensates. Energ Fuel 29:3134–3142

  8. Giesche H (2006) Mercury porosimetry: a general (practical) overview. Part Part Syst Charact 23:9–19

  9. Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenerg 61:196–205

  10. Hapca SM, Houston AN, Otten W, Baveye PC (2013) New local thresholding method for soil images by minimizing grayscale Intra-Class variance. Vadose Zone J 12. doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0172

  11. Hilpert M, Glantz R, Miller CT (2003) Calibration of a pore-network model by a pore-morphological analysis. Transp Porous Media 51:267–285

  12. Horgan GW (1998) Mathematical morphology for analysing soil structure from images. Eur J Soil Sci 49:161–173

  13. Jeffery S, Meinders MBJ, Stoof CR, Bezemer TM, van de Voorde TFJ, Mommer L, van Groenigen JW (2015) Biochar application does not improve the soil hydrological function of a sandy soil. Geoderma 251-252:47–54

  14. Jones K, Ramakrishnan G, Uchimiya M, Orlov A (2015) New applications of X-ray tomography in pyrolysis of biomass: biochar imaging. Energ Fuel 29:1628–1634

  15. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45:359–378

  16. Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT (2012) Hydrologic properties of biochar produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenerg 41:34– 43

  17. Mukherjee A, Lal R (2014) The biochar dilemma. Soil Research 52:217–230

  18. Nakashima Y, Kamiya S (2007) Mathematica programs for the analysis of three dimensional pore connectivity and anisotropic tortuosity of porous rocks using X ray computed tomography image data. J Nucl Sci Technol 44:1233–1247

  19. Novak JM, Ippolito JA, Lentz RD, Spokas KA, Bolster CH, Sistani K, Trippe KM, Phillips CL, Johnson MG (2016) Soil health, crop productivity, microbial transport, and mine spoil response to biochars. Bioenergy Research 9:454–464

  20. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from Gray-Level histograms. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 9:62–66

  21. Pratt WK (2007) Digital image processing, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey

  22. Promentilla MAB, Sugiyama T, Hitomi T, Takeda N (2009) Quantification of tortuosity in hardened cement pastes using synchrotron-based X-ray computed tomography. Cem Concr Res 39:548–557

  23. Quin PR, Cowie AL, Flavel RJ, Keen BP, Macdonald LM, Morris SG, Singh BP, Young IM, Van Zwieten L (2014) Oil mallee biochar improves soil structural properties—a study with x-ray micro-CT. Agr Ecosyst Environ 191:142–149

  24. Rawal A, Joseph SD, Hook JM, Chia CH, Munroe PR, Donne S, Lin Y, Phelan D, Mitchell DRG, Pace B, Horvat J, Webber JBW (2016) Mineral-biochar composites: molecular structure and porosity. Environ Sci Technol 50:7706–7714

  25. Schnee LS, Knauth S, Hapca S, Otten W, Eickhorst T (2016) Analysis of physical pore space characteristics of two pyrolytic biochars and potential as microhabitat. Plant Soil 408:357–368

  26. Shaaban A, Se S-M, Dimin MF, Juoi JM, Husin MHM, Mitan NMM (2014) Influence of heating temperature and holding time on biochars derived from rubber wood sawdust via slow pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 107:31–39

  27. Tabor Z, Rokita E (2007) Quantifying anisotropy of trabecular bone from gray-level images. Bone 40:966–972

  28. Verheijen FGA, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, van der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils—a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions 149 pp (EUR 24099 EN, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  29. Vogel HJ, Weller U, Schlüter S (2010) Quantification of soil structure based on Minkowski functions. Comput Geosci 36:1236–1245

  30. Yu X, Wu C, Fu Y, Brookers PC, Lu S (2016) Three-dimensional pore structure and carbon distribution of macroaggregates in biochar-amended soil. Eur J Soil Sci 67:109–120

Download references


This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 637020 – MOBILE FLIP.

Author information

Correspondence to Jari Hyväluoma.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyväluoma, J., Kulju, S., Hannula, M. et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of several biochars with 3D imaging. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 25648–25658 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8823-x

Download citation


  • Biochar
  • Soil amendment
  • Pore structure
  • Water retention
  • X-ray tomography
  • Image analysis