Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a duopoly market pricing competition and cooperation under the carbon emissions cap

Reducing air and soil pollution in China: issues in environmental technologies and management
  • 135 Downloads

Abstract

This article studies the price competition and cooperation in a duopoly that is subjected to carbon emissions cap. The study assumes that in a departure from the classical Bertrand game, there is still a market for both firms’ goods regardless of the product price, even though production capacity is limited by carbon emissions regulation. Through the decentralized decision making of both firms under perfect information, the results are unstable. The firm with the lower maximum production capacity under carbon emissions regulation and the firm with the higher maximum production capacity both seek market price cooperation. By designing an internal carbon credits trading mechanism, we can ensure that the production capacity of the firm with the higher maximum production capacity under carbon emissions regulation reaches price equilibrium. Also, the negotiation power of the duopoly would affect the price equilibrium.

Keywords

Price equilibrium Duopoly markets Carbon emissions 

References

  1. Benjaafar S, Elhafsi M (2012) A production-inventory system with both patient and impatient demand classes. IEEE T Autom Sci Eng 9:148–159. doi: 10.1109/tase.2011.2158645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M (2013) Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models. IEEE T Autom Sci Eng 10:172–179. doi: 10.1109/tase.2012.2203304 Google Scholar
  3. Calzadilla A, Rehdanz K, Tol RSJ (2011) Trade liberalization and climate change: a computable general equilibrium analysis of the impacts on global agriculture. Water 3:526–550. doi: 10.3390/w3020526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Changsong M, Xu C, Zhenyu L (2015a) Production strategy of considering low carbon emission policies regulation under stochastic demand. Control and Decision 30:969–976Google Scholar
  5. Changsong M, Zhenyu L, Tian L (2015b) Production strategy considering mandatory carbon emission policies regulation under stochastic demand. Syst Eng 33:61–64Google Scholar
  6. Choi SC (1991) Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Market Sci 10:271–296. doi: 10.1287/mksc.10.4.271
  7. Hong Z, Chu C, Yu Y (2012) Optimization of production planning for green manufacturing. In: 2012 9th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 193–196Google Scholar
  8. Hongguang P (2013) Optimal subsidy policy for accelerating the diffusion of green products. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 6:626–641. doi: 10.3926/jiem.734 Google Scholar
  9. Wenlong C, Huijun S, Wei W, Jianjun W (2013) Price competition model in decentralized and centralized supply chains with demand disruption. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 6:16–24. doi: 10.3926/jiem.616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wu X (2012) Bertrand model overview. Industrial & Science Tribune 11:75–76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming Jian
    • 1
  • Hua He
    • 1
    • 2
  • Changsong Ma
    • 2
  • Yan Wu
    • 3
  • Hao Yang
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Transportation and LogisticsSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Tian Fu College of SouthWestern University of Finance and EconomicsChengduChina
  3. 3.International Business SchoolSichuan Technology and Business UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations