Determination of glyphosate in surface water with high organic matter content
- 835 Downloads
In this paper, we investigate the sample preparation and analysis process in order to achieve adequate results for surface water collected from rivers that flow through swamps and are consequently rich in organic matter. We show that matrix effects in glyphosate determination can be reduced by optimizing sample volume, liquid chromatography (LC) mobile phase buffer concentration and pH as well as gradient speed. Also, aspects of derivatization procedure (borate buffer concentration, fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride concentration) and their influence on accuracy are considered in detail. We encountered a cross-talk effect in the mass spectra, interfering with quantization during analysis, which was removed by optimizing MS parameters. As a result it was demonstrated that isotope-labelled internal standard with just one 13C atom is sufficient for the analysis.
All these aspects were found to strongly impact the accuracy of the glyphosate determination but have received little or no attention in earlier works. We propose a reliable solid phase extraction and LC/ESI/MS/MS method for determination of glyphosate in organic-rich waters and demonstrate that LoD can be decreased by about two times using an ESI nebulizer with a modified design.
KeywordsGlyphosate Matrix effect Mass spectrometry Electrospray ionization Derivatization
This work has been supported by the grant No. 8373 from the Estonian Science Foundation, by PUT 34 from the Estonian Research Council, by the Estonian National Research and Infrastructure development programme of measure 2.3 “Promotion of development activities and innovation” (Regulation No. 34) funded by the Estonian Enterprise foundation and by the institutional research grant IUT21-2 from the Estonian Ministry of Education and Science.
- Bester K, Bordin G, Rodriguez A, Schimmel H, Pauwels J, Van Vyncht G (2001) How to overcome matrix effects in the determination of pesticides in fruit by HPLC-ESI-MS-MS Fresenius J Anal Chem 371(4):550–555.Google Scholar
- EFSA (2015) EFSA Risk assessment: Glyphosate. European Food Safety Autority, Parma (Italy) 2015. Available:http://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/corporate_publications/files/efsaexplainsglyphosate151112en.pdf (Last accessed 13.12.2015).
- Hanke I, Singer H, Hollender J (2008) Ultratrace-level determination of glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid and glufosinate in natural waters by solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: performance tuning of derivatization, enrichment and detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 391(6):2265–2276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IARC (2015) IARC Monographs Volume 112: evaluation of five organophosphate insecticides and herbicides. World Health Organisation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (France), 2015. Available from https://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/pdf/MonographVolume112.pdf (Last accessed: 13.12.2015).
- Karlsson KM, Spoof LEM, Meriluoto JAO (2005) Quantitative LC-ESI-MS analyses of microcystins and nodularin-R in animal tissue—Matrix effects and method validation. EnvironToxicol 20:381–389Google Scholar
- Küsters M, Gerhartz M (2010) Enrichment and low-level determination of glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid and glufosinate in drinking water after cleanup by cation exchange resin. J Sep Sci 33(8):1139–1146Google Scholar
- Licea-Perez H, Wang S, Szapacs ME, Yang E (2008) Development of a highly sensitive and selective UPLC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of testosterone and 5α-dihydrotestosterone in human serum to support testosterone replacement therapy for hypogonadism. Steroids 73(6):601–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Magnusson B, Örnemark U (1998) Eurachem guide: the fitness for purpose of analytical methods—a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, 2nd ed. Eurachem, Teddington, available from www.eurachem.org
- Patsias J, Papadopoulou A, Papadopoulou-Mourkidou E (2001) Automated trace level determination of glyphosate and aminomethyl phosphonic acid in water by on-line anion-exchange solid-phase extraction followed by cation-exchange liquid chromatography and post-column derivatization. J Chromatogr 932:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanchis J, Kantiani LM, Rubio F, Ginebreda A, Fraile J, Garrido T, Farre M (2012) Determination of glyphosate in groundwater samples using an ultrasensitive immunoassay and confirmation by on-line solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 402(7):2335–2345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vreeken RJ, Speksnijder P, Bobeldijk-Pastorova I, Noij THM (1998) Selective analysis of the herbicides glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water by on-line solid-phase extraction-high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 794(1):187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zrostlikova J, Hajslova J, Poustka J, Begany P (2002) Alternative calibration approaches to compensate the effect of co–extracted matrix components in liquid chromatography–electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues in plant materials. J Chromatogr A 973(1–2):13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar