Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 35, pp 34912–34921 | Cite as

Fouling mitigation and cleanability of TiO2 photocatalyst-modified PVDF membranes during ultrafiltration of model oily wastewater with different salt contents

  • Ildikó Kovács
  • Gábor Veréb
  • Szabolcs Kertész
  • Cecilia Hodúr
  • Zsuzsanna LászlóEmail author
Advanced oxidation processes for water/wastewater treatment


In the present study, TiO2-coated ultrafiltration membranes were prepared and used for oily water filtration (droplet size < 2 μm). The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of different salt contents on fouling and filtration properties of neat and TiO2-coated membranes during oil-in-water emulsion filtration. The effect of the TiO2 coating on the flux, surface free energy, and retention values was measured and compared with the neat membrane values. The cleanability of the fouled TiO2-coated membranes by UV irradiation was also investigated by measuring flux recovery and contact angles, and the chemical changes during cleaning were characterized by ATR-IR. It was found that increasing the salt content of the model wastewaters, oil-in-water emulsions, increased the zeta potential and the size of the droplets. The presence of the TiO2 coating decreases the membrane fouling during oily emulsion filtration compared to the neat membrane, due to the hydrophilicity of the coating regardless of the salt content of the emulsions. The neat and coated membrane oil retention was similar, 96 ± 2%. The coated membrane can be effectively cleaned with UV irradiation without additional chemicals and a significant flux recovery can be achieved. Monitoring of the cleaning process by following the membrane surface wettability and ATR-IR measurements showed that the recovery of flux does not mean the total elimination of the oil layer from the membrane surface.


TiO2-coated membrane PVDF Salt content Oil-in-water emulsion Ultrafiltration Fouling 


Funding information

This project was supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The authors received financial support from the project Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (NKFI contract number K112096).


  1. Atitar MF, Belhadj H, Dillert R, Bahnemann DW (2015) The relevance of ATR-FTIR spectroscopy in semiconductor photocatalysis. In Larramendy ML, Soloneski S (ed) Emerging pollutants in the environment—current and further implications.doi: Google Scholar
  2. Bae TH, Tak TM (2005) Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on fouling mitigation of ultrafiltration membranes for activated sludge filtration. J Membr Sci 249(1-2):1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai H, Liu Z, Sun DD (2010) Hierarchically multifunctional TiO2 nano-thorn membrane for water purification. Chem Commun 46(35):6542–6544. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellobono IR, Stanescu R, Costache C, Canevali C, Morazzoni F, Scotti R, Bianchi R, Mangone ES, de Martini G, Tozzi PM (2005) Laboratory-scale photomineralisation of n-alkanes in aqueous solution, by photocatalytic membranes immobilising titanium dioxide. Int J Photoenergy 7(2):79–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bet-moushoul E, Mansourpanah Y, Farhadi K, Tabatabaei M (2016) TiO2 nanocomposite based polymeric membranes: a review on performance improvement for various applications in chemical engineering processes. Chem Eng J 283:29–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chin SS, Chiang K, Fane AG (2006) The stability of polymeric membranes in a TiO2 photocatalysis process. J Membrane Sci 275(1-2):202–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickhout JM, Moreno J, Biesheuvel PM, Boels L, Lammertink RGH, de Vos WM (2017) Produced water treatment by membranes: a review from a colloidal perspective. J Colloid Interface Sci 487:523–534. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170(2–3):530–551. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He Y, Jiang ZW (2008) Technology review: treating oilfied wastewater. Filtr Separat 45(5):14–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hesampour M, Krzyzaniak A, Nyström M (2008) Treatment of wastewater from metal working by ultrafiltration, considering the effects of operating conditions. Desalination 222(1-3):212–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoek EMV, Bhattacharjee S, Elimelech M (2003) Effect of membrane surface roughness on colloid−membrane DLVO interactions. Langmuir 19(11):4836–4847. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu B, Scott K (2008) Microfiltration of water in oil emulsions and evaluation of fouling mechanism. Chem Eng J 136(2-3):210–220. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim SH, Kwak SY, Sohn BH, Park TH (2003) Design of TiO2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane as an approach to solve biofouling problem. J Membr Sci 211:157–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiss ZL, Kertész S, Beszédes S, Hodúr C, László Z (2013) Investigation of parameters affecting the ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsion wastewater. Desalin Water Treat 51(25-27):4914–4920. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolltweit Y (2016) Relationship between crude oil composition and physical-chemical properties, Master Thesis, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, University of Bergen, June 2016Google Scholar
  16. Kovács I, Kertész S, Veréb G, Papp IZ, Kukovecz Á, Hodúr C, László Z (2017) Membrane fouling control by means of TiO2 coating during model dairy wastewater filtration. Desalin Water Treat 73:415–421. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leong S, Razmjou A, Wang K, Hapgood K, Zhang X, Wang H (2014) TiO2 based photocatalytic membranes: a review. J Membr Sci 472:167–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Low ZX, Wang Z, Leong S, Razmjou A, Dumée LF, Zhang X, Wang H (2015) Enhancement of the antifouling properties and filtration performance of poly(ethersulfone) ultrafiltration membranes by incorporation of nanoporous titania nanoparticles. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(44):11188–11198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luján-Facundo MJ, Mendoza-Roca JA, Cuartas-Uribe B, Álvarez-Blanco S (2015) Evaluation of cleaning efficiency of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by BSA using FTIR–ATR as a tool. J Food Eng 163:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luxbacher T, Coday B, Cath T (2014) Does the surface zeta potential approach zero at high salinity? The 2014 Word Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM14), Busan, Korea, 2014.08.24–28Google Scholar
  21. Mahani H, Keya AL, Berg S, Bartels WB, Nasralla R, Rossen W (2015) Driving mechanism of low salinity flooding in carbonate rocks (SPE 174300). doi:
  22. Mogyorósi K, Balázs N, Srankó FD, Tombácz E, Dékány I, Oszkó A, Sipos P, Dombi A (2010) The effect of particle shape on the activity of nanocrystalline TiO2 photocatalysts in phenol decomposition. Part 3: the importance of surface quality. Appl Catal B-Environ 96(3-4):577–585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molinari R, Lavorato C, Argurio P (2016) Recent progress of photocatalytic membrane reactors in water treatment and in synthesis of organic compounds. A review. Catal Today 281:144–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molinari R, Palmisano L, Drioli E, Schiavello M (2002) Studies on various reactor configurations for coupling photocatalysis and membrane processes in water purification. J Membr Sci 206(1-2):399–415. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliveira R (1997) Understanding adhesion: a means for preventing fouling. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 14(4):316–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Razmjou A, Mansouri J, Chen V (2011) The effects of mechanical and chemical modification of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface chemistry, structure and fouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 378(1):73–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ríos G, Pazos C, Coca J (1998) Destabilization of cutting oil emulsions using inorganic salts as coagulants. Colloid Surf A 138(2-3):383–389. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruckenstein E, Kalthod DG (1981) Role of hydrodynamics and physical interactions in the adsorption and desorption of hydrosols or globular proteins. In Hallstrom B, Lund DB, Ch. Tragardh, (ed) Fundamentals and applications of surface phenomena associated with fouling and cleaning in food processing, Tylosand, Sweden, pp. 115–167Google Scholar
  29. Salgın S, Salgın U, Soyer N (2013) Streaming potential measurements of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes to determine salt effects on membrane zeta potential. Int J Electrochem Sci 8(1-3):4073–4084. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Veréb G, Ambrus Z, Pap Z, Kmetykó Á, Dombi A, Danciu V, Cheesman A, Mogyorósi K (2012) Comparative study on UV and visible light sensitive bare and doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the decomposition of environmental pollutants in water. Appl Catal A-Gen 417–418:26–36. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yi XS, Yu SL, Shi WX, Sun N, Jin LM, Wang S, Zhang B, Ma C, Sun LP (2011) The influence of important factors on ultrafiltration of oil/water emulsion using PVDF membrane modified by nano-sized TiO2/Al2O3. Desalination 281:179–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Process Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations