Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 35, pp 34863–34872 | Cite as

Transformation of sulfaquinoxaline by chlorine and UV light in water: kinetics and by-product identification

  • Rania Nassar
  • Samia Mokh
  • Ahmad Rifai
  • Fatmeh Chamas
  • Maha Hoteit
  • Mohamad Al Iskandarani
Advanced oxidation processes for water/wastewater treatment

Abstract

Sulfaquinoxaline (SQX) is an antimicrobial of the sulfonamide class, frequently detected at low levels in drinking and surface water as organic micropollutant. The main goal of the present study is the evaluation of SQX reactivity during chlorination and UV irradiations which are two processes mainly used in water treatment plants. The SQX transformation by chlorination and UV lights (254 nm) was investigated in purified water at common conditions used for water disinfection (pH = 7.2, temperature = 25 °C, [chlorine] = 3 mg L−1). The result shows a slow degradation of SQX during photolysis compared with chlorination process. Kinetic studies that fitted a fluence-based first-order kinetic model were used to determine the kinetic constants of SQX degradation; they were equal to 0.7 × 10−4 and 0.7 × 10−2 s−1corresponding to the half time lives of 162 and 1.64 min during photolysis and chlorination, respectively. In the second step, seven by-products were generated during a chlorination and photo-transformation of SQX and identified using liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS). SO2 extrusion and direct decomposition were the common degradation pathway during photolysis and chlorination. Hydroxylation and isomerization were observed during photodegradation only while electrophilic substitution was observed during chlorination process.

Keywords

Sulfaquinoxaline Disinfection Chlorination UV photolysis Kinetic study By-products LC-MS-MS 

References

  1. Abdallah H, Arnaudguilhem C, Jaber F, Lobinski R (2014) Multiresidue analysis of 22 sulfonamides and their metabolites in animal tissues using quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe extraction and high resolution mass spectrometry (hybrid linear iontrap-Orbitrap). J Chromatogr A 1355:61–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.05.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acero JL, Javier Benitez FJ, Real FJ, Roldan G (2010) Kinetics of aqueous chlorination of some pharmaceuticals and their elimination from water matrices. Water Res 44(14):4158–4170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams C, Wang Y, Loftin K, Meyer M (2002) Removal of antibiotics from surface and distilled water in conventional water treatment processes. J Environ Eng 128(3):253–260.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:3(253) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avisar D, Lester Y, Mamane H (2010) pH induced polychromatic UV treatment for the removal of a mixture of SMX, OTC and CIP from water. J Hazard Mater 175(1-3):1068–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baran W, Adamek E, Ziemiańska J, Sobczak A (2011) Effects of the presence of sulfonamides in the environment and their influence on human health. J Hazard Mater 196:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boxall ABA, Kolpin DW, Halling-Sorensen B, Tolls J (2003) Are veterinary medicines causing environmental risks? Environ Sci Technol 37:286–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell WC (2008) History of the discovery of sulfaquinoxaline as a coccidiostat. J Parasitol 94(4):934–945.  https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1413.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chamberlain E, Adams C (2006) Oxidation of sulfonamides, macrolides, and carbadox with free chlorine and monochloramine. Water Res 40(13):2517–2526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui C, Jin L, Jiang L, Han Q, Lin K, Lu S, Zhang D, Cao G (2016) Removal of trace level amounts of twelve sulfonamides from drinking water by UV-activated peroxymonosulfate. Sci Total Environ 572:244–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Liguoro M, Di Leva V, Gallina G, Faccio E, Pinto G, Pollio A (2010) Evaluation of the aquatic toxicity of two veterinary sulfonamides using five test organisms. Chemosphere 81(6):788–793.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dodd MC, Huang CH (2004) Transformation of the antibacterial agent sulfamethoxazole in reactions with chlorine: kinetics, mechanisms, and pathways. Environ Sci Technol 38(21):5607–5615.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es035225z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doretto KM, Peruchi LM, Rath S (2014) Sorption and desorption of sulfadimethoxine, sulfaquinoxaline and sulfamethazine antimicrobials in Brazilian soils. Sci Total Environ 476–477:406–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenberg G (1943) Colorimetric determination of hydrogen peroxide. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 15(5):327–328.  https://doi.org/10.1021/i560117a011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El Najjar NH, Deborde M, Journel R, Vel Leitner NK (2013) Aqueous chlorination of levofloxacin: kinetic and mechanistic study, transformation product identification and toxicity. Water Res 47(1):121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaffney Vde J, Cardoso W, Benoliel MJ, Almeida CM (2016) Chlorination and oxidation of sulfonamides by free chlorine: identification and behaviour of reaction products by UPLC-MS/MS. J Environ Manag 166:466–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia-Galan MJ, Silvia Diaz-cruz M, Damia Barcelo (2008) Identification and determination of metabolites and degradation products of sulfonamide antibiotics. TrAC 27:1008–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton RJ (1998) Blackie academic and professional. Thomson Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoff RB, Barreto F, Melo J, Jank L, Ruaro Peralba MC, Pizzolato TM (2012) Characterization and estimation of sulfaquinoxaline metabolites in animal tissues using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Method 4(9):2822–2830.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ay25197c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoff B, Meneghini L, Pizzolato T, Peralba M, Diaz-Cruz M, Barcelo D (2014) Structural elucidation of sulfaquinoxaline metabolism products and their occurrence in biological samples using high-resolution orbitrap mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 86(11):5579–5586.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac501132r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klavarioti M, Mantzavinos D, Kassinos D (2009) Removal of residual pharmaceuticals from aqueous systems by advanced oxidation processes. Environ Internat 35(2):402–417.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Fur C, Legeret B, de Sainte CP, Wong-Wah-Chung P, Sarakha M (2013) Liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the analysis of sulfaquinoxaline byproducts formed in water upon solar light irradiation. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 27(6):722–730.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lian J, Qiang Z, Li M, Bolton JR, Qu J (2015) UV photolysis kinetics of sulfonamides in aqueous solution based on optimized fluence quantification. Water Res 75:43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liao Q-N, Ji F, Li J-C, Zhan X, Hu Z-H (2016) Decomposition and mineralization of sulfaquinoxaline sodium during UV/H2O2 oxidation processes. Chem Eng J 284:494–502.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li L, Wei D, Wei G, Du Y (2013) Transformation of cefazolin during chlorination process: products, mechanism and genotoxicity assessment. J Hazard Mater 262:48–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nassar R, Trivella A, Mokh S, Al Iskandarani M, Budzinski H, Mazellier P (2017) Photodegradation of sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxypiridazine, amitriptyline, and clomipramine drugs in aqueous media. J Photochem Photobiol A 336:176–1820.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nicole I, De Laat J, Dore M, Duguet JP, Bonnel C (1990) Use of UV radiation in water treatment measurement of photonic flux hydrogen peroxide actinometry. Water Res 24(2):157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(90)90098-Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shemer H, Sharpless CM, Linden KG (2005) Photodegradation of 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in aqueous solution. Water Air Soil Pollut 168(1–4):145–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-0960-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Urbano V, Maniero M, Perez-Moya M, Guimaraes J (2016) Influence of pH and ozone dose on sulfaquinoxaline ozonation. J Environ. Manage 195:224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yassine M, Rifai A, Doumyati S, Trivella A, Mazellier P, Budzinski H, Al Iskandarani M (2017a) Oxidation of danofloxacin by free chlorine—kinetic study, structural identification of by-products by LC–MS/MS and potential toxicity of by-products using in silico test. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(9):7982–7993.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8409-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yassine MH, Rifai A, Hoteit M, Mazellier P, Al Iskandarani, M. (2017b) Study of the degradation process of ofloxacin with free chlorine by using ESI-LCMSMS: kinetic study, byproducts formation pathways and fragmentation mechanisms. Chemosphere 189:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rania Nassar
    • 1
  • Samia Mokh
    • 2
  • Ahmad Rifai
    • 2
  • Fatmeh Chamas
    • 1
  • Maha Hoteit
    • 1
  • Mohamad Al Iskandarani
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Public Health ILebanese UniversityHadathLebanon
  2. 2.Laboratory for Analysis of Organic Compound LACO, National Council for Scientific Research CNRSLebanese Atomic Energy Commission LAECBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations