Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 2062–2078 | Cite as

Evaluation of the quality and quantity of compost and leachate from household waterless toilets in France

  • Behzad NasriEmail author
  • Florent Brun
  • Olivier Fouché
Groundwater under threat from diffuse contaminants: improving on-site sanitation, agriculture and water supply practices

Abstract

One of the most undesired wastes is the human excreta due to the socio-environmental pressure. Otherwise, the nutriments contained in human excreta could be used as fertilizers to enrich the soil. Familial waterless litter composting toilets (FWLCT) are an alternative for locations where a centralized sewerage network cannot be provided or where there is a lack of standard urban infrastructure including roads, electricity, and water supply. The scientific researches on the composting techniques, the methods of control of the composting processors, and the rate of produced leachate are very limited. In this research, the composting systems included a feces and urine collection device. In each passage, the litter (carbonaceous material) is added to the excreta. Regularly, the buckets were emptied into a composting device located outside the house to which an additional portion of carbonaceous materials can be added. Monitoring was carried out on five rural and one urban familial composting areas in France for 1.5 years. The physiochemical and microbiological properties of the compost and leachate have been monitored and measured in compliance with the protocols. The results show that one of the main problems of this system of human excreta treatment is that the composting process does not achieve a significant rise in temperature and does not allow reaching the optimum temperatures (> 50 °C). Otherwise, from an agronomic point of view, the obtained compost is not rich enough in nutriments to be a good compost as soil fertilizer. But it can be used as a soil conditioner. The average leachate flux from the composters is 1.79 L/day. Because of the very short stay time in the piles, the leachate is contaminated by harmful bacteria and should be treated by another sanitation system.

Keywords

Composting toilets Human excreta treatment and management Environmental discharge Chemical flux 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been developed within the familial waterless toilet project undertaken by Toilettes Du Monde (TDM) with the support of French Agency of Environment and Energy Control (ADEME, grant no. 1106C0083).

The authors are grateful to the owners of the houses for their participation in data collecting and the member of the Ecological Sanitation Network (Réseau de l’Assainissement Écologiquewww.rae-intestinale.fr). Thanks to LTHE laboratory (Grenoble, France) who permitted to develop the scientific protocols and to interpret the leachate analysis.

References

  1. Abbott R (2004) Skaneateles Lake watershed, composting toilet project. Small flows Q 5(2):32–39Google Scholar
  2. Adani F, Ubbiali C, Generini P (2006) The determination of biological stability of composts using the Dynamic Respiration Index: the results of experience after two years. Waste Manag (New York, N.Y.) 26(1):41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand CK, Apul DS (2014) Composting toilets as a sustainable alternative to urban sanitation—a review. Waste Manag 34(2):329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartram J, Sandy Cairncross S (2010) Hygiene, sanitation, and water: forgotten foundations of health. PLoS Med 7(11):1–9Google Scholar
  5. Baum R, Luh J, Bartram J (2013) Sanitation: a global estimate of sewerage connections without treatment and the resulting impact on MDG progress. Environ Sci Technol 47:1994–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernal MP, Alburquerque JA, Moral R (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresour Technol 100:5444–5453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Bertoldi M, Vallini G, Pera A (1983) The biology of composting: a review. Waste Manage Res 1:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulter-Bitzer JI, Trevors JT, Boland GJ (2006) A polyphasic approach for assessing maturity and stability in compost intended for suppression of plant pathogens. Appl Soil Ecol 34:65–81Google Scholar
  9. Brewer LJ, Sullivan DM (2003) Maturity and stability evaluation of composted yard trimmings. Compost Science & Utilization 11(2):96–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brinton WF (2000) Compost quality standards and guidelines: an international view. ME, Woods End Research Laboratory IncGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronick CJ, Lal R (2004) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124(1–2):3–22Google Scholar
  12. California Integrated Waste Management Board (2007) Compost quality: performance requirements—matching performance needs with product characteristics [online]. Available from http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Organics/Products/Quality/Needs.htm
  13. Chan KY, Heenan DP, So HB (2003) Sequestration of carbon and changes in soil quality under conservation tillage on light-textured soils in Australia: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 43:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman PD (1993) Compost toilets: an option for human waste disposal at remote sites. Lincoln University. http://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/handle/10182/3016
  15. Chefetz B, Hatcher PG, Hadar Y, Chen Y (1996) Chemical and biological characterization of organic matter during composting of municipal solid waste. J Environ Qual 25(4):776–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Circular (2007) Règlementation française relative aux plans de gestion des déchets ménagers. http://www.ineris.fr/aida/consultation_document/7295
  17. Compost Ingredients (2012) http://www.the-compostgardener.com/compostingredients.html#axzz22zsZdjAv> (accessed August 2012) (Unpublished Work)
  18. Cordova A, Knuth B (2005) Barriers and strategies for dry sanitation in large-scale and urban settings. Urban Water J 2:245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Del Porto D, Steinfeld C (1998) The composting toilet system book: a practical guide to choosing, planning and maintaining composting toilet systems, a water-saving, pollution-preventing alternative. Center for ecological pollution prevention, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Depledge D (1997) Design examples of waterless composting toilets. South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission. Report 249. <http://www.pacificwater.org/userfiles/file/MR0249.pdf> (accessed February 2013)
  21. Dharmabalan P (1988) Small waste disposal systems. Papua new guinea university of technology department of civil engineering, PapuaGoogle Scholar
  22. Dzwairo B, Hoko Z, Love D, Guzha E (2006) Assessment of the impacts of pit latrines on groundwater quality in rural areas: a case study from Marondera district, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 31(15):779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Enferadi KM (1981) A field evaluation of the waterless toilet as an alternative to the failing soil absorption system. In: Individual onsite wastewater systems—proceedings of the NSF eighth national conference 1981: 201–209Google Scholar
  24. Epstein E (1997) The Science of Composting. Technomic Publishing Company Inc., Lancaster, p 487Google Scholar
  25. Feachem RG, Bradley DJ, Garelick H, Mara DD (1983) Sanitation and disease. Health aspects of excreta and wastewater management. World bank studies in water supply and sanitation. John Willey and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Fittschen I, Niemczynowicz J (1997) Experiences with dry sanitation and greywater treatment in the ecovillage Toarp, Sweden. Water Sci Technol 35:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flynn RP, Wood CW (1996) Temperature and chemical changes during composting of broiler litter. Compost Science & Utilization 4(3):62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Franceys R (1992) A guide to the development of on-site sanitation. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. Gajalakshmi S, Abbasi SA (2008) Solid waste management by composting: state of the art. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 38:311–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Germer J, Boh MY, Schoeffler M, Amoah P (2010) Temperature and deactivation of microbial faecal indicators during small scale co-composting of faecal matter. Waste Manag 30:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grewal SK, Rajeev S, Sreevatsan S, Fredrick CM (2006) Persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and other zoonotic pathogens during simulated composting, manure packing, and liquid storage of dairy manure. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haug RT, Haug HT (1993) The practical handbook of compost engineering. Boca Raton, Lewis publishers, CRC Press IncGoogle Scholar
  33. Heinrich D, Hergt M (1993) Atlas de l'écologie. LGF, Livre de Poche, ParisGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill GB, Susan AB (2012) Vermicomposting toilets, an alternative to latrine style microbial composting toilets, prove far superior in mass reduction, pathogen destruction, compost quality, and operational cost. Waste Manag 32(10):1811–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmqvist A, Stenstrom AT (2002) Survival of Ascaris suum ova, indicator bacterial and salmonella typhimurium phage 28B in mesophilic composting of household waste. EcoSanRes, Stolkholm Environment Institute, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  36. Hsu JH, Lo SL (1999) Recycling of separated pig manure: characterization of maturity and chemical fractionation of elements during composting. Water Sci Technol 40(1):121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huang RT (1993) The practical handbook of compost engineering. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, ISBN 0-87371, pp 373–377Google Scholar
  38. Iglesias Jiménez E, Pérez Garcia V (1991) Composting of domestic refuse and sewage sludge. I. Evolution of temperature, pH, C/N ratio, and cation exchange capacity. Resour Conserv Recycl 6(1):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inbar Y, Hadar Y, Chen Y (1993) Recycling of cattle manure: the composting process and characterization of maturity. J Environ Qual 22(4):857–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jenkins J (1999) The humanure handbook: a guide to composting human manure, 2nd edn. Jenkins Publishing, Grove City, p 154Google Scholar
  41. Jenkins J (2005) The humanure handbook. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River JuncitonGoogle Scholar
  42. Jensen PKM, Phuc PD, Konradsen F (2009) Survival of Ascaris eggs and hygienic quality of human excreta in Vietnamese composting latrines. Environ Health 8:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaczala F (2006) A review of dry toilet systems. Department of Technology, University of Kalmar, LinnaeusGoogle Scholar
  44. Ko HJ, Kim KY, Kim HT, Kim CN, Umeda M (2008) Evaluation of maturity parameters and heavy metal contents in composts made from animal manure. Waste Management 28:813–820Google Scholar
  45. Lasaridi KE, Stentiford EI, Evans T (2000) Windrow composting of wastewater biosolids: process performance and product stability assessment. Water Sci Technol 42(9):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leich HH (1981) Norwegians test 21 composting toilets. Biocycle 22(2):22–23Google Scholar
  47. Li HF, Imai T, Ukita M, Sekine M, Higuchi T (2004) Compost stability assessment using a secondary metabolite: geosmin. Environ Technol 25(11):1305–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mathur SP, Owen G, Dinel H, Schnitzer M (1993) Determination of compost biomaturity. I. Literature review. Biol Agric Hortic 10:65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller FC (1992) Composting as a process based on the control of ecologically selective factors. In: Metting FB Jr (ed) Soil microbial ecology, applications in agricultural and environmental management. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 515–544Google Scholar
  50. Nataka S, Zavala MAL, Funamizu N, Otaki M, Takakuwa T (2003) Temperature effect on pathogens decline in the bio-toilet system. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Dry Toilet Conference: Dry Toilet. Tampere, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  51. NFU 44-095 (2004) Amendements organiques - Composts contenant des matières d’intérêt agronomique, issues du traitement des eaux. French national standard collection. composting of the sludge form wastewater plants, ParisGoogle Scholar
  52. Paterson C, Mara D, Curtis T (2007) Pro-poor sanitation technologies. Geoforum 38(5):901–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prüss-Ustün A, Bartram J, Clasen T, Colford JM, Cumming O, Curtis V, Bonjour S, Dangour AD, De France J, Fewtrell L (2014) Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene in low-and middle-income settings: a retrospective analysis of data from 145 countries. Tropical Med Int Health 19(8):894–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pujari PR, Nanoti M, Nitnaware VC, Khare LA, Thacker N, Kelkar P (2007) Effect of on-site sanitation on groundwater contamination in basaltic environment case study from India. Environ Monit Assess 134(1):271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rapaport D (1996) The CCD toilet. An aerobic double vault composting toilet for tropical environments that achieves zero-discharge sanitation with low maintenance requirements. Center for Clean Development, OregonGoogle Scholar
  56. Redlinger T, Graham J, Corella-Barud V (2001) Survival of fecal coliforms in dry-composting toilets. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4036–4040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rubin AR, Claude P, Jerry S (2012) On-site wastewater treatment systems. Washington State Department of Health, Recommended Standards and Guidance for Performance, Application, Design, & Operation Maintenance. DOH Publication, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  58. Savage AJ, Tyrrel SF (2004) Compost liquor bioremediation using waste materials as bio filtration media. Bioresour Technol 96(5):557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith ME (1981) Evaluation of compost toilets. United States Department of Agriculture, Equipment Development Centre, San DimasGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith ED, Poon CP, Struss SR, Bandy JT, Scholze RJ (1984) Appropriate technology for treating wastewater at remote sites on army installations: preliminary findings. Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champain (Technical report: N-160)Google Scholar
  61. Stoner CH (1977) Goodbye to the flush toilet: water-saving alternatives to cesspools, septic tanks, and sewers. Rodale Press, EmmausGoogle Scholar
  62. Strande L, Mariska R, Damir B (2014) Faecal sludge management: systems approach for implementation and operation. IWA Publ, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Templeton MR, Hammoud AS, Butler AP, Braun L, Foucher JA, Grossmann J, Boukari M, Faye S, Jourda JP (2015) Nitrate pollution of groundwater by pit latrines in developing countries. AIMS Environ Sci 2(2):302–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tønner-Klank L (2007) Microbiological assessments of compost toilets: in situ measurements and laboratory studies on the survival of fecal microbial indicators using sentinel chambers. Waste Manag (New York, NY) 27:1144–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vinneras B, Bjorklund A, Jonsson H (2003) Thermal composting of faecal matter as treatment and possible disinfection method-laboratory-scale and pilot-scale studies. Bioresour Technol 88:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weppen P (2001) Process calorimetry on composting of municipal organic wastes. Biomass Bioenergy 21:289–299Google Scholar
  67. Weissenbacher N, Mayr E, Niederberger T, Aschauer C, Lebersorger S (2008) Alpine infrastructure in Central Europe: integral evaluation of wastewater treatment systems at mountain refuges. Water Sci Technol 57(12):2017–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. WHO/UNICEF (2014) Progress on drinking water and sanitation: 2014 update. Tech. rep. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  69. Wichuk KM, McCartney D (2010) Compost stability and maturity evaluation—a Literature review. J Environ Eng Sci 37(11):5Google Scholar
  70. Winblad U, Mayling SH, Calvert P (2004) Ecological sanitation. Stockholm Environment Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  71. Withers PJA, May HP, Jarvie P, Jordan D, Doody RH, Foy M, Bechmann S, Cooksley R, Dils N, Deal N (2012) Nutrient emissions to water from septic tank systems in rural catchments: uncertainties and implications for policy. Environ Sci Pol 24:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wu L, Ma LQ, Martinez GA (2000) Comparison of methods for evaluating stability and maturity of biosolids compost. J Environ Qual 29(2):424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Young B (1986) A background report on Clivus Multrum composting toilets at Kosciusko National Park. National Parks and Wildlife Service, New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  74. Zavala MAL, Funamizu N (2006) Design and operation of the bio-toilet system. Water Sci Technol 53:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zavala MAL, Funamizu N, Takakuwa T (2004) Temperature effect on aerobic biodegradation of faeces using sawdust as a matrix. Water Res 38(9):2406–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GeF lab., Geomatique & FoncierParisFrance
  2. 2.Toilettes Du MondeNyonsFrance

Personalised recommendations