Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 2402–2408 | Cite as

Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA

  • Alper AslanEmail author
  • Mehmet Akif Destek
  • Ilyas Okumus
Research Article

Abstract

This study aims to examine the validity of inverted U-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve by investigating the relationship between economic growth and environmental pollution for the period from 1966 to 2013 in the USA. Previous studies based on the assumption of parameter stability and obtained parameters do not change over the full sample. This study uses bootstrap rolling window estimation method to detect the possible changes in causal relations and also obtain the parameters for sub-sample periods. The results show that the parameter of economic growth has increasing trend in 1982–1996 sub-sample periods, and it has decreasing trend in 1996–2013 sub-sample periods. Therefore, the existence of inverted U-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve is confirmed in the USA.

Keywords

Environmental pollution Economic growth Rolling window causality EKC hypothesis USA 

References

  1. Ahmed K (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission in Mongolia: an empirical analysis. Manag Environ Qual: Int J 25(4):505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbostancı E, Türüt-Aşık S, Tunç GI (2009) The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37(3):861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic 70:466–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1622–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Nat Hazards 80(3):1729–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrews DWK (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61:821–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrews DWK, Ploberger W (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62:1383–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Apergis N (2016) Environmental Kuznets curves: new evidence on both panel and country-level CO 2 emissions. Energy Econ 54:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baek J (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO 2 emissions: the case of Arctic countries. Energy Econ 50:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balcilar M, Ozdemir ZA, Arslanturk Y (2010) Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Econ 32(6):1398–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrion-i-Silvestre JL, Kim D, Perron P (2009) GLS-based unit root tests with multiple structural breaks under both the null and the alternative hypotheses. Economet Theor 25(06):1754–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EIA (2016) U.S. Energy Information Administration databaseGoogle Scholar
  16. Farhani S, Mrizak S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 71:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  18. Hacker RS, Hatemi-J A (2006) Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: theory and application. Appl Econ 38:1489–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen BE (1992) Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes. J Bus Econ Stat 10:321–336Google Scholar
  20. He J, Richard P (2010) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO 2 in Canada. Ecol Econ 69(5):1083–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iwata H, Okada K, Samreth S (2010) Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO 2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energy Policy 38(8):4057–4063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO 2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12):5167–5172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A (2003) Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. J Econ 112(2):359–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lapinskienė G, Tvaronavičienė M, Vaitkus P (2014) Greenhouse gases emissions and economic growth–evidence substantiating the presence of environmental Kuznets curve in the EU. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(1):65–78Google Scholar
  25. Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 91:138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Onafowora OA, Owoye O (2014) Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ 44:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osabuohien ES, Efobi UR, Gitau CMW (2014) Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in Africa: evidence from panel cointegration. J Environ Policy Plan 16(4):517–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ozokcu S, Ozdemir O (2017) Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:639–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic 57:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (No. 992927783402676). International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  32. REN21 (2016) Renewables 2016 Global Status ReportGoogle Scholar
  33. Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and energy consumption in Malaysia: a cointegration approach. Energy Sources Part B: Econ Plan Policy 11(9):861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence. World Bank Publications 904:1–50Google Scholar
  35. Shahbaz M, Mutascu M, Azim P (2013) Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shahbaz M, Dube S, Ozturk, I, Jalil A (2015) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Portugal. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(2):475–481Google Scholar
  38. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 67:623–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Hye QMA (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregression with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66:225–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. WDI (2016) World development indicators database. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alper Aslan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mehmet Akif Destek
    • 2
  • Ilyas Okumus
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNevsehir Haci Bektas Veli UniversityNevsehirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsGaziantep UniversityGaziantepTurkey

Personalised recommendations