Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 1283–1293 | Cite as

Use the predictive models to explore the key factors affecting phytoplankton succession in Lake Erhai, China

  • Rong Zhu
  • Huan Wang
  • Jun Chen
  • Hong Shen
  • Xuwei DengEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Increasing algae in Lake Erhai has resulted in frequent blooms that have not only led to water ecosystem degeneration but also seriously influenced the quality of the water supply and caused extensive damage to the local people, as the lake is a water resource for Dali City. Exploring the key factors affecting phytoplankton succession and developing predictive models with easily detectable parameters for phytoplankton have been proven to be practical ways to improve water quality. To this end, a systematic survey focused on phytoplankton succession was conducted over 2 years in Lake Erhai. The data from the first study year were used to develop predictive models, and the data from the second year were used for model verification. The seasonal succession of phytoplankton in Lake Erhai was obvious. The dominant groups were Cyanobacteria in the summer, Chlorophyta in the autumn and Bacillariophyta in the winter. The developments and verification of predictive models indicated that compared to phytoplankton biomass, phytoplankton density is more effective for estimating phytoplankton variation in Lake Erhai. CCA (canonical correlation analysis) indicated that TN (total nitrogen), TP (total phosphorus), DO (dissolved oxygen), SD (Secchi depth), Cond (conductivity), T (water temperature), and ORP (oxidation reduction potential) had significant influences (p < 0.05) on the phytoplankton community. The CCA of the dominant species found that Microcystis was significantly influenced by T. The dominant Chlorophyta, Psephonema aenigmaticum and Mougeotia, were significantly influenced by TN. All results indicated that TN and T were the two key factors driving phytoplankton succession in Lake Erhai.

Keywords

Water bloom Phytoplankton succession Predicted models Lake Erhai 

Notes

Funding information

The research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0605201), the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology (2016FBZ08), and the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2012ZX07105-004).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_512_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Beaulieu M, Pick F, Palmer M, Watson S, Winter J, Zurawell R, Gregory-Eaves I, Prairie Y (2014) Comparing predictive cyanobacterial models from temperate regions. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71:1830–1839Google Scholar
  2. Birk S, Van Kouwen L, Willby N (2012) Harmonising the bioassessment of large rivers in the absence of near-natural reference conditions—a case study of the Danube River. Freshw Biol 57:1716–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradburn MJ, Lewis WM Jr, McCutchan JH Jr (2012) Comparative adaptations of Aphanizomenon and Anabaena for nitrogen fixation under weak irradiance. Freshw Biol 57:1042–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carey CC, Ibelings BW, Hoffmann EP, Hamilton DP, Brookes JD (2012) Eco-physiological adaptations that favour freshwater cyanobacteria in a changing climate. Water Res 46:1394–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis TW, Berry DL, Boyer GL, Gobler CJ (2009) The effects of temperature and nutrients on the growth and dynamics of toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis during cyanobacteria blooms. Harmful Algae 8:715–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong XH, Bennion H, Maberly SC, Sayer CD, Simpson GL, Battarbee RW (2012) Nutrients exert a stronger control than climate on recent diatom communities in Esthwaite Water: evidence from monitoring and palaeolimnological records. Freshw Biol 57:2044–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Downing JA, Watson SB, McCauley E (2001) Predicting cyanobacteria dominance in lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1905–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elser JJ, Bracken ME, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glibert PM, Burkholder JM (2006) The complex relationships between increases in fertilization of the earth, coastal eutrophication and proliferation of harmful algal blooms. Ecol Harmful Algae 189:341–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glibert PM, Anderson DM, Gentien P, Graneli E, Sellner KG (2005) The global, complex phenomena of harmful algal blooms. Oceanography 18:136–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gumbo RJ, Ross G, Cloete ET (2008) Biological control of Microcystis dominated harmful algal blooms. Afr J Biotechnol 7:4765–4773Google Scholar
  12. Hallett CS, Valesini FJ, Clarke KR, Hoeksema SD (2016) Effects of a harmful algal bloom on the community ecology, movements and spatial distributions of fishes in a microtidal estuary. Hydrobiologia 763:267–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heisler J, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM, Anderson DM, Cochlan W, Dennison WC, Dortch Q, Gobler CJ, Heil CA, Humphries E, Lewitus A, Magnien R, Marshall HG, Sellner K, Stockwell DA, Stoecker DK, Suddleson M (2008) Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus. Harmful Algae 8:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu HJ, Wei YX (2006) Freshwater algae in China. In: Science Press. PRC, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudnell HK, Dortch Q (2008) A synopsis of research needs identified at the interagency, international symposium on cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (ISOC-HAB). In: Hudnell HK (ed) Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms: state of the science and research needs. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 17–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ibelings BW, Fastner J, Bormans M, Visser PM (2016) Cyanobacterial blooms. Ecology, prevention, mitigation and control: editorial to a CYANOCOST special issue. Aquat Ecol 50:327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang Y-J, He W, Liu W-X, Qin N, Ouyang H-L, Wang Q-M, Kong X-Z, He Q-S, Yang C, Yang B, Xu F-L (2014) The seasonal and spatial variations of phytoplankton community and their correlation with environmental factors in a large eutrophic Chinese lake (Lake Chaohu). Ecol Indic 40:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. John DM, Whitton BA, Brook AJ (2002) The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles—an identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. JÖHnk KD, Huisman JEF, Sharples J, Sommeijer BEN, Visser PM, Stroom JM (2008) Summer heatwaves promote blooms of harmful cyanobacteria. Glob Chang Biol 14:495–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katsiapi M, Moustaka-Gouni M, Sommer U (2016) Assessing ecological water quality of freshwaters: PhyCoI—a new phytoplankton community index. Ecol Inform 31:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kosten S, Huszar VLM, Bécares E, Costa LS, Donk E, Hansson L-A, Jeppesen E, Kruk C, Lacerot G, Mazzeo N, Meester L, Moss B, Lürling M, Nõges T, Romo S, Scheffer M (2012) Warmer climates boost cyanobacterial dominance in shallow lakes. Glob Chang Biol 18:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landsberg JH (2002) The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms. Rev Fish Sci 10:113–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu D, Wang P, Wei GR, Dong WB, Hui F (2013a) Removal of algal blooms from freshwater by the coagulation-magnetic separation method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu H, Zhang H, Niedzwiedzki DM, Prado M, He G, Gross ML, Blankenship RE (2013b) Phycobilisomes supply excitations to both photosystems in a megacomplex in cyanobacteria. Science 342:1104–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma H, Cui FY, Fan ZQ, Liu ZQ, Zhao ZW (2012) Efficient control of Microcystis blooms by promoting biological filter-feeding in raw water. Ecol Eng 47:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niu Y, Shen H, Chen J, Xie P, Yang X, Tao M, Ma Z, Qi M (2011) Phytoplankton community succession shaping bacterioplankton community composition in Lake Taihu, China. Water Res 45:4169–4182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Neil JM, Davis TW, Burford MA, Gobler CJ (2012) The rise of harmful cyanobacteria blooms: the potential roles of eutrophication and climate change. Harmful Algae 14:313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliver RL, Hamilton DP, Brookes JD, Ganf GG (2012) Physiology, Blooms and Prediction Planktonic Cyanobacteria. In: Whitton BA (ed) Ecology of cyanobacteria II: their diversity in space and time. Springer, Netherlands, p 155–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3855-3
  29. Paerl HW (2008) Nutrient and other environmental controls of harmful cyanobacterial blooms along the freshwater-marine continuum. In: Hudnell HK (ed) Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms: state of the science and research needs, pp 217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paerl HW, Huisman J (2008) Blooms like it hot. Science 320:57–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paerl HW, Huisman J (2009) Climate change: a catalyst for global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. Environ Microbiol Rep 1:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paerl HW, Paul VJ (2012) Climate change: links to global expansion of harmful cyanobacteria. Water Res 46:1349–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pandey LK, Bergey EA, Lyu J, Park J, Choi S, Lee H, Depuydt S, Oh YT, Lee SM, Han T (2017) The use of diatoms in ecotoxicology and bioassessment: insights, advances and challenges. Water Res 118:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods for sea water analysis. Pergamon, Elmsford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Persaud AD, Paterson AM, Dillon PJ, Winter JG, Palmer M, Somers KM (2015) Forecasting cyanobacteria dominance in Canadian temperate lakes. J Environ Manag 151:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In: R foundation for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna URL http://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
  37. Rajasekhar P, Fan LH, Nguyen T, Roddick FA (2012) A review of the use of sonication to control cyanobacterial blooms. Water Res 46:4319–4329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reynolds CS (2006) Ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rigosi A (2014) The interaction between climate warming and eutrophication to promote cyanobacteria is dependent on trophic state and varies among taxa. Limnol Oceanogr 59(1):99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh AK, Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi M, Elvitigala T, Ghosh B, Aurora R, Pakrasi HB (2009) A systems-level analysis of the effects of light quality on the metabolism of a cyanobacterium. Plant Physiol 151:1596–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith JL, Boyer GL, Zimba PV (2008) A review of cyanobacterial odorous and bioactive metabolites: impacts and management alternatives in aquaculture. Aquaculture 280:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tao M, Xie P, Chen J, Qin B, Zhang D, Niu Y, Zhang M, Wang Q, Wu L (2012) Use of a generalized additive model to investigate key abiotic factors affecting microcystin cellular quotas in heavy bloom areas of Lake Taihu. PLoS One 7:1–10Google Scholar
  43. Wood SN (2004) Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. J Am Stat Assoc 99:673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xie P (1996) Experimental studies on the role of planktivorous fishes in the elimination of Microcystis bloom from Donghu Lake using enclosure method. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 14:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu H, Paerl HW, Qin BQ, Zhu GW, Gao G (2010) Nitrogen and phosphorus inputs control phytoplankton growth in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. Limnol Oceanogr 55:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu S, Wang Y, Huang B, Wei ZB, Miao AJ, Yang LY (2015) Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of phytoplankton growth in different areas of Lake Taihu, China. J Freshw Ecol 30:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang JR, Lv H, Isabwe A, Liu L, Yu X, Chen H, Yang J (2017) Disturbance-induced phytoplankton regime shifts and recovery of cyanobacteria dominance in two subtropical reservoirs. Water Res 120:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu G, Jiang Y, Song G, Tan W, Zhu M, Li R (2014) Variation of Microcystis and microcystins coupling nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients in Lake Erhai, a drinking-water source in southwest plateau, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:9887–9898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zelazna-Wieczorek J, Nowicka-Krawczyk P (2015) The cascade construction of artificial ponds as a tool for urban stream restoration—the use of benthic diatoms to assess the effects of restoration practices. Sci Total Environ 538:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rong Zhu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Huan Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jun Chen
    • 1
  • Hong Shen
    • 1
  • Xuwei Deng
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Donghu Experimental Station of Lake Ecosystems, State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of HydrobiologyChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations