Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 552–561 | Cite as

Fungicidal activity of slow-release P(3HB)/TEB formulations in wheat plant communities infected by Fusarium moniliforme

  • Tatiana G. Volova
  • Svetlana V. Prudnikova
  • Natalia O. Zhila
Research Article

Abstract

Fungicidal activity of experimental tebuconazole (TEB) formulations was investigated in laboratory soil ecosystems in wheat plant communities infected by Fusarium moniliforme. TEB was embedded in the matrix of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate, shaped as films and microgranules. These formulations were buried in the soil with wheat plants, and their efficacy was compared with that of commercial formulation Raxil and with the effect of pre-sowing treatment of seeds. In the experiment with the initially infected seeds and a relatively low level of natural soil infection caused by Fusarium fungi, the effects of the experimental P(3HB)/TEB formulations and Raxil were comparable. However, when the level of soil infection was increased by adding F. moniliforme spores, P(3HB)/TEB granules and films reduced the total counts of fungi and the abundance of F. moniliforme more effectively than Raxil. Seed treatment or soil treatment with Raxil solution showed an increase in the percentage of rot-damaged roots in the later stages of the experiment. In the early stage (between days 10 and 20), the percentage of rot-damaged roots in the soil with TEB embedded in the slowly degraded P(3HB) matrix was similar to that in the soil with Raxil. However, the efficacy of P(3HB)/TEB formulations lasted longer, and in later stages (between days 20 and 30), the percentage of rot-damaged roots in that group did not grow. In experiments with different TEB formulations and, hence, different fungicidal activities, the increase in plant biomass was 15–17 to 40–60% higher than in the groups where TEB was applied by using conventional techniques.

Keywords

Tebuconazole Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate Fungicidal effect Fusarium moniliforme Wheat plant communities Root rot 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the state budget allocated to the fundamental research at the Russian Academy of Sciences (project no. ААА-А17-117013050028-8).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asrar J, Ding Y, La Monica RE, Ness LC (2004) Controlled release of tebuconazole from a polymer matrix microparticle: release kinetics and length of efficacy. J Agric Food Chem 52:4814–4820.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0306385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binder EM, Tan LM, Chin LM, Handl J, Richard J (2007) Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients. Anim Feed Sci Technol 137:265–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyandin AN, Zhila NO, Kiselev EG, Volova TG (2016) Constructing slow-release formulations of metribuzin based on degradable poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). J Agric Food Chem 64:5625–5632.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fletcher RA, Gilley A, Sankhla N, Davis TD (2000) Triazoles as plant growth regulators and stress protectants. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural reviews. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Oxford, pp 55–138Google Scholar
  5. Grossmann K (1990) Plant growth retardants as tools in physiological research. Physiol Plant 78:640–648.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb05254.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jendrossek D (2001) Microbial degradation of polyesters. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 71:293–325Google Scholar
  7. Khalikov S, Dushkin A, Dvaleti R, Evsenko V (2013) The creation of innovatice fungicides based on tebuconazole and mechanochemical processes. Fundam Issled 10:2695–2700 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Kravchenko LV, Tutelyan VA (2005) Review. Biosafety mycotoxins—natural contaminants of wheat. Vopr pitan (Dietary issues) 3:3–13 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Netrusov AI, Egorov MA, Zakharchuk LM, Kolotilova NN (2005) Workshop on microbiology: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Academy Publ, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Prudnikova SV, Boyandin AN, Kalacheva GS, Sinskey AJ (2013) Degradable polyhydroxyalkanoates as herbicide carriers. J Polym Environ 21:675–682.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0561-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Qian K, Shi T, He S, Luo L, Liu X, Cao Y (2013) Release kinetics of tebuconazole from porous hollow silica nanospheres prepared by miniemulsion method. Micropor Mesopor Mater 169:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ricciardi A, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP, Lockwood JL (2013) Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species. Ecol Monogr 83:263–282.  https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0183.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Savenkova L, Gercberga Z, Muter O, Nikolaeva V, Dzene A, Tupureina V (2002) PHB-based films as matrices for pesticides. Process Biochem 37:719–722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00263-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simberloff D, Stiling P (1996) How risky is biological control? Ecology 77:1965–1974.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2265693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter MR (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  16. Sudesh K, Abe H, Doi Y (2000) Synthesis, structure and properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates: biological polyesters. Prog Polym Sci 25:1503–1555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00035-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sutton D, Fothergill A, Rinaldi M (2001) Key pathogenic and opportunistic fungi. Mir, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Tropin VP (2007) Advanced formulations of pesticides and their application techniques. Zas Karantin Rast (Plant protection and quarantine) 7:32–33 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  19. Volova T, Kiselev E, Shishatskaya E, Zhila N, Boyandin A, Syrvacheva D, Vinogradova O, Kalacheva G, Vasiliev A, Peterson I (2013) Cell growth and accumulation of polyhydroxyalkanoates from CO2 and H2 of a hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium, Cupriavidus eutrophus B-10646. Bioresour Technol 146:215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Volova T, Kiselev E, Vinogradova O, Nikolaeva E, Chistyakov A, Sukovatiy A, Shishatskaya E (2014) A glucose-utilizing strain, Cupriavidus euthrophus B-10646: growth kinetics, characterization and synthesis of multicomponent PHAs. PLoS One 9:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Volova TG, Prudnikova SV, Boyandin AN (2016a) Biodegradable poly-3-hydroxybutyrate as a fertilizer carrier. J Sci Food Agric 96:4183–4193.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Volova TG, Prudnikova SV, Zhila NO, Vinogradova ON, Shumilova AA, Nikolaeva ED, Kiselev EG, Shishatskaya EI (2016b) Efficacy of tebuconazole embedded in biodegradable poly-3-hydroxybutyrate to inhibit the development of Fusarium moniliforme in soil microecosystems. Pest Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4367
  23. Volova T, Zhila N, Kiselev E, Prudnikova S, Vinogradova O, Nikolaeva E, Shumilova A, Shershneva A, Shishatskaya E (2016c) Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/metribuzin formulations: characterization, controlled release properties, herbicidal activity, and effect on soil microorganisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:23936–23950.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7636-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Volova TG, Zhila NO, Vinogradova ON, Nikolaeva ED, Kiselev EG, Shumilova AA, Shershneva AM, Shishatskaya EI (2016d) Constructing herbicide metribuzin sustained-release formulations based on the natural polymer poly-3-hydroxybutyrate as a degradable matrix. J Env Sci Health, Part B 51:113–125.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2015.1092833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Volova TG, Zhila NO, Vinogradova ON, Shumilova AA, Prudnikova SV, Shishatskaya EI (2016e) Characterization of biodegradable poly-3-hydroxybutyrate films and pellets loaded with the fungicide tebuconazole. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:5243–5254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5739-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watanabe T (2002) Pictorial atlas of soil fungi: morphologies of fungi and key species, 2nd edn. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang D, Wang N, Yan X, Shi J, Zhang M, Wang Z, Yuan H (2014) Microencapsulation of seed-coating tebuconazole and its effect on physiology and biochemistry of maize seedlings. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 114:241–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zernovyye kultury (2008) vyrashchivaniye, uborka i ispolzovaniye (Cereal crops: cultivation, harvesting, and use). Publishing house DLV Agrodelo, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  29. Zhang B, Zhang T, Wang Q, Ren T (2015) Microorganism-based monodisperse microcapsules: encapsulation of the fungicide tebuconazole and its controlled release properties. RSC Adv 32:25164–25170.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA01629K, Paper CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana G. Volova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Svetlana V. Prudnikova
    • 1
  • Natalia O. Zhila
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Siberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussian Federation
  2. 2.Institute of Biophysics SB RAS, Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS”KrasnoyarskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations