Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 1168–1175 | Cite as

The synergetic effects of turbulence and turbidity on the zooplankton community structure in large, shallow Lake Taihu

  • Jian Zhou
  • Boqiang QinEmail author
  • Xiaoxia Han
Research Article

Abstract

Climate change is predicted to influence the heat budget of aquatic ecosystems and, in turn, affect the stability of the water column leading to increased turbulence coupled with enhanced turbidity. However, the synergetic effects of turbulence and turbidity on zooplankton community structure remain to be understood in large, shallow lakes. To determine the possible synergetic effects of these factors on zooplankton communities, a 15-day mesocosm experiment was carried out and tested under four turbulence and turbidity regimes namely control (ɛ = 0, 7.6 ± 4.2 NTU), low (ɛ = 6.01 × 10−8 m2 s−3, 19.4 ± 8.6 NTU), medium (ɛ = 2.95 × 10−5 m2 s−3, 55.2 ± 14.4 NTU), and high (ɛ = 2.39 × 10−4 m2 s−3, 741.6 ± 105.2 NTU) conditions, which were comparable to the natural conditions in Lake Taihu. Results clearly showed the negative effects of turbulence and turbidity on zooplankton survival, which also differed among taxa. Specifically, increased turbulence and turbidity levels influenced the competition among zooplankton species, which resulted to the shift from being large body crustacean-dominated (copepods and cladocerans) to rotifer-dominated community after 3 days. The shift could be associated with the decrease in vulnerability of crustaceans in such environments. Our findings suggested that changes in the level of both turbidity and turbulence in natural aquatic systems would have significant repercussions on the zooplankton communities, which could contribute to the better understanding of community and food web dynamics in lake ecosystems exposed to natural mixing/disturbances.

Keywords

Zooplankton Community structure Turbulence Turbidity Lake Taihu 

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41701098, 41230744, 41621002) and the International Scientific Cooperation Project (2014DFG91780).

References

  1. Baranyi C, Hein T, Holarek C, Keckeis S, Schiemer F (2002) Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube River floodplain system: effects of hydrology. Freshw Biol 47:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaver J, Jensen D, Casamatta D, Tausz C, Scotese K, Buccier K et al (2013) Response of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in six reservoirs of the middle Missouri River (USA) to drought conditions and a major flood event. Hydrobiologia 705:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickel SL, Hammond JDM, Tang KW (2011) Boat-generated turbulence as a potential source of mortality among copepods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 401(1–2):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardoso LS, Marques DM (2007) Hydrodynamics-driven plankton community in a shallow lake. Aquat Ecol 43:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrasco NK, Perissinotto R, Miranda N (2007) Effects of silt loading on the feeding and mortality of the mysid Mesopodopsis africanain the St. Lucia Estuary, South Africa. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 352:152–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrasco NK, Perissinotto R, Jones S (2013) Turbidity effects on feeding and mortality of the copepod Acartiella natalensis (Connell and Grindley, 1974) in the St. Lucia Estuary, South Africa. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 446:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaparro G, Marinone MC, Lombardo R, Schiaffino MR, Guimarães A, O’Farrell I (2011) Zooplankton succession during extraordinary drought-flood cycles: a case study in a South American floodplain lake. Limnologica 4:371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dasari S (2012) Inorganic elemental concentrations in water samples from Kentucky Lake, Clarks River and Ohio River: possible effects on establishment of zebra mussel population. Murray State University Murray, Kentucky, p 4Google Scholar
  9. David V, Sautour B, Galois R, Chardy P (2006) The paradox high zooplankton biomass–low vegetal particulate organic matter in high turbidity zones: what way for energy transfer? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 333:202–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dejen E, Vijverberg J, Nagelkerke LAJ, Sibbing FA (2004) Temporal and spatial distribution of microcrustacean zooplankton in relation to turbidity and other environmental factors in a large tropical lake (L. Tana, Ethiopia). Hydrobiologia 513:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flöder S, Sommer U (1999) Diversity in planktonic communities: an experimental test of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1114–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. G- Tóth L, Parpala L, Balogh C, Tátrai I, Baranyai E (2011) Zooplankton community response to enhanced turbulence generated by water-level decrease in Lake Balaton, the largest shallow lake in Central Europe. Limnol Oceanogr 56:2211–2222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harkonen L, Pekcan-Hekim Z, Hellen N, Ojala A, Horppila J (2014) Combined effects of turbulence and different predation regimes on zooplankton in highly colored water—implications for environmental change in lakes. PLoS One 9:e111942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart R (1990) Zooplankton distribution in relation to turbidity and related environmental gradients in a large subtropical reservoir: patterns and implications. Freshw Biol 24:241–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henley WF, Patterson MA, Neves RJ, Lemly AD (2000) Effects of sedimentation and turbidity on lotic food webs: a concise review for natural resource managers. Rev Fish Sci 8:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horppila J, Eloranta P, Liljendahl-Nurminen A, Niemisto J, Pekcan-Hekim Z (2009) Refuge availability and sequence of predators determine the seasonal succession of crustacean zooplankton in a clay-turbid lake. Aquat Ecol 43:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jack JD, Wickham SA, Toalson SA, Gilbert JJ (1993) The effects of clays on freshwater plankton community: an enclosure experiment. Arch Hydrobiol 127(3):257–270Google Scholar
  18. Jones S, Carrasco NK, Perissinotto R (2015) Turbidity effects on the feeding, respiration and mortality of the copepod Pseudodiaptomus stuhlmanni in the St. Lucia Estuary, South Africa. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 469:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koenings JP, Burkett RD, Edmundson JM (1990) The exclusion of limnetic cladocera from turbid glacier-meltwater lakes. Ecology 71:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lansactôha FA, Bonecker CC, Velho LFM, Simões NR, Dias JD, Alves GM et al (2009) Biodiversity of zooplankton communities in the Upper Parana River floodplain: interannual variation from long-term studies. Braz J Biol 69:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levine SN, Zehrer RF, Burns CW (2005) Impact of resuspended sediment on zooplankton feeding in Lake Waihola, New Zealand. Freshw Biol 50:1515–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Litchman E, Ohman MD, Kiorboe T (2013) Traitbased approaches to zooplankton communities. J Plankton Res 35:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miquelis A, Rougier C, Pourriot R (2001) Impact of turbulence and turbidity on the grazing rate of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus (Pallas). Hydrobiologia 386:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Modéran J, Bouvais P, David V, Noc SL, Simon-Bouhet B, Niquil N et al (2010) Zooplankton community structure in a highly turbid environment (Charente estuary, France): spatio-temporal patterns and environmental control. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 88:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ohman MD, Romagnan JB (2015) Nonlinear effects of body size and optical attenuation on Diel Vertical Migration by zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 61:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al. (2015) Vegan: Community Ecology Package, R Package Version 3.2–2, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html
  27. Paidere J (2009) Influence of flooding frequency on zooplankton in the floodplains of the Daugava River (Latvia). Acta Zool Lituanica 19:306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Papista E, Acs E, Boddi B (2002) Chlorophyll-alpha determination with ethanol—a critical test. Hydrobiologia 485:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pécseli HL, Trulsen JK, Fiksen Ø (2014) Predator-prey encounter and capture rates in turbulent environments. Limnol Oceanogr: Fluids Environ 4:85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qin B, Xu P, Wu Q, Luo L, Zhang Y (2007) Environmental issues of Lake Taihu, China. Hydrobiologia 581:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna URL https://www.R-project.org/
  32. Schulze PC (2011) Evidence that fish structure the zooplankton communities of turbid lakes and reservoirs. Freshw Biol 56:352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shurin J (2000) Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81:3074–3086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sotton B, Guillard J, Anneville O, Maréchal M, Savichtcheva O, Domaizon I (2014) Trophic transfer of microcystins through the lake pelagic food web: evidence for the role of zooplankton as a vector in fish contamination. Sci Total Environ 466:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stromberg K, Smyth T, Allen J, Pitois S, O’Brien T (2009) Estimation of global zooplankton biomass from satellite ocean colour. J Mar Syst 78:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thorp JH, Mantovani S (2005) Zooplankton of turbid and hydrologically dynamic prairie rivers. Freshw Biol 50:1474–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tirok K, Scharler UM (2013) Dynamics of pelagic and benthic microalgae during drought conditions in a shallow estuarine lake (Lake St. Lucia). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 118:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vargas C, Martinez R, Escribano R, Lagos N (2010) Seasonal relative influence of food quantity, quality, and feeding behaviour on zooplankton growth regulation in coastal food webs. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 90:1189–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Visser AW, Mariani P, Pigolotti S (2009) Swimming in turbulence: zooplankton fitness in terms of foraging efficiency and predation risk. J Plankton Res 31:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Young IR, Zieger S, Babanin AV (2011) Global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science 332:451–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zehrer RF, Burns CW, Flöder S (2015) Sediment resuspension, salinity and temperature affect the plankton community of a shallow coastal lake. Mar Freshw Res 66:317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang ZS, Huang XF (1991) Research methods on plankton in freshwater. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  43. Zhao S, Guo Y, Sheng Q, Shyr Y (2014) Advanced heat map and clustering analysis using heatmap3. Biomed Res Int e986048:986048Google Scholar
  44. Zhou J, Qin B, Casenave C, Han X, Yang G, Wu T, Wu P, Ma J (2015) Effects of wind wave turbulence on the phytoplankton community composition in large, shallow Lake Taihu. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:12737–12746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou J, Han X, Qin B, Casenave C, Yang G (2016) Response of zooplankton community to turbulence in large, shallow Lake Taihu: a mesocosm experiment. Fundam Appl Limnol 187(4):315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu G (2005) Direct evidence of phosphorus outbreak release from sediment to overlying water in a large shallow lake caused by strong wind wave disturbance. Chin Sci Bull 50:577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhu M, Paerl HW, Zhu G (2014) The role of tropical cyclones in stimulating cyanobacterial (Microcystis spp.) blooms in hypertrophic Lake Taihu, China. Harmful Algae 39:310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Taihu Laboratory for Lake Ecosystem Research, State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and EnvironmentNanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations